Connect with us

Ohio

Ohio State recruiting primer: Positions of need, prospects to watch in Class of 2025

Published

on

Ohio State recruiting primer: Positions of need, prospects to watch in Class of 2025


Ohio State is off to a blazing start in the 2025 recruiting cycle. The Buckeyes’ class ranks second nationally in the 247Sports Composite and leads the country with a 94.53 average player rating.

The class is headlined by three five-star prospects, including in-state quarterback Tavien St. Clair and the top two corners in the class, Devin Sanchez and Na’eem Offord.

It’s clear Ohio State isn’t going to land every blue-chip prospect it wants, but the Buckeyes have a chance to build an elite secondary, fix some glaring weaknesses and address depth concerns in the trenches.

All of that starts Friday when on-campus visits commence.

Advertisement

Here’s a preview of what’s to come.

Ohio State’s Class of 2025 commitments

Player Pos National Ranking Pos Ranking

Devin Sanchez

CB

5

Advertisement

1

Na’eem Offord

CB

6

2

Advertisement

Tavien St. Clair

QB

14

3

Tarvos Alford

Advertisement

LB

47

5

Carter Lowe

OT

Advertisement

54

7

Zahir Mathis

LB

60

Advertisement

5

London Merritt

DL

116

13

Advertisement

Nate Roberts

TE

132

6

DeShawn Stewart

Advertisement

S

294

26

De’zie Jones

WR

Advertisement

313

42

Cody Haddad

S

373

Advertisement

18

Eli Lee

LB

377

41

Advertisement

How should Ohio State fans feel about the class?

Very good.

Notre Dame currently has the No. 1 ranking, but the Fighting Irish’s class consists of 22 players compared to Ohio State’s 12.

As June inches closer, the Buckeyes’ focus will be to add to the class, but they also need to hold onto the commits. Corner Blake Woodby decommitted a few weeks ago. That wasn’t a major loss, but losing either Sanchez or Offord would be an issue. It sounds unlikely that either will flip, but you can never be certain in recruiting.

It helps that a few of Ohio State’s biggest recruits are in-state. St. Clair is about as locked in as a recruit can be, so it would be a significant surprise if the program had to deal with another quarterback flip this cycle. The same goes for Carter Lowe, who plays for Whitmer High in Toledo.

Ohio State will have to stay on Tarvos Alford, though. The Florida native is going to be pursued by Miami and Florida State up until signing day.

Advertisement

What are the positions of need in this class?

This is an important class for Ohio State because it has a few positions it absolutely must hit on. The offensive line and defensive line are at the top of that list.

The Buckeyes have missed on O-linemen in recent years but are off to a good start with Lowe, who is ranked in the top 60 nationally. Ohio State has made five-star tackle David Sanders Jr., the No. 2 player in the country, a priority. The North Carolina native has a visit to Ohio State planned for June 21 and is also being pursued by Clemson, Alabama, Georgia and South Carolina, among others. Another tackle to watch is Josh Petty, a top-50 prospect from Georgia who will visit Ohio State on June 14.

The defensive line is crucial, especially after Ohio State signed only two at the position in the 2024 cycle. The Buckeyes are off to a good start but are looking to add more.

Two other spots to watch are running back and safety. Both positions have new coaches, with Carlos Locklyn leading the running back recruiting and Matt Guerrieri at safety. Both have elite prospects they need to land.

Ohio is home to two of the best running backs in the country, Bo Jackson and Jordan Davison. They are ranked fifth and sixth at the position, respectively, and are being recruited by Ohio State heavily. The Buckeyes likely need at least two running backs in this class. Hitting on both Jackson and Davison would be the dream but will be difficult. Both are planning visits to Ohio State this summer, so the Buckeyes will get their chance to keep the talent in state.

Advertisement

As for safety, Ohio State is once again looking at two of the best players in the country — Trey McNutt, from Shaker Heights, and Maryland native Faheem Delane.

Prospects to watch

We touched on a few key targets above, but here are a few more players on the Buckeyes’ board.

Ohio State is no stranger to locking down elite wide receiver talent, and it’s going after the best once again. Brian Hartline is pushing for five-star Dakorien Moore, the top receiver in the class and a former LSU commitment. Texas will be very hard to beat for Moore, who plays at power Duncanville (Texas) High. Vernell Brown III, a top-40 prospect, and five-star Jaime Ffrench are high on Ohio State’s list, as well. Brown will reportedly visit Ohio State this weekend. Ffrench doesn’t have a visit to Columbus scheduled but could get one on the books for the fall.

Edge rusher Justin Hill, a four-star prospect from Cincinnati, will visit Ohio State this summer and is expected to announce his decision July 3.

One more big name is five-star corner Dorian Brew, who has strong Ohio State ties. His mother, Donica Merriman, is a former Ohio State sprinter and is in the program’s hall of fame. If Ohio State locks down Brew, it will have three of the top five corners in the class on board.

Advertisement

(Photo of Tavien St. Clair: Steve Helwagen / The Advocate / USA Today Network)



Source link

Ohio

Thousands head to Columbus for 23rd annual Home Improvement Show at Ohio Expo Center

Published

on

Thousands head to Columbus for 23rd annual Home Improvement Show at Ohio Expo Center


Thousands of people are expected to head to downtown Columbus for the 23rd annual Home Improvement Show this weekend.

Organizers say visitors can find ideas for everything from small interior design projects to major renovations.

The event is being held at the Ohio Expo Center and includes seminars, exhibits and demonstrations from local and national companies.

The show begins at noon Friday and runs until 6 p.m.

Advertisement

It continues Saturday from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. and Sunday from 11 a.m. to 5 p.m.

Adult tickets cost $5 at the door.



Source link

Continue Reading

Ohio

Matt Patricia sought stability in return as Ohio State football defensive coordinator

Published

on

Matt Patricia sought stability in return as Ohio State football defensive coordinator


Matt Patricia’s contract extension earlier this offseason included a pay raise that figures to make him the highest-paid assistant coach in college football this year.

But Patricia, who will make $3.75 million in guaranteed compensation as Ohio State’s defensive coordinator in 2026, also held an appreciation for his situation.

“Ohio State is such a special place, not only just the history, the tradition, the football program, the school, but the people here,” Patricia said. “Having a chance to have a little stability with my family, it’s hard when you have to move your family around, your kids and the new school and all that.”

Advertisement

Before he joined Ryan Day’s staff last year, the 51-year-old Patricia had bounced around as an assistant in the NFL for much of the decade.

He spent 2021 and 2022 in a variety of roles with the New England Patriots, then a year as a defensive assistant with the Philadelphia Eagles. He took off from coaching in 2024. The frequent relocation gave him perspective.

“We had an unbelievable experience settling into Columbus,” Patricia said. “Everybody’s been so nice and welcoming. It feels like home. It’s a big deal for us to be in a place where everybody’s happy. That’s really important.”

Advertisement

Patricia had a significant impact on the Buckeyes in his first year replacing Jim Knowles. Despite heavy roster attrition following their national championship season, he kept the defense atop the Football Bowl Subdivision. For the second straight season, no one allowed fewer points than Ohio State.

The 9.3 points per game allowed by the Buckeyes were the fewest by any defense since Alabama in 2011.

The success made Patricia a hot commodity on the coaching market, rebuilding his reputation as a sharp and creative football mind only a decade removed from his tenure as a Super Bowl-winning defensive coordinator for the Patriots. He was a finalist for the Broyles Award as the nation’s top assistant.

Patricia said he heard about opportunities in the NFL and elsewhere across the college football landscape, though none of them would pry him away from Ohio State.

Advertisement

“It wasn’t necessarily something where you’re looking to leave,” Patricia said, “but you do have to listen when those things come up. I’m just glad everything worked out.”

His challenge in his second season mirrors his previous one, as the Buckeyes are again managing the loss of eight starters on defense.

But unlike 2025, they have fewer returning pieces, relying on a larger class of transfers to help fill the holes on the depth chart.

“With as much coming into the program for the first time, not only are you trying to catch them up on the football scheme, but you’re also trying to catch them up on everything else,” Patricia said. “This is how we work, this is how we do things, this is the standard we’re looking for, this is how we practice, this is how we prepare, this is how we go to school. That has to be also taught. It becomes a lot, but that’s why you bring in the right guys that have the mental makeup to do all that.”

Joey Kaufman covers Ohio State football for The Columbus Dispatch. Email him at jkaufman@dispatch.com and follow him on @joeyrkaufman on X.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Ohio

Which central Ohio schools get the best results for their money?

Published

on

Which central Ohio schools get the best results for their money?


play

Which central Ohio school districts get the most bang for their buck?

On average, school districts in Ohio spend $16,069 per-pupil for education, according to the education think tank Fordham Institute.

Advertisement

However, different district types spend different amounts of money. For example, large urban districts with very high poverty spend around $21,000 per-pupil, but small towns with low poverty spend around $14,900. The district type closest to the state average are those considered rural and high poverty and suburban districts with low poverty.

Aaron Churchill, lead Ohio researcher for the Fordham Institute, said that urban districts – like Columbus City Schools, the state’s largest district – often have higher spending because they can pull more in tax revenue and the state supports them at a higher rate because they are serving a higher proportion of disadvantaged students. Small, high-poverty towns on the other hand, generate less tax revenue from property values and district employee wages, the highest expense for schools, may be lowered by less market competition.

Churchill said schools should be focused on directing their funding toward initiatives that improve student outcomes and achievement.

“It’s making sure we’re focused on quality, we’re focused on performance, and that we’re rewarding performance,” Churchill said. “And we don’t do enough of that in the education system now.”

Advertisement

Churchill said there is a long-running debate among education researchers about whether increasing spending translates to meaningful results for students. Overall, school funding has increased on average over $2,000 per-pupil since 2015 and reached a record-high in 2025, according to the Fordham Institute.

“You can see in the numbers that we’re spending more than we ever have,” Churchill said. “The real million-dollar question is ‘Can our schools spend the money well?’”

Which central Ohio districts have the best results compared to funding?

The Dispatch compared overall spending per-pupil for central Ohio school districts to the ODEW’s performance index, using 2025 state data.

The Performance Index uses the performance level results for students in third grade through high school on Ohio’s state testing. The Performance Index (PI) score accounts for the level of achievement of every student, not just whether they are “proficient.” Higher performance levels receive larger weights in the calculation, but all achievement levels are included. Overall, the state average of performance scores was 91.8, according to 2025 state data.

Advertisement

The central Ohio school district with the highest spending was Columbus City Schools, which spent $24,505 per pupil and received a PI score of 60.7. The district with the highest PI was Grandview Heights Schools, which received a 106 PI score and spent $21,567 per pupil. New Albany-Plain Local Schools was a close second in PI at 105.1 while spending more than $4,000 less than Grandview Heights at $16,923 per-pupil.

Here’s how central Ohio schools stack up by spending versus achievements on tests, according to the Ohio Department of Education (sorted by highest spending per-pupil):

  • Columbus City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $24,505; PI score: 60.7
  • Grandview Heights Schools – Spending per-pupil: $21,567; PI score: 106
  • Bexley City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $21,025; PI score: 102.7
  • Dublin City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $18,702; PI score: 97.6
  • Worthington City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $18.573 ; PI score: 94.3
  • Madison-Plains Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $17,646; PI score: 88
  • New Albany-Plain Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,923; PI score: 105.1
  • Westerville City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,815; PI score: 89.7
  • Olentangy Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,780; PI score: 103.9
  • Groveport Madison Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,236; PI score: 72.6
  • Upper Arlington City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16,282; PI score: 103.6
  • Canal Winchester Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $16.154; PI score: 89.1
  • Average Ohio school district – Spending per-pupil: $16,069; PI score: 91.8
  • Reynoldsburg City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,956; PI score: 72.2
  • Gahanna-Jefferson City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,742; PI score: 89.7
  • Hilliard City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,694; PI score: 90
  • South Western City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,600; PI score: 78.5
  • Whitehall City Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,593; PI score: 66.95
  • Johnstown-Monroe Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $15,163; PI score: 94.5
  • Jonathan Alder Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $14,803; PI score: 95.9
  • Pickerington Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $14,470 ; PI score: 90.9
  • Big Walnut Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $14,239; PI score: 95.1
  • London City – Spending per-pupil: $13,750; PI score: 81.3
  • Marysville Exempted Village Schools – Spending per-pupil: $13,608; PI score: 95.5
  • Licking Heights Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $13,585; PI score: 85.4
  • Hamilton Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $12,971; PI score: 82.2
  • Bloom-Carrol Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $12,720; PI score: 90.89
  • Licking Valley Local Schools – Spending per-pupil: $12,587; PI score: 85

Cole Behrens covers K-12 education and school districts in central Ohio. Have a tip? Contact Cole at cbehrens@dispatch.com or connect with him on X at @Colebehr_report



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending