Connect with us

North Dakota

South Dakota can continue to be isolated or we can join the growing passenger rail network. The choice is clear. — The South Dakota Standard

Published

on

South Dakota can continue to be isolated or we can join the growing passenger rail network. The choice is clear. — The South Dakota Standard


People live here. Yes, right here in South Dakota – our home that has often been derided as “flyover country”. For the first time in over 50 years, we have an opportunity to change that. We can have more affordable and convenient transportation options both within the state and to the outside world.

In February 2023, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) conducted study workshops to identify how to better connect underserved parts of the country (as shown in the public domain map above, posted in wikimedia commons) with the passenger rail network.  The study recommended a new train route across the state that would connect Rapid City, Pierre, Sioux Falls and points in between with Denver and the Twin Cities.

Regrettably, in the wake of the April 2024 South Dakota State Railroad Board meeting, misconceptions have surfaced that could end up halting progress and perpetuating our isolation.  Some believe there is no travel demand here, while others claim that decades-long disinvestment in railroad infrastructure should stop us from ever having passenger rail service.  These unfounded assertions could not be further from the truth.

Travel demand

Advertisement

The FRA study concluded there is a lot of travel demand for trains through South Dakota, one of just two states in the ‘lower 48’ without Amtrak trains. This comes as no surprise for people who live here, as we are the home of two major population centers and a burgeoning tourist industry across the state.

Population density doesn’t ride trains, people do. People in our region have outsized travel needs compared to those in more population dense regions.

We often have to travel longer distances to reach essential services, more frequently, and in some adverse travel conditions, compared to those living on the coasts. Across the Amtrak network, long-distance trains, such as the Empire Builder service in North Dakota and Montana, perform exceptionally well — especially in rural areas like South Dakota.

The trans-South Dakota, Twin Cities to Denver, route has over 4 times the travel demand (on a per-mile basis) compared to the much-vaunted, and long-needed, route via southern North Dakota and Montana: the North Coast Hiawatha. Despite the Hiawatha’s potential lower travel demand, the FRA has recognized and supported the route through inclusion in the Corridor ID program. The Rail Passengers Association (whose board I sit on) conducted research which identified $271 Million in potential economic benefits to the states served, far exceeding the costs to operate the train.

In addition to the proposed North Coast Hiawatha restoration, the trans-South Dakota route has more travel demand per mile than the much-requested Denver-to-Dallas and Houston route (which includes a leg of the Texas Triangle proposed service) and the Twin Cities-to-Phoenix route.

Advertisement

If there is justification to expand Sioux Falls and Rapid City airports (which I support), there is certainly the demand for modal diversification – especially for a transportation mode that can more directly serve additional communities all across the state.

National investment value

While existing neglected railroad infrastructure in South Dakota does not currently support passenger trains, that has no bearing on the need for rail service in our state. Any transportation infrastructure upgrade faces engineering and implementation challenges. When we are spending billions of dollars subsidizing the highway and aviation networks (not just essential air services), we can find the money to get South Dakota ‘on the map’.

We should have as much right to federal investment as those living on the coasts and the Northeast Corridor in particular, where proponents are proposing a $9 billion redevelopment project for Washington DC Union Station, to enhance service to a metropolitan area that already has many rail options.

As South Dakotans, we already should be investing more in our state railroad system for freight and economic development. Not completing long-proposed freight-focused projects has real financial costs to operators and South Dakota taxpayers. As a start, SDDOT could pursue some of the $2.4 Billion in CRISI NOFO funding currently available and seize the opportunity to apply for a comprehensive grant to address all proposed freight rail projects across South Dakota.

Advertisement

With regards to the argument that the geology of Pierre shale precludes passenger rail service, trains could utilize the Mitchell – Chamberlain – Kadoka – Rapid City alignment due to it having fewer recorded soil issues. Regardless, I am quite certain engineers can find ways to address these challenges. If we can figure out how to safely build two new Hudson River tunnels, and create projects like the Gotthard Base Tunnel and Tibetan Railway, we can find ways to manage these soil issues safely and cost-effectively.

Finally, some argue that we should not invest in South Dakota passenger rail because the state will lose Special Transportation Circumstance (STC) grant funding. This would happen anyway when Minnesota or Iowa establishes passenger rail service that enters the state as proposed in their State Rail Plans. And while out-of-state connections to Sioux Falls are badly needed, they will do little to help western South Dakota 340 miles away.

Concluding thoughts

The Federal Railroad Administration’s comprehensive long-distance rail study resulted in the proposed network of routes that would greatly enhance transportation access across this country. The carefully-considered plan reflects the four primary criteria Congress established when considering potential new long-distance routes:

● link and serve large and small communities as part of a regional rail network;

Advertisement

● advance the economic and social well-being of rural areas of the United States;

● provide enhanced connectivity for the national long-distance passenger rail system;

and

● reflect public engagement and local and regional support for restored passenger railservice.

The proposed rail line across South Dakota meets all of these criteria.

Advertisement

Far from being too expensive to consider South Dakota for passenger rail service, Amtrak and the nation can ill afford to exclude us. We can ill afford to ignore the importance of South Dakota and railroads in our broader economy. South Dakota can continue to be isolated for decades to come, or we can join this nation’s growing passenger rail network. The choice is clear.

People live here!

Dan Bilka of Sioux Falls is co-founder and president,  All Aboard Northwest.  You can reach him at dan@allaboardnw.org



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

North Dakota

Lawmakers advance bill to replace North Dakota drones made by foreign adversaries

Published

on

Lawmakers advance bill to replace North Dakota drones made by foreign adversaries


BISMARCK — Lawmakers unanimously advanced a bill aimed at replacing over 300 Chinese-made drones used by North Dakota agencies due to security concerns, though development of drone infrastructure in the bill drew scrutiny from lawmakers.

House Bill 1038

would create a $15 million program to replace all drones used by North Dakota agencies that do not comply with the

National Defense Authorization Act

Advertisement

and the

American Security Drone Act of 2023.

In short, any drones that are manufactured in adversarial countries would be replaced.

For North Dakota, that would be 307 of the 353 drones — or 86.97% — used by state agencies, according to a survey administered by the North Dakota University System.

All 307 drones that would be replaced are from China, according to the survey, specifically from a company called DJI, according to bill sponsor Rep. Mike Nathe, R-Bismarck.

Advertisement

During his testimony to the appropriations committee, Nathe said that DJI has roughly 90% of the hobby market, 70% of the industrial market and 80% of the first responder market in the U.S., something he said was “very disturbing” to him.

“Even if out of the 307 we have one of these that are bad, it’s worth doing,” Nathe said. “So, these drones are flying all over our state. They’re flying over our communities, our air bases, our missile sites, our oil fields and God knows if they’re collecting data and transmitting that. And that is not only a security risk for North Dakota but also for the country.”

Nathe said North Dakota agencies are using Chinese drones because they are cheap.

“Why do we have so many of these in our inventory? And we’re not the only state, every other state is – has as many of these as we do,” Nathe said. “And the answer is they’re cheap. Cheaper than U.S. stuff, and they’re easy to fly and they’re very consumer-friendly. And they are not just years ahead, they’re like generations ahead of the (U.S.) manufacturers.”

Despite this, he said he has not had any pushback from state agencies on the proposed bill.

Advertisement

The program would be run by the Grand Forks-based

Northern Plains Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Test Site

. Under the proposed bill, the test site would find and pay for drones that could serve the same function of the Chinese drones currently used by agencies, then organize training on the new drones for agencies’ personnel and inspect and dispose of the Chinese-made drones.

Agencies would be able to continue using the drones they have until a replacement drone from a U.S. manufacturer or a manufacturer in a country friendly to the U.S. has been found by the test site, Nathe said.

Some members of the committee questioned how much it would cost to replace the current drones. Frank Mattis, director of UAS integration at Thales and newly minted chair of the

Advertisement

North Dakota UAS Council

, said that it would likely cost more than $10,000 per drone to replace the current DJI drones used by state agencies.

Thales is a company partnered with the state and the Northern Plains UAS Test Site to develop the

Vantis

system. The system, simply put, is a radar system that tracks and identifies drones, which allows them to operate beyond the line of sight of pilots.

Advertisement

The second part of HB 1038 would allocate $11 million to develop an FAA radar data enclave and engage in a first-of-its-kind one-year pathfinder program where the FAA would share radar data with Vantis that would extend the system’s reach over most of the state.

Northern Plains UAS Test Site Deputy Executive Director Erin Roesler said the system covers 3,000 square miles and with the FAA data would cover 56,000 square miles — an expansion that would cost the state $255 million to develop without the FAA’s assistance.

The hope, according to those in support of the bill, is that Vantis with the FAA’s data would become the guideline for a national drone infrastructure system.

According to Mattis, this would be the first time the FAA shared unfiltered radar data with an organization outside of the federal government.

The data is not classified as “top secret” or “secret,” Mattis said, but it does rise to a level of importance where it needs to be protected. The $11 million would pay for the training, screening of personnel, and physical and cybersecurity upgrades to the test site that would allow them to house and utilize the data.

Advertisement

Several lawmakers on the committee questioned how and when the state would see a return on the $11 million investment in Vantis.

Roesler said that Vantis should be viewed as an infrastructure project and that its value comes from the opportunities it will create.

She said that state agencies and other drone operators must create their own often costly and redundant systems to operate drones the way Vantis allows for. Creating this shared-use infrastructure lowers the barrier for agencies and companies to use drones in new ways.

Rep. David Richter, R-Williston, told a story about a hospital in his part of the state using a drone to deliver medicine across Lake Sakakawea to a remote area as an example of the use of drone infrastructure.

“We build highways and then people use them,” Richter said. “We are building a highway and people will use it.”

Advertisement

The bill was given a unanimous “do pass” recommendation by the committee and will be carried to the floor for a vote by Nathe.





Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

European potato company plans first U.S. production plant in North Dakota

Published

on

European potato company plans first U.S. production plant in North Dakota


Screen Capture: https://agristo.com/timeline

Agristo, a leading European producer of frozen potato products, is making big moves in North America. The company, founded in 1986, has chosen Grand Forks, North Dakota, as the site for its first U.S. production facility.

Agristo has been testing potato farming across the U.S. for years and found North Dakota to be the perfect fit. The state offers high-quality potato crops and a strong agricultural community.

Advertisement

In a statement, Agristo said it believes those factors make it an ideal location for producing the company’s high-quality frozen potato products, including fries, hash browns, and more.

“Seeing strong potential in both potato supply and market growth in North America, Agristo is now ready to invest in its first production facility in the United States, focusing on high-quality products, innovation, and state-of-the-art technology.”

Agristo plans to invest up to $450 million to build a cutting-edge facility in Grand Forks. This project will create 300 to 350 direct jobs, giving a boost to the local economy.

Agristo is working closely with North Dakota officials to finalize the details of the project.

Negotiations for the plant are expected to wrap up by mid-2025.

Advertisement

For more information about Agristo and its products, visit www.agristo.com.

Agristo’s headquarters are located in Belgium.



Source link

Continue Reading

North Dakota

Audit of North Dakota state auditor finds no issues; review could cost up to $285K • North Dakota Monitor

Published

on

Audit of North Dakota state auditor finds no issues; review could cost up to 5K • North Dakota Monitor


A long-anticipated performance audit of the North Dakota State Auditor’s Office found no significant issues, consultants told a panel of lawmakers Thursday afternoon.

“Based on the work that we performed, there weren’t any red flags,” Chris Ricchiuto, representing consulting firm Forvis Mazars, said.

The review was commissioned by the 2023 Legislature following complaints from local governments about the cost of the agency’s services.

The firm found that the State Auditor’s Office is following industry standards and laws, and is completing audits in a reasonable amount of time, said Charles Johnson, a director with the firm’s risk advisory services.

Advertisement

“The answer about the audit up front is that we identified four areas where things are working exactly as you expect the state auditor to do,” Johnson told the committee.

Charles Johnson of consulting firm Forvis Mazars shares the result of a performance audit of the North Dakota State Auditor’s Office during a Legislative Audit and Fiscal Review Committee meeting on Jan. 9, 2025. (Mary Steurer/North Dakota Monitor)

The report also found that the agency has implemented some policies to address concerns raised during the 2023 session.

For example, the Auditor’s Office now provides cost estimates to clients before they hire the office for services, Johnson said. The proposals include not-to-exceed clauses, so clients have to agree to any proposed changes.

The State Auditor’s Office also now includes more details on its invoices, so clients have more comprehensive information about what they’re being charged for.

The audit originally was intended to focus on fiscal years 2020 through 2023. However, the firm extended the scope of its analysis to reflect policy changes that the Auditor’s Office implemented after the 2023 fiscal year ended.

Advertisement

State Auditor Josh Gallion told lawmakers the period the audit covers was an unusual time for his agency. The coronavirus pandemic made timely work more difficult for his staff. Moreover, because of the influx of pandemic-related assistance to local governments from the federal government, the State Auditor’s Office’s workload increased significantly.

Gallion said that, other than confirming that the changes the agency has made were worthwhile, he didn’t glean anything significant from the audit.

“The changes had already been implemented,” he said.

Gallion has previously called the audit redundant and unnecessary. When asked Thursday if he thought the audit was a worthwhile use of taxpayer money, Gallion said, “Every audit has value, at the end of the day.”

The report has not been finalized, though the Legislative Audit and Fiscal Review Committee voted to accept it.

Advertisement

Audit of state auditor delayed; Gallion calls it ‘redundant, unnecessary’

“There was no shenanigans, there were no red flags,” Sen. Jerry Klein, R-Fessenden, said at the close of the hearing.

Forvis representatives told lawmakers they plan to finish the report sometime this month.

The contract for the audit is for $285,000.

Johnson said as far as he is aware Forvis has sent bills for a little over $150,000 so far. That doesn’t include the last two months of the company’s work, he said.

Advertisement

The consulting firm sent out surveys to local governments that use the agency’s services.

The top five suggestions for improvements were:

  • Communication with clients
  • Timeliness
  • Helping clients complete forms
  • Asking for same information more than once
  • Providing more detailed invoices

The top five things respondents thought the agency does well were:

  • Understanding of the audit process
  • Professionalism
  • Willingness to improve
  • Attention to detail
  • Helpfulness

Johnson said that some of the survey findings should be taken with a “grain of salt.”

“In our work as auditors, we don’t always make people happy doing what we’re supposed to do,” he said.

YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.

Advertisement

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending