Connect with us

South Dakota

South Dakota senators put the pornography industry first – Washington Examiner

Published

on

South Dakota senators put the pornography industry first – Washington Examiner


A group of four Republicans in the South Dakota state Senate Judiciary Committee killed a bill Thursday that would require pornography sites to implement an ID check for age verification.

The four Republican senators, Michael Rohl, Helene Duhamel, Michael Walsh, and David Wheeler, provided the four votes necessary to prevent HB 1257 from advancing to the floor of the Senate. But Republican state Rep. Bethany Soye told the Washington Examiner in an interview that there will be an effort next week to “smoke out” the bill and force a floor vote in the Senate.

The four senators who voted to kill the bill claimed that a “private cause of action” that allowed anyone to bring a legal case against a noncompliant pornography site was unworkable and problematic and that the bill would not stop children from watching pornography.

The attempted “smoke out” motion is slated to take place next week and, if successful, would place the bill on the desk of Gov. Kristi Noem (R-SD), as the bill has already passed the state House with overwhelming support. If HB 1257 is signed, South Dakota would join several other states that have already enacted age verification laws.

Advertisement

But the fact that the state Senate is even in a position to have to use unusual parliamentary motions to force a vote on the bill is befuddling. In every state that has voted on age verification legislation, the bills have passed with overwhelming bipartisan support.

“I am shocked that my Senate colleagues are not willing to take action to protect children from the porn industry,” Soye said in the interview before noting that the dominance of the Republican Party in South Dakota means that candidates who have more liberal positions tend to run as Republicans in order to win office.

“When you’re campaigning, you can say whatever you want, but when it comes down to an actual vote like this, that’s where we see who you really are,” she said.

I reached out to the four lawmakers who voted the bill down to understand why they did it. Of the four, two responded. State Sen. Helene Duhamel said in an interview that she could still be swayed to vote for the bill but was concerned that it would not be effective.

“We have a really limited number of dollars in our state to spend, and I want to spend it on things that are effective, and I just don’t know if this one will be effective,” Duhamel told me. “It was a hard vote. I struggled with this one. It was hard.”

Advertisement

In an email statement, Rohl said that he voted against the bill because it “created a private right of action, doesn’t stop the problems of VPNs, has significant issues enforcing, requires no parental steps to try to stop it, doesn’t hold parents liable for negligent behavior (like we do with alcohol), would include social media sites like Twitter, and doesn’t ensure the privacy of South Dakota residents.”

“We heard testimony from the age verification company, that they would be able to sell the information collected to 3rd party companies,” he added, arguing that people who use their ID to verify their age and watch pornography could have their data sold.

In other words, Rohl is afraid that people who engage in the dirty and perverse habit of watching pornography will be exposed. Still, he said that he is looking for other ways to address the issue.

“We inten[d] to continue working on the subject to come with legislation that closes these loopholes and provides safety and security to all South Dakotans by looking at solutions that work for South Dakota, and not just legislation pushed by other states that may work for them, but not us,” Rohl said. “We don’t pass laws to provide an illusion of safety; we pass laws that actually work.”

If Rohl had bothered to do any research, he would know that these laws passed in other states have actually worked quite well, even if their success is not obvious.

Advertisement

Take Virginia, for example. After the state enacted age verification last year, Pornhub blocked access to the site for all IP addresses originating from the state. The only way around it is a more labor-intensive method through a virtual private network. In other words, the law is stopping children from accessing porn simply by angering the porn industry. It would be, and is, effective.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

As Jon Schweppe, the policy director for the American Principles Project, noted to me, “Who could be against this? Who could possibly think it’s a problem to hold the porn industry responsible for how it exploits and intentionally harms children?”

With any courage, the South Dakota Senate will rectify the Judiciary Committee’s baffling error and put children first instead of the smut peddlers in the pornography industry.



Source link

Advertisement

South Dakota

South Dakota lawmakers push bill criminalizing deepfakes nearer to governor’s desk

Published

on

South Dakota lawmakers push bill criminalizing deepfakes nearer to governor’s desk


PIERRE — A bill from South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley to criminalize the creation or sharing of deepfakes was amended this week to more clearly define what constitutes nudity before it reaches Gov. Larry Rhoden’s desk.

The amendment, added on the floor of the House of Representatives, came in response to concerns about unintended consequences.

Senate Bill 41 creates a class of felony crime for the creation or distribution of images digitally altered to depict a person in a state of nudity or involved in a sexually explicit act, commonly referred to as deepfakes.

Advertisement

In testimony in the House Judiciary Committee on Monday in Pierre, Jackley pointed to the case of Mark Rathbun, a former Division of Motor Vehicles employee who is accused of taking images of women and girls from state databases and creating sexual images.“This is real, and it’s something that we unfortunately are seeing happen in our state,” Jackley said.

The judiciary committee voted 8-3 to send the bill to the House floor but not before a discussion on its potential to criminalize political memes.

The bill’s definition of nudity originally encompassed a partial state of nudity. Fort Pierre Republican Rep. Will Mortenson asked Jackley if that would include a fabricated topless photo. Jackley said yes. Then Mortenson asked if a fabricated image of Democratic Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker without a shirt, if shared by President Donald Trump on social media, would put the president in line for felony charges.

Jackley said a Pritzker image wouldn’t qualify because Pritzker is male, but Mortenson pushed back.

Advertisement

He noted that partially nude fabrications would be a felony if done with the intent to “self-gratify or alarm, annoy, embarrass, harass, invade the privacy of, threaten, or cause emotional, financial, physical, psychological, or reputational harm to that individual.”

Nothing in the bill specified that a person in a digitally fabricated topless image must be female.

“We just said that half-nude is a state of nudity, and so now he’s shirtless, and the point of this is to embarrass this guy,” Mortenson said of his topless Pritzker meme scenario.

Mortenson voted against the bill in committee but brought an amendment Tuesday to define nudity as inclusive of male or female genitalia, buttocks or the female nipple.

The amendment passed, but it did not address every concern about the bill.

Advertisement

Democratic Rep. Kadyn Wittman of Sioux Falls asked Jackley during the bill’s committee hearing why he didn’t use it to enhance penalties for people who film others in states of undress or participating in sexual activity against their will.

That behavior is a felony if it involves the recording of a minor, or if it happens repeatedly. The new penalties for deepfakes would be added to the same chapter of South Dakota law.

“Why is the first time hidden recording a misdemeanor generally, but a digitally fabricated image would automatically be a classified felony,” said Wittman.

Jackley said he feels that the creation of digitally manipulated sexual images, even if they aren’t shared, signals “significant criminal intent.” He told South Dakota Searchlight after the committee meeting that he’s open to addressing that issue, but that SB 41’s primary purpose was to target deepfakes.

On the House floor, Wittman was one of two representatives to say the bill’s felony penalties could be unnecessarily harsh in instances where young people make “a stupid decision” and create a deepfake.

Advertisement

“I feel like, in a lot of situations, this bill covers behavior that could be covered by a lower level of offense,” Wittman said.

Supporters countered that the creation of fake nudes can do real psychological damage to real people, and that the state needs to clearly signal that doing so is a serious crime.

“It’s only fun and games until it happens to you,” said Rep. Mary Fitzgerald, R-St. Onge.

The bill passed the House 60-6. It now moves to the state Senate, which passed the bill 32-0 on Jan. 16. The Senate would need to approve the amended version of the bill before it could be delivered to Gov. Larry Rhoden to sign or veto.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

South Dakota

SD Lottery Mega Millions, Millionaire for Life winning numbers for March 3, 2026

Published

on


The South Dakota Lottery offers multiple draw games for those aiming to win big.

Here’s a look at March 3, 2026, results for each game:

Winning Mega Millions numbers from March 3 drawing

07-21-53-54-62, Mega Ball: 16

Check Mega Millions payouts and previous drawings here.

Advertisement

Winning Millionaire for Life numbers from March 3 drawing

09-10-13-25-54, Bonus: 05

Check Millionaire for Life payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your prize

  • Prizes of $100 or less: Can be claimed at any South Dakota Lottery retailer.
  • Prizes of $101 or more: Must be claimed from the Lottery. By mail, send a claim form and a signed winning ticket to the Lottery at 711 E. Wells Avenue, Pierre, SD 57501.
  • Any jackpot-winning ticket for Dakota Cash or Lotto America, top prize-winning ticket for Lucky for Life, or for the second prizes for Powerball and Mega Millions must be presented in person at a Lottery office. A jackpot-winning Powerball or Mega Millions ticket must be presented in person at the Lottery office in Pierre.

When are the South Dakota Lottery drawings held?

  • Powerball: 9:59 p.m. CT on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
  • Mega Millions: 10 p.m. CT on Tuesday and Friday.
  • Lucky for Life: 9:38 p.m. CT daily.
  • Lotto America: 9:15 p.m. CT on Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Dakota Cash: 9 p.m. CT on Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Millionaire for Life: 10:15 p.m. CT daily.

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a South Dakota editor. You can send feedback using this form.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

South Dakota

Nebraska volleyball to play regular-season match in South Dakota

Published

on

Nebraska volleyball to play regular-season match in South Dakota


Nebraska volleyball will play South Dakota State in a regular-season match in Brookings, S.D. The Huskers will face the Jackrabbits on September 2 at First Bank & Trust Arena.

Nebraska finished 2025 with a 33-1 overall record and was ranked No. 3 in the final AVCA poll of the season. South Dakota State was 23-5 and was the Summit League regular-season champions.

These two programs have faced each other before. They played a spring exhibition match in May 2025. The Huskers were victorious by a 4-0 sweep (25-18, 25-19, 25-17, 25-19).

Harper Murray led the Huskers in kills with 12, while also earning seven digs, five blocks and two aces. Andi Jackson delivered a double-double on the day, finishing with 11 kills and 10 blocks. 

Advertisement

Nebraska is scheduled to play two exhibition games this spring. The Huskers will face Iowa State in Sioux Falls, S.D. on April 11 and Creighton in Omaha on April 17.

Contact/Follow us @CornhuskersWire (https://twitter.com/CornhuskersWire) on X (formerly Twitter) and like our page onFacebook (https://www.facebook.com/CornhuskersWire) to follow ongoing coverage of Nebraska news, notes and opinions.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending