North Dakota

Lame-duck North Dakota lawmakers roamed to faraway conferences on the taxpayers’ dime

Published

on


BISMARCK — Over a long career in public budget writing, former North Dakota Rep. Jeff Delzer earned a reputation as a champion of conservative spending.

The Underwood Republican’s travel log tells a different story.

Delzer took more than 30 taxpayer-funded trips to out-of-state conferences and meetings in the past decade, collecting nearly $26,000 in daily payments for himself along the way.

One of Delzer’s costliest excursions came after voters decided they didn’t want him in office any longer.

Advertisement

About two months after

losing his bid for reelection

in last year’s primary, Delzer attended an annually held legislative summit in Denver. The state funded the trip to the tune of $3,700.

Delzer wasn’t the only lame duck to wander from the pond. Since 2014, the North Dakota Legislature has spent more than $45,000 to send a dozen retiring and defeated lawmakers to out-of-state conferences, according to documents obtained by Forum News Service through a public records request.

Some of the departing lawmakers served on interstate policy boards and were expected to show up to faraway meetings, but others went to conferences that could have been attended by any of their colleagues who planned to remain in the Legislature.

Advertisement

Rep. Robin Weisz, a Hurdsfield Republican who briefly oversaw legislative conference attendance this year, said lawmakers who announce their retirement or lose an election “shouldn’t be sent anywhere after that point.”

“To me, it should be people going that are gonna get usefulness out of the meeting,” Weisz said.

Delzer said lawmakers who are leaving office still can gain valuable information from conferences to share with those who will stay in the Legislature.

Former North Dakota Republican Rep. Jeff Delzer chairs a meeting of the House Appropriations Committee at the state Capitol on March 14, 2019.

Forum News Service file photo

Advertisement

“You don’t want to quit learning, and just because you’re not there does not mean you’re not going to have the opportunity to visit with people and bring back and share what you learned at these conferences,” Delzer said.

Most of the lame-duck trips were approved by former Sen. Ray Holmberg, a Grand Forks Republican who resigned in June after a Forum investigation found he

exchanged text messages

with a jailed man accused of child pornography crimes.

Advertisement

Holmberg, who

attended more out-of-state trips

than any of his peers since 2013, also signed off on his own travel during the parts of eight years he served as chairman of Legislative Management, an interim panel of top lawmakers.

The senator’s ability to authorize his own state-funded trips was “a basic conflict of interest,” said Mark Jendrysik, a political science professor at the University of North Dakota.

“That is completely unethical. I can’t believe they let him do that,” Jendrysik said. “You can’t possibly be unbiased in your own case.”

Advertisement

When asked whether it was a conflict of interest to approve his own travel, Holmberg said the chairman of Legislative Management is given that authority by state law.

“How else would you do it? That’s what the law is,” Holmberg said.

Since 2013, the state has spent an average of $450,000 each two-year budget cycle to cover legislators’ conference-related expenses, including airfare, lodging, meals and daily pay, known as per diem.

The goal of sending lawmakers to conferences is “primarily educational,” said Legislative Council Director John Bjornson.

Members of the House of Representatives and Senate can learn from policy experts and compare notes with their counterparts from other states, Bjornson said. When the Legislature heads into session, lawmakers can use what they picked up at conferences.

Advertisement

Jendrysik said sending soon-to-be sidelined lawmakers on such trips strikes him as unethical since “you can’t apply the things you learn on the taxpayers’ dime in the Legislature.”

Nearly all of the lame-duck lawmakers who attended out-of-state conferences during their waning terms held positions of influence within the Legislature or their party.

Delzer, the longtime chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, made two state-funded trips after losing to two Republican candidates in June. Besides the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) summit in Denver, he attended a San Antonio meeting of the Energy Council, a board on which he served.

Former North Dakota Rep. Kim Koppelman, R-West Fargo, chairs a committee meeting during the 2019 legislative session.

John Hageman / Forum News Service

Advertisement

Former House Speaker Kim Koppelman, R-West Fargo, attended a July meeting of Midwest lawmakers hosted by the Council of State Governments (CSG) in Wichita, Kansas. Several months earlier, he had

dropped out of his race for reelection

after losing his local party’s endorsement.

Less than two weeks after proclaiming that he

Advertisement

would not seek another term

in July 2019, former Sen. Dwight Cook attended an NCSL summit in Nashville, Tennessee. The Mandan Republican who chaired the Senate Finance and Taxation Committee for a decade also attended meetings of two separate

interstate tax policy groups

to which he belonged.

Caroyln Nelson, a former assistant minority leader in the Senate, attended an NCSL conference near San Diego in December 2017 less than a month after

Advertisement

announcing her intention to retire

the following year. The Fargo Democrat also went to meetings in northern Minnesota and Chicago for boards on which she served.

Former House budget writer Mark Dosch, R-Bismarck, attended a CSG meeting in Milwaukee about six months after

it became public

he would not seek reelection in 2016.

Advertisement

Former House Speaker and Majority Leader Wesley Belter, R-Fargo, attended conferences in Chicago, Denver and Burlington, Vermont, after

announcing he would not seek another term

in December 2015.

Tony Grindberg, a longtime Senate budget writer from Fargo, went to a CSG conference in Anchorage, Alaska, three months before the end of his final term in 2014. The Republican who now serves on the Cass County Commission

announced he would not seek another legislative term

Advertisement

in January of that year.

The ex-lawmakers offered several justifications for the trips they took before leaving the Legislature.

Cook and Nelson said they were already registered for the conferences before announcing they would retire. Nelson added that she shared the information she gained from the meetings with other members of her small Democratic caucus.

Belter said elected representatives must continue serving their district and the state until the end of their term. He noted that current lawmakers occasionally ask him about certain issues, so his legislative knowledge is still put to good use.

“I think that the biggest point I would like to make is that I see nothing wrong with a legislator going to a conference after they’ve decided (to retire) because there is no replacement for them at that point in time,” Belter said.

Advertisement

Delzer said the trips he took were justified since he used the knowledge he gained “validly and wisely.”

Koppelman, Dosch and Grindberg did not respond to Forum News Service’s requests for comment on this story.

Several other lame-duck lawmakers attended out-of-state meetings of groups to which they belonged, including former Sen. Jessica Bell and former Reps. Scot Kelsh, Lois Delmore and Jim Schmidt.

Bell, Kelsh and Delmore said they were expected to go to the meetings as members of their respective panels. Schmidt did not respond to a request for comment.

Former Sen. Joe Miller, R-Park River, attended a Denver agriculture conference as a lame duck in 2016, but he did not collect a per diem or any travel reimbursements. The state paid only the $745 he needed to register for the conference.

Advertisement

Miller told Forum News Service he received enough regular compensation for being a lawmaker, and he “just thought it was unnecessary to be further paid” for going to a meeting.

Holmberg approved most of the lame-duck trips as the chairman of Legislative Management from 2013-2018 and again from 2021 until April 2022, when he resigned from the position.

He told Forum News Service he took cues from the majority and minority leaders, who recommended members of their caucuses for different conferences. Holmberg said he thought sending lame ducks to conferences wasn’t a good use of public funds, but signed off on it if legislative leaders insisted.

Former Senate Majority Leader Rich Wardner, R-Dickinson, speaks at a news conference on Dec. 1, 2020, in the North Dakota Capitol.

Jeremy Turley / Forum News Service

Advertisement

Former Senate Majority Leader Rich Wardner, R-Dickinson, said he rejected plenty of travel requests by soon-departing lawmakers, but he made exceptions for important members of interstate committees.

Former House Majority Leader Chet Pollert, R-Carrington, said it was valuable to send experienced lawmakers — even sometimes lame ducks — to represent North Dakota in various policy groups to make sure other states didn’t have undue influence.

Weisz chaired Legislative Management for less than two weeks this month before House Majority Leader Mike Lefor, R-Dickinson, took over the role.

But even in his abbreviated time at the helm, Weisz said he began receiving travel requests from lawmakers for conferences as far out as next year. Some of the requests came from colleagues he believes won’t seek reelection. Now, Lefor will have to deal with those, he said.

Advertisement

“I was like, ‘OK, do we really want to send someone who’s not running or frankly is checked out in a way already? To me, that is an issue,” Weisz said. “You do want to send people that are going to bring back something useful and not (to) get a paid vacation.”

Weisz, who has attended only a couple of out-of-state conferences during his nearly 30-year tenure, said the approval of conference attendance over time has become more first-come-first-serve and less a strategic effort by leaders to prepare and improve important lawmakers.

Lefor said he will evaluate travel requests on a case-by-case basis to determine whether investing in a lawmaker’s training benefits the state. Lawmakers can spend up to $965,000 over the next two years on conference attendance.

Jet-setting at state’s expense

The locations of conferences attended by Holmberg since 2013 read like a glossy travel magazine’s table of contents: Norway, Puerto Rico, Alaska, Los Angeles, Miami and Vail, Colorado.

Advertisement

As Weisz put it, Holmberg “rarely missed a meeting.”

In all, Holmberg made about 65 publicly funded trips over the last decade at a total cost of nearly $126,000 —

by far the most of any lawmaker.

He was paid $47,000 in per diem for attending the conferences.

He approved most of the trips himself as chairman of Legislative Management.

Advertisement
Former North Dakota Sen. Ray Holmberg, R-Grand Forks, speaks on the Senate floor in November 2021.

Jeremy Turley / Forum News Service

Holmberg told Forum News Service his role as a leader in between legislative sessions necessitated his frequent appearances at conferences and meetings across the continent.

Despite holding the ultimate authority to approve his own travel, Holmberg said he consulted Wardner before signing up for the conferences. Wardner said he never rejected Holmberg’s requests “because they were all reasonable.”

Advertisement

Weisz said it makes sense that Holmberg attended more meetings than the average legislator, but “he took advantage of it.”

Jendrysik, who teaches a graduate-level class on ethics in the public sector, said Holmberg shouldn’t have been able to exert influence on his own travel requests. The professor noted that he wasn’t permitted to approve his own travel when he chaired his department due to the conflict of interest it would have presented.

In the future, there should be a committee or some other mechanism to review travel requests by the chairman of Legislative Management, Wardner said.

Since Lefor is both the House majority leader and the chairman of Legislative Management, he wouldn’t have to consult anyone at all before approving his own trips.

Lefor agreed that there probably should be some check on the chairman’s travel, but he isn’t yet sure what form that would take. On a personal level, Lefor said abusing the power of the position won’t be an issue for him.

Advertisement

“I don’t think you’ll find me taking a lot of trips,” Lefor said. “I think I would hold myself to a higher standard.”





Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Trending

Exit mobile version