Connect with us

Midwest

Ilhan Omar defends MEALS Act despite ties to massive Minnesota fraud scheme

Published

on

Ilhan Omar defends MEALS Act despite ties to massive Minnesota fraud scheme

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., said she has no regrets about supporting the MEALS Act during the COVID-19 pandemic, despite the program becoming linked to Minnesota’s alleged $250 million “Feeding Our Future” fraud scheme.

“Do you regret pushing for that bill, the MEALS Act? Do you think it led to the fraud?” Nicholas Ballasy for Fox News Digital asked Omar on Capitol Hill.

“Absolutely not, it did help feed kids,” Omar said.

Omar introduced the MEALS Act on March 11, 2020, to modify the Department of Agriculture’s food and nutrition programs to allow certain waivers on requirements for school meal programs, including those that raised federal costs during school closures related to the pandemic.

Advertisement

WALZ URGES NOEM TO ‘REASSESS’ IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT STRATEGY IN MINNESOTA AFTER ALLEGED CITIZEN ARRESTS

Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., said she has “absolutely” no regrets about the 2020 MEALS Act, because “it did help feed kids.” (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

Minnesota has faced scrutiny for alleged mismanagement of federal funds accessed through these waivers, including in distributing money for the “Feeding Our Future” program, which authorities believe to be the largest fraud scheme in the history of the pandemic. 

INSIDE MINNESOTA’S $1B FRAUD: FAKE OFFICES, PHONY FIRMS AND A SCANDAL HIDING IN PLAIN SIGHT 

The scheme allegedly exploited the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s decision to waive many of its standard requirements for the Federal Child Nutrition Program during the pandemic, including relaxing its requirement for non-school-based distributors to participate in the program.

Advertisement

Fox News Digital first reported on the status of the fraud in July. FBI Director Kash Patel described it at the time as “one of the worst” in Minnesota history — and as of November 2025, more than 75 individuals have been charged in connection with the scheme, according to federal prosecutors.

President Donald Trump has recently announced a flurry of new actions to crack down and investigate fraud schemes in Minnesota, which he has assailed as a “hub of money laundering activity,” and cited as the basis of his decision to terminate deportation protections for hundreds of Somali migrants.

Minnesota’s Speaker of the House, Republican Lisa Demuth, speaks during a press conference in the governor’s reception room at the Minnesota Capitol in St. Paul, Minn., Thursday, May 15, 2025.  (Jerry Holt/The Minnesota Star Tribune via Getty Images)

Senior Trump administration officials announced fresh investigations this month, including a new Treasury Department probe into how taxpayer dollars were allegedly diverted to the terrorist organization al-Shabaab, according to Secretary Scott Bessent. 

Trump and other officials have zeroed in on these alleged fraud schemes, arguing that the criminal activity is a result of mismanagement and “incompetence” from Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, a Democrat and former vice presidential candidate.

Advertisement

‘INCOMPETENCE OR DERELICTION’: MINNESOTA LAWMAKER RIPS TIM WALZ AS STATE FRAUD LOSSES MOUNT 

“It’s not surprising that the president has chosen to broadly target an entire community,” Walz said of Trump’s efforts, adding, “This is what he does to change the subject.” 

Conspirators falsely claimed to have served millions of meals during the pandemic, but instead used the money for personal gain. They also are accused of fabricating invoices, submitting fake attendance records and falsely distributing thousands of meals from hundreds of so-called food distribution “sites” across the state.

Some of the individuals are part of Minnesota’s Somali diaspora, which is the largest in the U.S., though the ringleader of the scheme is not.

Stealing from the federal government equates to stealing from the American people — there is no simpler truth,” FBI’s special agent in charge, Alvin Winston, told Fox News Digital in a statement. 

Advertisement

The sun shines on the Minnesota State Capitol on Monday, Feb. 12, 2024, in St. Paul, Minnesota.  (AP Photo/Steve Karnowski)

Charging documents show that roughly 300 “food sites” in the state served little or no food, with the so-called “food vendors” and organizations fabricated to launder money intended to reimburse the cost of feeding children.

FBI officials told Fox News that the investigation and resulting trials and indictments continue to impact the state, and have already touched off legislative reform in Minnesota.

They added that the investigation into the fraud remains ongoing, and that additional charges are expected, though they did not immediately share more details.

“The egregious fraud unveiled in the Feeding our Future case epitomizes a profound betrayal of public trust,” Patel told Fox News Digital earlier this year. 

Advertisement

“These individuals misappropriated hundreds of millions in federal funds intended to nourish vulnerable children during a time of crisis, redirecting those resources into luxury homes, high-end vehicles and extravagant lifestyles while families faced hardship,” he added.

President Donald Trump speaks during a roundtable in the Cabinet Room of the White House in Washington, D.C., on Monday, Dec. 8, 2025.  ( Yuri Gripas/Abaca/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Trump suggested earlier this month that Omar, who fled Somalia as a child, “shouldn’t be allowed to be a congresswoman,” prompting fierce backlash from some Democrats and from Minnesota’s congressional delegation. 

Omar, for her part, said Trump’s remarks were “vile.” 

“His obsession with me is creepy,” she said on social media. “I hope he gets the help he desperately needs.”

Advertisement

ICE REJECTS OMAR CLAIM SON WAS PULLED OVER BY FEDS, PRESSED FOR CITIZENSHIP PROOF: ‘ABSOLUTELY ZERO RECORD’

Ballasy later pressed Omar about another incident dominating headlines.

“Congresswoman, the ICE director is saying now that your son was not pulled over by ICE. He’s saying there’s no evidence,” Ballasy said to Omar on Capitol Hill.

The head of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) rejected a viral claim from Omar that her son was pressed for proof of U.S. citizenship by agency personnel after stopping at a Minnesota Target over the weekend.

Omar had told CBS’ Twin Cities affiliate that her son was subjected to a traffic stop-type encounter by ICE agents but was ultimately let go without further issue after he was able to produce a U.S. passport or passport card.

Advertisement

Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons speaking at a press conference at the John Joseph Moakley U.S. Courthouse in Boston on June 2. (Suzanne Kreiter/The Boston Globe via Getty Images)

Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons pushed back on the assertion on Tuesday, telling Fox News Digital the incident never happened.

“How do they know that?” Omar countered. “How do they know that? Is he saying he has documentations of all the people they pulled over? Because we’ve been asking for that information. We haven’t gotten it from them, so if ICE is confirming now that they collect data and refusing to provide it to members of Congress, then that’s an interesting admission.”

“ICE has absolutely zero record of its officers or agents pulling over Congresswoman Omar’s son,” Lyons said.

“It speaks volumes that Congresswoman Omar is leveling this accusation with absolutely zero proof.”

Advertisement

Lyons called Omar’s comments to the local outlet a “ridiculous effort” to demonize federal law enforcement. He also said her rhetoric contributes to a spike in threats against ICE personnel, citing a 1,150% increase in assaults and an 8,000% increase in death threats.

When asked to respond to Lyons’ comment, Omar told Ballasy, “Well, their crackdown has terrorized my community, so they need to stop.”

Read the full article from Here

Illinois

Temps Stay In The 80s All Week For Chicago Area

Published

on

Temps Stay In The 80s All Week For Chicago Area


Temperatures in the upper 80s are possible Tuesday and Wednesday, as “warm and dry conditions are expected for the majority of the week,” the National Weather Service shared.

Tuesday and Wednesday both have a high of 86 degrees. It will be cooler near the lake, with temps in the 70s.

The weather service said “daily lake breezes will keep temperatures cool near the lakeshore…”

Thursday will have a high of 81 and Friday a high of 82 degrees. According to the weather service, temps will be in the 60s near the lake for the end of the week.

Advertisement

The daily lake breezes and cold front will result in “building waves and dangerous swimming conditions at Lake Michigan beaches,” on Wednesday night and Thursday, according to the weather service.

The rest of the week should also remain dry, besides a low chance of showers and storms late Wednesday, the weather service said.

Here is a more detailed look at the weather for the rest of the week, per the weather service:

TUESDAY: Partly sunny, with a high near 84. Southeast wind around 5 mph, with gusts as high as 10 mph.

TUESDAY NIGHT: Mostly cloudy, with a low around 62. Southeast wind around 5 mph becoming calm after midnight.

Advertisement

WEDNESDAY: Mostly sunny, with a high near 85. Light and variable wind becoming northeast 5 to 10 mph in the afternoon. Winds could gust as high as 15 mph.

WEDNESDAY NIGHT: Mostly clear, with a low around 58. North northeast wind around 10 mph, with gusts as high as 20 mph.

THURSDAY: Sunny, with a high near 74. Northeast wind 10 to 15 mph, with gusts as high as 20 mph.

THURSDAY NIGHT: Mostly clear, with a low around 52.

FRIDAY: Sunny, with a high near 80.

Advertisement

FRIDAY NIGHT: Mostly clear, with a low around 56.





Source link

Continue Reading

Indiana

Indiana Rangers say they’re seeking overdue recognition for service during Vietnam War

Published

on

Indiana Rangers say they’re seeking overdue recognition for service during Vietnam War


INDIANAPOLIS (CNN/CNN Newsource/WKRC) – The Indiana Rangers said they’re seeking overdue recognition for their service during the Vietnam War.

Surviving members of an Indiana National Guard unit that served in the Vietnam War are seeking long-awaited recognition for the group’s service.

(WISH/CNN/CNN Newsource)

Advertisement

Company D, 151st Infantry, was deployed to Vietnam in late 1968. The unit received airborne and ranger training and became known as the Indiana Rangers. The soldiers were the only National Guard combat unit deployed to Vietnam as one intact group.

During their year-long tour, members of the unit earned more than 500 medals, including 175 Bronze Stars and 110 Purple Hearts. Despite those honors, the Rangers say the unit has never received recognition as a collective group.

Now, that could change.

The office of U.S. Rep. Victoria Spartz has notified the Rangers that paperwork for the Valorous Unit Award has been submitted. The award is one level below the Presidential Unit Citation.

Advertisement

“We lost six people during the conflict of ’69 and today I’ve been the treasurer for about 35-40 years I guess, and now we’ve lost 124 deceased,” one Ranger told WISH.

Comment with Bubbles

BE THE FIRST TO COMMENT

Spartz told the Rangers she is also working to secure a Presidential Unit Citation for the unit.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Iowa

Iowa Democrats to pitch new-look caucuses in bid to go first once more

Published

on

Iowa Democrats to pitch new-look caucuses in bid to go first once more


play

Iowa Democrats will travel to Washington, D.C., this week to pitch a streamlined caucus plan they hope will convince national party leaders that Iowa deserves another shot to be at the front of the presidential nominating calendar. 

Advertisement

The state is among a dozen that will make in-person appeals to members of the Democratic National Committee’s powerful Rules and Bylaws Committee across three days beginning Wednesday, May 27.  

That committee is tasked with setting the calendar for the 2028 presidential primary — a move that will determine where a wide-open field of expected candidates will dedicate their time, attention and resources in the years ahead.  

Iowa Democratic Party Chair Rita Hart has argued repeatedly that the committee should reconsider Iowa as Democrats work to regain ground with rural, working-class voters who have fled the party in droves.  

“In order to do that, we’ve got to have a state like Iowa where any Democratic presidential candidate can compete, where it’s affordable and where the candidates can look forward to getting up close and personal and really understanding the issues that will bring us back to an understanding of working class voters,” Hart told the Des Moines Register.  

Advertisement

The committee plans to choose one state from each of four geographic regions, as well as a potential fifth state.

Members said the final calendar should include a grouping of states that represent the wider electorate. 

The applicants are:   

  • East: Delaware and New Hampshire
  • Midwest: Illinois, Iowa and Michigan
  • South: Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia
  • West: Nevada and New Mexico

Each of the prospective states made written applications, which the committee reviewed at a January meeting.  

Here’s what Iowa Democrats want their 2028 presidential caucuses to look like 

Late last year, the Iowa Democratic Party released the results of a survey it conducted to gather feedback from rank-and-file Democrats about the future of the presidential nominating caucuses.  

Advertisement

Hart said it was clear through that survey that Iowa Democrats want the caucuses to be more accessible.  

She said Iowa Democrats are proposing opening an absentee window to allow Democrats to indicate their presidential preferences by mail ahead of an in-person caucus. 

“We can no longer hold a caucus on one cold night in January and think that that’s representative of our Democratic Party,” Hart said. “That’s a priority for us that we have more accessibility, and the obvious way to do that is through a mail-in process.” 

Hart said that absentee process will be completed before Caucus Day to allow for an in-person component, which is also important to Iowa Democrats.  

Advertisement

But gone will be the caucus format of years past when Democrats had to physically stand to show their support for a candidate and be counted.  

The complicated math and “state delegate equivalents” also are out.  

Instead, Democrats will express their preferences for their favorite candidate in writing. 

“I think from our party faithful, from our volunteers who were tasked with making that math work, I think that was a lot of pressure on people and just was a headache,” Hart said. “They want a simpler process.”  

She said she believes the new proposed process retains “the character and the flavor of the in-person caucus” but ditches the things that overcomplicated the system.  

Advertisement

The tabulation of results should be simpler, and the party plans to hire a vendor to ensure it can release the full set of results on Caucus Night, she said.  

In the past, any hint of paper ballots has triggered a fight with New Hampshire, which has long argued that it holds the nation’s first primary after Iowa’s first-in-the-nation caucuses. If Iowa’s caucuses starts to look too much like a primary, New Hampshire has pushed back.  

“My major concern is not with New Hampshire,” Hart said. “New Hampshire’s got to do what New Hampshire’s got to do. We’re going to do what’s best for Iowa.” 

At the presentation in Washington, D.C., representatives for Iowa will make the case to the committee that in addition to winning back rural voters, national Democrats need to be able to counter the message Republicans will be spreading in Iowa as they host their first-in-the-nation caucuses in 2028.  

Republicans spent $120 million in ads while competing in Iowa’s 2024 Republican caucuses, they’ll say, far exceeding what was spent in other early states.

Advertisement

Iowa representatives contend that unanswered messaging overwhelmed Democrats in Iowa and nationally at a key moment in the campaign cycle. 

They will also argue that Iowa Democrats are on track to regain ground in the 2026 midterm elections with key battleground seats in the U.S. House, U.S. Senate and the governor’s race.  

How did Iowa Democrats get here? 

The DNC stripped Iowa of its first-in-the-nation caucus spot and reordered the nominating calendar in 2022 following a disastrous 2020 presidential caucus in which Iowa’s results were riddled with delays and errors. 

Then-President Joe Biden recommended that South Carolina replace Iowa at the front of the line in 2024, with New Hampshire, Nevada, Georgia and Michigan to follow. 

In 2024, rather than holding their traditional in-person first-in-the-nation caucuses, Iowa Democrats held a fully absentee mail-in event with the results announced on Super Tuesday in March.

Advertisement

Democrats met in person only to conduct party business the same day Iowa Republicans held their caucuses. 

The DNC reopened the calendar process in 2025, with committee leaders saying they would prioritize states that can create a “rigorous, efficient and fair” nominating contest.  

Brianne Pfannenstiel is the chief politics reporter for the Des Moines Register. She writes about campaigns, elections and the Iowa Caucuses. Reach her at bpfann@dmreg.com or 515-284-8244. Follow her on X at @brianneDMR.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending