Missouri

Missouri House votes to require disclosure of medical marijuana ownership records • Missouri Independent

Published

on


The Missouri Home voted overwhelmingly Tuesday to require state regulators to show over possession data for companies granted medical marijuana licenses to legislative oversight committees.

Democratic Rep. Peter Merideth of St. Louis added the transparency necessities as an modification to an area authorities invoice authorized by the Senate earlier this yr. After a short debate the place nobody spoke in opposition, the modification was authorized 128-6.

The underlying invoice, which incorporates quite a few different Home amendments, was authorized and now heads again to the Senate. The legislative session ends at 6 p.m. Friday.

Each Republican and Democratic lawmakers argued Tuesday that the Division of Well being and Senior Service’s resolution to deem possession information confidential has brought on issues in offering oversight of the medical marijuana program. And that downside will solely worsen, they contend, if a leisure marijuana poll measure wins voter approval this fall.

Advertisement

“If we’ve a scenario the place the entire entities that bought licenses below this current program have a bonus in a much bigger market, we’ve to proceed doing actual oversight to ensure that they had been working correctly below the present constitutional tips,” Merideth mentioned, pointing to provisions within the proposed poll measure that guarantee present medical marijuana license holders get the preliminary batch of leisure licenses.

Evaluation by The Unbiased and the Missourian final yr of 192 dispensary licenses issued by the state discovered a number of cases the place a single entity was linked to greater than 5 dispensary licenses.

In line with the structure, the state can’t challenge greater than 5 dispensary licenses to any entity below considerably frequent management, possession or administration. However as a result of DHSS has steadfastly withheld any possession details about license holders from public disclosure, it’s unimaginable to find out who owns what.

That is a kind of conditions with unusual bedfellows, people on reverse ends of the spectrum that usually do not agree with one another. However we agree that this as a accountable factor to do.

Advertisement

– Rep. Peter Merideth, D-St. Louis

The Home tried so as to add the the same transparency modification to laws final yr however was compelled to take away it below risk of veto by Gov. Mike Parson.

“I don’t agree with the gentleman from St. Louis Metropolis on absolutely anything,” mentioned state Rep. Ben Baker, R-Neosho, mentioned of Merideth. “However that is one thing the place I do… it’s a very good modification that can deliver somewhat bit extra oversight and transparency to this program.”

Advertisement

The state has justified withholding data from public disclosure by pointing to a portion of the medical marijuana constitutional modification adopted by voters in 2018 that claims the division shall “keep the confidentiality of stories or different data obtained from an applicant or licensee containing any individualized information, data, or information associated to the licensee or its operation… .”

In February, the Missouri Supreme Courtroom ordered the state to show over sure medical marijuana software data that it had argued was confidential to an organization interesting a denied license.

Medical marijuana immediately turned large enterprise in Missouri after voters handed a constitutional modification permitting it in 2018, and competitors for licenses turned fierce when the state capped the quantity it will challenge.

The Missouri Home launched an investigation into the licensing course of in early 2020, fueled by widespread stories of irregularities in how license functions had been scored and allegations that conflicts of curiosity inside DHSS and a non-public firm employed to attain functions could have tainted the method.

Legislative criticism of the medical marijuana program, particularly the state’s resolution to cap that variety of licenses issued to develop and promote product, have bubbled up periodically all through the session.

Advertisement

In the meantime, rumblings of an FBI investigation across the medical marijuana trade have swirled.

In November 2020, the pinnacle of Missouri’s medical marijuana program testified below oath {that a} federal grand jury subpoena his company obtained was linked to an FBI investigation in Independence.

Missouri’s medical marijuana regulators obtained two extra federal grand jury subpoenas in 2020, with every redacted earlier than being turned over to the media on the request of the federal authorities to obfuscate the information being sought by regulation enforcement.

A Kansas Metropolis-area businessman testified in a deposition that he was questioned by federal regulation enforcement final about medical marijuana licensing in Missouri and utility contracts in Independence — an indication {that a} doubtlessly wide-ranging public corruption probe could also be ongoing.

“That is a kind of conditions with unusual bedfellows, people on reverse ends of the spectrum that usually don’t agree with one another,” Merideth mentioned. “However we agree that this as a accountable factor to do.”

Advertisement



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Trending

Exit mobile version