Connect with us

Finance

Finance Committee authorizes $27M settlement stemming from deadly police chase

Published

on

Finance Committee authorizes M settlement stemming from deadly police chase

A City Council committee on Friday agreed to pay $27 million to the family of a mother of six killed in a high-speed police chase — nearly triple the amount awarded by a jury — amid warnings that new evidence in the case exposed taxpayers to a settlement “well over $100 million.”

The settlement authorized by the Finance Committee is poised for full Council approval next week, and would go to the family of Stacy Vaughn-Harrell.

The 47-year-old woman and her then 21-year-old daughter, Kimberlyn Myers, were driving home in June 2017 — after Myers sang at a performance in Indiana — when they were hit by a car that was fleeing police through a residential area in Englewood at a speed of roughly 50 mph.

Vaughn-Harrell was killed, and Myers suffered serious injuries, including a concussion, a lacerated liver, and a broken collarbone requiring a plate and five screws. Vaughn-Harrell left behind six children, three of whom were teenagers.

Before the chase, police had pulled over a white Kia they believed was present during a shooting, though they didn’t know if the shots came from the car, the family’s attorney said at the time. A passenger got out of the car when it was pulled over, then the Kia sped off.

Advertisement

Police chased the Kia in an unmarked car, with a marked car following, according to the family’s trial attorney, who contended this violated department policy requiring a marked car to lead a chase using both lights and sirens.

The Kia had run through four stop signs before crashing into Vaughn-Harrell’s car at an intersection.

Three years ago, a jury awarded $10 million to the victim’s family.

On Friday, Deputy Corporation Counsel Margaret Mendenhall-Casey cited six reasons to explain why an appellate court’s decision to order a new trial based on an improper closing argument and other legal violations turned into a proposed $27 million settlement, all but $7 million shouldered by Chicago taxpayers.

Chief among them is a post-crash video that the “first jury did not see,” and the new trial judge has “already hinted he is inclined” to allow in a second trial, she said.

Advertisement

Lawyers for Vaughn-Harrell’s family likely would use that video “ to argue that our officers were callous,” Mendenhall-Casey said. “Video of Kimberlyn crawling over her mother’s dead body and falling to the ground while officers stood by and watched, the plaintiff will argue.”

Other factors that strengthen the family’s case include: likely testimony from all six of the victim’s children, only two of whom testified at the first trial; more detail about Myers’ traumatic brain injury as well as testimony from her and her doctors; and the fact that the six surviving children lost not only their mother but their home-schooling teacher.

A second jury would also be permitted to hear more criticism of the police officers involved in the pursuit that was not allowed during the first trial, Mendenhall-Casey said. And a grieving family that did not seek compensation for pain and suffering would now likely seek those funds.

“As you can see, a second trial would have a substantially different and larger case presented to it on damages,” Mendenhall-Casey told the Finance Committee. “If this matter proceeds to a second trial, the plaintiff will ask the jury to award well over $100 million dollars.”

The City Council recently rejected an $8.25 million settlement in another deadly police pursuit case. But the city’s managing deputy of litigation, John Hendricks, advised alderpersons not to roll the dice on this case.

Advertisement

“ We have a different case with new evidence. We have a different case with new witnesses. We have a different case with new and broader claims for damages. And we have a likelihood of more evidence coming in that was not allowed at the first trial based on judicial findings,” Hendricks said.

Citing a 2024 police pursuit case with a similar set of facts that culminated in a $79 million settlement, Hendricks said, “We have a new set of facts similar to set of facts that resulted in what people sometimes refer to as a nuclear verdict.”

During the public comment period that preceded Friday’s hearing, the Finance Committee heard tearful testimony from Myers.

“I am the individual who crawled out of that car. Who was not assisted by no officer. I did not see one hand reach out for me,” Myers said. “Every day there is pain that we all go through. Today is just as hard as it was on June 24, [2017].”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Finance

Proximo Congress 2026: US Energy & Infrastructure Finance | Insights | Mayer Brown

Published

on

Proximo Congress 2026: US Energy & Infrastructure Finance | Insights | Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a proud sponsor of Proximo Congress 2026. This senior meeting of the US energy, infrastructure, and digital infrastructure finance community is shaped around the questions credit and investment committees are actually asking in 2026: how asset classes are converging, how risk is being priced in a recalibrated policy and geopolitical environment, and how public and private capital are being structured together to deliver projects at scale.

Mayer Brown has also been recognized for three separate awards which will be presented during the event. These awards include:

  • Proximo North America Transport Deal of the Year 2025 – SR 400 Peach Partners
  • Proximo North America Rail Deal of the Year 2025 – Brightline West
  • Proximo North America LNG Deal of the Year 2025 – Port Arthur LNG 2

For more information, visit the event website. 

Continue Reading

Finance

What are nonconforming mortgages and what are the risks?

Published

on

What are nonconforming mortgages and what are the risks?

If you have ever taken out a mortgage, you’ll know there are a lot of requirements to meet. You may need to put down a certain amount and have a debt-to-income ratio below a certain threshold. You may also run into limits on how much you can borrow or what sources of income the lender will count.

These rules do not apply to all mortgages — just to conforming mortgages, which is what the majority of borrowers take out. However, mortgage lenders are increasingly offering what are known as nonconforming loans, or mortgages that do not “comply with every one of the strict standards put in place after the housing crisis,” said The Wall Street Journal. While “still a small portion,” the “share of mortgages using alternative lending practices” has “doubled in size over the past three years.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Finance

Financial Stress Is Changing What Consumers Value in Credit Cards | PYMNTS.com

Published

on

Financial Stress Is Changing What Consumers Value in Credit Cards | PYMNTS.com

What U.S. consumers ask of their credit cards has changed. For financially stressed households, it has little to do with rewards.

As more households turn to credit cards to manage liquidity and cover everyday expenses, a new set of practical concerns is driving card behavior: Can the card help avoid a missed payment? Can it make balances easier to track? Can it provide enough visibility into available credit and upcoming obligations to help manage an uncertain month?

Those concerns are beginning to reorder what consumers value most in their credit card relationships.

That evidence is clear in “Winning Top of Wallet: How Credit Card Apps Shape Choice,” a PYMNTS Intelligence and Elan Credit Card report examining how consumers use mobile apps to manage spending, payments and engagement across their credit card portfolios. The report found 30% of consumers primarily use credit cards to build credit or extend purchasing power, while another 22% primarily use cards for cash flow management, together outweighing rewards-based usage.

The divide is more pronounced among financially stressed households. Among consumers living paycheck to paycheck and struggling to pay bills, 40% cited credit dependence as their primary reason for using credit cards. Just 11% pointed to rewards.

Advertisement

For a growing share of consumers, credit cards are functioning less like discretionary spending products and more like liquidity management tools.

Advertisement: Scroll to Continue

What Matters Most

That evolution is also changing which app features matter most.

Among cash flow-focused consumers, 31% said scheduling payments or autopay encouraged them to spend more on a card, while 27% cited alerts and reminders. Credit-motivated consumers showed similarly high engagement with tools tied to available credit visibility and payment timing.

Rewards still influence spending behavior, particularly among financially stable households. Half of consumers who prioritize rewards said tracking or redeeming rewards through a mobile app encouraged them to spend more on the card.

Advertisement

But the report suggests that financial stress changes the hierarchy of engagement. As household budgets tighten, rewards become less central than predictability, visibility and control.

That shift helps explain why mobile apps increasingly influence which cards become top of wallet.

Among credit-dependent consumers, 77% said the quality of a credit card app influences which card they use most often. Credit-dependent consumers also reported the highest app adoption levels, with 77% using their primary card’s app regularly or occasionally.

The competition, in other words, is no longer simply about card acquisition. It is about becoming the card consumers rely on to navigate everyday financial management.

Digital Experience Becomes a Financial Retention Tool

The report also suggests that digital experience increasingly shapes retention risk.

Advertisement

Nearly 1 in 4 cardholders said a poor app or digital experience contributed to reduced card use. Among Gen Z consumers, that figure climbed to 45%.

At the same time, 7 in 10 cardholders said app quality influences which card becomes their primary card, underscoring how mobile interfaces are becoming embedded directly into consumer payment behavior.

For issuers, the implications extend beyond app design.

Consumers living paycheck to paycheck hold nearly as many credit cards as financially stable households, meaning financially stressed consumers are not disengaging from credit entirely. Instead, they are becoming more selective about which cards feel easiest to manage and most useful during periods of financial pressure.

Rewards and promotional offers still matter, particularly among affluent and financially stable consumers. But for a growing segment of households, the most valuable card may be the one that reduces uncertainty around balances, payment timing and available liquidity.

Advertisement

In a crowded multi-card market, financial visibility itself is becoming part of the product.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending