I worked at the police department, the office of public information, as the second deputy chief, for five years. That was a complete culture shock, going from non-law enforcement to being basically embedded in the police department. There were a lot of folks who didn’t trust me. I was like, 20-something years old at that time, right? My job was to find stories that we can get out to the community that went beyond that we just arrested somebody or the blood and guts.

Q. Back to the Kilpatrick administration, I think the basic question would be, what did you see?

A: I didn’t go to any parties. (Laughs)

Q: Did you have any sense there was corruption?

A: No, it was not as salacious as some people would think, right? All I saw was, you know, people working hard, burning the candle from end to end. It was a lot of young, Black, positive energy.

I would come in at four in the morning, call the news stations, and I wouldn’t leave until about 8 p.m. because I was in love with it. It was intoxicating. I never got tired, never got frustrated. It felt this was the time for a younger generation of Detroiters to now take the place to the next level.

Q: Did it take you a while to admit, personally, that there was some wrongdoing going on?

A; I mean, whatever was dealt with in court, that was the final arbiter for me. I never had to reconcile what I saw in front of me versus that, because . . . I was there for the work, and I think we did some pretty doggone good work when we were there.

Q: Do you recall a moment of clarity, or someone who pushed you to run for council? What was the turning point?

A: When I was at the police department, I was on TV a lot. I was the guy who dealt with, you know, the public statements on all the blood and guts. I was never prepared for what I would see. I remember the first body that I saw. I was a 14-year-old girl, face down. She had on blue jeans, a pink shearling coat with little fur around it. Thankfully, I didn’t get a chance to see her face. But I remember her to this day.

But me being on camera meant that people got a chance to see me. And they felt that I was articulate enough to speak on behalf of the community. Folks who were in my atmosphere, they kept pushing me and saying, ‘You should run.’

If, I can’t trust myself, who can I trust? I wanted to be a part of making things better, period.

And I (remember) clearly … asking my wife, you know, for permission to do this. She said, ‘I got your back, whatever you decide to do.’ I resigned from the police department. Nine months my wife held down the household. Now this is in return, because I held down a household when she was getting her master’s degree.

Q: I want to ask about the bankruptcy. Was there any other choice?

A: There was no other path to getting beyond that point. When we had broken vehicles that weren’t being repaired. We had, you know — it’s 10 o’clock at night when the trash collector would come by and other times they missed it, right? That wasn’t great quality of life for residents.

When you get here (at council) and you look at the documents and you see how dismal our financial situation is, there was no choice. It absolutely needed to happen. There were a lot of people that were hurt, let’s be honest. Especially when we talk about our retirees, who are still trying to figure out what their next infusion of assistance is going to be.

Q: Could that have been avoided?

A: Any time a deal is made, you can always make it this way or that way. So there’s always alterations that could have been made. I never want to say when people are thrust through the pain that they’re still trying to figure out, that it was worth it. But it paid off going through that process for us as a city. Because we were able to now restructure that massive debt. We now were able to purchase vehicles. We now were able to slowly increase our credit rating so that now we can borrow more. We were now able to increase services period within the city of Detroit.

Q: Gosh, we’re talking about such tremendous things, from the Kwame administration corruption, crime, the bankruptcy. Was there ever a point where you thought it was too overwhelming?

A: No. It’s my city, yeah, and now I’m in the seat. So, it’s up to me to be a part of the group. I remember sitting at the table, prior to bankruptcy, and we are arguing about $1,000 going to a department here versus a department there. That’s how tight it was, right?

We’re now talking about healing and growing and making things better. We still have a long way to go, because we got a lot of folks who need help right now.

Q: You were the creator of the urban agricultural ordinance back in 2013. Was there hope it would be the start of a flourishing urban farming scene?

A: Honestly, I wasn’t that guy who even tried to think . . . that large scale. I was just saying it doesn’t make sense . . . that we can’t grow fruits and veggies in a neighborhood. And allow neighbors to pick them and, you know, eat the food.

I didn’t do all the sweat equity that all those men and women did in the urban gardens, in the urban farms. But I want to say that I played a role in getting the ball rolling.

Q: Any other pieces of legislation that you consider high marks for you?

A: The cannabis legislation. That one was important to me, because we’re talking about a new industry. That’s very rare that you’re on the forefront of an industry in the city. So, for me, it was important not to try to entice, you know, Detroiters to either consume or to own these businesses. But if they’re going to exist in the city of Detroit, it makes sense to try to identify ways to allow Detroiters to participate, have an opportunity to succeed. You still got to have a great business plan. But how do we level the playing field when you are now competing against folks who are much more connected and have deeper pockets?

Now, the industry has changed completely since then. So everybody, whether you are in the city or outside the city, there’s the challenge for many of them.

Q: Is there anything that you think the public generally often gets wrong about what you do?

A: I don’t know if it’s wrong. I just don’t think that they know what all it entails. You know, many times they only see the headline. They see a vote, but they don’t recognize that, every Tuesday, there’s sometimes hundreds of items that we have to go through (at council meetings.) Those 100 items or plus, don’t just pop up. They’re in the committee. We’re doing that homework in the committee, and we are doing everything we can to read all these documents that come before us. It’s a constant flow of information that we are receiving, and also information that we’re trying to put out and provide to the community.

I think one misperception is people believe we don’t want the community to be involved, especially our younger folks. You know, I come across 20-year-olds all the time, they don’t want cars, they don’t want to drive.

So now that really puts a bigger emphasis for us to improve our public transportation. So last year, I was one who raised my hand with other council members, and we put an infusion of dollars into our DDOT system. We’re going to have to do that over and over again. But it becomes more challenging year by year, especially nowadays, with all this financial uncertainty and political uncertainty. The dollars that we receive for our public transportation come from the federal government. Yeah, that’s been cut a bit now.

Q: There’s a council member who wants to get rid of the Detroit land bank. How do you think that conversation is going to go?

A: I don’t think getting rid of the land bank is the answer. There’s got to be far more conversation than just a will and desire to get rid of it. I don’t think that’s where overall the body is. But are we at a point where we want to see some changes in how it operates? Absolutely.

Q: Many people are frightened of what’s happening at the federal government level, national policies … tell me what that means for you as an elected official for a local city government. How do you respond?

A: From what’s happening potentially, like in Minnesota, coming (to Detroit), yeah.

Q: It’s not just ICE, of course. The federal cuts, other measures.

A: When you see what’s happening in Minnesota, and then when you saw what was happening in LA, that’s really what’s shaking our country, without a doubt. Do I want that to happen here? Absolutely not. Part of it is we have to be very strategic in our communication to our residents and how we project what our intentions are. We can get a crowd excited in a room, but also, in a way, poke the bear. And the same people that we’re trying to help are the ones who end up being harmed. While we get applause, people are being harmed.

It’s not about telling and forecasting every move that you’re going to make. Make the moves, build connection with the community, understand clearly what those needs are, and just do them to the best of your ability. Everything does not, in my opinion, have to have this stance, this statement, that we are declaring that we shall not do this if it has not arrived. Now, when it arrives, it’s time to kick butt. It’s time to respond. We don’t have to forecast it, just do it.

Thus far, I want to give credit to the mayor, the former mayor, former council and this council, we’re doing just that; listening to the community, taking in the information, investigating, but not putting us in a point where we are a target.

Q: How long do you think you will stay on council?

A: You got to ask the people of the city of Detroit. You’ve got to ask my wife, ask my doctor. I’m just blessed, you know, to be this late in my tenure on council and run unopposed in my district, that’s huge. Yeah, and now to be appointed council president by my colleagues, you know that again, is a very tremendous honor. I don’t put a shelf life on it. I just, you know, continue to work.

Q: A former council member is now the mayor. How does that change the dynamic?

A: Huge expectations. Not just because she’s a former council member, but a Detroiter. She has a heart for the community . . . she has certainly the intelligence to pull this off.

Q: Huge expectations for lowering taxes? New developments? For lowering crime?

A: Fill in the blank.

Q: Really?

A: Yeah, I mean, so it’s not just about lowering taxes or another single issue. It’s about the way you approach things, right? It’s about all those items that we have been talking about on council. How do we actually make those things happen? And it’s not that they weren’t happening with the previous administration. It was just happening in a different way.

But there’s huge expectations for this current administration, because this one feels a bit more organic. And you know, Mayor Sheffield was on council for 12 years. So when you get a chance to know a person, you have expectations that person will bring out all those things that are inside of them, and not just allow the world to consume them.

laguilar@detroitnews.com