Connect with us

Wisconsin

‘We owe them one’: Wisconsin hockey goes for a payback and a Big Ten title vs. Michigan State

Published

on

‘We owe them one’: Wisconsin hockey goes for a payback and a Big Ten title vs. Michigan State


play

MADISON – The buildup to this week has been immense everywhere but where you’d expect it most.

The Wisconsin men’s hockey team is all about its dailies, as coach Mike Hastings likes to say, so he did his best to keep the thoughts of a worst-to-first turnaround that have simmered for his team the past few weeks on the backburner as long as possible.

Advertisement

It wasn’t until Monday that he brought up the prospect of winning a Big Ten championship.

“I know it’s boring hearing it from us, but it is true: The group has kind of stayed present,” he said. “That is why I think they’re in the situation they are.”

Fourth-ranked Wisconsin (24-8-2, 15-6-1 – 47 points Big Ten) faces No. 6 Michigan State (21-8-3, 15-5-2 – 49) at 8 p.m. Friday and Saturday at the Kohl Center. Two wins in regulation or one win in regulation and one in overtime would give the Badgers the championship outright, the first league title for the program since 2021. Two overtime wins would give them at least a share of the title.

Michigan State needs only one more win to wrap up its first conference title since winning the CCHA championship in 2001.

In November, Michigan State swept Wisconsin when the Badgers were fresh off a three-week run of six straight wins over ranked teams that included Big Ten favorites Minnesota and Michigan.

Advertisement

The chance for redemption has been more than three months in the making.

“We marked this one on our calendar and early on I think we were hoping it would come down to this weekend,” Badgers senior David Silye said. “It’s something you wish for and kind of fun playing as a player. We’re excited. We learned a lot, but the base thing for us is that we owe them one.”

Here’s what the Badgers need to do to win the Big Ten title.

More: Three scenarios that would give Wisconsin the Big Ten hockey title and how to watch the action

Advertisement

Handle the pressure, control the puck

Michigan State defeated the No. 1 UW, 4-2, on Nov. 17 and 3-2 on Nov. 18. If you take away an empty-net goal by the Spartans in Game 1, the contests were one-goal affairs.

The Spartans, however, scored first in both games, never allowed Wisconsin to hold the lead and had a plus-eight advantage in shots on goal in the second game.

Hastings admitted the Spartans set the tone for the series with their pressure on both ends of the ice. That can’t happen again.

“It was one of the first teams that kind of put it to us a bit and we learned and we grew from that,” Hastings said.

Advertisement

The offense continues to show its depth

In addition to simply bouncing back from a sweep by Ohio State, the positive development for UW last week at Penn State was the depth of its scoring. The Badgers dressed 20 skaters for the series. Fourteen scored at least one point. Six had a multi-point series.

The Badgers power play also converted on three of 11 chances (27%), a promising development considering UW was 0 for 8 on the power play at Michigan State.

Leading the way was the No. 1 line of Silye, sophomore Cruz Lucius and senior Mathieu De St. Phalle. The three combined for five goals and six assists at Penn State.

On Saturday, sophomore Christian Fitzgerald snapped a three-game stretch without a point with one goal and one assist in a 3-2 overtime win over the Nittany Lions.

“Those are guys that we were looking forward to being leaders for us offensively and defensively,” Hastings said in regard to his top line and Fitzgerald. “They play in every situation, top-six role, power play, penalty kill. And when those guys are going and you supplement that with Carson Bantle and some of the others … when that happens we’re a much better team and we can have depth scoring.”

Advertisement

Make home ice a true advantage

Wisconsin is 18-1-2 in games when it scores first. That mark is 5-0-1 when scoring first against ranked teams. The challenge for UW has been making that happen consistently. There have been 10 other occasions versus ranked teams when the Badgers gave up the first goal.

With a sellout or near-sellout crowd on hand, the situation is ripe for Wisconsin to take advantage of being at home provided it gives the crowd something to be excited about.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Wisconsin

Democratic donors prop up far-right candidates, including Wisconsin gun activist in Senate race

Published

on

Democratic donors prop up far-right candidates, including Wisconsin gun activist in Senate race


WASHINGTON (AP) — David Steinglass, a wealthy donor, has supported scores of Democrats running for office and calls himself an activist for transgender rights.

So his donation earlier this year to a far-right candidate in Wisconsin’s U.S. Senate race seemed wildly out of character. He gave the maximum $3,300 to help get a man on the ballot who had these items in his background: He was investigated in the plot to kidnap Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, he is a gun rights activist and he has called for banning some gender-affirming treatments for minors.

Far from an anomaly, the donation is part of a larger design. Steinglass’ contribution to “America First” candidate Thomas Leager, and thousands more he and his wife gave to other far-right independents in key congressional races, is supporting a plan to boost Democrats and siphon votes from Republicans, an Associated Press examination found.

As the election cycle enters an urgent, final five weeks, both Democrats and Republicans are engaging in questionable tactics that threaten to subvert the democratic process by trying to shape the ballot through deceptive means.

Advertisement

“Whether it’s congressional or presidential races, this kind of activity is a real problem and it undermines the functioning of democracy,” said Edward B. Foley, a law professor who leads Ohio State University’s election law program.

Leager told the AP he was recruited last year to run by operatives who said they were with the Patriots Run Project. That group promoted itself as a pro-Trump grassroots movement that attacked both parties and urged conservatives to run for office as independents. The AP found the group was supported by Democratic firms and donors who worked to install several pro-Trump independent candidates in key House races. Most of them were disabled, retired or both.

Records show Democrats have given tens of thousands of dollars seeking ballot access for the far-right candidates. The supporters include Steinglass and his wife, Liz, who have given more than $5 million to support Democratic political groups, and others who have contributed to and worked for Democratic candidates.

While the strategy hasn’t always worked, Leager is among the candidates who qualified for the Nov. 5 ballot and could complicate Republicans’ efforts to reclaim the Senate. He’s running as a right-wing alternative to GOP nominee Eric Hovde, who is challenging two-term Democratic Sen. Tammy Baldwin.

The AP’s findings triggered a criminal investigation in Iowa and prompted a conservative group to file a legal complaint with the Federal Election Commission alleging that it had violated political disclosure laws.

Advertisement

The Patriots Run Project came under scrutiny after the AP reported that one of its candidates in a House race in Iowa suspected he’d been tricked and removed his name from the ballot last month.

The man, Joe Wiederien, who is impaired after suffering a stroke, said an Iowa Division of Criminal Investigation agent visited him last week and he filed an election fraud complaint.

“Whoever it is, I think that project is going down sooner or later,” said Wiederien, who was among several recruited to run through the group’s network of now-shuttered Facebook pages.

What to know about the 2024 Election

The Patriots Run Project is not a registered business, nonprofit organization or political committee. After AP’s report last month, the group moved even further underground, disabling its account for X, formerly Twitter, and websites. More than 10 donors and consultants supporting its efforts haven’t returned messages.

Advertisement

Liz Steinglass declined comment when a reporter visited her at the family’s Washington, D.C., home. Her husband, a retired private equity fund manager, didn’t return a message. The couple has given at least $9,900 to three candidates who said they were recruited by the Patriots Run Project, records show.

When an operative for Patriots Run Project called him last summer and urged him to enter the Senate race in Wisconsin, Leager said he told the group that he would be a controversial candidate because of his association with some of the men charged in the 2020 plot to kidnap Whitmer. He was not among several defendants charged in state and federal court, and he has said he never discussed plans to kidnap her. Court documents show he was among 16 others listed by the Michigan attorney general’s office as an unindicted co-conspirator.

But the Patriots Run Project nonetheless arranged roughly $20,000 in donations from Democratic donors to gather the signatures needed to qualify for the ballot, which went to a firm that usually works for Democrats.

Leager was subpoenaed to testify at a 2022 trial for four defendants and exercised his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination after a judge found he had legal exposure. A prosecutor said at that hearing Leager was “under investigation for a similar plot involving a different” politician, had encouraged violence against the FBI on his podcast, and had invited armed protesters to appear outside a courthouse in an effort to intimidate jurors. Leager has denied supporting violence.

Leager is former executive director of Wisconsin Gun Owners Inc., which takes a maximalist position on the Second Amendment. In 2020, he organized protests for ReOpen Wisconsin, which included armed demonstrations opposing government closures and mandates intended to curb the spread of COVID-19.

Advertisement

Through his activism he became acquainted with Stephen Robeson, with whom he later broke after correctly suspecting he was an FBI informant. Leager attended a field training exercise in Cambria, Wisconsin, where investigators alleged the idea of attacking government officials was discussed.

Leager said he was an associate of alleged kidnapping plot leader Barry Croft, who is serving a lengthy prison term. Croft argues he was entrapped by government informants and is asking for a new trial.

“I was the Wisconsin target for the FBI in the Whitmer case. We just happened to slip through their nets,” Leager said in March on “The Free Men Report,” a show he streams on Rumble.

Leager said an operative calling himself “Johnny Shearer” told him Patriots Run Project had seen his work and he was the exact type of candidate they wanted, saying the group was impressed “that I had not caved under pressure from the feds.”

Six donors gave Leager the maximum $3,300 donation. In addition to David Steinglass, they include venture capitalist Richard Thompson of Wyoming and political consultant Joe Fox, a veteran of Democratic campaigns and House Majority PAC, congressional Democrats’ super PAC.

Advertisement

Leager said their money paid for signature-gathering efforts by Urban Media LLC, a Milwaukee firm that usually works for Democrats and has done work for Vice President Kamala Harris and Baldwin.

The Steinglass family, Fox and Thompson also donated to independent conservative candidates Robert Reid and Thomas Bowman in House races in Virginia and Minnesota, records show.

A small network of Democratic donors also supported the three candidates as well as Vann Whitley, who unsuccessfully sought ballot access as a Libertarian in a Colorado House race.

Leager said he was “suspicious a little bit” of the group’s motives but that he ultimately didn’t care. “I was like, ‘if this gets me on the ballot, that’s the main point.’ I wanted to get in the game,” he said.

Leager said the Patriots Run Project had no other “real influence” on his campaign but he was angry to have been misled.

Advertisement

Hovde has alleged publicly that Leager is a “Democrat plant” intended to take votes from him.

Baldwin’s campaign said it had no role in getting Leager on the ballot.

Leager rejected the allegation that he would hurt only Hovde, saying he expects to take votes from both sides.

“They are trying to say I am some kind of Democratic operative, which is silly because I am more conservative than Hovde is,” he said.

___

Foley reported from Iowa City, Iowa. AP news researcher Rhonda Shafner in New York contributed to this report.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

We Energies plans new solar, wind, battery storage in Wisconsin

Published

on

We Energies plans new solar, wind, battery storage in Wisconsin


We Energies filed plans with the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin to build five new large-scale renewable energy projects. 

A news release says the projects would add 500 megawatts (MW) of new solar power and 180 MW of wind power to the grid. That is enough energy to power about 250,000 homes.

Advertisement

The projects, which will be eligible for federal tax credits, also include 100 MW of new battery storage, which would be charged during the day and provide customers with “sunshine after sunset.”

SIGN UP TODAY: Get daily headlines, breaking news emails from FOX6 News

The proposed projects are the Dawn Harvest Solar Energy Center in Rock County, the Saratoga Solar Energy Center in Wood County, the Ursa Solar Park in Columbia County, the Badger Hollow Wind Farm in Iowa and Grant counties, and the Whitetail Wind Farm in Grant County.

Advertisement

If approved, the facilities would be jointly owned by We Energies, Wisconsin Public Service (WPS) and Madison Gas & Electric (MGE). The power produced would serve customers across the state.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

2024 Purdue Football: Purdue (1-3) at Wisconsin (2-2)

Published

on

2024 Purdue Football: Purdue (1-3) at Wisconsin (2-2)


This is going to be a difficult game. Purdue tends to not play well against Wisconsin over the last two decades. We’ve seen really good Purdue teams get blown out by the Badgers and we’ve seen some not great Purdue teams play them close but no matter, the end result is the same, Wisconsin wins. It would be the ultimate way to end this streak if THIS Purdue team took down the Badgers and ended the curse of The Fumble and Kyle Orton.

Join us here all week as the staff covers Wisconsin, what to expect now that Graham Harrell is gone, and how we are surviving this football season. We know it’s been a tough one, and we appreciate you sticking with us through this. There’s still much to learn about this season and this staff especially now that Harrell is gone. This will be Purdue’s first game without him. How will they do?



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending