Connect with us

News

EU to probe aluminium imports diverted by Trump’s tariffs

Published

on

EU to probe aluminium imports diverted by Trump’s tariffs

Stay informed with free updates

The EU is launching an investigation into the aluminium market to protect the bloc’s beleaguered industry from a surge in cheap imports displaced by Donald Trump’s tariffs.

The European Commission will announce the probe, aimed at verifying a sudden rise in imports and covering all trading partners, on Wednesday, according to a document seen by the Financial Times.

Brussels will impose countermeasures if the probe identifies such an increase in aluminium imports. It is also set to tighten loopholes in its tariff regime on steel imports.

Advertisement

The document says the 25 per cent tariffs on aluminium announced by the US president last week “are likely to worsen the situation further” for a sector that has been hit by high energy prices, sluggish demand and cheap imports.

Brussels has promised to retaliate against Washington with tariffs on up to €26bn of US products.

But the aluminium probe shows the impact of the US president’s tariffs cascading across the globe as the commission tightens its rules against third-country imports and a broader trade war comes closer.

The EU document highlights what it says is “a significant threat of trade diversion from multiple destinations” because of last week’s US tariffs.

It notes the bloc’s aluminium producers have “lost substantial market share over the past decade”.

Advertisement

Other than Norway and Iceland, which are part of the bloc’s economic area and could be exempted, the main exporters of the metal to the EU are the United Arab Emirates, Russia and India.

The bloc decided last month to phase out Russian aluminium imports by the end of 2026.

While the US has used security grounds to justify its measures, the EU will base its response to any surge in aluminium imports on traditional trade defence law based on World Trade Organization rules.

Its safeguard measures could echo previous steps it has taken on steel, for which in 2018 it set a 25 per cent tariff on imports exceeding a specified quota.

The safeguards on steel will expire in June 2026 but the commission document says it will ensure adequate protection for the industry beyond that date.

Advertisement

The bloc’s 2023 steel production was the lowest since records began, with the exception of the pandemic years.

Pressure on the industry was “likely to be exacerbated” as other countries raise tariff barriers to keep out Chinese metal blocked by the US, the commission said. It added the EU could become the “main receiving ground of global excess capacities” for steel.

The commission will expand its steel measures to prevent China using third countries to circumvent them.

It will also consider a plan to hit nations that restrict exports of scrap metal to the EU with a reciprocal ban.

EU scrap steel exports have more than doubled in recent years to account for 20 per cent of production, denying steelmakers a raw material.

Advertisement

The draft metals action plan, which could still change before publication, was first reported by Table Media.

The action plan also promises greater protection under the carbon border tax that comes into force next year as well as attempts to help the industry reduce its carbon emissions.

Companies have complained they cannot afford to invest in new technology such as hydrogen-powered blast furnaces.

The steel industry estimates it must spend €14bn annually until 2030 to decarbonise. “Most of these projects are not likely to be economically feasible in the current environment”, the document says.

The commission suggests member states could reduce energy taxes for heavy industry and provide greater subsidies for hydrogen.

Advertisement

It will encourage customers to buy green steel, which is more expensive than conventional supply, by changing procurement rules and setting resilience and sustainability measures for many industrial products.

The commission declined to comment on the proposal but said its action plan would indicate additional sector-specific priority actions as well as long-term measures to replace trade defence safeguard measures expiring in June 2026.

News

Lawmakers threaten Attorney General Bondi with contempt over incomplete Epstein files

Published

on

Lawmakers threaten Attorney General Bondi with contempt over incomplete Epstein files

Attorney General Pam Bondi, accompanied by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche (L) and FBI Director Kash Patel (R), speaks during a news conference at the Justice Department on Nov. 19. Some lawmakers said the department’s release of files relating to Jeffrey Epstein had too many redactions as well as missing information.

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

Two lawmakers are threatening a seldom-used congressional sanction against the Department of Justice over what they say is a failure to release all of its files on convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein by a deadline set in law.

Reps. Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie spearheaded the effort to force the Epstein files’ release by co-sponsoring the Epstein Files Transparency Act, but both have said the release had too many redactions as well as missing information.

“I think the most expeditious way to get justice for these victims is to bring inherent contempt against Pam Bondi,” Massie, a Republican from Kentucky, told CBS’s Face the Nation on Sunday. “Basically Ro Khanna and I are talking about and drafting that right now.”

Advertisement

Inherent contempt refers to Congress’ authority to fine or arrest and then bring to trial officers who are obstructing legislative functions. It was last successfully used in the 1930s, according to the American Bar Association.

Khanna, a California Democrat, noted that the House would not need the Senate’s approval to take such action, which he said would result in a fine for Attorney General Pam Bondi.

“I believe we’re going to get bipartisan support in holding her accountable,” he told Face the Nation.

Justice Department defends partial release

The Justice Department on Sunday defended its initial, partial release of documents, some of which were heavily redacted.

“The material that we released on Friday, or the material that we’re going to release over the next a couple of weeks, is exactly what the statute requires us to release,” said Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche on NBC’s Meet the Press, referring to the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

Advertisement

Blanche said the administration has hundreds of lawyers going through the remaining documents to ensure that victims’ information is protected. Still, lawmakers from both parties remain unsatisfied.

“Any evidence or any kind of indication that there’s not a full reveal on this, this will just plague them for months and months more,” said Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky on ABC’s This Week. “My suggestion would be — give up all the information, release it.”

Blanche told NBC he was not taking the threats of contempt seriously.

“Not even a little bit. Bring it on,” he said, adding that lawmakers who have spoken negatively about Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel “have no idea what they’re talking about.”

Back and forth over Trump photo

The trove of documents released Friday contained little new information about Epstein, prompting accusations that the department wasn’t complying with the law. There was a photograph included in Friday’s release that showed a desk full of photos, including at least one of President Trump. It was among more than a dozen photographs no longer available in the Justice Department’s “Epstein Library” by Saturday, NPR found.

Advertisement

On Sunday, the Justice Department re-uploaded the photo of the desk, and provided an explanation on X.

“The Southern District of New York flagged an image of President Trump for potential further action to protect victims,” the post read. “Out of an abundance of caution, the Department of Justice temporarily removed the image for further review. After the review, it was determined there is no evidence that any Epstein victims are depicted in the photograph, and it has been reposted without any alteration or redaction.”

The Justice Department did not offer an explanation for the other photos whose access had been removed.

Blanche told NBC the Justice Department was not redacting information around Trump or any other individual involved with Epstein. He said the Justice Department had removed photos from the public files “because a judge in New York has ordered us to listen to any victim or victim rights group, if they have any concerns about the material that we’re putting up.

“And so when we hear concerns, whether it’s photographs of women that we do not believe are victims, or we didn’t have information to show that they were victims, but we learned that there are concerns, of course, we’re taking that photograph down and we’re going to address it,” he said.

Advertisement

Earlier Sunday, the Justice Department also posted to X a new version of the 119-page transcript of grand jury proceedings in the case of Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell. The original version had been entirely redacted.

“Here is the document now with minimal redactions. Documents and photos will continue to be reviewed consistent with the law and with an abundance of caution for victims and their families,” the Justice Department wrote in its post.

Continue Reading

News

Russia says talks on US peace plan for Ukraine ‘are proceeding constructively’

Published

on

Russia says talks on US peace plan for Ukraine ‘are proceeding constructively’

FILE – Russian Presidential foreign policy adviser Yuri Ushakov, left, U.S. President Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, center, U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff, foreground right, and Russian Direct Investment Fund CEO Special Presidential Representative for Investment and Economic Cooperation with Foreign Countries Kirill Dmitriev, behind Witkoff, arrive to attend talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the Senate Palace of the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia, Dec. 2, 2025. (Alexander Kazakov, Sputnik, Kremlin Pool Photo via AP, File)

The Associated Press

Continue Reading

News

Video: First Batch of Epstein Files Provides Few Revelations

Published

on

Video: First Batch of Epstein Files Provides Few Revelations

new video loaded: First Batch of Epstein Files Provides Few Revelations

transcript

transcript

First Batch of Epstein Files Provides Few Revelations

The Justice Department, under pressure from Congress to comply with a law signed by President Trump, released more than 13,000 files on Friday arising from investigations into Jeffrey Epstein.

Put out the files and stop redacting names that don’t need to be redacted. It’s just — who are we trying to protect? Are we protecting the survivors? Or are we protecting these elite men that need to be put out there?

Advertisement
The Justice Department, under pressure from Congress to comply with a law signed by President Trump, released more than 13,000 files on Friday arising from investigations into Jeffrey Epstein.

By McKinnon de Kuyper

December 20, 2025

Continue Reading

Trending