Minnesota
How six Minnesota conservatives feel about the presidential race ahead of the RNC
Some of them love former President Donald Trump, and some can’t stand him.
After a statewide callout for voters, the Star Tribune invited six Minnesota conservatives for a discussion on the 2024 presidential election.
They shared their opinions about some of this year’s top issues: Immigration, the economy, political polarization and more.
Here’s what they had to say, less than four months away from Election Day.
Joe Bridges, 61, Miltona
The farm equipment sales rep does not like the extremes of either party. He’s not sure if he can bring himself to vote for President Joe Biden, but he definitely will not vote for Trump.
“I grew up working on a farm. The people were Republicans, and that sort of rubbed off on me. I feel like the Republican Party has passed me by. I’m extremely troubled by the coarseness of not just society but both political parties, their extreme viewpoints. I have a neighbor down the road with a, ‘F Biden’ flag, and I think, ‘What possible redeeming value is there in having that type of attitude?’”
Bridges said he’s also concerned about isolationist views among some Republicans.
“I’m troubled by seemingly turning our back on other democratic nations — Trump’s lack of support for NATO. Now to say, ‘Do your own thing, take care of yourself,’ I think that’s sad and short-sighted.”
“The Republican Party used to be fiscally conservative: That’s certainly an issue for me, the deficit, which has fallen by the wayside. There should be orderly immigration.”
AK Kamara, 40, Forest Lake
Initially not a fan of Trump, Kamara now believes he’s “one of the best presidents of my lifetime.” Kamara is also a Minnesota delegate to the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee this week, and was elected the state GOP’s national committeeman for 2028.
“I would crawl over broken glass to vote for Trump. I don’t care if he gets convicted, 30 more felonies, 300 more felonies,” he said.
Heading into November, immigration and the economy are the top issues he’s thinking about. Though he ardently supports Trump, he thinks everyone’s voice should be heard at the polls.
“I’ll always turn out. I’ll never not vote because I think every American should do it,” he said. “Because if you want to have a society that functions, you don’t want a king and you don’t want a theocracy. The people in every community need to take some ownership and say, ‘I need to go out and have my voice be heard.’”
Sue Keator, 68, Edina
The retiree and election judge is worried about crime — “The riots made me just so angry” — and security at the southern border. She said she sees people who are homeless in her community and wonders why the U.S. isn’t focusing more on its own problems.
“Until everybody that is legally here, you know, the citizens and the legal immigrants, until they’re all taken care of and our veterans are taken care of, don’t let anybody else in,” Keator said. “We’ve got enough problems taking care of our own.”
The importance of voting was instilled in Keator at an early age. She said Election Day should be a work holiday so everyone can participate.
Keator said she will “absolutely” vote for Trump over Biden, “if things are the way they are today.”
“I am not a Trumper, though,” Keator said.
She said she’d also vote for Trump over Vice President Kamala Harris if Biden were to exit the race. Other candidates she would be interested in are independent Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Nikki Haley and Tulsi Gabbard.
Daniel McMonigal, 64, Cannon Falls
The retired telecommunications professional said he is worried about the future of the country and the problems his granddaughter and other children will inherit.
Increasing federal debt. Drug trafficking. A public education system he fears is in decline and focused on political “indoctrination.”
“Our children, we’re failing them. We’re falling behind,” McMonigal said. “And then the danger of the lack of law and order and the crime.”
McMonigal, who describes himself as a “constitutional conservative,” said he could never vote for a Democrat because of how the party has changed over the past 20 years. He doesn’t like Minnesota’s politics, criticizing Gov. Tim Walz and the DFL-controlled Legislature for spending most of a historic $17 billion state budget surplus last year.
Trump, he said, has an “obnoxious personality.” McMonigal said he doesn’t excuse it, but he chalks it up to the former president being a New Yorker.
He said he’s “absolutely voting for Trump.”
“I do think that he’s one of the most patriotic presidents in my lifetime. I think he’s right up there with Reagan and Eisenhower.”
Donna Schiff, 68, Prior Lake
Schiff, a longtime election judge, describes herself as politically conservative but strives “to look for the right thing to do” and is open to both sides of the political spectrum.
“If it happens to be a Democratic idea and I think it’s right, I will do it. But generally speaking, I vote Republican,” she said.
Right now, Schiff is leaning toward voting for Trump. Schiff was a Nikki Haley supporter, but without her in the race, she isn’t left with many options. However, if Democratic Sen. Amy Klobuchar ran for the White House, Schiff said she would vote for her.
“I don’t like everything that Trump says. I would hold my nose and vote for him. At the current time, if Biden was running, I absolutely could not vote for him because I disagree with almost everything he’s done,” Schiff said.
Ted Storck, 88, Morris
The U.S. Navy veteran and former small-town radio station owner voted for Trump twice but now dislikes both candidates.
“I’m a Republican because I’m against the nanny state: Everybody takes care of you from the time you were born to your grave. We need more people that take care of themselves. I’m for less government. I was a Republican all my life. I voted for one Democrat in my life, and that was John Kennedy. But I’m disturbed on where our Republican Party has gone or is going.”
Storck said his top issue is Ukraine.
“I’m afraid that if Trump gets in that he’s going to do what he says and ask for Ukraine to give back to Russia what they’re already taken over. I spent a year in Vietnam, 28 years in the Navy and the Navy Reserves. We need a strong military. We gotta stop Putin. We gotta stop China and Iran. I’m worried he’s not going to do that. He’s a loose cannon.”
“I’m a conservative, but I think Trump is out for himself and not for the country, and that worries me a lot.”
Storck said he could potentially vote for a Democrat, but would “have to hold my nose and do it.”
What question do you have?
Minnesota
Dennis Peterson
With family by his side, Dennis “Bud” Peterson went to be with the Lord on the morning of June 1, 2026.
He was born at Drake, North Dakota on April 2, 1932 in the home of his parents Nick and Helen Peterson. The family moved to Duluth at the beginning of World War II.
After graduation from Duluth Central High School Bud served in the US Army in Korea during the Korean War, and received an Honorable Discharge with the rank of Sergeant. He used his GI Bill benefits to attend UMD receiving an Associate Degree, and also earned his Commercial Instrument Pilot rating.
Bud was a longtime employee of St. Louis County retiring as Supervisor of Roads and Bridges. In retirement he served as Boiler Engineer and a do it all repairman for Duluth Gospel Tabernacle. He generously devoted his time and talents as a consummate do it yourself repairman to all of his family.
Dennis is preceded in death by his parents, Nick & Helen Peterson; brother, Robert Peterson; sister, June (Don) Kruger; and infant brother and sister, James and Delores Peterson.
He is survived by his sister, Carol (Eli) Miletich; and numerous nieces and nephews all of whom he loved dearly.
At Bud’s request, his family will be holding a private funeral service. Arrangements by Dougherty Funeral Home 218-727-3555.
Minnesota
Medical services in limbo for thousands of providers amid Minnesota fraud crisis
The Minnesota Department of Human Services is reexamining over 5,000 Medicaid service providers across the state in an effort to combat fraud.
The federal government said it would pull $2 billion in annual Medicaid funding from Minnesota in January if the state didn’t make changes.
The Minnesota Department of Human Services set out to revalidate thousands of providers in programs deemed high risk for fraud by asking providers to submit verification paperwork and making unannounced site visits. The deadline passed on Sunday.
The latest data, published on May 27, shows 1,009 providers approved, 1,151 disenrolled and over 3,000 providers with pending applications.
Paige Berland and Camille Heyman run Minnesota Behavioral Specialists, providing autism care to children through two locations in the metro area. The women say that after submitting their paperwork, they received letters from DHS with determinations for both locations: the Bloomington center was terminated and the Eagan office was approved.
“It doesn’t make sense, everything is the same minus the location,” Berland said. “So why was one approved and one wasn’t approved?”
The termination letter said the Bloomington center was denied because they failed to disclose a managing employee during a site visit. Berland disputes that and said she already submitted an appeal.
“We were told to keep running, keep continuing as we are while we go through this process,” she said. “It just means that we don’t have the money coming in.”
Josh Berg with Accessible Space says they’re also in limbo. Berg said they offer integrated community supports, which means caretakers provide in-unit assistance for people with spinal cord injuries and disabilities.
“Most of the folks that we support are wheelchair-bound,” Berg said. “Helping with meals, helping with medications, helping them just live their lives.”
Berg said that of the seven locations where people are housed, the Department of Human Services terminated five and approved two. He believes the timeline to conduct this revalidation process was too aggressive. He said Accessible Space has also submitted an appeal.
“We’re not able to bill for services, we’re not able to start new services for anybody or change any of the supports that they receive,” he said.
Both Berg and Berland say they agree fraud needs to be dealt with, but they hope Minnesotans who truly need services aren’t left without the services they need.
“Not just the clients rely on services, but the families do too, so we can’t stop services; that’s not an option on our plate,” Berland said. “We want to continue to provide these services; they are medically necessary.”
The Minnesota Department of Human Services said a disenrollment letter could be sent for a few reasons, including failure to submit revalidation application after two notification attempts, failure to provide all requested documents within the required timeframe and failure to meet the criteria required during an on-site visit.
A spokesperson for the Department of Human Services said it’s currently in the process of compiling data from the thousands of applications, but didn’t say when the department would share those final numbers.
Minnesota
Minnesota GOP disavows Chauvin moment of silence at convention
Social media slams Netflix’s Kevin Hart roast
Some online users shared their reactions to jokes told about George Floyd and Charlie Kirk at Netflix’s “The Roast of Kevin Hart.”
The Minnesota Republican Party is distancing itself from a moment of silence held for Derek Chauvin during its state convention, saying the gesture was not part of leadership planning, not included in the official program, and should not be interpreted as a party position.
GOP officials said in a Monday, June 1 Facebook post that the recognition of the former Minneapolis police officer, who was convicted in the killing of George Floyd in 2020, emerged from a spontaneous delegate motion on the convention floor and was not initiated or endorsed by leadership.
The controversy quickly escalated after state leaders, civil rights attorneys and Democratic lawmakers condemned the action, describing it as deeply harmful to Floyd’s family and inconsistent with accountability under the law.
The moment of silence took place during the party’s annual gathering in Duluth on May 30 and comes just days after the sixth anniversary of Floyd’s murder in Minneapolis, an event that reshaped national debates over policing and racial justice.
Republican Party of Minnesota says gesture was not leadership action
In a statement, the Republican Party of Minnesota said the recognition of Derek Chauvin originated as a delegate request during floor proceedings at the convention in Duluth and was handled under standard rules of order.
Party officials emphasized that convention leadership, including chair Danny Nadeau, did not propose the motion. The statement said leadership’s role was procedural only, and that presiding over the motion did not reflect agreement with or endorsement of its subject matter.
Officials reiterated that the convention agenda itself did not include any planned recognition of Chauvin and said the episode should not be interpreted as a leadership-driven decision or policy stance.
Minnesota attorney general calls action ‘profound cruelty’
Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, who led the prosecution of Chauvin, sharply criticized the gesture, calling it an “act of profound cruelty” toward the Floyd family.
Ellison said the timing, so close to the anniversary of Floyd’s death, compounded the harm.
He said honoring Chauvin “dishonors the memory of George Floyd and wounds his loved ones all over again,” and called it “disturbing” to recognize someone convicted of violating his oath as a police officer.
Ellison also said the action was “disrespectful” to law enforcement officers who serve honorably, and reaffirmed that courts had already upheld Chauvin’s conviction through multiple appeals.
Broader backlash and political fallout
Democratic state Rep. Jamie Long called the moment of silence “disgusting,” arguing that Republicans chose to honor a convicted murderer rather than victims of violence or service members.
The gesture also drew criticism from civil rights attorneys Ben Crump and Antonio Romanucci, who represented George Floyd’s family in its civil case after his death. The attorneys called the moment of silence immoral and demanded a retraction and apology, saying it disrespected both the Floyd family and the broader public record of Chauvin’s conviction.
Floyd was killed on May 25, 2020, when Chauvin, a white former Minneapolis police officer, knelt on his neck for more than nine minutes. Chauvin was later convicted of second-degree murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter, and sentenced to 22½ years in state prison.
The killing sparked global protests and became a defining moment in the Black Lives Matter movement and debates over policing in the United States.
Chauvin’s conviction has been upheld through multiple appeals, including a denial by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2023, and he is serving his sentence in federal custody.
Party officials say despite the controversy, their focus remains on candidate endorsements and upcoming elections, not the floor action that triggered the backlash.
Reporter Anthony Thompson can be reached at ajthompson@usatodayco.com, or on X @athompsonUSAT.
-
Politics8 minutes agoHilton and Becerra lead California’s unsettled governor’s race; Steyer faces elimination
-
Sports16 minutes ago‘SNL’ star Marcello Hernández to host 2026 ESPYs as show leaves L.A. for New York
-
World26 minutes agoUS House passes Iran war powers resolution in rare moment of Trump backlash
-
News53 minutes agoHouse votes to rein in Trump on Iran as war loses GOP support
-
Los Angeles, Ca2 hours agoPolice investigate deadly stabbing in Tarzana; suspect in custody
-
Detroit, MI3 hours agoDetroit Tigers sweep Tampa Bay Rays in win as Dillon Dingler stays hot
-
San Francisco, CA3 hours agoRetired San Francisco firefighter dies from lung cancer after Blue Shield denies treatment claims
-
Dallas, TX3 hours agoTrackdown: Dallas 7-Eleven robbery suspect wanted