North Dakota

Park document lays out ‘script’ for discussing removal of wild horses, shows bias, advocate says

Published

on


MEDORA, N.D. — National Park Service officials discussed how to explain “contradictions” in a key park document that described the wild horses in Theodore Roosevelt National Park as an “other important resource” at a time the park was proposing to get rid of the horses.

The 33-page “overview” document, including “workshop notes” from a meeting of park officials in October 2022, laid out talking points for park officials to make in public meetings and messages concerning a new management plan for horses and longhorn steers in the park.

Chris Kman, president of Chasing Horses Wild Horse Advocates, described the document as a “script” that shows officials plotting how they would explain reasons for getting rid of the horses and longhorns.

“It’s deliberate and calculated,” Kman said Monday, Oct. 9. “It’s like they’re pounding out the details on the narrative they’re going to feed the public. They’ve got answers for everything,” including what to say if legal action is brought to contest a decision to remove the horses.

Advertisement

The document repeatedly provides examples revealing officials’ intentions to remove the horses, rather than weigh alternatives that would allow the horses and longhorns to stay in the park, she said.

“I think this shows the park is not engaging in a neutral NEPA process at all,” Kman said, despite requirements to do so under the National Environmental Protection Act.

Park Superintendent Angie Richman did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

‘Key decisions’ and ‘preferred nomenclature’

The document summarizes plans made in a meeting of park officials held at the Rough Rider Hotel in Medora in October 2022, two months before the park service

Advertisement

began public discussions in December 2022

concerning its new “livestock management plan.”

Officials also discussed the possible need to euthanize horses after helicopter roundups if they were unable to find people to adopt the animals.

“The group felt that euthanasia should be included for horses that the Park was unable to place after multiple attempts,” according to the document.

At the outset of the planning process, park officials said their preferred alternative would be to remove the wild horses and longhorn steers from the park. This fall, the park

Advertisement

narrowed its options to keeping its current plan for managing the horses and longhorns or removing the herds, gradually or quickly.

“Cattle will be the preferred nomenclature, not steer or longhorn steer,” was cited as a “key decision” in advance of the public information meetings.

The document also instructed that

horses and cattle would be considered livestock, not wildlife,

in preparing an environmental assessment that would guide the management plan for the herds.

Advertisement

The discussion notes reveal park officials knew they would have to explain an apparent contradiction in the park’s “foundation document,” spelling out the park’s guiding principles, which referred to horses as an “other important resource” “which says the horses are important to consider in future planning.”

About 200 wild horses roam the park’s south unit. Although park officials at first tried to remove all of the horses after the park was established in 1947, since the early 1970s wild horses and have been managed to depict a “historic scene” of the area when Theodore Roosevelt ranched and hunted there in the 1880s.

Regional park officials suggested “explaining the thinking around the contradiction of the foundation document saying horses were an ‘other important resource’ in the founding of the Park.”

Park officials decided to do an “in-depth literature search for any evidence that Roosevelt wanted or supported horses on the landscape,” apparently in case they would need to provide a rebuttal for any such evidence, according to the document.

The document noted that the “no action” alternative was to keep in place a management plan for the horses stemming from a 1978 environmental assessment that

Advertisement

set a goal of maintaining a herd of 35 to 60 horses.

“There happens to be a large number of horses at this time, but there have also been elevated numbers in the past and could be in the future,” the document said.

Park officials “discussed the need for talking points on what efforts the Park is taking to manage native prairie ecosystems, such as invasive plant management and bison and elk management under their respective plans.”

Park officials noted that since the 1970s, wild horse herds have increased on federal Bureau of Land Management lands in the West “and opportunities to see them now exist in many places,” according to the document.

Moving away from ‘historic scene’

Advertisement

The “historic scene” noted in the 1978 environmental assessment concerning the horses “reflected a management perspective at that time that has since evolved,” according to the document.

The park’s mission shifted from striving to depict the Badlands as they were in Roosevelt’s time to protecting the natural prairie ecosystem — a term Kman said park officials never have bothered to explain.

Kman asked if the park intended to restore the park landscape to what it was 6,000 years ago, around the time horses are believed to have disappeared from North America, 1,000 years ago or during Roosevelt’s time.

“Historic scene is not an emphasis now, it is managing for native species, resources, and ecosystems,” the document said. “While Roosevelt noted that there were horses and cattle on the landscape, his stronger overarching message for the body of his work was his conservation mindedness. Roosevelt viewed horses as an intrusion or runaway on the landscape as quoted in the 1978” environmental assessment.

Roosevelt actually brought wild horses from Montana to the Badlands and wrote of commonly seeing wild horses in the Badlands,

Advertisement

“invariably of domestic descent, being either themselves runaways from some ranch or Indian outfit.”

Park officials distorted Roosevelt’s meaning when referring to “runaways,” by saying he regarded them as an “intrusion on the landscape” when horses were crucial to cattle ranching, Kman said.

“I think what they’re doing is twisting that quote,” she said.

‘They blame the horses for everything’

The north unit of Theodore Roosevelt had nine steers and 300 bison as of October 2022, while the south unit had 600 bison and 200 horses, according to the document, which said there was a “very low potential for impact” in the north unit “due to the low magnitude of change from maintaining or removing steer.”

Advertisement

In public meetings, park officials were vague in providing the number of bison in the park, which Kman said was to understate the effect bison have on the range.

“When you’re talking about 600 bison and 200 horses, what’s the problem, why can’t we have horses?” she said.

Many park visitors are from Great Plains states, primarily North Dakota, South Dakota and Minnesota, the park document said. “A stated purpose of visitors is to see bison more than to see horses.”

Bison in the park are managed under a 1986 resource management plan, while the elk resource management plan dates to 1985.

In discussing current conditions in the park, including vegetation, park officials noted that “trampling occurs by all species” and said “livestock impacts are not distinguishable from native species impacts.”

Advertisement

Elsewhere, the report noted “removing livestock does not completely remove hooves on the ground.”

Camera data showed water was not a limiting factor for grazing species, with observational data for the last 20 years. However, under a “climate change” scenario, officials expressed concern that artesian wells in the park could stop producing.

“Horses and native species have not been seen congregating along the Little Missouri (River) more in drought years than in non-drought years, implying that they have other water resources available to them in the Park,” the document said.

Meeting notes indicate the park has “overlapping animal damage, primarily from bison,” such as damage to archaeological sites, but a

draft environmental assessment now under consideration by the park

Advertisement

cites horses for the damage, Kman said.

“They blame the horses for everything,” she said.

Besides Richman, park officials present at the meeting included Deputy Superintendent Maureen McGee-Ballinger, Chief Resource Officer Blake McCann and Supervisory Park Ranger Bret Morton, according to the document.





Source link

Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Trending

Exit mobile version