Connect with us

Iowa

Officials weigh further searches of precarious partially collapsed apartment building as 5 residents remain unaccounted for | CNN

Published

on

Officials weigh further searches of precarious partially collapsed apartment building as 5 residents remain unaccounted for | CNN




CNN
 — 

Officials in Davenport, Iowa, say they’re carefully assessing whether rescuers can further search a partially collapsed apartment building – which they say can topple at any moment – for missing residents before they order the structure demolished.

Five people are unaccounted for after the back portion of the six-story structure collapsed Sunday afternoon, and officials believe two of those missing may still be in the building, Mayor Mike Matson said Tuesday.

On Tuesday afternoon, emergency crews reentered the building and rescued several animals as they searched portions that engineers believed were safe enough to explore – but they did not detect signs of human survivors, the city said.

Advertisement

Officials are determining whether further searches are possible as the “extremely volatile” wreckage threatens to crumple even further and poses a significant safety risk for crews who may enter, Davenport Fire Marshal Jim Morris said at a news conference Tuesday.

The debris from Sunday’s collapse is currently helping to hold the building up, according to Larry Sandhaas, a structural engineer hired by the city.

“You can’t run up to a pile of bricks and rocks and just start throwing things off – as much as we want to,” Morris said at Tuesday’s news conference, becoming emotional several times as he spoke. “It’s not that we don’t want to do this. It’s the fact that we have to do it in a safe manner. … We’re going to reevaluate how safe we can be in order to get in there and not currently make the situation any worse.”

News that the city was weighing the building’s demolition drew protesters this week to the property – demonstrators who were concerned some residents could still be trapped, CNN affiliate Quad-City Times reported. Some held signs reading, “Who is in the rubble?” and “Find them first!!”

The city had initially indicated in an online post Monday that demolition was expected to start Tuesday morning, with an official later adding a demolition was necessary “to maintain as much safety for the surrounding area as possible.”

Advertisement

A ninth survivor ended up being rescued from the site that day, the mayor said. By Tuesday morning, the city government posted that the timing of the demolition “is still being evaluated,” though initial phases of the process, such as permitting and staging of equipment, would begin Tuesday.

Besides the nine rescued, more than a dozen others were escorted from the site following the collapse, officials said. The cause of the collapse has not been determined.

Rescue and recovery crews have performed multiple searches of the structure using dogs, drones, thermal imaging, infrared and trained rescuers, but found no additional signs of life, Davenport Fire Chief Mike Carlsten said.

All of the building’s residents have been displaced, with city officials saying they will not be allowed back into the building to collect their belongings.

With officials yet to announce when the building will be demolished, the family of a resident it says is missing wants the city to carry out further searches before razing the site.

Advertisement

The resident was supposed to meet his family on the evening of the collapse, but never made it to the gathering, one of the person’s cousins, Mike Collier, told CNN affiliate KWQC.

“We believe him to be down in the rubble, and they’re trying to tear down the building and I don’t believe that’s right,” Collier told KWQC on Tuesday morning.

“I’ve got a mix of emotions right now. I just want to see my cousin alive,” he said. “I just want them to do the right thing.”

The way the building collapsed “reduces the chances that there will be spaces – what we call void spaces – large spaces where people can survive,” Sandhaas, the structural engineer who assessed the building, said.

Five residents of the six-story apartment building remained unaccounted for, including two who may still be in the building, officials said.

“We understand that this is an unthinkable situation, especially for the families that are involved and impacted by this event,” Matson said Tuesday.

A family member of missing resident Ryan Hitchcock says his loved ones have come to terms with the likelihood that he did not survive and that the family supports the city’s plan to take down the rest of the building to prevent further harm.

Advertisement

“I don’t discount that he could be trapped under there miraculously,” Hitchcock’s relative Amy Anderson said at the city’s Tuesday news conference. “But we don’t want to see any more families lose their lives or anybody else be injured in trying to remove that rubble and have anything fall.”

Morris, the fire marshal, said his department is partnering with other groups to determine how “to remove any possible human remains with dignity.”

“I will not allow them to use explosives in a heavily populated downtown area,” Morris said. “This would be a coordinated demolition.”

The cause of the catastrophe has still not been determined, officials have said, but the city plans to turn over documentation including videos, photo and logs to an investigative team, Matson said.

The agency that will lead the investigation has yet to be determined, the mayor said.

Advertisement

“At this time, we have not gotten to the point where we have determined whether a criminal offense has occurred in order to initiate a criminal investigation,” Morris said. “Regardless of what happens, there will be an investigation into how this happened. There must be.”

A rescue crew assembles near the collapse site on Tuesday.

The building’s owner had current permits for repairs to the exterior wall, according to officials.

Images of piled rubble and the building’s exposed interior rooms evoked memories of the 2021 condo building collapse in Surfside, Florida, that killed 98 people, as well as a recent New York City parking garage collapse that killed one person and injured at least five.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Iowa

KTIV receives 6 awards from the Iowa Broadcasters Association

Published

on

KTIV receives 6 awards from the Iowa Broadcasters Association


SIOUX CITY (KTIV) – Members of KTIV were in Des Moines, Iowa Thursday, June 12, for the Iowa Broadcasters Association’s Award Ceremony.

The association, which promotes over-the-air broadcasting like radio and television, awarded KTIV six awards. Each award was for the Small Market TV category and is listed below.

  • Breaking News Award for Siouxland’s Historic June 2024 Flooding
  • Digital Excellence Award for Siouxland’s Historic June 2024 Flooding
  • Election Coverage Award for the Iowa Caucuses
  • News Special or Documentary Award for KTIV’s special “The Town Too Tough To Die: Pilger Tornado 10 Years Later”
  • Outstanding Public Service Campaign for the Mighty Mo Run
  • Outstanding Station Promotion for KTIV’s Santa Tracker
KTIV was in Des Moines, Iowa on Thursday, June 12, for the IBA Awards.(KTIV)

Want to get the latest news and weather from Siouxland’s News Source? Follow these links to download our KTIV News app and our First Alert Weather app.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Iowa

Reynolds vetoes Iowa bill aimed at limiting eminent domain for carbon pipelines

Published

on

Reynolds vetoes Iowa bill aimed at limiting eminent domain for carbon pipelines


Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds vetoed a bill Wednesday that would have made it more difficult for companies to use eminent domain to build carbon capture pipelines and other energy infrastructure.

In her veto message, Reynolds said the bill is not just about eminent domain.

“It goes much further — and in doing so, sets a troubling precedent that threatens Iowa’s energy reliability, economy and reputation as a place where businesses can invest with confidence,” she said.

Reynolds said the bill’s insurance mandates and 25-year permit limit would even block pipeline projects that use only voluntary agreements with landowners.

Advertisement

“I understand this was not the intent,” she said. “Those who crafted the bill said they don’t want to stop CO2 pipelines that rely entirely on voluntary agreements. But that is exactly what the bill does. For that reason alone, I cannot sign it.”

Reynolds also raised concerns about the bill’s changes to permitting rules for other types of pipelines, including those that transport oil, gas and fertilizer. She also said the bill would put Iowa at a competitive disadvantage for biofuels production as other Midwestern states move forward with carbon capture projects.

She said she is “committed to working with the Legislature to strengthen landowner protections, modernize permitting, and respect private property.” In the meantime, Reynolds said she is asking Iowa Utilities Commission members to be present for live testimony and informational meetings, which would have been required by the bill she vetoed.

“Those who crafted the bill said they don’t want to stop CO2 pipelines that rely entirely on voluntary agreements. But that is exactly what the bill does. For that reason alone, I cannot sign it.”

Gov. Kim Reynolds

Advertisement

House Speaker Pat Grassley, R-New Hartford, said he has asked House members to sign a petition to hold a special session to override the governor’s veto.

“This veto is a major setback for Iowa,” Grassley said in a statement. “It is a setback not only for landowners who have been fighting across Iowa, but for the work the House of Representatives has put in for four years to get legislation like HF639 passed. We will not stop fighting and stand firm on our commitment until landowners in Iowa are protected against eminent domain for private gain.”

Lawmakers can override a veto if two-thirds of the members of each chamber vote to pass the bill again.

Senate Majority Leader Jack Whitver, R-Grimes, said he supports Reynolds’ decision.

“Based on the votes on that bill in the Iowa Senate, a significant majority of our caucus supports a better policy to protect landowner rights,” he said. “I expect that majority of our caucus would not be interested in any attempt to override her veto.”

Advertisement

Katarina Sostaric

/

Iowa Public Radio

Eminent domain bill supporters in red shirts and opponents in blue shirts watched as the Iowa Senate debated a bill to limit eminent domain for carbon pipelines May 12, 2025.

Iowans who oppose the use of eminent domain for the Summit Carbon Solutions carbon capture pipeline have fought for years to get a bill passed that would prevent the company from acquiring land from unwilling landowners in its path. State utility regulators gave Summit Carbon Solutions conditional approval last year to use eminent domain for the project.

Advertisement

This year, 12 Republican senators defied their leaders and forced a vote on a bill aimed at further restricting eminent domain and pipeline projects. After a contentious, late night debate in which GOP senators publicly argued with each other about the potential impact of the bill, 13 Republicans joined with 14 Democrats to pass it.

Senate Democratic Leader Janice Weiner of Iowa City said she was disappointed by the veto but not surprised.

“There is simply no amount of political posturing or legislative stonewalling that can deny the fact that Iowans’ right to private property should never be infringed upon for private gain,” she said.

House Minority Leader Brian Meyer, D-Des Moines, said Reynolds sided with her political donors rather than Iowa landowners.

“Iowa House Democrats and Republicans worked together to protect property rights,” he said. “At the end of the day, there is only one group to blame for the failure of the eminent domain bill: Iowa Republican lawmakers.”

Advertisement

Summit Carbon Solutions thanked the governor for her “thoughtful and thorough review of the bill.”

“We look forward to continued discussions with state leaders as we advance this important project,” Summit’s statement reads. “At a time when farmers are facing increasing pressures, this project opens the door to new markets and helps strengthen America’s energy dominance for the long term.”

Supporters and opponents of the bill have disagreed about its impact

The Summit Carbon Solutions pipeline would transport carbon dioxide emissions from ethanol plants in Iowa, Nebraska, South Dakota and Minnesota to be sequestered underground in North Dakota. Biofuels producers have said the project is needed to create new markets for low-carbon fuels, which they said would increase demand for corn and boost Iowa’s economy.

Monte Shaw, executive director of the Iowa Renewable Fuels Association (IRFA), thanked Reynolds for vetoing the bill.

“Any thoughtful review of this bill would determine that it would lead to higher energy prices for Iowans, hamper future economic development, hold back job creation and stifle new markets for Iowa farmers,” he said. “IRFA thanks Gov. Reynolds for listening to Iowans, studying the actual legislation and ignoring the rhetoric that was as inaccurate as it was loud.”

Advertisement

Shaw said the bill would not have enhanced property owner rights, and that it simply sought to kill carbon capture pipelines.

Iowans living in or near the path of proposed carbon pipelines rallied at the Statehouse in support of a bill that would restrict the use of eminent domain for such projects.

Madeleine Charis King

/

Iowa Public Radio

Advertisement
Iowans living in or near the path of proposed carbon pipelines rallied at the Statehouse in support of a bill that would have restricted the use of eminent domain for such projects.

Landowners facing the use of eminent domain have said the bill wouldn’t stop any pipelines — but it would have leveled the playing field for affected landowners and their neighbors.

Mary Powell, an affected landowner from Shelby County, said last month the bill was a reasonable, common sense measure to help protect Iowans’ rights to have control over their land.

“The issue at hand is not a partisan issue,” she said. “It’s not about Democrats or Republicans or who has the most money to push through their private agenda for private gain. It’s about taking a stand and protecting the rights of Iowans. It’s about holding the pipeline companies and those in public office accountable.”

Rep. Charley Thomson, R-Charles City, said he wrote the bill. He recently wrote on Facebook that the bill is “a relatively tepid first step toward fixing Iowa’s broken pipeline permitting system.”

“The entire CO2 pipeline project is based on lies, so I’m not the least surprised that the CO2 pipeline crowd launched a blizzard of lies in their attacks on HF639,” he wrote.

Advertisement

What would the bill have done?    

The bill says a hazardous liquid pipeline can only use eminent domain if it is a common carrier, which is defined as transporting a commodity for entities not affiliated with the pipeline company.

A company seeking to use eminent domain would have to establish “by clear and convincing evidence that the proposed use meets the definition of a public use, public purpose, or public improvement.”

The bill would have established insurance requirements for hazardous liquid pipelines that would’ve included coverage for landowners who couldn’t get insurance or whose premiums rose as a result of the pipeline.

Pipelines transporting carbon dioxide would have also been prohibited from operating for longer than 25 years, and the Iowa Utilities Commission (IUC) would’ve not be allowed to renew a permit granted to a carbon pipeline.

The bill would have put in place requirements for IUC members to attend hearings and informational meetings regarding the proposed use of eminent domain — something Reynolds said she is asking ICU members to do. It would’ve specified who could intervene in IUC proceedings, and limited the situations in which the IUC could impose sanctions on interveners.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Iowa

Iowa high school co-ed state golf: Cedar Falls, Grundy Center take home titles

Published

on

Iowa high school co-ed state golf: Cedar Falls, Grundy Center take home titles


play

The 2025 Iowa high school golf season is in the books following the conclusion of the state co-ed golf tournament on June 10.

In Class 2A, the duo of Molly Ratchford and Anthony Galvin from Cedar Falls took home the state title at the Cedar Pointe Golf Course in Boone. The pair shot a combined 68, claiming the crown by two strokes over the team from Cedar Rapids Washington, Jane Petersen and Preston Haefner.

Advertisement

The third-place team in 2A was Natalie Henson and Ty Faltys from Marshalltown, who shot a 74.

In Class 1A, the duo of Leah Larson and Judd Jirovsky from Grundy Center won the state co-ed crown with a score of 75 at the American Legion Golf Course in Marshalltown. Another Grundy Center duo, Avery Knutsen and Preston Martens, claimed second place. They finished just two strokes behind Larson and Jirovsky with a 77.

Advertisement

Finishing in third place was Woodward-Granger’s team of Mallory Polito and Max Behrens, who also shot a 77.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending