Connect with us

Wisconsin

College football Week 3 preview: Can Wisconsin slow down Jalen Milroe, Alabama?

Published

on

College football Week 3 preview: Can Wisconsin slow down Jalen Milroe, Alabama?


After a thrilling Week 2, which included plenty of upsets, standout performances and a ton of excitement from start to finish, we shift our focus to Week 3, where “Big Noon Kickoff” heads to Madison for a massive non-conference showdown between Wisconsin and No. 4-ranked Alabama (noon ET on FOX and the FOX Sports app). 

The Tide currently have the third-best odds to win the SEC title, listed at +460, while the Badgers are currently listed at +5000 for the Big Ten title.

Colin & JMac’s Big Ten bets: Wisconsin, Arkansas State cover, Washington wins Apple Cup

In other Week 3 action, No. 9 Oregon and standout QB Dillon Gabriel take on in-state foe Oregon State on the road (3:30 p.m. ET on FOX and the FOX Sports app), while defending national champion Michigan looks to get back on track after slipping to No. 17 in the AP Top 25 Poll this week with a tilt against Arkansas State.

Advertisement

FOX Sports college football writers Laken Litman, Michael Cohen and RJ Young are here to preview the biggest storylines heading into Week 3.

No. 4 Alabama hits the road to take on Wisconsin on Saturday. What is the key for Luke Fickell’s Badgers to slow down an Alabama team that has scored 105 points through its first two games?

Laken Litman: Camp Randall will be rocking Saturday, there’s no doubt about that. One thing that could make the place even louder? If Wisconsin gets off to a fast start like it did last week, scoring touchdowns on two of its first three drives. The Badgers need to force turnovers, especially since Alabama is susceptible. Quarterback Jalen Milroe hasn’t thrown an interception yet, but the Crimson Tide have fumbled six times in two games. The Badgers also have to stay on their toes. Last week, the Tide took a one-point game in the fourth quarter and turned it into a lopsided 42-16 final score. Fickell’s team must limit explosive plays, get pressure on Milroe and not assume the game is over if it isn’t.

[ Alabama’s win over USF propelled Tide to memorable 2023 run; can history repeat itself?]

Michael Cohen: The Badgers need to tackle better — much better — if they want to have any chance of handling Alabama this weekend. Defensive coordinator Mike Tressel’s unit was dinged for 12 missed tackles during an unconvincing 27-13 win over South Dakota, an FCS opponent, last week. That included three missed tackles by starting linebacker Jake Chaney, who was ejected for targeting and will be suspended for the first half against the Crimson Tide, and two by star safety Hunter Wohler — the team’s leading tackler in 2023, after he made 120 stops and missed only nine all season. In total, nine different players were charged with missed tackles against the Coyotes, whose top three running backs tore through the line of scrimmage for 136 combined yards and a touchdown on 22 carries. The shoddy tackling has to be a concern for Tressel and Fickell, especially considering how much more consistent Wisconsin was in that department a week prior. Though the season-opening victory against Western Michigan still left plenty to be desired, the Badgers only missed three tackles when facing a significantly higher-caliber opponent from the Mid-American Conference. Of those three misses, just one was assigned to a starting defender; the others came from scarcely used reserves. Wisconsin needs to shore things up in a hurry before facing an Alabama rushing attack that has already forced 18 missed tackles this season. 

Advertisement

RJ Young: Run the ball, Wisconsin. Take the air out of the game. Limit possessions for what can be an explosive offense in Alabama and help a defense that has not been able to tackle in space. A low-scoring game is one Wisconsin can win, and a high-scoring game feels like one they will definitely lose. Even when Alabama looked sloppy, Kalen DeBoer’s offense proved capable of scoring in 10 minutes what takes Wisconsin an entire game — 28 points. Don’t play with dynamite like Alabama’s offense. It’s explosive.

[ RJ Young’s 2024 college football rankings]

4

Alabama Crimson Tide

ALA

Advertisement

Wisconsin Badgers

WIS

Advertisement

Conversely, what is the key for Alabama to leave Madison with a victory?

RJ: Play a clean football game. The Tide looked sloppy, undisciplined and at times utterly incapable of holding onto the ball. Committing 13 penalties and fumbling the ball three times against South Florida at home on the day the field at Bryant-Denny Stadium was named for Nick Saban did little to inspire confidence. With Wisconsin, DeBoer’s Tide has an opportunity to reset the perception of his program. While the AP ranked the Tide as one of the four best teams in the sport, I simply don’t see that. In my latest ranking, they sit at No. 8 — behind four other SEC teams. A vintage Milroe performance on the road at Camp Randall feels timely, especially given Wisconsin’s inability to tackle in space against lesser teams, Western Michigan and South Dakota. If Milroe plays well, Alabama will win.

Michael: Based on name value and tradition, Saturday’s matchup certainly qualifies as a marquee non-conference tilt. It pits a team with six national titles since 2009 (the Tide) against a program that has won at least 10 games in a season 13 times since securing a famous Rose Bowl victory under former head coach Barry Alvarez in 1993 (the Badgers). But from a talent perspective, it’s hard to argue that these rosters are even in the same universe entering this weekend. Even after losing Saban to retirement, Alabama will still bring 67 former blue-chip prospects (four- and five-star recruits) to Camp Randall Stadium. The Badgers, meanwhile, have just 28 blue-chip prospects on their roster, according to 247Sports. All of which is to say that Alabama is in position to win Saturday’s game based on talent alone, and that explains the 16-point spread in favor of the Crimson Tide. But among the improvements that DeBoer and his staff will want to see is a reduction in silly mistakes. Through the first two weeks of the season, Alabama leads the SEC in penalties with 20, including eight charged to the offensive line alone: five holding, two false starts, one illegal block. The offense is tied for 108th nationally with four turnovers lost, all of which were fumbles, while the defense is already averaging 9.5 missed tackles per game this season against lesser competition after surrendering just 7.9 per game for all of 2023. There is plenty for DeBoer & Co. to address. 

Laken: Last week, Alabama beat South Florida, 42-16, in what might be the most deceiving scoreline ever. The Tide struggled to pull away, thanks to 13 penalties, three second-half fumbles and Milroe getting sacked three times. Bama entered the fourth quarter with a narrow 14-13 lead before shocking the Bulls and scoring 28 points in the final 10 minutes. Credit to the Tide for being able to score points in a flurry, but DeBoer’s team likely can’t afford the same kind of miscues against Wisconsin on the road. Add in the fact that Alabama has been without starting left tackle Kadyn Proctor, who missed the first two games with a shoulder injury, to force a shakeup along the offensive line. The unit was the culprit of several penalties vs. USF. DeBoer said afterward that this wasn’t a “wakeup call,” but his team is going to have to play better against the Badgers.

Advertisement

Alabama: Can Kalen DeBoer lead the Tide to a win in his first road game as HC?

Which team has surprised you the most through the first two weeks of the 2024 college football season, and why?

Michael: USC. The speed with which new defensive coordinator D’Anton Lynn has seemingly transformed the Trojans into an aggressive, assignment-sound group is extremely impressive given how corrosive that unit was a season ago. USC finished the 2023 campaign ranked 119th in total defense (432.8 yards per game), 121st in scoring defense (34.4 points per game), 109th in opponent third-down conversions (43.7% conversion rate) and 115th in opponent red zone touchdown rate (69.1%). The totality of that ineptitude forced head coach Lincoln Riley to dismiss defensive coordinator Alex Grinch in early November and pluck Lynn from crosstown rival UCLA. With Lynn at the helm, the Trojans are showing legitimate signs of improvement in several areas that forecast long-term success. USC’s average missed tackles are down from 10.8 per game in 2023 to just seven per game so far this season, with one of its two games coming against a highly talented SEC opponent in LSU. The defense has only been flagged for one penalty through its first two games, down from an average of 3.2 per game last year. And Lynn’s group has given up just four scrimmage plays of 20-plus yards compared to an astronomical mark of 5.5 such plays surrendered per week in 2023. So far, this defense seems more than capable of providing some ballast for USC’s high-powered offense and transforming the Trojans into a legitimate College Football Playoff contender.

Laken: Oregon. Entering this season, the Ducks were a favorite to win the national championship and Gabriel, who transferred from Oklahoma, was a Heisman Trophy front-runner. Both of those things could still happen, but not unless Oregon improves. In back-to-back weekends, the Ducks struggled to beat less talented teams from the state of Idaho. Last weekend, Oregon beat Boise State on a last-second field goal. The offense hasn’t been able to get enough going, while the defense — which is projected to be one of the best units in the country — has allowed too many points to start. Head coach Dan Lanning has plenty of new players who are trying to gel, but that’s the case with a lot of teams. The problem is, the schedule only gets tougher from here, and that Oct. 12 date against Ohio State is going to come fast.

RJ: Oregon. Getting bullied by the state of Idaho? Giving up 192 rushing yards to a Group of 5 running back? An inability to separate from less talented teams in the second half of back-to-back games? What happens when you get Ohio State in your living room instead of Boise State? Nah, forget that. What happens when you have to play outside the 5A high school classification? In my preseason rankings, I believed Oregon to be a top-four team. You’re a top-10 team today, but keep sleepwalking, and you’re gonna find yourself in some trouble.

Advertisement
9

Oregon Ducks

ORE

Oregon State Beavers

OREST

Advertisement

Ryan Day’s Ohio State team has outscored its opponents 112-6 through two weeks and clearly look like the best team in the Big Ten. Which team do you believe is the biggest threat to the Buckeyes in the conference this season?

Laken: It’s really hard to answer that question right now because Michigan doesn’t look like a threat after its crushing loss to Texas, Oregon (as mentioned above) hasn’t proven it’s a legitimate Big Ten or CFP contender yet, and while USC has been impressive in the first two weeks of the season, it’s still early. The Buckeyes have a winnable few weeks coming up before they hit an intriguing gauntlet of conference games. On Oct. 12, they’ll head to Autzen Stadium for a showdown with Oregon. Then they get a bye before hosting Nebraska and going to Penn State. That three-game stretch will tell us what we need to know about Day’s team.

Advertisement

RJ: Ohio State is the biggest threat to Ohio State. To demonstrate how much better the Buckeyes look after two weeks, look at how they’ve measured against a common opponent: While Wisconsin struggled to beat Western Michigan 28-14 (WMU held a 14-13 in the fourth quarter), Ohio State broke the Broncos, 56-0. They’re talented enough to bring a fight to the eventual SEC champion (Georgia, we think), deep enough to overcome most injuries and possess one of the best coaching staffs in the country. OSU’s biggest impediment will be its own focus. With many expecting Ohio State to compete in the national title game — and win it — in the longest season in the history of the sport, will the Buckeyes be able to play with blinders on until the world once again stops on Nov. 30 to find out if it can beat Michigan for the first time since 2019? There’s a lot of football to play between now and then.

Michael: As we enter Week 3, the current answer to that question is nobody — and only time will tell if the likes of Oregon or Penn State can muster some kind of challenge in the coming months. For the moment, it seems quite clear that the Buckeyes, whose handful of high-level transfer portal acquisitions have transformed the roster from great to elite, are a cut above everyone else in the Big Ten at this early juncture. The latest AP Poll in which third-ranked Ohio State is the only Big Ten team among the top seven in the country seems to validate that statement, with the other six spots owned by the SEC: No. 1 Georgia, No. 2 Texas, No. 4 Alabama, No. 5 Ole Miss, No. 6 Missouri, No. 7 Tennessee. (It should be noted, however, that the Big Ten does have three more teams ranked in the top 11 with Penn State at No. 8, Oregon at No. 9 and USC at No. 11). The biggest disappointment thus far is Oregon, a team many believed to be a legitimate contender to win both the Big Ten Championship and the national championship during its first season in a new league. But the Ducks have underwhelmed in back-to-back narrow victories over Idaho (24-14) and Boise State (37-34) that invited legitimate questions about the quality of Oregon’s offensive line, which has already allowed 18 QB pressures. If the Ducks can’t topple Ohio State, which ranks in the top 10 nationally for both total offense and total defense, then it might be a runaway for the Buckeyes.

Laken Litman covers college football, college basketball and soccer for FOX Sports. She previously wrote for Sports Illustrated, USA Today and The Indianapolis Star. She is the author of “Strong Like a Woman,” published in spring 2022 to mark the 50th anniversary of Title IX. Follow her at @LakenLitman.

RJ Young is a national college football writer and analyst for FOX Sports and the host of the podcast “The Number One College Football Show.” Follow him at @RJ_Young.

Michael Cohen covers college football and basketball for FOX Sports with an emphasis on the Big Ten. Follow him at @Michael_Cohen13.

Advertisement

[Want great stories delivered right to your inbox? Create or log in to your FOX Sports account, follow leagues, teams and players to receive a personalized newsletter daily.]


Get more from College Football Follow your favorites to get information about games, news and more






Source link

Wisconsin

Vote: Who is Wisconsin High School Boys Basketball’s Top Guard of 2025-26?

Published

on

Vote: Who is Wisconsin High School Boys Basketball’s Top Guard of 2025-26?


With the action-packed Wisconsin high school boys basketball regular season completed and March Madness beginning, it’s time to take a look at some of the outstanding players and cast your vote for the best.

We began by looking at the most prolific individual scoring threats, talented 3-point shooters,strong rebounders, and top free-throw shooters so now it’s time to take a look at the high-caliber guards from throughout the state.

There are hundreds of high-caliber boys basketball players in Wisconsin, and these lists are not intended to be comprehensive.

Voting remains open until March 9 at 11:59 p.m. PT.

Advertisement

(Players are listed in alphabetical order and all nominees are leaders from the 2025-26 season as compiled by Bound.com, and WIAA; the poll is below the list of athletes)

Castillo is averaging 25.4 points per game with 5.4 rebounds, 2.3 assists, and 1.1 steals for Greendale (18-6 overall record).

Collien is averaging 15 points per game with 4.1 rebounds and 2.0 assists for Oakfield (21-3 overall record).

Edwards is averaging 14.1 points per game with 7.1 rebounds and 6.6 assists for D.C. Everest (21-3 overall record).

Gray Jr. was averaging 24.3 points per game with 6.9 rebounds, 4.0 assists and 2.1 steals prior for West Allis Central (22-2 overall record).

Advertisement

Hereford is averaging 36.4 points per game with 9.0 rebounds, 5.6 assists, and 4.1 steals for Beloit Memorial (22-2 overall record).

Johnson is averaging 27.3 points per game with 8.5 rebounds, 4.6 assists, and 3.6 steals for Milwaukee Juneau (22-1 overall record).

Jones is averaging 23.3 points per game with 5.0 rebounds, 3.3 assists, and 2.6 steals for Germantown (15-9 overall record).

Kern is averaging 16 points per game with 6.2 rebounds and 3.0 assists for New Berlin West (21-3 overall record).

Kilgore is averaging 14.6 points per game with 7.0 rebounds, 3.6 assists, and 3.0 steals for Kewaunee (24-0 overall record).

Advertisement

Kohnen is averaging 16.3 points per game with 3.8 rebounds, 1.8 assists, and 1.3 steals for Slinger (20-4 overall record).

Knueppel is averaging 17.4 points per game with 7.4 rebounds, 3.9 assists, 1.9 blocks, and 1.4 steals for Wisconsin Lutheran (24-0 overall record).

Loose is averaging 18.2 points per game with 5.3 rebounds, 3.0 assists, and 2.3 steals for Port Washington (23-1 overall).

Manchester is averaging 35.8 points per game for Mount Horeb (19-5 overall record).

Platz is averaging 19.5 points per game with 7.2 rebounds and 2.3 assists, and 1.4 steals for Brookfield East (19-5 overall record).

Advertisement

Prochnow is averaging 21.3 points per game with 11.1 assists, 4.8 assists, and 3.2 steals for Reedsville (21-3 overall record).

Resch is averaging 21.3 points per game with 3.3 assists and 2.0 steals for Arrowhead (18-6 overall record).

Schultz is averaging 27.4 points per game with 6.5 rebounds, 3.8 assists, and 2.0 steals for Plymouth (17-7 overall record).

Schwalbach is averaging 15 points per game with 4.7 assists and 3.3 rebounds, and 1.7 steals for Kaukauna (21-3 overall).

Sweeney is averaging 15.5 points per game for Appleton North (20-4 overall record).

Advertisement

Vandenberg is averaging 13 points per game with 2.3 assists and 2.0 rebounds for Freedom (23-1 overall).

About Our Player Poll Voting
High School on SI voting polls are meant to be a fun, lighthearted way for fans to show support for their favorite athletes and teams. Our goal is to celebrate all of the players featured, regardless of the vote totals. Sometimes one athlete will receive a very large number of votes — even thousands — and that’s okay! The polls are open to everyone and are simply a way to build excitement and community around high school sports. Unless we specifically announce otherwise, there are no prizes or official awards for winning. The real purpose is to highlight the great performances of every athlete included in the poll.

— Jeff Hagenau | jeffreyhagenau@gmail.com



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Setting sail on iceboats across a frozen lake in Wisconsin

Published

on

Setting sail on iceboats across a frozen lake in Wisconsin




Setting sail on iceboats across a frozen lake in Wisconsin – CBS News

Advertisement













Advertisement




























Advertisement

Watch CBS News


CBS News’ Noel Brennan hits a frozen lake in Wisconsin to go ice sailing.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Senate must pass bill so WI athletics can stay in the game | Opinion

Published

on

Senate must pass bill so WI athletics can stay in the game | Opinion



AB 1034 provides clarity around NIL policies, offers limited financial flexibility tied to existing athletic facility obligations, and ensures that Wisconsin Athletics can compete on equal footing.

Advertisement
play

  • Wisconsin’s Assembly Bill 1034 aims to modernize state law to reflect new NCAA rules on athlete compensation.
  • The bill would relieve several state universities of $15 million in athletic facility debt to reinvest in athletic programs.
  • Proponents argue the legislation is necessary for Wisconsin universities to compete with peer institutions in other states.
  • Wisconsin athletics reportedly generate over $750 million in statewide economic impact annually.

Let me put my bias, or experience up front. I was a student athlete at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and was fortunate to have one of my sons graduate as a far better student athlete.

I am writing in support of Assembly Bill 1034, which modernizes Wisconsin law to reflect the realities of today’s college athletic landscape, not because of those past “glory days,” but because college athletics has changed more in the past three years than in the previous three decades.  

New national rules now see universities sharing millions of dollars annually with student-athletes through revenue sharing and name, image, and likeness (NIL) opportunities. Other states have responded quickly, updating their laws to ensure they can compete in this new environment.

Advertisement

Making sure Wisconsin doesn’t fall behind

The State Assembly, with overwhelming bipartisan support, passed AB 1034, now it’s up to the Wisconsin State Senate to pass this legislation and send it quickly to Gov. Tony Evers to ensure Wisconsin doesn’t fall behind.

AB 1034 provides clarity around NIL policies, offers limited financial flexibility tied to existing athletic facility obligations, and ensures that Wisconsin Athletics can compete on equal footing with peer institutions across the country. In a measured way, the bill would relieve UW-Madison, UW-Milwaukee, and UW-Green Bay of $15 million of debt related to athletic facilities with the expressed purpose that those dollars would instead be used to invest in athletic programs.

This legislation is critical for two inter-connected reasons, competition and economic impact.

At a recent capitol hearing, UW-Madison Director of Athletics Chris McIntosh explained that 80 percent of the entire athletic department budget is generated by the football program. That revenue underwrites the competitive commitment to the other 11 men’s and 12 women’s varsity teams, supporting some 600 student athletes.

Advertisement

The capacity for this to continue is threatened by $20 million in new annual name and likeness costs that impact all NCAA schools. An expense that will continue to rise.  In addition, peer institutions in the Big Ten and across the country are committing substantial additional resources to these NIL efforts. In short, without this debt support, the university and its athletes will not only lose an even playing field, they may lose the ability to get on the field.  

This threat from the changing nature of NCAA athletics also poses a threat to the economic impact from college athletics. A recent study found that nearly 2 million visitors came to campus events annually, generating more than $750M in statewide economic impact from Wisconsin athletics. Case in point, each home football game produces a $19M economic impact, with 5,600 jobs in the state tied directly or indirectly to the department’s activities.  

This bipartisan legislation is not about propping up a single sport. It’s about protecting broad based opportunities for all our student-athletes, some of whom we just watched win a gold medal for the U.S. women’s’ hockey team.

Advertisement

Athletics are often noted as the front door to the university, but I would broaden that opening to the State of Wisconsin. Our public university system success strengthens enrollment, attracts the talent that drives our prosperity, and serves as a sustaining way forward for our economy.

Bill provides measured and responsible investment

As the former head of one of our state’s largest business groups, I have spent much of my career engaged in economic development. I know what generates “return on investment.” AB 1034 provides a measured and responsible investment that will generate a positive impact for Wisconsin taxpayers, citizens, and employers.

NCAA athletics has changed, and Wisconsin must change with it, or sit on the sidelines. So let’s encourage the Wisconsin State Senate to pass AB 1034 and put Wisconsin in position to compete on the field which provides a win for our student athletes and all of us who benefit from a world class university system.

Tim Sheehy is a UW-Madison graduate and former student athlete. Sheehy served as the president of the Metropolitan Milwaukee Association of Commerce for more than 30 years where he oversaw economic development and business attraction for the region.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending