Iowa
8 ways Trump’s ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ will affect Iowans, from rural hospitals to biofuels
Trump signs his sweeping tax and spending bill on the Fourth of July
President Donald Trump signed his sweeping tax cut and spending bill on the Fourth of July.
Big changes are coming to Iowans’ health care, taxes, nutrition assistance, energy generation and student loans — courtesy of President Donald Trump’s “One Big, Beautiful Bill Act.”
Trump signed the law July 4 in a ceremony at the White House after all six of Iowa’s Republican members of Congress voted for the legislation. And over the next few years, Iowans can expect its impact to affect their lives in a variety of ways.
The law makes permanent a set of 2017 tax cuts that Trump signed during his first term, as well as cutting taxes on tips and overtime pay and boosting spending on border security and the military.
It cuts Medicaid spending by about $1 trillion over a decade, which is expected to lead to 11.8 million people becoming uninsured, and cuts nearly $200 billion in spending on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, according to estimates from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.
It also is projected to increase deficits by about $3.4 trillion over the next 10 years, according to the CBO.
Here are eight ways the law will affect Iowans.
Federal spending on Iowa Medicaid could decrease by billions
The law makes major changes to Medicaid, the federal program that provides health care to low-income and disabled Americans, and it reduces spending by nearly $1 trillion over 10 years.
A KFF analysis found that Iowa will see federal Medicaid spending decrease between $8 billion and $14 billion over the next 10 years as a result.
“This bill was not framed as a health care reform effort,” said Larry Levitt, executive vice president for health policy at KFF. “But it represents the biggest change to the health care system since the passage of the Affordable Care Act 15 years ago.”
The law will require states, which administer Medicaid, to perform eligibility checks twice a year instead of once annually. And states will have to set up systems to verify a person’s employment or exemption status.
The legislation requires “able-bodied” Medicaid recipients to work 80 hours a month, although some people will qualify for an exemption, such as students, caregivers or those with a disability.
Republicans say the changes will strengthen Medicaid by reducing fraud, waste and abuse.
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has projected that 11.8 million Americans could lose Medicaid coverage over the next decade as a result of the law.
In Iowa, Democrats on the House Joint Economic Committee estimate that 113,979 people could lose health care coverage. That includes coverage through Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act.
Iowa’s Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds signed legislation earlier this year requiring new work requirements for tens of thousands of Iowans seeking Medicaid. But those requirements won’t kick in until the state gets a waiver approved by the Trump administration.
It’s not clear how the new federal law will affect Iowa’s law. Many of the provisions will be phased in over time, Levitt said.
“We’re not all going to wake up one morning and find millions more people uninsured,” he said.
The Congressional Budget Office has cautioned that it can’t know how states will respond to and implement these changes, causing major uncertainty in their cost estimates.
Rural hospitals brace for ‘profound’ negative effect
Rural hospitals are expected to be hit particularly hard by the Medicaid changes.
In Iowa, rural hospitals account for 67.8% of all community hospitals, according to KFF.
According to a KFF analysis, Iowa will see an estimated $4.45 billion reduction in federal Medicaid spending in rural areas over the next decade as a result of the law.
Iowa Hospital Association President and CEO Chris Mitchell said even a conservative estimate of the loss of funding, which he pegs at $3.5 billion, would have a “profound” negative effect on Iowa hospitals, “particularly ones in rural areas.”
Republicans included a $50 billion stabilization fund for rural hospitals to try to offset some of those negative effects. But experts say it’s far from enough.
Mitchell said the fund “doesn’t really move the needle in mitigating the long-term damages (of) these cuts.”
A June 12 letter from four Democratic U.S. senators identifies two Iowa hospitals that are at risk of closing or losing services from the law: MercyOne’s Newton Medical Center and the Manning Regional Healthcare Center.
Mitchell said he couldn’t speak to the data underlying that report.
“But, for the larger question, are there hospitals at risk today as a result of the passage of the ‘big, beautiful bill’? I would say yes,” he said.
Even though many of the law’s biggest Medicaid provisions won’t take effect immediately, Mitchell said hospitals already need to make decisions about how they will adjust their business models to account for future changes.
“Rural hospitals as we stand today are already operating on razor-thin margins,” he said. “… A lot of the questions are: Do we eliminate service? Do we reduce staff? Do we think about closure?”
Law extends tax cuts, expands child tax credit, creates new breaks for tips and overtime wages
The law extends the 2017 tax cuts Trump signed during his first term in office.
It keeps in place the seven tax brackets created in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, with a bottom rate of 10% for lower earners and a top rate of 37% for higher earners.
Starting in tax year 2025, the law permanently increases the standard deduction to $15,750 for single filers, $23,625 for heads of household and $31,500 for joint filers. There are adjustments for inflation after 2025.
Without the law, U.S. Sen. Chuck Grassley’s office said “the average Iowa household’s taxes would increase by $2,063.”
It also includes new tax breaks for tipped wages and overtime for tax years 2025 through 2028.
Workers will be able to deduct up to $25,000 in tips (so long as they “customarily and regularly” receive them, as servers do) and $12,500 in overtime pay.
And seniors 65 years old and older will see a $6,000 federal income tax deduction from 2025 through 2028, intended to offset Social Security taxes. The deduction tapers off for those making at least $75,000 per year.
That’ll compound benefits such as Iowa’s exemption of retirement income from the state income tax, Iowans for Tax Relief President Chris Hagenow said.
“We obviously have an older population in Iowa, and any benefit to senior citizens is going to be felt strongly in Iowa,” Hagenow said. “… It’s another benefit that can help retirees stay in their homes longer, stay in the state, and that can be a good thing for Iowa.”
The law expands the child tax credit from $2,000 to $2,200 and ties the amount to inflation so it will increase further in the future, according to Grassley’s office.
Plus, taxpayers can write off up to $40,000 in state and local taxes, or SALT, from their federal taxes. That’ll give a bigger tax deduction to Americans in high-tax states such as California.
“Sometimes that’s cast as a red-state-versus-blue-state thing, but property taxes have gotten so high in Iowa that that is going to provide relief for a growing number of Iowans,” Hagenow said.
Estate taxes exemptions ‘bolster farmers’ financial stability’
Beginning in 2026, the law permanently increases the estate tax exemption to $15 million. Under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which had been set to expire, the exemption was $10 million.
The estate tax is beneficial for farmers passing land and expensive farm property down to their children.
“These measures bolster farmers’ financial stability, allowing them to invest in their operations and pass family farms to the next generation without the lingering fear of excessive tax penalties,” Iowa Agriculture Secretary Mike Naig said in a statement.
23,000 Iowans live in a household that could lose some SNAP benefits, estimate says
The law reduces federal spending on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program by roughly $186 billion over a decade.
It expands work requirements for the program by extending them to people aged 55 to 64, as well as parents of children 14 and older, veterans, people experiencing homelessness and young adults who have aged out of the foster care system.
The left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities estimates that 23,000 Iowans live in a household that could lose at least some benefits, and 15,000 of those people are at risk of losing their benefits entirely.
About 264,000 Iowans were enrolled in SNAP as of March, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
The law also puts states on the hook for more of the cost of running the SNAP program, and for the first time states could be responsible for paying for some SNAP benefits.
Previously, the federal government and states equally split the cost of running the program. But under the new law, states will pay 75% of administrative costs beginning in fiscal year 2027.
Luke Elzinga, chair of the Iowa Hunger Coalition, said that could cost Iowa $13 million to $15 million per year.
And the law says if states have a SNAP payment error rate above 6%, they must pay a percentage of the cost of SNAP benefits for the first time.
Iowa’s SNAP payment error rate — including overpayments and underpayments — recently rose to 6.14% in fiscal year 2024.
If the rate remains above 6%, Elzinga said the state could be on the hook for roughly $27 million in benefits costs beginning in fiscal year 2028. That amount could be higher if Iowa’s payment error rate rises above 8% or 10%.
Conversely, if Iowa drops its error rate below 6%, it would not be required to pay any SNAP benefit costs.
Clean energy tax credit changes boost biofuels, phase out wind and solar
Several changes to clean energy tax credits boost to biofuels, while phasing out incentives for wind and solar power.
The law extends the Clean Fuel Production Credit, known as 45Z, through 2029.
The tax credit can be claimed by producers of low-emission transportation fuel, including sustainable aviation fuel, as long as the fuel is produced from feedstock grown in the United States, Mexico and Canada.
It also extends the small agri-biodiesel tax credit through 2026 and boosts the amount from $0.10 to $0.20 per gallon. And the law raises reference prices for soybeans to $10 per bushel, with annual increases for inflation beginning in 2031.
The law phases out tax credits for wind and solar projects in two years, limiting companies from claiming the credits unless their projects are “placed in service” by Dec. 31, 2027.
Grinnell College will see tax cut instead of major increase under final law
While the law hikes tax rates on colleges with large endowments, one Iowa school will receive a tax cut instead.
The law raises the tax on endowments at private colleges and universities from a 1.4% rate set in 2017.
But the new law applies only to schools with more than 3,000 students, while the old law kicked in for schools with more than 500 students.
That means that Grinnell College, which has about 1,750 students and has been paying about $2.4 million per year in taxes under the 1.4% rate, will no longer see its endowment taxed.
An earlier version of the legislation, which passed the U.S. House on May 22, would have raised the endowment tax to 21%, which would have increased Grinnell’s tax bill to about $30 million per year.
“In those early days of the House bill, we were facing a pretty existential moment of going from paying $2.4 million to $30 million,” Grinnell College President Anne Harris said in an interview.
Grinnell, which has an endowment worth $2.67 billion as of June 30, 2024, is the only Iowa school affected by the law.
Harris said the college expects to use some of the savings from the tax cut to increase financial aid to students.
Grinnell relies on its endowment for more than 60% of its annual operating budget and provided students with $67 million in financial aid from the endowment last year.
Federal student loan borrowers to see big changes
Federal student loan borrowers will soon see major changes to loan options and repayment plans available.
By 2028, the law streamlines and phases out multiple federal student loan repayment plans, leaving new borrowers to choose one of only two repayment plans: a new Repayment Assistance Plan or a standard plan.
The standard repayment plan remains the same and structures the loan based on the amount borrowed, typically ranging from 10 to 25 years.
The Repayment Assistance Plan revamps income-driven repayment options, allowing borrowers to pay a percentage of their discretionary income, between 1% and 10%.
It also eliminates the Graduate PLUS Program, which allows graduate and professional school students to cover the full cost of attendance. Currently enrolled Graduate PLUS loan borrowers would be grandfathered in and could access these loans for the next few years until they graduate.
New graduate student loan borrowers will see lifetime loan caps of $100,000 ($20,500 per year) and $200,000 ($50,000 per year) for medical and law students.
Parent PLUS loans will now be capped at $65,000 and will not be eligible for repayment programs.
Starting with loans issued after July 1, 2027, borrowers who have lost jobs or face another financial hardship will no longer be able to pause payments.
“The changes the bill makes related to higher education are really going to target low- and middle-income class families,” said Betsy Mayotte, president of The Institute of Student Loan Advisors. “… It’s also going to affect higher education access and choice for those income levels.”
Mayotte said new loan borrowing limits likely will disproportionately affect nontraditional students, including working parents or those who work and can’t afford to attend school full-time.
Currently, students can access the full annual loan limit if they’re enrolled at least half-time. Under the law, annual loan limits will be prorated based on whether a student is enrolled full-time or half-time. The limit will be halved for half-time students.
“I think that’s going to bar a lot of the working parents and older borrowers that are currently attending school from being able to attend,” Mayotte said.
USA TODAY contributed to this report.
Brianne Pfannenstiel is the chief politics reporter for the Des Moines Register. Reach her at bpfann@dmreg.com or 515-284-8244. Follow her on X at @brianneDMR.
Stephen Gruber-Miller covers the Iowa Statehouse and politics for the Des Moines Register. He can be reached by email at sgrubermil@registermedia.com or by phone at 515-284-8169. Follow him on Twitter at @sgrubermiller.
Marissa Payne covers the Iowa Statehouse and politics for the Des Moines Register. Reach her by email at mjpayne@registermedia.com. Follow her on X, formerly known as Twitter, at @marissajpayne.
Iowa
Iowa woman accused of pandering for prostitution and harassment after incidents at Casey’s and a daycare
AURELIA, Iowa (KTIV) – A Northwest Iowa woman is facing charges of harassment and pandering for prostitution after two incidents took place in December 2025.
Forty-seven-year-old Kristal Miller of Odebolt was taken into custody on an arrest warrant and faces three charges: one count of pandering for prostitution and two counts of first-degree harassment, according to court documents.
The charges stem from two separate incidents that took place on Thursday, Dec. 18. 2025.
According to court documents, at 6:15 a.m., Miller reportedly went to the Casey’s General Store, located at 100 Pearl St. in Aurelia. Documents state Miller approached an employee and customers, requesting money from them.
Authorities state Miller claimed she was wanted by the FBI and told people, if anyone called the police, “she would kill them.”
During this encounter, she also allegedly asked an employee to remove the string from her hooded sweatshirt. Documents state when the employee refused this request, she threatened to strangle them.
That same day at 7 a.m., Miller reportedly approached a female employee outside an Aurelia daycare and asked them for money.
Court documents stated Miller suggested the unnamed employee leave her boyfriend. Miller reportedly told the employee, if she did, then she and Miller would both be paid.
Authorities say when she was told no by the employee, Miller became upset and started yelling at them.
Miller also allegedly threatened to “steal her car” and ”take her away to her guys to start a new life.”
She was booked into the Cherokee County Jail on a cash-only bond of $5,000. A preliminary hearing has been scheduled in Cherokee for Friday, Jan. 9, at 10 a.m.
Want to get the latest news and weather from Siouxland’s News Source? Follow these links to download our KTIV News app and our First Alert Weather app.
Copyright 2026 KTIV. All rights reserved.
Iowa
Iowa law on police appeals ‘constitutionally vacuous,’ prosecutor says
The Iowa Supreme Court’s 2025-2026 docket is filled with key cases
Iowa’s top court has a busy schedule as it launches into a new term this fall, delving into cases involving subjects including bullying and TikTok.
A feud between two Jefferson County officials has landed before the Iowa Supreme Court, which must decide if a 2024 addition to Iowa’s Rights of Peace Officers law is unconstitutional.
Jefferson County Attorney Chauncey Moulding is asking the state’s high court to overturn what he calls the “constitutionally vacuous” law, which allows officers to petition the courts to be removed from their county’s Brady-Giglio list.
Named for two U.S. Supreme Court decisions, the lists compiled by prosecutors identify law enforcement officers and others whose credibility is in question, and it can provide grounds for questioning their testimony in court.
After a dispute over a case involving a sheriff’s deputy’s use of force, Moulding in 2024 notified Jefferson County Sheriff Bart Richmond he was placing him on the Brady-Giglio list. Richmond petitioned a court to reverse Moulding’s decision, and a district judge did, finding Richmond’s actions in connection with the case, while unprofessional, did not bring his honesty or credibility into question.
In his appeal, Moulding argues that’s not up to the court to decide, and that the law lets judges improperly intrude on prosecutors’ professional judgment and, ultimately, defendants’ rights.
“The practical real application of (the 2024 law) is to create a Kafkaesque scenario where a criminal defendant could face the prospect of criminal charges involving a State witness who is so lacking in credibility that the State’s attorney has qualms about even calling him to testify, but is prevented from disclosure,” Moulding wrote. “Such a situation is unconscionable, and underlines the constitutional vacuousness of the statute itself.”
The court has not yet scheduled arguments for the case, which could have impacts far beyond Jefferson County. Attorney Charles Gribble, representing Richmond, said this is just one of three Iowa Brady-Giglio appeals he personally is involved in.
What is a Brady-Giglio list?
Under the Fifth Amendment, criminal defendants are entitled to due process of law. In Brady v. Maryland in 1963 and in subsequent cases the U.S. Supreme Court held that due process requires a prosecutor to disclose any known exculpatory evidence to the defense. That includes anything giving rise to doubts about the credibility of the prosecution’s witnesses, including law enforcement officers.
In 2022, Iowa formalized that process by mandating prosecuting agencies maintain a Brady-Giglio list of officers whose credibility can be questioned due to past dishonesty or other misconduct. The law requires agencies to notify officers when they are being put on a list and allows them to seek reconsideration.
Being placed on a list can damage or destroy an officer’s career, as prosecutors generally will decline to call them as witnesses or to bring charges that would depend on their testimony.
2024 law gives courts a role in Brady-Giglio lists
Iowa’s 2024 law went beyond requiring officers be notified of their placement on a Brady-Giglio list by giving them the right to appeal to a district court if their prosecuting agency refuses to take them off a list. The law requires judges to confidentially review evidence and allows them to affirm, modify or reverse an officer’s Brady-Giglio listing “as justice may require.”
In less than two years, courts have reversed local prosecutors on several Brady-Giglio placements, including a messy Henry County dispute in which prosecutors accused a sheriff’s deputy of making misleading statements on a search warrant application.
What happened in Jefferson County?
The lawsuit before the Iowa Supreme Court involves an April 2024 traffic stop by a Jefferson County deputy. As laid out in a subsequent memo by Moulding, video recordings show the deputy handling the driver roughly and, when the man complains, telling him “I can do whatever I want” and, “You’re not going to tell me what I can and can’t do. … You’re going to learn what respect is, young man.”
After learning about the incident, Moulding wrote, he repeatedly emailed Richmond, asking if the deputy’s actions had violated any county policies. Richmond did not respond. Concerned about possible litigation against the county, Moulding then asked another county to conduct an investigation. While the details are disputed, Moulding accuses Richmond of stonewalling both his office and the outside investigators and instructing his subordinates also not to cooperate.
“A county sheriff ordering deputies not to cooperate with an inquiry into a deputy’s use of force represents a fundamental lapse in judgment and raised serious concerns regarding the Sheriff’s honesty, candor and ethics as a law enforcement official,” Moulding wrote.
He scheduled a meeting that Richmond did not attend and then placed him on the county’s Brady-Giglio list. In an emailed statement, Moulding called the entire matter “unfortunate.”
“Frankly, I am shocked that instead of attempting to address this matter with my office cooperatively, the Sheriff instead decided to stonewall an investigation, stonewall the Brady-Giglio investigation, and then take this matter to court instead of sitting down and addressing the matter like an adult and an elected official,” he said.
In a letter, Moulding warned Richmond that he would no longer be called as a law enforcement witness and advised him to limit his involvement with criminal investigations, as “your engagement in such activities could likely negatively impact the outcomes in court.”
Judge disagrees with sheriff’s placement on list
After Moulding denied Richmond’s request for reconsideration, Richmond filed suit. In February 2025, Judge Jeffrey Farrell ruled Richmond should be removed from the list.
Farrell’s order criticized both parties, finding that Moulding had failed to comply with some procedural elements of the law but that Richmond could have avoided the whole situation with “basic and professional” responses to Moulding’s emails. Nonetheless, he found Richmond’s actions did not demonstrate dishonesty or deceit that would justify placement on a Brady list.
“This is not a case in which an officer lied to a court, was convicted of a crime, manufactured or destroyed evidence, or committed some other act that would serve as the basis for impeachment in any criminal case,” Farrell wrote. “Game-playing the county attorney is not the standard of professionalism that Iowans expect of our elected county sheriffs,” he added, but does not constitute grounds for a Brady-Giglio listing.
Prosecutor appeals, argues law is unconstitutional
In his appeal, Moulding does not address Farrell’s factual findings, instead asking the court only to decide whether the law is constitutional.
“The most glaring constitutional defect in (the 2024 law) is that it impedes a criminal Defendant’s substantive and procedural due processes of law, and right to a fair trial,” the appeal says. “These fundamental rights constitute the bedrock raisons d’être for the entire body of Brady-Giglio jurisprudence in the first place.”
Iowa appears to be the only state with a law allowing officers to sue to be removed from a Brad-Giglio list, but Moulding cites a recent federal lawsuit where a judge rejected a South Dakota officer’s attempt to get removed from a list, finding the request “in essence, asks this Court to require a State’s Attorney to violate the constitution.” He further argues that the law violates the constitutional separation of powers and is “so poorly drafted as to be unenforceable and void for vagueness.”
Sheriff’s attorney says single lapse of judgment is not grounds for listing
Gribble, Richmond’s attorney, argued in his Supreme Court brief that the law is constitutional and that the sheriff’s actions fall well short of Brady-Giglio standards.
“Under (the 2024 law), placement on the Brady-Giglio list results not from a single lapse of judgment but rather from repeated, sustained, intentional and egregious acts over a period of time,” he wrote. “Thus, while a singular act of bad judgement may undermine a police officer’s credibility in a particular case, placement on the Brady-Giglio list places a permanent and unreviewable scarlet letter on the officer that he/she is unlikely to be able to ever overcome.”
He also suggests that a court order removing an officer from a list “does not in any way alter the prosecuting attorney’s duty to provide exculpatory evidence in all cases.” In an interview, he argued there should be a legal distinction between prosecutors disclosing concerns about an officer’s conduct in the case in which it occurred, and doing so in every future case involving them.
“To me, that’s what Brady-Giglio is for, not for occasional or first-time wrongs, even if established of a police officer, but those that have a history of that sort of thing,” he said.
The Supreme Court has not yet set a date for arguments in the case.
William Morris covers courts for the Des Moines Register. He can be contacted at wrmorris2@registermedia.com or 715-573-8166.
Iowa
Univ. of Iowa students practice life-saving skills through realistic medical simulations
IOWA CITY, Iowa (KCRG) – Some students at the University of Iowa are getting hands-on medical experience before the spring semester officially begins — and they’re doing it inside a mobile simulation lab.
Wednesday, Simulation in Motion-Iowa (SIM-IA) brought its high-tech training truck to the university’s main hospital campus during what’s known as “transitions week,” just days before physician assistant students head out on clinical rotations.
Instead of practicing on classmates, students worked through simulated emergency scenarios using lifelike mannequins designed to closely mimic real patients. The mannequins can breathe, blink, sweat, and even go into cardiac arrest — giving students a realistic first taste of what they’ll soon face in hospitals and clinics.
“So they have pulses like you and I, they have lung sounds, breath tones, so they get to practice their patient assessments — their head-to-toes, what they think is wrong with that patient, determine what treatments they’re going to offer and do,” said Lisa Lenz, a Simulation in Motion-Iowa instructor.
Lenz controls the mannequins’ movements and symptoms behind the scenes, adjusting each scenario based on how students respond in real time.
“We can kind of assess and watch and make sure they’re doing the skills that we would expect them to do, we then get to change and flow through our scenario,” Lenz said. “So we start out with a healthy patient, maybe something like chest pains and continue through states of either progression or decline.”
Faculty members say the goal is to help students bridge the gap between classroom learning and real patient care — especially with clinical rotations beginning soon.
“This is now putting book work to the clinical practice,” said Jeremy Nelson, a clinical assistant professor in the university’s Department of PA Studies and Services. “We’re getting them ready to go out to various scenarios.”
Nelson says repetition is key, especially since some medical emergencies are rare while others are unpredictable.
“They may see them 10 times on rotation, they may see them once,” Nelson said. “This gives them that ‘first touch’ so when they do see it they have a better chance of learning more and being engaged and practicing.”
The spring semester at the University of Iowa officially begins January 20 for those students. Faculty say experiences like this help boost confidence and reduce anxiety before students ever step into a real emergency situation.
Copyright 2026 KCRG. All rights reserved.
-
Detroit, MI5 days ago2 hospitalized after shooting on Lodge Freeway in Detroit
-
Technology2 days agoPower bank feature creep is out of control
-
Dallas, TX4 days agoDefensive coordinator candidates who could improve Cowboys’ brutal secondary in 2026
-
Health5 days agoViral New Year reset routine is helping people adopt healthier habits
-
Nebraska2 days agoOregon State LB transfer Dexter Foster commits to Nebraska
-
Iowa2 days agoPat McAfee praises Audi Crooks, plays hype song for Iowa State star
-
Nebraska2 days agoNebraska-based pizza chain Godfather’s Pizza is set to open a new location in Queen Creek
-
Entertainment2 days agoSpotify digs in on podcasts with new Hollywood studios