Connect with us

News

Lawrence: Harris & Walz rally huge crowds while Donald Trump does absolutely nothing

Published

on

Lawrence: Harris & Walz rally huge crowds while Donald Trump does absolutely nothing

IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

  • Now Playing

    Lawrence: Harris & Walz rally huge crowds while Donald Trump does absolutely nothing

    11:52

  • UP NEXT

    Trump is a ‘joke,’ Harris ‘walks the walk,’ UAW president says

    05:18

  • ‘He’s well known for his insanity’: Pelosi says Dems no longer ‘agonize’ over Trump

    05:33

  • Lawrence: Harris’ VP pick Tim Walz just told Trump & GOP to ‘Mind your own damn business’

    13:07

  • Enthusiasm for Harris across communities is ‘inspiring,’ says fmr. campaign staffer

    06:40

  • Lawrence: Trump knows he does not have the mental and cognitive health to debate Harris

    09:34

  • ‘It’s just a scam’: The real truth about Trump’s no tax on tips or social security pledge

    07:47

  • GOP SCOTUS justices having ‘emotional support billionaires’ must end, Melissa Murray says

    05:46

  • ‘They have nothing at all to run on’: Rep. Strickland blasts GOP bills honoring Trump

    06:10

  • ‘He doesn’t get Wisconsin’: Sen. Baldwin blasts ‘insulting’ Trump-backed rival Eric Hovde

    04:44

  • Trump attacks on Harris ‘unhinged, racist and wrong,’ says Ohio Democrat

    07:00

  • ‘Towering accomplishment of diplomacy’: Sen. Coons on Biden-Harris prisoner swap

    07:40

  • Stop Trump’s SCOTUS-granted immunity with Biden amendment, retired federal judge says

    07:33

  • Rep. Gallego on facing Kari Lake: We’re focused on what we’ll do, ‘not who you should hate’

    05:59

  • ‘Who the hell is Donald Trump to question VP Harris’ Blackness?’: PA Dem torches Trump

    06:03

  • VP Harris blasts Trump on border, puts him on offense for torching bipartisan bill

    03:55

  • Vice President Harris draws crowd of 10,000 at Georgia rally

    05:28

  • ‘Warn your friends and family’: Team Harris blasts Trump’s extreme Project 2025 agenda

    07:22

  • Rep. Swalwell: Many freedoms will be gone if Trump reelected

    04:49

  • ‘Chaos creators’: Rep. Crockett on threats posed by Trump & the GOP

    09:59

While Vice President Harris and her new running mate, Governor Tim Walz, held campaign rallies in Michigan and Wisconsin, MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell reports what “the laziest presidential campaigner since the invention of jet travel,” Donald Trump, was doing. Absolutely nothing.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Qantas slashes former boss Joyce’s exit pay

Published

on

Qantas slashes former boss Joyce’s exit pay

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Australian airline Qantas has cut bonuses due to its former chief executive Alan Joyce by more than A$9.3mn (US$6mn) to reflect damage done to its reputation in the last year of his tenure.

The decision is the outcome of a review launched in 2023 into management actions and the culture at the carrier known as the “Flying Kangaroo”, in a year when its share price crashed as it was found to have sold “ghost flights” and illegally sacked 1,700 workers.

Joyce, who quit last year after 15 years at the helm. was the main target for passenger and investor ire as it was revealed that the Irish executive was due to receive a leaving package of up to A$24mn. That triggered a shareholder rebellion with more than 80 per cent voting against its pay policy at its annual meeting last November.

Advertisement

The review, published on Thursday and conducted by McKinsey partner Tom Saar, found there was “too much deference to a long-tenured CEO” at Qantas and that a “command and control” leadership style under Joyce was a part of the “root cause” that underpinned the crisis that hit the company in 2023. It added that the board was “financially, commercially and strategically oriented” but should have also focused on employees and customers.

As a result of the review’s recommendation, the Qantas board opted to slash Joyce’s short-term and long-term bonuses because of the reputational damage done to the company during the post-pandemic period.

The board cut short-term bonuses paid to top executives by a third — equating to A$4.1mn including nearly A$1mn due to Joyce — to reflect issues at the airline. It also decided that Joyce’s entire long-term incentive bonus — due between 2021 and 2023 but as yet unpaid — of about A$8.4mn, would be forfeited.

Joyce was not immediately available for comment on the decision.

John Mullen, who will replace corporate veteran Richard Goyder as chair of Qantas in September, said the pay adjustments and leadership review would allow the new management team to “restore pride” in the airline.

Advertisement

“It’s important that the board understands what went wrong and learns from the mistakes of the past, as it’s clear that we let Australians down,” Mullen said.

Joyce had repeatedly defended his actions, and potential bonus, pointing to the airline’s rapid financial turnaround after it flew close to collapse during the pandemic.

A decision to sack 1,700 ground and baggage staff during that period was later deemed to be illegal and preceded a customer service meltdown that infuriated passengers. Last year, the corporate regulator sued the airline for selling tickets for flights it had already cancelled. That triggered a 20 per cent drop in its share price and Qantas eventually admitted it had misled customers. It is paying an A$100mn penalty as a result. 

Michael Kaine, national secretary of the Transport Workers’ Union, said there were early signs that Qantas had improved its ways but slammed Joyce over what he called the “destruction of an Australian icon”.

“This review is important because it verifies what workers, passengers and the Australian community have been saying for years: Qantas was a corporate dictatorship with a timorous board incapable of speaking up to Alan Joyce as CEO, who prioritised a toxic ‘profit at all costs’ culture,” Kaine said.

Advertisement

Qantas, now led by Vanessa Hudson, has invested heavily in improving its customer service and reliability. Its position in the lucrative domestic aviation market has been maintained, despite its woes, after low-cost competitor Bonza collapsed and regional airline Rex entered administration this year.

Continue Reading

News

Nasa may ask SpaceX to retrieve astronauts stuck at space station

Published

on

Nasa may ask SpaceX to retrieve astronauts stuck at space station

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Nasa said on Wednesday it is considering tapping SpaceX to shuttle two astronauts back to Earth from the International Space Station following technical difficulties with the Boeing CST-100 Starliner spacecraft they took to get there.

Astronauts Sunita Williams and Barry Wilmore, who were supposed to return to Earth nearly two months ago, may now stay at the station until February. SpaceX had a mission to the space station planned for later this month to deliver crew and supplies, but the US space agency has now pushed it back until September to weigh whether it should bring the astronauts home.

The SpaceX mission may carry only two astronauts aboard instead of four, leaving two seats to ferry Wilmore and Williams home early next year. Officials from Nasa said they were still evaluating which spacecraft to use to bring Williams and Wilmore back, and the agency would decide in mid-August.

Advertisement

“We’re in a new situation in that we have multiple options,” said Nasa associate administrator Ken Bowersox. “We don’t just have to bring a crew back on Starliner. We can bring them back on another vehicle.”

“Reasonable people could take either path,” he added, but the agency was “getting more serious about evaluating our other options”.

The move would be a blow to Boeing, which is being scrutinised by regulators over the quality and safety of its processes to manufacture commercial aeroplanes. It plead guilty in July to defrauding the US Federal Aviation Administration.

Nasa astronauts Sunita Williams and Barry Wilmore are greeted by the crew of the International Space Station © AP

Starliner is meant to compete with billionaire Elon Musk’s SpaceX to bring crew and supplies to the space station. But the programme has had its own hurdles, coming in billions of dollars over budget and with multiple launch delays even before Williams and Wilmore lifted off from Cape Canaveral, Florida on June 5, with plans for an eight-day mission.

Since lift-off, helium has leaked from the Starliner and five of its thrusters have functioned improperly. Nasa officials said scientists and engineers were studying the problems to determine their cause.

Advertisement

If Nasa decides to transport Wilmore and Williams back to Earth via SpaceX, Boeing and the agency will need to reconfigure certain software parameters so that Starliner can undock from the space station automatically for its return, rather than requiring crew members to steer.

While Boeing was “very confident” that Starliner can bring the astronauts home, Bowersox said, some staff at Nasa were “more conservative”.

“The Nasa community in general would like to understand a little bit more of the root cause and the physics,” said Steve Stich, manager for Nasa’s commercial crew programme.

Boeing said on Wednesday that, “we still believe in Starliner’s capability and its flight rationale”, a term that means it is safe for a mission to continue. “If Nasa decides to change the mission, we will take the actions necessary to configure Starliner for an uncrewed return.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Judge rules against majority of claims in Black student's hair discrimination case

Published

on

Judge rules against majority of claims in Black student's hair discrimination case

Darryl George of Mont Belvieu, Texas, faced multiple suspensions for not cutting his hair.

Michael Wyke/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Michael Wyke/AP

Darryl George of Mont Belvieu, Texas, faced multiple suspensions for not cutting his hair.

Darryl George of Mont Belvieu, Texas, faced multiple suspensions for not cutting his hair.

Michael Wyke/AP

A federal judge has dismissed most of the claims in a lawsuit filed by a Black Texas high school student who alleged that school officials had violated his civil rights by insisting he cut his hair to fit school policy.

Darryl George’s battle with Barbers Hill High School in Mont Belvieu (a town roughly 40 minutes outside of Houston) began last summer when he faced numerous in-school suspensions over his natural locs.

Advertisement

School officials said George’s locs fell below his eyebrows and ear lobes, according to local media reports, which violates the district’s dress code for male students.

George missed most of his regular classes in his junior year, spending the day in in-school suspension.

“He has to sit on a stool for eight hours in a cubicle,” Darryl’s mother, Darresha George, told The Associated Press at the time. “That’s very uncomfortable. Every day he’d come home, he’d say his back hurts because he has to sit on a stool.”

As a result, George and his mother sued the school district, the district superintendent, his principal and assistant principal as well as Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton for violation of the state’s CROWN Act (Creating a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair), which bans race-based hair discrimination.

George was initially suspended just a day before the Texas law went into effect statewide on Sept 1 of last year.

Advertisement

In the Tuesday ruling, U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Brown dismissed the claims against Abbott, Paxton, and the district and school employees.

Brown also dismissed claims that enforcement was primarily being done against Black students, as well as the claim that George’s First Amendment rights had been violated as a result of the district policy. The judge said the school had not shown a “persistent, widespread practice of disparate, race-based enforcement” with its policy. When it came to the free speech claim, he determined there was no precedent to demonstrate that hair length is supported under the First Amendment.

However, George’s claim of sex discrimination stood. In his ruling, Brown wrote: “What is the rationale for the dress code’s distinction between male and female students? Because the District does not provide any reason for the sex-based distinctions in its dress code, the claim survives this initial stage.”

Brown acknowledged that the state’s case had its issues, invoking a similar case from 1970 in which the judge concluded that “the presence and enforcement of the hair-cut rule causes far more disruption of the classroom instructional process than the hair it seeks to prohibit.”

Brown wrote: “Regrettably, so too here.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending