Connect with us

Midwest

Gym allegedly allowing biological male into women's locker room faces criminal probe from Missouri AG

Published

on

Gym allegedly allowing biological male into women's locker room faces criminal probe from Missouri AG

A St. Louis branch of Life Time Fitness could be facing civil and criminal liabilities after it allegedly “adopted a policy” allowing transgender women into the female locker rooms, the state’s attorney general announced Friday.

Missouri AG Andrew Bailey told the CEO of Life Time Fitness in a letter that while allowing biological males to enter whatever restroom they choose is popular in corporate policy books, he would not tolerate it under his jurisdiction.

“While it might be considered fashionable in certain corporate boardrooms to pretend that biology is irrelevant, the American heartland still lives in reality,” he said. “Missourians recognize that allowing adult men to openly invade and disrobe in spaces set aside for women and young girls is indefensible and places political correctness above public safety.” 

The investigation followed an incident where a 52-year-old transgender woman entered the women’s locker room, to the outrage of some of Life Time’s customers. Some of the staff corrected customers, instructing them to use certain language when discussing the trans person.

PLANET FITNESS HIRES NEW DEI-FOCUSED CEO AMID CONTROVERSY OVER TRANSGENDER LOCKER ROOM POLICY

Advertisement

Life Time Fitness gym in hot water amid Missouri General AG probe.  (Fox News Digital )

“Even more concerning is the fact that instead of taking the safety concerns from your gym members seriously, you rudely correct them and insist they call this biological male by the ‘correct pronouns,’” Bailey alleged. 

He then said he was looking into criminal charges against them under various statutes after numerous constituents complained to his office, alleging “the gym has actively allowed a biological male to use women and girls’ private spaces.” 

The Missouri AG cited a statute of “Trespass in the first degree,” arguing that he had previously established a precedent that a biological male entering a female-only space was a violation of the law.

“[T]he Court confirmed that a male’s presence in a females’ public restroom constitutes criminal trespass,” he said. “When restrooms are separately designated for males and females, one is only permitted to use the restroom designed for his or her gender.”

Advertisement

KIDS’ GENDER CLINIC WHISTLEBLOWER TELLS DR. PHIL REGRETFUL PATIENTS BEGGED TO ‘HAVE BODY PARTS PUT BACK ON’

Additionally, Bailey alleged that – generally speaking – a biological male exposing himself in a female space “may be subject to further criminal liability for multiple sexual offenses, including sexual misconduct in the first degree and the felony offense of sexual misconduct involving a child.”

Life Time gym’s “policies are enabling potentially criminal behavior, and I am writing to assure you that it will not continue on my watch,” the AG warned in a letter.  (Adobe Stock)

The Life Time gym’s “policies are enabling potentially criminal behavior, and I am writing to assure you that it will not continue on my watch,” the AG warned. “If you insist on endangering women and young girls in our state, in open defiance of the law, be assured you will face the consequences.”

Fox News Digital contacted Life Time fitness for comment and did not immediately receive a response. 

Advertisement

KIDS’ GENDER CLINIC WHISTLEBLOWER TELLS DR. PHIL REGRETFUL PATIENTS BEGGED TO ‘HAVE BODY PARTS PUT BACK ON’

The company previously released a statement which said it was complying with existing state laws. 

Female athlete preparing for a workout in a gym locker room.  (Adobe Stock)

“At Life Time, we recognize that there are varying opinions regarding locker room access. As a company, we are committed to following the law in every area we operate with respect to public accommodation. When members join Life Time, we review state-issued IDs to confirm their identity. The State of Missouri provides a mechanism for an individual to change their gender designation on their state-issued drivers’ license,” the company said. 

Advertisement

“In this instance, the member presented a state-issued drivers’ license identifying as female and, based on Missouri laws, we cannot deny or discriminate on the basis of sex. Therefore, the member is to use Life Time’s women’s locker room.”

Read the full article from Here

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Milwaukee, WI

Milwaukee Common Council opposes We Energies’ data center rate plan

Published

on

Milwaukee Common Council opposes We Energies’ data center rate plan


play

The Milwaukee Common Council has called on state utility regulators to reject We Energies’ data center rate proposal in its current form.

The council unanimously adopted a resolution March 3 opposing We Energies’ proposal to create a separate energy rate for large-scale data centers, saying the plan does not go far enough to protect ratepayers.

Advertisement

At the same time, a group of council members led by District 14 Ald. Marina Dimitrijevic is drafting a six-month moratorium on data center development in the city of Milwaukee.

We Energies’ plan “is not a good deal for Milwaukeeans,” Dimitrijevic said during a Common Council meeting March 3.

We Energies’ proposal would create a separate energy rate for “very large” customers with an expected load of 500 megawatts or more. These very large customers, which include data center developers like Microsoft and Vantage, would pay for the massive amount of new infrastructure being built to serve them.

In October, We Energies filed plans to build more than $5 billion in new solar projects and natural gas plants to meet electricity demand brought by hyperscale data centers.

Advertisement

The utility says its rate plan protects customers from bearing costs associated with these projects, and hold data center companies responsible for costs through the life of the new assets.

“Our proposal is fair, transparent, and establishes strong safeguards — including binding agreements so data centers owners, not other customers, pay for the infrastructure they require,” We Energies spokesperson Brendan Conway said in a statement. “That means Wisconsin families are not subsidizing these projects.”

The resolution, introduced by Dimitrijevic, calls for stronger ratepayer protections, including binding service agreements that last the life of new infrastructure and include termination charges. It also wants the “very large” customer threshold lowered from 500 megawatts to prevent avoidance by data center companies.

In filings submitted to the Public Service Commission, We Energies said it would be willing to lower the threshold to 250 megawatts.

The resolution took particular issue with We Energies’ proposed cost split for the new natural gas plants. Under the current proposal, data center companies would pay for 75% of operating and maintenance, and other ratepayers would cover the remaining 25% as well as annual fuel costs.

Advertisement

We Energies says the plants will serve all customers as demand for energy is projected to rise across rate classes.

“If data centers never existed, we would’ve had to have built other plants, other power generation to meet our customers’ increasing need,” Conway previously told the Journal Sentinel.

The resolution said data center companies should pay “100% of all incremental and fixed costs required to serve them, including generation capacity, operations and maintenance, and fuel costs attributable to serving the data center load.”

Council members’ concerns echo those brought by environmental and consumer advocacy groups during a public hearing Feb. 10. The Public Service Commission will rule on the proposal by May 1.

This is not the first time the City of Milwaukee has weighed in on We Energies cases brought before the Public Service Commission. It’s intervened in opposition to previous energy rate hikes proposed by the utility, arguing they disproportionately burden thousands of low-income Milwaukee households.

Advertisement

In December, Dimitrijevic proposed a six-month moratorium on data center development in the city. The pause will give council members time to establish a regulatory framework for large-scale data center proposals, she told the Journal Sentinel.

“Sometimes the economy moves so quickly that we haven’t been able to catch up in licensing,” Dimitrijevic said. “We have to set up a careful way to regulate it and have public input.”

A group of aldermen want to require data center developers apply for a special use permit through the Milwaukee Zoning Appeals Board, a process they say creates more transparency. Should this pass, large data center proposals would be subject to public hearings, and the Zoning Appeals Board can reject a plan based on public health concerns.

The moratorium will receive a public hearing in the next few weeks.

This article was updated to include new information.

Advertisement

Francesca Pica can be reached at fpica@usatodayco.com.



Source link

Continue Reading

Minneapolis, MN

Whitefish council creates proclamation in solidarity with city, citizens of Minneapolis

Published

on

Whitefish council creates proclamation in solidarity with city, citizens of Minneapolis


The Whitefish City Council in February presented and signed a proclamation expressing solidarity with the city and citizens of Minneapolis.

The proclamation states that Whitefish mourns the loss of life that occurred in Minneapolis and stands in solidarity with its residents.

It reaffirms the city’s commitment to equal treatment under the law and emphasizes that peaceful protest is a fundamental American right.

The proclamation was supported by five of the six council members.

Advertisement

Mayor John Muhlfeld said the action was meant to reaffirm the city’s values.

“A mayoral proclamation that is supported by five of six City Council members supporting solidarity with the city and citizens of Minneapolis, Minnesota, and reaffirming our supportive, just, equal and welcoming community,” Muhlfeld said. “I think this is somewhat overdue. Our town’s been through a lot over the years, This is more importantly to reaffirm our values as a council with our community because we care deeply about you.”

Over the last year, Whitefish has faced criticism amid rising tensions surrounding the Department of Homeland Security.

Comment with Bubbles

BE THE FIRST TO COMMENT

Advertisement

View the full proclamation below.



Source link

Continue Reading

Indianapolis, IN

Noblesville man arrested, accused of rape of UIndy student in dorm room

Published

on

Noblesville man arrested, accused of rape of UIndy student in dorm room


INDIANAPOLIS (WISH) — A 21-year-old man was arrested and accused of raping a University of Indianapolis student on campus.

Police say the investigation began on Jan. 24 when University of Indianapolis Police received a call from a woman who said she believed she was drugged at a bar in downtown Indianapolis and then raped in her dorm room.

Court documents say she met Marwan Khalaf of Noblesville at the Metro Bar on Massachusetts Avenue and went back to her dorm room, where he repeatedly raped her. When she woke up one of the last times, he was gone.

According to court documents, she next went to shower and passed out again. She woke up in the shower at 7 a.m. Jan. 24 and called 911.

Advertisement

The student told investigators she had gone out alone on Jan. 23 and took an Uber to a few bars downtown before arriving at the Metro Bar at 12:51 a.m. Jan. 24. Court documents state that’s where she met Khalaf and they danced together.

Court documents say the bar refused to serve the student a drink because she was already intoxicated when she arrived. Khalaf then bought her a shot and they asked her to leave. She says Khalaf left with her and offered to take her home.

The student says she recalls his car being “parked directly across the street from Metro.” According to UIPD Detective Jay Arnold, the student’s identification card was used to enter the dorm at 2:13 a.m.

In an interview with detectives, Khalaf admitted to being at the bar and kissing her, but denied having sexual contact with the student. He told detectives he took care of her because she was drunk and said he left the dorm when it became light outside because his mother was calling him.

Khalaf has been charged with two counts of rape and one count of sexual battery.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending