Connect with us

News

EU to probe aluminium imports diverted by Trump’s tariffs

Published

on

EU to probe aluminium imports diverted by Trump’s tariffs

Stay informed with free updates

The EU is launching an investigation into the aluminium market to protect the bloc’s beleaguered industry from a surge in cheap imports displaced by Donald Trump’s tariffs.

The European Commission will announce the probe, aimed at verifying a sudden rise in imports and covering all trading partners, on Wednesday, according to a document seen by the Financial Times.

Brussels will impose countermeasures if the probe identifies such an increase in aluminium imports. It is also set to tighten loopholes in its tariff regime on steel imports.

Advertisement

The document says the 25 per cent tariffs on aluminium announced by the US president last week “are likely to worsen the situation further” for a sector that has been hit by high energy prices, sluggish demand and cheap imports.

Brussels has promised to retaliate against Washington with tariffs on up to €26bn of US products.

But the aluminium probe shows the impact of the US president’s tariffs cascading across the globe as the commission tightens its rules against third-country imports and a broader trade war comes closer.

The EU document highlights what it says is “a significant threat of trade diversion from multiple destinations” because of last week’s US tariffs.

It notes the bloc’s aluminium producers have “lost substantial market share over the past decade”.

Advertisement

Other than Norway and Iceland, which are part of the bloc’s economic area and could be exempted, the main exporters of the metal to the EU are the United Arab Emirates, Russia and India.

The bloc decided last month to phase out Russian aluminium imports by the end of 2026.

While the US has used security grounds to justify its measures, the EU will base its response to any surge in aluminium imports on traditional trade defence law based on World Trade Organization rules.

Its safeguard measures could echo previous steps it has taken on steel, for which in 2018 it set a 25 per cent tariff on imports exceeding a specified quota.

The safeguards on steel will expire in June 2026 but the commission document says it will ensure adequate protection for the industry beyond that date.

Advertisement

The bloc’s 2023 steel production was the lowest since records began, with the exception of the pandemic years.

Pressure on the industry was “likely to be exacerbated” as other countries raise tariff barriers to keep out Chinese metal blocked by the US, the commission said. It added the EU could become the “main receiving ground of global excess capacities” for steel.

The commission will expand its steel measures to prevent China using third countries to circumvent them.

It will also consider a plan to hit nations that restrict exports of scrap metal to the EU with a reciprocal ban.

EU scrap steel exports have more than doubled in recent years to account for 20 per cent of production, denying steelmakers a raw material.

Advertisement

The draft metals action plan, which could still change before publication, was first reported by Table Media.

The action plan also promises greater protection under the carbon border tax that comes into force next year as well as attempts to help the industry reduce its carbon emissions.

Companies have complained they cannot afford to invest in new technology such as hydrogen-powered blast furnaces.

The steel industry estimates it must spend €14bn annually until 2030 to decarbonise. “Most of these projects are not likely to be economically feasible in the current environment”, the document says.

The commission suggests member states could reduce energy taxes for heavy industry and provide greater subsidies for hydrogen.

Advertisement

It will encourage customers to buy green steel, which is more expensive than conventional supply, by changing procurement rules and setting resilience and sustainability measures for many industrial products.

The commission declined to comment on the proposal but said its action plan would indicate additional sector-specific priority actions as well as long-term measures to replace trade defence safeguard measures expiring in June 2026.

News

Former Olympian pleads not guilty in reflecting pool vandalism charges

Published

on

Former Olympian pleads not guilty in reflecting pool vandalism charges

Former U.S. Olympian David Hearn (left) walks with his attorney Norman Eisen to speak to reporters and protesters gathered after his arraignment at the Superior Court of the District of Columbia in Washington, D.C. on Thursday.

Finn Gomez/Getty Images


hide caption



toggle caption

Advertisement

Finn Gomez/Getty Images

Former U.S. Olympic canoeist David Hearn pleaded not guilty to damaging the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool in D.C. Superior Court Thursday morning.

Federal prosecutors charged Hearn with a single count of destruction of property causing more than $1,000 in damage to the pool.

Hearn has previously claimed, which his attorneys repeated during a short press conference outside the court, that he simply touched the water in the pool out of curiosity.

Advertisement

The Trump administration had just completed a $14 million renovation of the pool.

But shortly after the work finished, peeling paint and algae gathered in the water. The remodel has been largely criticized as a massive failure and waste of taxpayer dollars.

Superior Court Judge Carmen McLean released Hearn on his own recognizance. His next hearing is scheduled for Aug. 5.

Norm Eisen, one of Hearn’s attorneys, spoke to reporters outside of court following the hearing. He said the administration is using Hearn as a “scapegoat … for their own failures.”

“It is not a crime to touch the reflecting pool, to touch water in the United States of America,” he said.

Advertisement

Prosecutors say there is a host of evidence against Hearn.

This is a developing story.

Continue Reading

News

Three more people charged with damaging Reflecting Pool after Trump’s multimillion-dollar restoration | CNN Politics

Published

on

Three more people charged with damaging Reflecting Pool after Trump’s multimillion-dollar restoration | CNN Politics

Three more people have been criminally charged with destruction of property at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool.

Officers say they detained Cameron Thiers, Sophie Dennison-Gibby and Justin Carreno one Saturday afternoon in June and described in court documents witnessing them peeling and removing pieces of blue paint from the Reflecting Pool.

One officer “witnessed Carreno reach down into the reflecting pool and pull up a piece of the blue paint,” according to the court documents.

The officer who detained Dennison-Gibby “found 1 additional piece of the reflecting pool liner” in her purse, the documents said.

All three incidents were recorded on the officers’ body worn cameras, they said in the court documents.

Advertisement

Several “partnering law enforcement agencies assigned to the Reflecting Pool” working with US Park Police were involved in detaining the two men and one woman — including officers from Texas, Oklahoma, Montana and California.

One of the officers said in court documents that Thiers “admitted to removing a piece of blue sealant from the Reflecting Pool and still had it in his hand when I made contact with him.”

The three defendants were arraigned in court Wednesday and pleaded not guilty to the misdemeanor charges of destruction of property with a value less than $1,000. The judge ordered them to stay away from the Reflecting Pool.

Lawyers for Thiers and Dennison-Gibby declined to comment. CNN has reached out to Carreno’s attorney.

If found guilty of destruction of property, the defendants could be fined up to $1,000 and face a maximum of 180 days behind bars.

Advertisement

The New York Times first reported that three additional people had been charged with damaging the Reflecting Pool.

President Donald Trump has repeatedly claimed that vandals caused major damage to the pool by gashing the lining after his administration spent more than $14 million on renovations, though he has not provided evidence to support that claim. The officers who charged Carreno, Thiers and Dennison-Gibby did not accuse them of gashing the lining.

Former Olympic canoeist David Hearn was indicted by a grand jury in Washington, DC, last week for allegedly damaging the Reflecting Pool. Hearn — unlike Carreno, Thiers and Dennison-Gibby – was charged with destruction of property with a value of more than $1,000 which carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison, if convicted. He is set to be arraigned in court Thursday.

Crews began draining the Reflecting Pool over the weekend to make repairs, according to Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, for the second time in three months.

The move comes after weeks of problems – algae blooms, green-hued water, a chipping bottom and the administration’s allegations of vandalism – that have plagued the iconic landmark, making its woes the subject of national interest.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Supreme Court financial disclosures reveal how their books add to their income

Published

on

Supreme Court financial disclosures reveal how their books add to their income

Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett speaks at the Reagan Library on Sept. 9, 2025, in Simi Valley, Calif. Barrett discussed and signed copies of her new book, Listening to the Law: Reflections on the Court and Constitution.

Mario Tama/Getty Images


hide caption



toggle caption

Advertisement

Mario Tama/Getty Images

Even as the Supreme Court was handing down one legal thunderbolt after another last week, the justices were quietly releasing their annual financial reports. Justice Samuel Alito was the only sitting justice to request an extension, which he has done for 15 years. The disclosures do not give a complete account of the justices’ total income and wealth, but they give insights into their concertgoing, guest professorships and even their involvement in youth sports.

In addition to their salaries, much of the justices’ reported income came from their book deals. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson led the pack earning more than $1.1 million last year for a total of roughly $4 million since her memoir, Lovely One, was published in 2024.

Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Neil Gorsuch, Amy Coney Barrett and retired Justice Anthony Kennedy also reported income from published books. Earnings from their books ranged from $849,000 for Barrett, to $300,000 for Gorsuch and $88,000 for Sotomayor, whose books include her 2013 autobiography and five children’s books. Justice Clarence Thomas, who previously earned $1.5 million for his 2007 memoir, listed no publisher payments last year, and Justice Brett Kavanaugh, one of 13 co-authors of a 2016 legal treatise, also received no payments last year. Kavanaugh is said to be working on a memoir but he listed no payments for the anticipated book. Alito does have a book coming out in the fall, but with his financial report still outstanding, there is no data on how much he was paid for the work in 2025.

Advertisement

The only two sitting justices who have not written books are Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Elena Kagan.

Many justices also earned income from teaching at law schools. Roberts reported income from New England Law, located in Boston, and Gorsuch reported teaching income from George Mason University in Virginia. Thomas taught classes at Catholic University in Washington, D.C., and Barrett and Kavanaugh taught at Notre Dame Law School. Barrett graduated from the school and began teaching there 23 years ago; Kavanaugh has family connections to Notre Dame.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending