NRA challenges Illinois semiautomatic gun ban in court: ‘Blatant violation’ of Second Amendment rights

EXCLUSIVE — The Nationwide Rifle Affiliation (NRA) filed a lawsuit Tuesday in opposition to the state of Illinois over its current gun management legislation that the group says is “unconstitutional” and a “blatant violation” of constitutional rights.

“The NRA is not going to stand by whereas activist politicians go unconstitutional legal guidelines that do nothing to advertise public security. We sued the state of Illinois as a result of this new legislation is a blatant violation of People’ Second Modification rights,” Jason Ouimet, government director of the NRA Institute for Legislative Motion (NRA-ILA), advised Fox Information Digital.

The Illinois Senate handed its model of the Defend Illinois Communities Act earlier this month, banning so-called assault weapons and high-capacity magazines from being manufactured or bought within the state.

Gov. J.B. Pritzker then signed the invoice into legislation, prohibiting the manufacture and sale of semiautomatic rifles and pistols, .50-caliber weapons, in addition to attachments that may enhance a gun’s hearth charge. The legislation additionally requires residents to register their banned firearms.

“The Supreme Courtroom has repeatedly dominated that the Second Modification protects firearms which are in widespread use,” Ouimet continued in his remark to Fox Information Digital. “AR-15s are the most well-liked rifle in America with hundreds of thousands being lawfully used daily. The truth is, in 2020, greater than thrice as many AR-15s have been bought as Ford F150s. Additional, lower than 2 p.c of all gun crime is dedicated with all these rifles. The governor signed this invoice to advance a political agenda, to not defend his constituents.”

ILLINOIS GOVERNOR SLAMS SHERIFFS WHO VOWED TO DEFY GUN BAN, SAYS LAW PROTECTS SCHOOLKIDS, CHURCHGOERS

Ouimet was citing a federal choose in California who dominated in 2021 that California’s ban on so-called assault weapons was unconstitutional and that F-150 pickup vans have been wildly well-liked in 2018, with 909,330 autos bought, however that “twice as many trendy rifles have been bought the identical 12 months.”

Ouimet added in a remark to Fox Information Digital, which comes two weeks after the Illinois laws was signed into legislation, that the “NRA has labored diligently to place collectively the strongest lawsuit attainable.”

“Whereas some rush to file litigation first out of the gate, we work to file the strongest authorized problem, one that can stand up to the prolonged litigation course of,” he stated. “We filed Bruen (New York State Rifle & Pistol Affiliation Inc. v. Bruen) in February 2018, and the Supreme Courtroom didn’t concern its ruling on that case till June 2022. We all know firsthand that submitting the best swimsuit is paramount to creating certain that we have now the most effective probability at the most effective end result for our members and gun homeowners.”

GUN RIGHTS GROUP FILES LAWSUIT OVER ILLINOIS ASSAULT WEAPONS BAN

The NRA and different Second Modification advocates have argued that the ban targets generally owned and bought firearms and magazines, thus violating the Structure.

Greater than six dozen sheriffs have additionally come out in opposition to the legislation, vowing to defy the bans they’ve additionally characterised as unconstitutional.

Nationwide Rifle Affiliation Government Vice President Wayne LaPierre speaks throughout the NRA-ILA assembly on the George R. Brown Conference Heart, Could 27, 2022, in Houston.
(AP Picture / Michael Wyke)

DOZENS OF ILLINOIS SHERIFFS VOW TO DEFY GOVERNOR’S ASSAULT WEAPONS BAN

“A part of my duties that I accepted upon being sworn into workplace was to guard the rights offered to all of us, within the Structure,” Edwards County Sheriff Darby Boewe stated in a current Fb submit.

“A kind of rights enumerated is the best of the individuals to KEEP and BEAR ARMS offered below the 2nd Modification. The precise to maintain and bear arms for protection of life, liberty and property is thought to be an inalienable proper by the individuals.”

Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker
(AP Picture / Charles Rex Arbogast / File)

The sheriff of DuPage County, Jim Mendrick, added in his personal assertion this month: “Neither myself nor my workplace will likely be checking to make sure that lawful gun homeowners register their weapons with the State, nor will we be arresting or housing law-abiding people which were arrested solely with non-compliance of this Act.”

He’s now coming below hearth from lawmakers who say he would not have the authority to override legal guidelines.

“He’ll put the cops which are there to guard them straight within the line of fireside,” Democratic Illinois Rep. Sean Casten stated Monday at a press convention, in keeping with Fox 32. “The sheriff’s place is harmful and unconstitutional.”

SECOND AMENDMENT GROUPS WARN OF ILLINOIS GUN CONTROL BILL HEADING TO GOVERNOR’S DESK 

Mendrick fired again, saying that “there’s completely nothing that we’re doing or not doing that will make a mass taking pictures extra accessible in DuPage County.”

“The truth is, I’ve requested on a number of events to extend penalties on all current gun crimes, but it surely doesn’t seem that they wish to have that dialog. They appear extra involved with lawful gun homeowners than individuals illegally possessing weapons,” the sheriff added.

Pritzker’s workplace slammed the sheriffs for vowing to not implement the legislation in a remark to Fox Information Digital final week, calling their statements “political grandstanding at its worst.”

“The assault weapons ban is the legislation of Illinois,” Pritzker’s workplace advised Fox Information Digital on Monday. “The Basic Meeting handed the invoice and the governor signed it into legislation to guard kids in colleges, worshippers at church and households at parades from the concern of sudden mass homicide.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“Sheriffs have a constitutional responsibility to uphold the legal guidelines of the state, not choose and select which legal guidelines they assist and when. We’re assured that this legislation will maintain as much as any future authorized challenges, however once more, it’s the present legislation of our state. Anybody who advocates for legislation, order, and public security after which refuses to observe the legislation is in violation of their oath of workplace,” the governor’s workplace stated.