Connect with us

News

Nestlé CEO Mark Schneider to step down

Published

on

Nestlé CEO Mark Schneider to step down

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Nestlé’s chief executive Mark Schneider has stepped down after eight years as head of the world’s largest food company, following a period of underperformance that has hit the company’s share price.

Schneider “has decided to relinquish his roles as CEO and member of the board of directors”, the company said on Thursday.

He will be replaced by Laurent Freixe, Nestlé’s executive vice-president and CEO in Latin America, who will begin in the role in September.

Advertisement

“Laurent is the perfect fit for Nestlé at this time. Under his leadership, Nestlé will further strengthen its position as a dependable, reliable company through consistent and sustainable value creation,” said chair Paul Bulcke.

Nestlé said that Schneider, who was previously chief executive of German healthcare company Fresenius, had helped shape the company’s portfolio by focusing on high-growth categories such as pet food, coffee and nutritional health.

For much of his tenure, the company, whose brands include Nescafé and KitKat, had outperformed many of its rivals in the consumer goods sector like Unilever. However, a string of mishaps and earnings misses disappointed investors and weighed on the share price, which has fallen 14 per cent over the past 12 months.

At the end of last year the company warned of a hit to sales after the integration of an IT system was botched, causing delays to its supply chains for vitamins and supplements. Then, earlier this year, Nestlé was investigated by French regulators for using illegal purification techniques on bottled mineral water.

The share price fell 6 per cent following the recent half-year earnings, after the group cut its sales outlook for the year, and after analysts concluded that its midterm growth forecast had been too ambitious.

Advertisement
Laurent Freixe has been Nestlé’s executive vice-president and CEO in Latin America © REUTERS

“After an increasingly difficult year, it’s not a total surprise to see a CEO change at Nestlé,” said Jefferies analyst David Hayes. When Mark Schneider was appointed, Freixe had also been a contender for the top job, he added.

“At the time, an outsider in Schneider was preferred — to shake things up. Freixe’s appointment today to us feels like a sign that the board wants to rebuild Nestlé culture,” he said.

Bernstein analyst Bruno Monteyne said that, if Schneider had been asked to step down by the board, this would have been a “harsh judgment”.

“Changing the chief executive isn’t going to change the categories they are in and the quality of the brands,” Monteyne said, adding that Schneider had a good record at the company.

Freixe, a Frenchman who joined the group almost four decades ago, has previously run its European and Americas businesses. “There will always be challenges, but we have unparalleled strengths . . . “ Freixe said. “We can strategically position Nestlé to lead and win everywhere we operate.”

Advertisement

Christopher Rossbach, portfolio manager at J Stern, a long-term holder of Nestlé, said he welcomed the appointment of Freixe, and believed he could get the business past its recent challenges. 

“Nestlé’s shares have sold off this year alongside other consumer products companies and are trading at multiyear valuation lows, both because of higher inflation and interest rates and the issues it has faced in its business,” he said. But that picture would improve as wages caught up with inflation, he added. 

News

Video: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

Published

on

Video: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

new video loaded: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

transcript

transcript

F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

The National Transportation Safety Board said that a “multitude of errors” led to the collision between a military helicopter and a commercial jet, killing 67 people last January.

“I imagine there will be some difficult moments today for all of us as we try to provide answers to how a multitude of errors led to this tragedy.” “We have an entire tower who took it upon themselves to try to raise concerns over and over and over and over again, only to get squashed by management and everybody above them within F.A.A. Were they set up for failure?” “They were not adequately prepared to do the jobs they were assigned to do.”

Advertisement
The National Transportation Safety Board said that a “multitude of errors” led to the collision between a military helicopter and a commercial jet, killing 67 people last January.

By Meg Felling

January 27, 2026

Continue Reading

News

Families of killed men file first U.S. federal lawsuit over drug boat strikes

Published

on

Families of killed men file first U.S. federal lawsuit over drug boat strikes

President Trump speaks as U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth looks on during a meeting of his Cabinet at the White House in December 2025.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Relatives of two Trinidadian men killed in an airstrike last October are suing the U.S. government for wrongful death and for carrying out extrajudicial killings.

The case, filed in Massachusetts, is the first lawsuit over the strikes to land in a U.S. federal court since the Trump administration launched a campaign to target vessels off the coast of Venezuela. The American government has carried out three dozen such strikes since September, killing more than 100 people.

Among them are Chad Joseph, 26, and Rishi Samaroo, 41, who relatives say died in what President Trump described as “a lethal kinetic strike” on Oct. 14, 2025. The president posted a short video that day on social media that shows a missile targeting a ship, which erupts in flame.

Advertisement

“This is killing for sport, it’s killing for theater and it’s utterly lawless,” said Baher Azmy, legal director of the Center for Constitutional Rights. “We need a court of law to rein in this administration and provide some accountability to the families.”

The White House and Pentagon justify the strikes as part of a broader push to stop the flow of illegal drugs into the U.S. The Pentagon declined to comment on the lawsuit, saying it doesn’t comment on ongoing litigation.

But the new lawsuit described Joseph and Samaroo as fishermen doing farm work in Venezuela, with no ties to the drug trade. Court papers said they were headed home to family members when the strike occurred and now are presumed dead.

Neither man “presented a concrete, specific, and imminent threat of death or serious physical injury to the United States or anyone at all, and means other than lethal force could have reasonably been employed to neutralize any lesser threat,” according to the lawsuit.

Advertisement

Lenore Burnley, the mother of Chad Joseph, and Sallycar Korasingh, the sister of Rishi Samaroo, are the plaintiffs in the case.

Their court papers allege violations of the Death on the High Seas Act, a 1920 law that makes the U.S. government liable if its agents engage in negligence that results in wrongful death more than 3 miles off American shores. A second claim alleges violations of the Alien Tort Statute, which allows foreign citizens to sue over human rights violations such as deaths that occurred outside an armed conflict, with no judicial process.

The American Civil Liberties Union, the Center for Constitutional Rights, and Jonathan Hafetz at Seton Hall University School of Law are representing the plaintiffs.

“In seeking justice for the senseless killing of their loved ones, our clients are bravely demanding accountability for their devastating losses and standing up against the administration’s assault on the rule of law,” said Brett Max Kaufman, senior counsel at the ACLU.

U.S. lawmakers have raised questions about the legal basis for the strikes for months but the administration has persisted.

Advertisement

—NPR’s Quil Lawrence contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

News

Video: New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

Published

on

Video: New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

new video loaded: New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

A frame-by-frame assessment of actions by Alex Pretti and the two officers who fired 10 times shows how lethal force came to be used against a target who didn’t pose a threat.

By Devon Lum, Haley Willis, Alexander Cardia, Dmitriy Khavin and Ainara Tiefenthäler

January 26, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending