Connect with us

Indiana

Stephanie White says fans ‘or bots on social media’ are a problem, not Indiana Fever locker room

Published

on

Stephanie White says fans ‘or bots on social media’ are a problem, not Indiana Fever locker room


play

  • Caitlin Clark and coach Stephanie White are dismissing rumors of a rift between them.
  • Speculation began after a heated timeout discussion during a game against Portland.
  • The two again refuted unsubstantiated reports of a sideline interaction and a divided locker room after a win at Connecticut, the Fever’s third straight.

UNCASVILLE, CT — Caitlin Clark and Stephanie White are firmly shutting any rumors, social media speculation or reports on a divide between them or the Indiana Fever locker room. And it’s not the first time they’ve had to do it.

It started when the Fever coach and her star player got into a disagreement during a timeout when Indiana was down big to Portland on May 28. The two were strongly talking to each other, with Clark seeming to throw her arms up in frustration before getting off the bench and standing up, Raven Johnson replacing her in the lineup.

Advertisement

Social media flared with speculation that White and Clark did not like each other or could not work together, especially after that game ended in a 100-84 defeat — their worst loss of the season so far.

But that, of course, was not the case. Clark and White did have a disagreement, but it wasn’t anything more than a coach and a player pushing each other in a frustrating game.

Buy 2026 Indiana Fever tickets!

Advertisement

“It’s two people being competitive, two people who really want to win,” Clark said on June 1. “I think a lot of those things happen all the time, and I know there’s a camera on me, and that’s how it’s going to be, but there are a lot of people out there in the media or on TV who think they know a lot of things, and they’re just blatantly wrong about a lot of things.”

Two weeks later, Clark and White are shutting down rumors that there’s division in the locker room again.

Following an 85-75 win over Connecticut on Saturday night, both Clark and White looked confused when a reporter started a question with “I wanted to address the elephant in the room” about unsubstantiated reports that the two had another interaction on the sideline at the end of the game against the Sun.

Clark received a technical foul (one she said postgame that she “deserved” and that it was “worth it”) for waving goodbye to the Sun crowd. Then, she checked out with 22 seconds left in the game with the Fever up 10 points.

Advertisement

But no such interaction with White happened. And any reports that the Fever locker room is divided, Clark said, has no merit.

“I think it’s speculation,” Clark said with a laugh.

Clark emphatically nodded her head along as White added: “I don’t think you’re talking about journalism. If we’re going to create news from fans on social media, or bots on social media, or whatever it may be, then that’s a problem, right? I think legitimate news sources need to report legitimate news.”

Clark responded: “I like that. Period.”

Chloe Peterson is the Indiana Fever beat reporter for IndyStar. Reach her at chloe.peterson@indystar.com or follow her on X at @chloepeterson67. Get IndyStar’s Indiana Fever and Caitlin Clark coverage sent directly to your inbox with our Caitlin Clark Fever newsletter. Subscribe to IndyStar TV: Fever for in-depth analysis, behind-the-scenes coverage and more.

Advertisement



Source link

Indiana

Sheriff’s department investigating after skeletal remains found in Southeastern Indiana

Published

on

Sheriff’s department investigating after skeletal remains found in Southeastern Indiana


FRANKLIN COUNTY, Ind. (WKRC) — The Franklin County Sheriff’s Department says it’s investigating after skeletal remains were found Friday.

The sheriff’s office did not offer a location of where the remains were found, only saying they were discovered in a rural area. The county coroner’s office has requested assistance from the University of Indianapolis Human Identification Center Forensic Anthropology Team to help examine and identify the remains.

Comment with Bubbles

BE THE FIRST TO COMMENT

Advertisement

The investigation is ongoing. The sheriff’s department is not releasing any more information at this time.



Source link

Continue Reading

Indiana

Indiana Banned Press From Executions for “Dignity.” It Actually Serves Repression.

Published

on

Indiana Banned Press From Executions for “Dignity.” It Actually Serves Repression.


A witness area at the lethal injection chamber at California’s San Quentin State Prison in 2010. Photo: Wally Skalij/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images

Jeremy Busby is a writer and activist incarcerated in Texas.

A few days before my best friend’s execution date in 2006, prison administrators granted me one last chance to see him in a legal visit. We discussed his concerns about the humaneness of the lethal injection that would kill him. I will never forget his terrified look.

The day of his execution, I paced my cell hoping for the best. Without access to a telephone, my only method to monitor if or how my friend had died was through radio reports from members of the media who were allowed to witness his final breath.

News reports have historically allowed us as a society to monitor our government when it exercises its greatest power: ending a person’s life. But the state of Indiana has decided to inhibit that public access by banning members of the media from attending executions — unless the condemned person chooses to give a reporter a spot that could instead have gone to their relatives or friends. An appellate court upheld the ban this week. 

Advertisement

Prison officials in Indiana claim the media ban is mainly about respecting the dignity of the condemned person. But the idea that there could ever be dignity in state-sanctioned killing of a perfectly healthy human is ludicrous within itself. That would be the case even if executioners eschewed cruel and unusual methods. But they don’t, even when the media is watching. 

Angel Nieves Diaz continued moving for half an hour after receiving an injection of a drug that was supposed to paralyze him during a Florida execution. It took Arizona officials two hours to kill Joseph R. Wood. He had to be injected with 14 doses beyond the dose that was supposed to cause his death. 

It took officials two hours to kill Joseph R. Wood.

Byron Black yelled, “It’s hurting so bad,” five minutes into a botched execution in Tennessee. John Marion Grant began convulsing and vomiting during his execution in Oklahoma. Prison officials had to enter the death chamber multiple times to wipe away and remove the vomit. The entire time, Grant was still breathing. Just last month, Tony Carruthers lay on a Tennessee gurney for more than hour moaning and bleeding as executioners struggled to find a vein. The execution was eventually called off by government officials.

Byron Black yelled, “It’s hurting so bad.”

These are only a few of the botched executions that lack “dignity.” This week, a federal appellate court upheld a decision blocking Alabama from using nitrogen gas to kill Jeffery Lee. Suffocating and asphyxiating on one’s own vomit seemed like a bridge too far. 

Advertisement

As a result of the barbarity of these events, it’s not far-fetched to wonder if Indiana officials have an ulterior motive. Perhaps the media ban has nothing to do with preserving the dignity of the condemned and is instead about obstructing government accountability and public oversight. 

Executions in this country were once highly public affairs. Often held in town squares, any member of the public could attend. In the 1830s, government officials began to enact laws that made executions private events. 

Tony Carruthers laid on a gurney moaning and bleeding as executioners struggled to find a vein.

This was not because 19th century executioners were moved to protect the dignity of the condemned (who were disproportionately Black). It was an effort to halt a growing capital punishment abolitionist movement. A significant number of Americans found the public spectacle disgusting.

The same is occurring today. According to the Death Penalty Information Center, support for capital punishment in America has decreased from 80 percent in 1994 to 52 percent in 2026. This division necessitates transparency — otherwise, the only nongovernment actors able to tell the public the truth are dead.

The “dignity” playbook is a well-worn one that I know well as an incarcerated journalist. As a result of restrictions placed on media access to prisons, prisons have become unjustifiably cruel, less humane and more difficult to monitor. Restricting press freedom erodes human rights and constitutional safeguards and blinds the public to the kinds of cruelty and abuse depicted in HBO’s Oscar-nominated documentary “The Alabama Solution.” 

Advertisement

Perhaps the media ban has nothing to do with preserving the dignity of the condemned and is instead about obstructing government accountability and public oversight. 

The film was made possible not because officials granted access to outside journalists, but because incarcerated people risked (and endured) severe punishment to document their reality with contraband phones. 

It’s not the first time surreptitious reporting methods revealed the real motives behind media restrictions. In 1906, a reporter in Minnesota ignored a ban on media executions and sneaked in to watch a condemned man spend 14 minutes gasping for air before he strangled to death because the rope used to hang him was too long – he hit the floor when dropped and needed to be raised back up. 

As appellate judge Candace Jackson-Akiwumi wrote in a dissenting opinion in the Indiana case, “A government exercises its greatest power when it ends a person’s life. As I see it, such severe and irreversible punishment on behalf of ‘the people’ must be observable to comply with the Constitution.”

Lifting the media ban is the only dignified thing Indiana can do, not only for the condemned but also for the people being asked to fund irreversible punishments.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Indiana

Elkhart County residents urged to report storm damage from June 11 to Indiana 211

Published

on

Elkhart County residents urged to report storm damage from June 11 to Indiana 211


INDIANAPOLIS (WNDU) – Residents in four Indiana counties are being asked to report damage from June 11 storms to help state officials assess the impact and plan recovery efforts.

Residents of Lake, Porter, Huntington and Elkhart counties can contact Indiana 211 by calling 866-211-9966 or visiting the Indiana 211 website to report damage.

The Indiana Department of Homeland Security will use the reports to determine damage estimates and develop the next course of action in the disaster recovery process.

Officials say only residents of Lake, Porter, Huntington and Elkhart counties should use Indiana 211 for June 11 damage reports. Residents in other counties should contact their local emergency manager.

Advertisement

All agriculture damages should be reported to the local USDA Farm Service Agency. You can use the USDA locator tool to find the appropriate contact.

Stay up to date on local news with WNDU on-air and online. Be sure to download the 16 News Now App and follow our YouTube page as we continue to bring you the latest news coverage.

Copyright 2026 WNDU. All rights reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending