Connect with us

Lifestyle

Asked to flag 'negative' National Park content, visitors gave their own 2 cents instead

Published

on

Asked to flag 'negative' National Park content, visitors gave their own 2 cents instead

Signs like this one in the Presidio of San Francisco, part of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area, have been going up around the country in response to President Trump’s executive order titled “Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History.”

Chloe Veltman/NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Chloe Veltman/NPR

Signs installed earlier this month in national parks across the country asking visitors to share feedback on “any signs or other information that are negative about past or living Americans” are eliciting all sorts of reactions. But comments viewed by NPR don’t provide the requested feedback.

Visitors to the Presidio of San Francisco, a National Historic Landmark and former military garrison with a complex history seemed unimpressed by the small black-and-white sign placed on a coffee table at roughly shin-level near the Presidio’s welcome center on a recent morning.

“The point of going to a park is to enjoy nature, not to whistleblow something that casts the American people in a bad light,” said Evan Sutterfield, a San Francisco school teacher enjoying a day out on his summer break.

Advertisement

“I think you need to tell the whole story,” said Russ Harwell, visiting from Charlotte, N.C. “If you’re gonna write it out of history, then you’re doomed to repeat it.”

Linda Mosinian from Milwaukee, Wis. added: “I think this is a waste of time.” 

‘Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History’

The signs, which invite people to send comments anonymously using a QR code, phone number, email or web address, have appeared in response to an executive order President Trump issued in March titled “Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History.” It specifically calls for the removal of content from monuments and properties within the Department of the Interior that “inappropriately disparages Americans past or living.”

In a statement to NPR, the Department of the Interior said: “The effort ensures public lands reflect an accurate portrayal of American history and heritage.”

NPR reviewed dozens of comments submitted from June 4 to 12 regarding signs placed in parks across the country. According to The Coalition to Protect America’s Parks, a multi-page PDF containing these comments was leaked by a national park employee who took screenshots of the comments pages on their computer and then shared the PDF with parks advocacy groups.

Advertisement

None of the submitted comments suggest the parks need to change their depictions of people or history.

Some are supportive. “The park rangers and volunteers go above and beyond to tell the full American story,” stated a comment about Catoctin Mountain Park in Maryland.

Others say national parks should reflect even more of the country’s difficult history. “Need more history on how black and indigenous people have been exploited,” one comment stated.

Differing opinions

That’s not to say all visitors are happy about the historical information shared at parks.

Department of the Interior spokesperson J. Elizabeth Peace said after Trump issued the executive order — but before the signs went up — her department had already started receiving feedback from national park visitors via the department’s email address.

Advertisement

Peace said one example relates to Capitol Reef National Park in Utah, where a visitor reported that a souvenir postcard mislabeled a nearby landmark and appeared to copy text from Wikipedia without attribution.

Another came from a visitor concerned about a video on the website of the Washington Monument in Washington, D.C., which inaccurately stated George Washington ended his inaugural oath with a phrase historians widely agree lacks definitive sourcing.

The phrase in question was “So help me God.”

Neither of these comments related to Trump’s executive order about content that, “inappropriately disparages Americans past or living.” But Peace said they were nevertheless useful.

“Both examples provided were reviewed by the National Park Service and appropriate corrective or clarifying action was taken,” Peace said. “These examples underscore the value of public feedback in helping us maintain historical accuracy across our sites and materials.”

Advertisement

Accuracy challenges

Accuracy isn’t a given, because feedback can be submitted through a general website or email address accessible from anywhere in the world.

“What would stop somebody with an agenda from posting fake comments?” said Clara Wooden, a member of the board of The Coalition to Protect America’s National Parks. “People at both ends of the ideological spectrum can game the system without even setting foot in a national park.”

In response to these concerns, the Department of the Interior’s Peace told NPR comments are individually reviewed before being routed to appropriate subject matter experts for further evaluation and validation. “This manual review process helps ensure that the feedback we work with is both relevant and credible,” she said.

Lifestyle

What a divorce coach wishes couples knew before ending a marriage

Published

on

What a divorce coach wishes couples knew before ending a marriage

Karen McNenny is a certified divorce coach, certified co-parenting specialist and author of the book The Good Divorce: How to End Your Marriage Without Ending Your Family.

Wiley/Jossey-Bass/NPR, Nicole Wickens/NPR


hide caption



toggle caption

Advertisement

Wiley/Jossey-Bass/NPR, Nicole Wickens/NPR

When Karen McNenny was facing divorce about 15 years ago, she was afraid of what it would mean for her future: despair, debt and a lifetime of resentment, she says.

At the same time, she was thinking of her two children, she says. She didn’t want their father to become her enemy.

So she and her former husband chose to approach divorce differently as a couple. “We’re going to renovate and transform this family. We’re not going to destroy it,” she says. “The marriage is ending, not your relationship.”

Advertisement

For McNenny, a mediator, certified divorce coach and certified co-parenting specialist, divorce is a tool, not a weapon. She expands on this concept in The Good Divorce: How to End Your Marriage Without Ending Your Family, which came out this spring. The book offers guidance on how to maintain compassionate and respectful ties with a former spouse while also healing and moving forward.

According to Pew Research Center, a third of Americans who have ever been married had a first marriage that ended in divorce. For that reason, McNenny hopes her book becomes a must-read for couples before they get married. “The best time to talk about divorce is before you need to talk about it,” she says.

She shared insights from her book in a conversation with Life Kit. This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

The book is called The Good Divorce. What does that mean?

[For those with kids,] the good divorce is about protecting the future of the family while we dissolve the marriage.

Advertisement

After the paperwork is done and the assets have been divided, can you and your co-parent sit on the same side of the bleachers during the basketball game? Can you still see yourselves as a partnership, with the ability to have thoughtful conversations about your kids?

For those who don’t have kids, [the good divorce is] about protecting your health — your mental health and your physical health. If we are doubling down with resentment and bitterness, all of that gets stored in the body and shows up in different ways. You deserve a pathway that’s less destructive.

Continue Reading

Lifestyle

‘Alice and Steve’ might be a mess — but it’s also too fun to stop watching

Published

on

‘Alice and Steve’ might be a mess — but it’s also too fun to stop watching

In Alice and Steve, Jemaine Clement and Nicola Walker play long-time friends who turn on each other after he gets involved with her 26-year-old daughter.

Lara Cornell/Disney+


hide caption



toggle caption

Advertisement

Lara Cornell/Disney+

I grew up watching episodic shows on network TV, nearly all of them formulaic but some indelibly great. Then, like everyone else, I moved into the days of what my colleague David Bianculli dubbed Platinum TV, where series like The Sopranos and The Wire and Fleabag aspired to something higher. What both these eras had in common was that their shows were carefully crafted — they had an internal logic, and a tone, that held them together.

In recent years, though, there’s been a proliferation of shows that, possibly obeying some algorithm, care less for coherence than sensation. They lurch among tones, from cuteness to sentimentality to meanness, stirring in random plot twists along the way. Bouncing all over the emotional map, these shows depend on compelling actors and a few memorable scenes to make us overlook their loose construction.

A great example is Alice and Steve, an entertaining but sometimes exasperating six-part British comedy on Hulu about two 50-something best friends who turn on each other after he gets involved with her 26-year-old daughter.

Advertisement

While the premise is juicy, it’s also a tad yucky, and I mainly tuned in because its title characters are played by performers Jemaine Clement from Flight of the Conchords and Nicola Walker, whom I’ve raved up on this show more than once.

The series starts poorly with Steve and Alice going on a cutesy bender after a friend’s funeral. Now, I always hate drunk scenes, which are an invitation to overact. As Clement and Walker bray their lines, we learn that Steve’s a divorced celebrity hair stylist who can’t find a girlfriend while Alice is a clothes designer with a doting younger husband, nicely played by Joel Fry, a sweetie-pie of a teenage son — that’s Tyrese Eaton-Dyce — and, of course, that 26-year-old daughter, Izzy, who has inherited her mother’s willfulness. Played by Yali Topol Margalith, Izzy kickstarts the plot by flirting with Steve. Predictably, he succumbs.

Almost immediately, they think they’re in love. While the weak-willed Steve wants to hide their romance — he knows it’s inappropriate — Izzy just blurts out the facts to her mom. Alice flips. And from hereon out in this series where the women are as alpha as the men are hangdog, Alice drives the action. Betrayed and violently angry, she’ll do whatever it takes to break them up — no matter who gets hurt. Her antics unleash Steve’s own malice. We’re in Beef territory.

Continue Reading

Lifestyle

How to enter your Sporty Spice era : It’s Been a Minute

Published

on

How to enter your Sporty Spice era : It’s Been a Minute

How to enter your Sporty Spice era.

Getty Images/quantic69/Olga Kurbatova/Anastasiia Zvonary/Photo Illustration by NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Getty Images/quantic69/Olga Kurbatova/Anastasiia Zvonary/Photo Illustration by NPR

Reality dating and professional sports are not as different as you’d think.

Brittany is in her Sporty Spice era – she watched the NBA playoffs, she’s following World Cup games, and she’s watching the New York Liberty play their WNBA season. These games are daily – and so is the reality dating show Love Island. And she noticed that the two formats are not very different at all. Defector.com staff writer and co-owner Kelsey McKinney came to the same conclusion – so the two of them discuss why these games of athleticism and love can bring us together… and why they get valued differently in our culture.

For more episodes on sports and reality TV, check out:
Get rich or die trying: how sports betting is changing our love of the game
Is this the end of reality TV?
The ugly truth of America’s expensive homes

Advertisement

Support Public Media. Join NPR Plus.
Follow Brittany on Instagram: @bmluse

This episode was produced by Liam McBain. It was edited by Neena Pathak. Our Supervising Producer is Cher Vincent. Our Executive Producer is Barton Girdwood. Our VP of Programming is Yolanda Sangweni.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending