Connect with us

News

Japan stocks climb as Wall Street powers rebound

Published

on

Japan stocks climb as Wall Street powers rebound

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Japanese stocks opened strongly on Friday, taking their momentum from the overnight surge on Wall Street and creating an upbeat end to one of the most turbulent weeks in Tokyo market history.

The broad Topix index rose about 1.5 per cent in the first hour of trading on Friday, matched by similar gains in the narrower Nikkei 225 Average. The yen, whose rapid surge played a central role in Monday’s crash in Tokyo shares, traded relatively calmly at about Y147.2 against the dollar.

On Thursday, US equities posted their strongest daily gain since November 2022 as a drop in US unemployment claims helped to soothe fears over an imminent economic slowdown.

Advertisement

Concerns around the US economy remain the overwhelming driver of sentiment, traders said. A week earlier, a more negative-looking jobs report stoked recession fears and helped trigger the massive, record-breaking sell-off in Tokyo on Monday that wiped 12 per cent off the major Japanese stock indices.

On Tuesday, with brokers able to convince investors that the sell-off had been wildly overdone, shares rebounded with their biggest one-day gain since 2008. By lunchtime on Friday, the Topix had sufficiently recovered to be only 1.5 per cent lower on the market close a week earlier.

Overnight, the benchmark S&P 500 share gauge rose 2.3 per cent, closing out its best day in almost 21 months, while the technology-heavy Nasdaq Composite added 2.9 per cent — its biggest daily gain since February. The rally has helped retrace some of the losses suffered through this week’s steep sell-off.

The advances follow data on Thursday showing that new US applications for unemployment aid — seen as a proxy for job cuts — had fallen to their lowest level in a month. This brought relief to investors after weaker than expected payroll figures last Friday triggered sharp selling across equity markets.

“It was the jobs report last week that sent markets into a tailspin,” said Kristina Hooper, chief global strategist at Invesco, so “it makes sense it was a labour market point that would calm markets” this week.

Advertisement

Figures from the US labour department on Thursday gave a reading of 233,000 for initial state unemployment claims in the week ending August 3 on a seasonally adjusted basis, down from the previous week’s upwardly revised level of 250,000 — and below economists’ forecasts of 240,000.

By contrast, last week’s payrolls report showed the world’s biggest economy added just 114,000 jobs in July, far fewer than consensus predictions of 175,000 — sending share prices sharply lower in volatile trading on Friday and Monday, and triggering a steep rally in government bonds as investors cranked up their bets that the Federal Reserve would need to cut interest rates imminently.

The Vix index of expected US stock market turbulence, known as Wall Street’s “fear gauge”, had briefly topped a reading of 60 on Monday, well above its long-term average of about 20, before retreating.

That gauge of volatility sat at roughly 24 on Thursday, but the day’s share gains still left the S&P about 2.3 per cent off its week-ago close.

For Tim Murray, multi-asset strategist at T Rowe Price, the unemployment report was “a big positive surprise after we’ve seen this run of negative surprises”.

Advertisement

Invesco’s Hooper pointed to an “ongoing process of healing — but with the caveat that markets are going to be on edge because nothing has changed with the Fed. They are not going to do any kind of rate cut before the September meeting.”

“I think it’s going to take time for markets to normalise but we have to ask ourselves what triggered that sell-off, and I think it was irrational,” she added. “I don’t think it’s telling us that we have a big recession coming.”

Equities had until recently had a particularly strong run, driven by hopes of a “soft landing” whereby the Fed successfully brings down inflation without triggering a recession, and by enthusiasm for artificial intelligence companies.

Murray noted that chipmaking giant Nvidia’s second-quarter earnings are due out later this month. Those figures “always have read-throughs for the broader AI infrastructure complex”, he noted. “That might be something that really supercharges the market.”

“But even then, I would be surprised if that happened. It’s more likely we’re back to a slow grind up. And if we have some negative data points along the way, then it could easily move back down very quickly.”

Advertisement

News

Video: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

Published

on

Video: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

new video loaded: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

transcript

transcript

F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

The National Transportation Safety Board said that a “multitude of errors” led to the collision between a military helicopter and a commercial jet, killing 67 people last January.

“I imagine there will be some difficult moments today for all of us as we try to provide answers to how a multitude of errors led to this tragedy.” “We have an entire tower who took it upon themselves to try to raise concerns over and over and over and over again, only to get squashed by management and everybody above them within F.A.A. Were they set up for failure?” “They were not adequately prepared to do the jobs they were assigned to do.”

Advertisement
The National Transportation Safety Board said that a “multitude of errors” led to the collision between a military helicopter and a commercial jet, killing 67 people last January.

By Meg Felling

January 27, 2026

Continue Reading

News

Families of killed men file first U.S. federal lawsuit over drug boat strikes

Published

on

Families of killed men file first U.S. federal lawsuit over drug boat strikes

President Trump speaks as U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth looks on during a meeting of his Cabinet at the White House in December 2025.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Relatives of two Trinidadian men killed in an airstrike last October are suing the U.S. government for wrongful death and for carrying out extrajudicial killings.

The case, filed in Massachusetts, is the first lawsuit over the strikes to land in a U.S. federal court since the Trump administration launched a campaign to target vessels off the coast of Venezuela. The American government has carried out three dozen such strikes since September, killing more than 100 people.

Among them are Chad Joseph, 26, and Rishi Samaroo, 41, who relatives say died in what President Trump described as “a lethal kinetic strike” on Oct. 14, 2025. The president posted a short video that day on social media that shows a missile targeting a ship, which erupts in flame.

Advertisement

“This is killing for sport, it’s killing for theater and it’s utterly lawless,” said Baher Azmy, legal director of the Center for Constitutional Rights. “We need a court of law to rein in this administration and provide some accountability to the families.”

The White House and Pentagon justify the strikes as part of a broader push to stop the flow of illegal drugs into the U.S. The Pentagon declined to comment on the lawsuit, saying it doesn’t comment on ongoing litigation.

But the new lawsuit described Joseph and Samaroo as fishermen doing farm work in Venezuela, with no ties to the drug trade. Court papers said they were headed home to family members when the strike occurred and now are presumed dead.

Neither man “presented a concrete, specific, and imminent threat of death or serious physical injury to the United States or anyone at all, and means other than lethal force could have reasonably been employed to neutralize any lesser threat,” according to the lawsuit.

Advertisement

Lenore Burnley, the mother of Chad Joseph, and Sallycar Korasingh, the sister of Rishi Samaroo, are the plaintiffs in the case.

Their court papers allege violations of the Death on the High Seas Act, a 1920 law that makes the U.S. government liable if its agents engage in negligence that results in wrongful death more than 3 miles off American shores. A second claim alleges violations of the Alien Tort Statute, which allows foreign citizens to sue over human rights violations such as deaths that occurred outside an armed conflict, with no judicial process.

The American Civil Liberties Union, the Center for Constitutional Rights, and Jonathan Hafetz at Seton Hall University School of Law are representing the plaintiffs.

“In seeking justice for the senseless killing of their loved ones, our clients are bravely demanding accountability for their devastating losses and standing up against the administration’s assault on the rule of law,” said Brett Max Kaufman, senior counsel at the ACLU.

U.S. lawmakers have raised questions about the legal basis for the strikes for months but the administration has persisted.

Advertisement

—NPR’s Quil Lawrence contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

News

Video: New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

Published

on

Video: New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

new video loaded: New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

A frame-by-frame assessment of actions by Alex Pretti and the two officers who fired 10 times shows how lethal force came to be used against a target who didn’t pose a threat.

By Devon Lum, Haley Willis, Alexander Cardia, Dmitriy Khavin and Ainara Tiefenthäler

January 26, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending