Connect with us

Entertainment

‘The White Lotus’ Season 3, Episode 4 recap: Pick up the phone, some answers are calling

Published

on

‘The White Lotus’ Season 3, Episode 4 recap: Pick up the phone, some answers are calling

“The White Lotus,” Mike White’s black comedy anthology series, is back on HBO for a third season. Times staffers love an escape, but since we can’t take a trip to Thailand to stay at a luxury resort, the next best thing is to immerse ourselves in the new season. Follow along with us for each episode as we discuss theories, observations and our favorite moments leading up to the finale. (Read our recaps: Episode 1, Episode 2 and Episode 3.)

From the opening moments of Episode 4, the characters telegraphed duress through some phone calls. Whatever Jaclyn (Michelle Monaghan) is feeling about her bestie Kate (Leslie Bibb), who might be a Trump supporter, takes a backseat when a call (and text) to her younger husband goes unanswered. Meanwhile, Belinda (Natasha Rothwell) connects with her son, Zion, as he prepares to board his flight to meet up with her: “Please be safe,” she tells him.

But it’s when genial hotel guard Gaitok (Tayme Thapthimthong) is given access to a gun and encouraged to familiarize himself with it after a robbery (and a lecture from his bosses) that the puzzle pieces seem to start locking into place.

This episode moves many of the characters outside the White Lotus resort. In an effort to keep from spiraling about her husband, Jaclyn rallies the ladies for a shift in scenery. But when another resort’s pool turns out, to Jaclyn’s extreme dismay, to be an oasis for older normies, she insists Valentin (Arnas Fedaravičius) take them on a better excursion. He obliges, leading them into the city center as Songkran, a celebration of the Thai New Year that involves water fights, is underway. In a moment crafted to provide us with endless GIFs, the friends are chased by kids armed with super soaker guns who hose the women in water, but you can’t wash away entitlement. They eventually meet up with Valentin and some of his friends at a party — what happens next remains to be seen.

However, the main event is a boat bash hosted by Greg/Gary (Jon Gries) and Chloe (Charlotte Le Bon), teased in last week’s episode. Despite Chelsea’s (Aimee Lou Wood) initial misgivings that something bad could await her there — “Things happen in threes. The robbery. The snake show. This could be some ‘Final Destination’ s—. Death is coming for me.” — she decides to attend after guilt-tripping Rick (Walton Goggins) into making an appearance before his flight to Bangkok. At the boat party, Chelsea manages to get Rick to share why he’s Bangkok-bound: “The dude who murdered my father owns this hotel,” he says.

Advertisement

Elsewhere, the Ratliff family continues to win the record for the most insane stories to share in therapy. Timothy (Jason Isaacs), who’s been self-medicating with Victoria’s Lorazepam, unintentionally flashes Piper (Sarah Catherine Hook) and Lochy (Sam Nivola) before breakfast — let this be a lesson to double-knot your robe belts, people. But the slip of skin didn’t derail the maritime festivities. At the boat party, Saxon (Patrick Schwarzenegger) continues to be an ick monster and Tim winds up swiping Victoria’s entire bottle of pills. We also learn that Tim’s grandfather was the governor of North Carolina, his father was a successful businessman, and both his parents are dead.

The Ratliff family heads to Greg/Gary and Chloe’s boat party.

(Stefano Delia / HBO)

Back on dry land, after Victoria (Parker Posey) stresses to Piper how lucky she is that, unlike the men on the boat, her father is a respectable man, Tim’s guilty conscience leads him to retrieve his phone from Pam. Messages come flooding in. And another phone call signaling doom takes place: Tim calls his attorney and learns that Kenny Nguyen, his associate in the scandal he is caught up in, is cooperating with the feds. Tim is advised to plead guilty to embezzlement and fraud so that he can cut a deal where, if he’s lucky, he’d only serve a few months in prison. “I would rather die. I would rather f—ing die. What am I supposed to tell my family?” he says. That’s when he spots the gun Gaitok left unattended in the nearby security shed.

Advertisement

Then there’s Belinda, who can’t shake the feeling she has about the ubiquitous rich bald guy. She does an internet search on Tanya McQuoid, which brings up news articles about her death and how authorities want to question Greg/Gary. In the episode’s closing moments, we see Greg/Gary scrolling through Belinda’s Instagram grid, stopping at a photo of her with her son. To quote Saxon, “S—’s about to get crazy!”

Before we begin this week’s analysis, we’re saying bon voyage to Meredith Blake, who has departed The Times after more than 12 years. Much like Tanya McQuoid, we won’t forget her. Now it’s time for Maira Garcia, this week’s sub-in, Greg Braxton and Yvonne Villarreal, platinum-status members of “The White Lotus” frequent guest program, to break it all down.

Who do we think is the corpse this week? Does the gun that’s loaned to Gaitok give us a clue?

Garcia: As much is at it would make sense to put my money down on someone from the Ratliff family, knowing how this show has played things in previous seasons, I’m not certain it’s one of them just yet. Tim is obviously experiencing a crisis, but Chelsea’s speech to Rick is awfully ominous. But that may also be too on the nose. Chelsea is very sweet and she appears to be benign compared to everyone else, but sadly, bad things happen to good people.

Braxton: I’m sticking with my previous pick of Victoria having a premonition. Although Chelsea’s mention of her possible “Final Destination” fear may ring true. It would be a cruel outcome. But those movies have no mercy.

Advertisement

Villarreal: I’m going to keep shifting my answer just so I can have a better shot of claiming that I guessed correctly. With that said, given all of poor Gaitok’s bad luck and this added detail about the gun, I thought maybe the dead body could be Mook in one of his blundered attempts to save the day. But with Tim taking possession of it, I don’t think that’s it. I also am skeptical the corpse was a victim of a gunshot. Maybe someone ate the fruit from the pong-pong tree, or suffered a snake bite, or a death glare from one of the monkeys was extra strong that morning.

It’s made clear again in this episode that Tim and Rick do not like each other. Is it just vibes or do you think there’s more to it?

Garcia: You know, I hadn’t given this much thought until you raised it, Yvonne. I think I’ve been more focused on the vibes between Rick and Greg/Gary, but I need to know what you think.

Braxton: Look at how Rick treats his girlfriend. Rick doesn’t like anybody unless they’re providing him with weed. He’s miserable, and sometimes misery does not love company.

Villarreal: Rick is very much the Hugh Grant of this trip — annoyed by everything around him in a way we can’t help but relate to — so I can see this tension stemming from something as slight as Tim breathing too loud or talking by speakerphone on his cell during that first boat trip to the resort. But it’s obvious we’re supposed to sense it, and I want to know why!

Advertisement
A woman in a colorful long-sleeve swimsuit cover-up stands facing a man in a black floral short on a dock by a yacht.

Sweet Chelsea (Aimee Lou Wood) learns why Rick (Walton Goggins) is so intent on escaping to Bangkok.

(Stefano Delia / HBO)

Speaking of Rick, what do you make of the story he tells Chelsea about his dad?

Garcia: It’s heartbreaking because I think he’s being truthful. As grouchy as Rick can be, he doesn’t seem like the type to lie, especially not to Chelsea. But you have to wonder whether his mother told him a tall tale as a child to comfort him. Trauma can be strange like that.

Braxton: That’s a hell of a burden to carry around all your life. I suspect the story is true, but I also suspect it goes deeper than that. That could definitely be revealed before we reach the end.

Advertisement

Villarreal: Not to throw his dead mother under the bus, but because this show makes me question everything it presents to me, I feel like maybe his mom told him that story on her deathbed to make him feel better about why his dad wasn’t in his life. Am I being too cynical?

Garcia: No, I’m with you on this.

Do you find it strange that Belinda hadn’t known about Tanya’s passing until now?

Garcia: Incredibly. Meredith raised this point in last week’s recap. Wouldn’t this have been news around work at least? I’d like to say most people scroll the news, but we know that’s not true [cries in falling subscription revenue]. That’s the only logical reasoning I can come up with.

Braxton: What’s bothering me even more is that Belinda recognizes Gary/Greg from two years ago. I can’t recall any significant interaction between then. One element of Jon Gries, which makes his acting and his character, is his physical ordinariness. Gary/Greg is a guy who could easily fade into the background in a crowded environment — there’s nothing distinctive about his look that would have set him apart from the hundreds of other ubiquitous bald guys who passed through the White Lotus where Belinda works. Walk into any supermarket and you’ll see at least five guys who look like Gary/Greg. Belinda’s nagging suspicion that she recognizes him is a stretch for me.

Advertisement

Villarreal: I don’t know that I agree with you on that, Greg. Women remember weird dudes. And Greg/Gary is a weird dude. I do find it strange that Belinda would not have heard about Tanya’s death through the work grapevine. I also definitely paused the screen. And the headlines about the death were from 2022, but there was one headline from CNN in the mix that was from 2024, which is clearly closer to when these events take place. So roughly two years have passed. And that CNN headline was about a Hollywood production company landing the rights to Tanya’s story — so I feel like that says this got enough public attention for that to happen? Maybe Belinda is just not doomscrolling like the rest of us. And if that’s the case, I need her master class on that now more than ever.

A woman in a red and white striped shirt looks intently at the screen of a laptop.

Belinda (Natasha Rothwell) learns to doomscroll — she’s just like us now!

(Fabio Lovino / HBO)

Jaclyn and her pals do not have a good experience when they finally venture outside the White Lotus. What is Mike White saying about culture clash and class?

Braxton: Although the women the trio meet at the other resort they visit are polite, they and the other guests are depicted as unattractive, almost grotesque. “Something is off,” Jacklyn whispers to her friends. They are way “above” these folks and can’t wait to get away from them. To me, it speaks to the elitism and shallowness of the trio that they are repelled by folks who are not as upscale as they are — they are repelled by “the great unwashed.” Their discomfort increases when they venture into town for Thai New Year. The native children sense their discomfort and escalate the watery attack, sending the women running for cover. Their horror indicates to me a rejection of the culture they have thousands of dollars to travel to. They are more comfortable being around the wealthy white tourists at the resort.

Advertisement

Garcia: And that scene at the other resort also reflects their ageism, a topic that came up in Episode 2 when Laurie and Kate talked about Jaclyn’s “waxy” face. We also know Jaclyn married a younger man, and she seemed aghast at being among older common folk. There are a few layers at work here, of course. These scenes were a vivid reflection of the show’s examination of race, culture and class.

Villarreal: Considering how much time White spent studying Thai culture and observing the kinds of tourists that visit, it’s exactly the depiction I’d expect of privileged travelers who want the photo op more than they want to explore the island and experience its offerings. They don’t care to actually understand another culture or truly bask in its surroundings, they just want to feel enough culture to post Instagram stories that will make you envious while you’re stuck at home.

Three drenched women stand in the aisle of a convenience store as one pulls down to her sunglasses to look outside.

Kate (Leslie Bibb), Jaclyn (Michelle Monaghan) and Laurie (Carrie Coon) drenched in privilege.

(Fabio Lovino / HBO)

Kate’s tight smile while being questioned about politics in last week’s episode was a masterclass in facial acting. But Chelsea’s sad face work with Rick over breakfast was just as inspiring. Do we need to start handing out Best Facial Expression awards?

Advertisement

Garcia: Only if I can give one to Mook for when she politely friend-zoned Gaitok.

Braxton: My candidate would be Amrita (Shalini Peiris), the spiritual counselor who always looks at Rick with interest and concern even as he is horribly rude to her. And when she tells him her story has touched his heart, it’s almost like she is smitten. If I were Chelsea, I’d keep a very close eye on her.

Villarreal: Chelsea’s pout to Rick was top-tier. But the one that had me cackling was Victoria’s reaction in taking stock of the odd couplings on the boat — the raised eyebrows, the sucking of her teeth and the sigh was an exquisite display of subtle judgment.

Greg/Gary somehow manages to feel even more dark and menacing. Why do you think he was looking at Belinda’s Instagram?

Garcia: OK, this gave me the heebie-jeebies. There was also that ominous shot of him on the boat looking down at the party. Dude’s nefarious and slimy and anything shady seems to have to do with him. With that said, Jon Gries’ talent is on full display in this role.

Advertisement

Braxton: Evil people often do research on their victims before laying the trap.

Villarreal: He’s definitely up to no good, trying to find her weak spot to keep her from gabbing to authorities. To quote Belinda, motherf—!

Who will party harder: our ladies Kate, Jaclyn and Laurie, or Saxon and Lochy?

Garcia: Nothing gives me more joy than seeing middle-aged women have fun, so I can’t wait to see how they party with Valentin and his crew.

Braxton: Girls just wanna have fun. They just wanna, they just wanna …

Advertisement

Villarreal: Let’s take notes for our next work lunch. Also, speaking of Saxon, how has Erewhon not announced a ridiculously priced smoothie in his honor by now?

Garcia: I hope you get a commission for this million-dollar idea.

Whose storyline do you find most compelling four episodes in?

Garcia: I’m going with Rick. He remains an enigma, though his revelation to Chelsea gives us more to look forward to. I want to know what he does, who he knows and whether he meets Sritala’s husband, who we’re being led to believe killed his father.

Braxton: I vote for Gaitok. He’s such a good guy, but a dark cloud is following him. The theft of the gun while he was out of the guardhouse will be another black mark. Things will not end well for him.

Advertisement

Villarreal: I’m with you, Greg. I want to protect Gaitok at all costs. But Rick’s troubled aura has me so intrigued. I want him to get the answers he needs to move on in life, but I worry he’ll get answers that will only do more to harden him.

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: Travolta’s “Propeller: One-Way Night Coach” is One for the Ages — All Ages

Published

on

Movie Review: Travolta’s “Propeller: One-Way Night Coach” is One for the Ages — All Ages

Back in the good ol’days — the ’90s — John Travolta would love to get off the topic of “Michael,” “Pulp Fiction” or “Get Shorty” in interviews with film journalists like me and regale us with how utterly besotted he had been with his first flying experience, how that drove his passion for piloting and buying planes and airfield-adjacent luxury houses.

He didn’t even seem to mind having to move house when this or that development balked at him flying his Boeing 707 out of there on the way to locations.

Travolta would tell any journalist who asked that he was writing a kid-friendly book, “Propeller: One Way Night Coach,” based on his first flights as a child in old propeller driven airliners — cheap red-eye overnight treks with too many connections for your average jet age traveller to tolerate.

I remember picking up the book when it came out later in the ’90s — at an airport gift shop — and thinking “Well, that’s as cute as I figured.”

And now, decades later and trapped in the B-movie hell of his post “Gotti” career, Travolta’s turned that cute book into the most delightful, fanciful and colorful bon bon of a movie.

Advertisement

“One Way Night Coach” is a child’s fantasy of flight and flying the way it used to be — with pristine, uncrowded, futuristic airports, an early ’60s era of jets and prop planes with over-uniformed stewardesses in white gloves, the days “Back before every Joe Sweatsock could wedge himself behind a lunch tray and jet off to Raleigh-Durham,” as Sideshow Bob memorably sneered on “The Simpsons’.”

It’s a fictionalized account of Travolta’s childhood about an only child (at least two Travolta siblings have bit parts in this movie) of a never-made-it/never-will actress/single-mom (Kelly Eviston-Quinnett) who indulges her aviation-obsessed eight-year-old with a cheap cross-country overnight flight.

Little Jeff (Clark Shotwell) will revel in almost every Idlewild to Pittsburgh to Dayton to Chicago to Kansas City to Denver and Los Angeles minute. He strolls into the cockpit to meet pilots, charms the stewardesses and checks out the sleeping bunks on the TWA Lockheed Super Constellation, loving even the delays if not the Chicken Cordon Bleu he’s offered on legs of the journey that offer a meal.

And as he’s an observant child, he comments (Travolta narrates) on his 50ish mother’s vamping and posing, her choice of cigarettes (Newports) and drinks, the solo traveling men whose attention she pursues and earns.

“I was her best audience,” adult Jeff remembers of the mother who’d read him plays as bedtime stories and delusionally hopes that this trip to Los Angeles might be her “big break” even though she’s pushing 50.

Advertisement

Hollywood called,” she’d explain about their overnight cheap flight arrangements to ticket agents and crew. “They told me to take the next flight!”

At every turn, Jeff meets or sees kindness — stewardesses who indulge his many questions and bump them up to first class on the mostly-empty planes, a captain who fixes his toy model of a Constellation, a mentally ill flyer who flips out but is calmed by a flight attendant who isn’t overworked and frazzled in jet-powered tin-can jammed with Joe and Jane Sweatsocks who think nothing of traveling in their pajamas.

Normally, I cringe at pictures this reliant on voice-over narration. I recoil from stars who populate their picture with Sandler etc. offspring. But “Propeller” is unfailingly sweet and never cloying.

Sure, it’s fictionalized. But if you’ve followed Travolta’s life and career, a lot of him is in this — his raptoruous engagement with flying, an indulged child who developed a taste for fine food and creature comforts, a mother who was his guiding star as an actor.

I get why there are less adoring reviews than mine floating around “Propeller.” It’s unfailingly sweet. Mom’s man-hunting is seriously dated. This TWA tale is decorated with Gershwin’s majestic “Rhapsody in Blue” — United Airlines’ signature tune. And Travolta’s been around long enough for recent generations to come up and not feel a connection to the “Saturday Night Fever/Get Shorty” star whose career has fallen off and life has been visited by too much tragedy.

Advertisement

But I’d hate to be seated next to anybody who doesn’t appreciate this adorable, pristine and nearly perfect aviation fantasy on any flight, much less an overnight one.

Rating: TV-PG

Cast: Clark Shotwell, Kelly Eviston-Quinnett, Ellen Travolta, Ella Beau Travolta, Olga Hoffmann and John Travolta.

Credits: Scripted and directed by John Travolta, based on his book. An Apple TV+ release.

Running time: 1:01

Advertisement
Unknown's avatar

About Roger Moore

Movie Critic, formerly with McClatchy-Tribune News Service, Orlando Sentinel, published in Spin Magazine, The World and now published here, Orlando Magazine, Autoweek Magazine

Continue Reading

Entertainment

After ‘Barbie’ success, Mattel looks to He-Man for another box-office lift

Published

on

After ‘Barbie’ success, Mattel looks to He-Man for another box-office lift

Three years ago, Mattel Inc. struck box-office gold — or rather, pink — with the billion-dollar success of “Barbie.”

In its first return to theaters since the female-forward phenomenon, the El Segundo toymaker is turning to the brawny He-Man for another box-office lift.

Its latest film, “Masters of the Universe,” opens this weekend, as Mattel looks to build on that previous success and continue extending its signature toy brands into the entertainment arena.

“The movie is very much in tune with culture,” said Mattel Chief Executive Ynon Kreiz. “Everything is much more contemporary relative to what was created more than 40 years ago, but it’s still very true to the origin story and to the DNA of the brand.”

The new film arrives at a pivotal time for Mattel, which is facing pressure from investors to grow its business. The maker of Hot Wheels, American Girl and Uno has recently confronted a challenging market for toys, beset by tariffs on goods produced overseas and weaker-than-expected demand for Barbie dolls and Fisher-Price preschool products.

Advertisement

Amid uncertainty in the toy market and the fallout from tariffs, Mattel’s net income dropped 25% to $398 million in 2025. And since the company announced disappointing holiday sales totals in February, its stock has dropped more than 30%, closing at $14.34 on Wednesday.

“Masters of the Universe” toys at Mattel headquarters in El Segundo.

(Myung J. Chun / Los Angeles Times)

The share price slide prompted investor Southeastern Asset Management to send a letter last month to Mattel leadership suggesting the toy maker should sell itself and go private. Southeastern manages about 4% of the company’s stock on behalf of its clients.

Advertisement

“The frustration among investors has been the fact that if you look at the business from 2021 through 2025 and even this year … the business really hasn’t grown,” said Eric Handler, a Roth Capital senior media and entertainment analyst, referring to Mattel. “This is a company that needed something fresh in the portfolio, and there’s a wide range of investments being made, of which ‘Masters of the Universe’ is one part.”

Kreiz pushed back on the idea that the company is not growing. In the fourth quarter of 2025, net sales were up 7% to $1.8 billion, though the result was not as strong as the company expected.

Mattel has spent $1.2 billion in the last three years to buy back shares, with an additional $1.5-billion share repurchase planned for the next three years.

“We’re investing in our own stock because we believe it is undervalued,” he told The Times in an interview at his office, which has floor-to-ceiling windows that give an expansive view of El Segundo. “We absolutely agree that the share price doesn’t reflect the progress that we’ve achieved over the last few years financially, operationally, our place in culture, the strength of our brands, and the continued expansion of the business. And more importantly, the potential that we have down the road.”

“Masters of the Universe” is a key variable in that equation.

Advertisement
Ynon Kreiz, chief executive of Mattel.

Ynon Kreiz, chief executive of Mattel.

(Myung J. Chun / Los Angeles Times)

The movie, which had a budget of roughly $170 million, is expected to bring in $25 million to $35 million in the U.S. and Canada during its debut weekend. That’s a far cry from the $162-million opening haul of “Barbie,” but box-office analysts say that film captured the cultural zeitgeist in a way that’s hard to replicate.

The ‘80s-era “Masters of the Universe” is “a property that was famous with a certain group of fans, but it hasn’t had much of a pop culture presence,” said Shawn Robbins, who directs movie analytics at Fandango and founded the forecasting site Box Office Theory. The movie has notched a respectable 74% approval rating from critics on aggregator Rotten Tomatoes.

“There’s been so many callbacks to nostalgic franchises,” he said. “Some people are always on board for them, and maybe the positive reviews bring people in who were on the fence. But people are also ready for something fresh and new and exciting.”

Advertisement

Kreiz said he’s often asked how the company will match the success of “Barbie.”

“The answer is, we don’t need to match ‘Barbie’s’ success for movies to have a meaningful economic impact on the company,” he said. “Not every movie will be ‘Barbie.’ If we create quality content that people want to watch and create quality experiences that people are engaged with, good things happen, and these brands will resonate and will be here for years to come.”

While theatrical revenue is important, the measure of success for “Masters of the Universe” could also include its eventual reception on streaming platforms and, of course, toy sales, analysts said.

There are hundreds of products tied to the movie, from collectible action figures of Nicholas Galitzine’s He-Man and Camila Mendes’ Teela, to branded Uno decks, Legos, clothing and skateboards.

Skeletor from "Masters of the Universe."

Skeletor from “Masters of the Universe.”

(Myung J. Chun / Los Angeles Times)

Advertisement

“For us, it’s a huge win already,” said Robbie Brenner, president of Mattel Studios and chief content officer, who also served as a producer on the film. “We have reinvigorated and relaunched this brand that has been around for decades … and done it in a way with just the best-in-class toys. Obviously that’s our bread and butter. And then to have made an epic, incredible movie … is a huge win.”

While Mattel does not yet have sales totals for its “Masters of the Universe” toys, executives said during an earnings call in late April that product sales were “growing double digits” amid strong customer demand, particularly from adults.

When Kreiz was named CEO in 2018, he saw the potential for Mattel to expand beyond toys. In an entertainment landscape dominated by known franchises and intellectual property, the former TV and media executive wanted to leverage the company’s IP in new ways to attract consumers.

Hence, Mattel has expanded into real-world experiences such as a Barbie pop-up at Coachella or a traveling Hot Wheels monster truck show. In February, the company fully acquired Mattel163 mobile game studio after buying out a stake held by Chinese tech firm NetEase. The studio has released games based on Uno, Skip-Bo and other Mattel intellectual property.

Advertisement

And on the film and television front, the Mattel Studios division now has 51 people — most of whom are based in El Segundo — focused on projects across platforms.

After “Masters of the Universe,” Mattel Studios plans to release a “Matchbox” streaming movie in October. The division has more than a dozen films in development that have been announced, including an American Girl movie with Paramount, Polly Pocket with Amazon MGM Studios, as well as a live-action Magic 8 Ball series from M. Night Shyamalan.

“The journey for the company was to evolve from being a toy manufacturer that was making items to become an IP company that is managing franchises,” Kreiz said. “It’s not that we’re not creating toys — it’s obviously a big part of our business — but the opportunity is to expand so much more than the physical product.”

“Masters of the Universe” was in development for years at several different studios before it was picked up by Amazon MGM.

That partnership stemmed from Mattel’s work on the “Barbie” movie with Courtenay Valenti, then president of production and development at Warner Bros. Pictures who is now head of film at Amazon MGM.

Advertisement

“Masters of the Universe” felt like a good property for Mattel to bet on because of its nostalgia factor and deep bench of colorful characters, from the green tiger Battle Cat to the heavily armored Ram Man and ever meme-able Skeletor, which the company hopes will attract new audiences, Brenner said.

The movie is directed by Travis Knight — chief executive of stop-motion studio Laika who also led the 2018 “Transformers” spin-off “Bumblebee” — who Brenner said “nailed” the narrative’s tone. (It didn’t hurt that Knight was already a fan of the franchise and had sported the He-Man haircut as a child.)

“It’s a property that’s kind of out there,” said Brenner, who grew up watching He-Man and his twin sister She-Ra. “It’s got all these crazy characters. But just riding that line between what is funny and kind of irreverent and then kind of heartfelt, that is a very hard thing to put in a blender and to get right.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Movie Review: Paul Rudd and Nick Jonas hit the right notes in ‘Power Ballad’

Published

on

Movie Review: Paul Rudd and Nick Jonas hit the right notes in ‘Power Ballad’

Let’s just say that the wedding band has never occupied the most exalted rung of the ladder in music.

Playing “September” and “Celebration” is often what’s most required. As one member of the Bride and the Groove, the band at the center of John Carney’s new film, puts it: They’re not rock stars. They’re human jukeboxes.

But in “Power Ballad,” a wedding band singer and pop star cross paths. For one night, all of the stratification of the music world falls away. “Power Ballad” starts like a fairy tale.

Since 2007’s “Once,” the Irish writer-director has focused his films on the redemptive capacity of music. Carney, who was once a bassist for the Frames, knows from experience. From “Sing Street” to “Flora and Son,” he has made unabashedly earnest tales where a song, or just picking up an instrument, changes lives.

This can, undoubtedly, lead Carney into sentimental territory. Lucky for him, his chosen subject — music — is more worthy of sentiment than almost anything else. Yet the song doesn’t quite remain the same in “Power Ballad,” a movie that begins with the gentle sweetness Carney is known for, but detours into something more discordant.

Advertisement

Rick (Paul Rudd) is an American musician who gave up on his once-promising rock band’s future to instead live with his wife (Marcella Plunkett) and teenage daughter (a spunky, underused Beth Fallon) in Dublin. His former group was called Octagon, a perfect former band name if there ever were one.

But for years, Rick has fronted the Bride and the Groove. It’s an unromantic day job (or rather a night one) that hasn’t entirely sapped his belief in his own songwriting. During an encore at one wedding, he plays an original tune and is mentally transported to an arena full of swaying fans. When he snaps out of it, he’s staring at an empty dance floor and faces that say: That wasn’t Kool & the Gang.

At another wedding at at a castle, the band is asked to let a friend of the newlyweds sit in. They reluctantly agree, and are surprised to see the very popular boy band veteran, Danny (Nick Jonas), step on stage. He sings Stevie Wonder’s “I Wish,” and it’s great. Though Rick had just dismissed Danny’s music as “manufactured content for young, excitable teens,” he discovers Danny is a genuine musician.

But, later that night, something even more remarkable transpires. Rick bumps into Danny, and the two quickly hit it off. They begin jamming together and sharing songs that need work. They are both so jazzed by their unlikely collaboration that they play into the next morning.

The actual moment of artistic creation, and the craft it requires, is something the movies almost always skip over. But capturing collaborative juices flowing is exactly what Carney excels at. You can feel his joy in it. So it’s fitting that one of the unfinished songs Rick plays for Danny, “How to Write a Song (Without You),” is about creative invention.

Advertisement

It’s here when you wonder where “Power Ballad” is headed. Is this, for Rick, the beginning of a beautiful friendship? Will they turn into the next great songwriting duo, lifting Rick out of weddings and proving to the world that Danny is more than a boy-band pretty face?

That is very possibly the movie Carney might have made a decade ago. But “Power Ballad,” which he co-wrote with Peter McDonald (who also co-stars as a band member), shifts six months ahead in time. Rick is standing in a shopping mall when the familiar lyrics of “How to Write a Song” softly float through the stores. He stands dumbfounded in the gleaming halls of commerce, a befuddlement that slowly turns into outrage the bigger and bigger Danny’s smash hit grows.

“Power Ballad” loses some of its steam in its second half, which follows Rick’s struggle for justice. Making things considerably harder is that he can find no recorded demo of the song. His family and his band don’t even really believe him.

But even as the movie struggles to sustain its opening refrain, Carney’s film is always riffing on ideas of authenticity and aspiration in music. That Jonas is, himself, a former boy band star who has at times gone it alone, lends the movie a direct connection to contemporary music, where tussles over authorship are increasingly common.

Jonas has been good in other films (notably the “Jumanji” movies), but this is his most ambitious and convincing performance to date. It’s a testament to the movie that Danny’s theft isn’t a purely villainous act. He gives the song a bridge and the vocal power to take it to another level. He’s under mounting pressure from his label to deliver a hit. An executive (Jack Reynor) wants “Danny 2.0” but has little faith he can supply it.

Advertisement

But it’s an even more well-tailored role for Rudd. He memorably and very goofily played a bassist in the 2009 comedy “I Love You, Man.” But while he sings well, it’s not his musical chops that lift the performance. It’s more that Rick, a contented family man with unrealized rock-star dreams, gives the exceptionally genial Rudd more notes to play as an actor. Rudd makes for a very likeable everyman out to convince the world he is capable of a beautiful song.

And that’s the abiding belief of Carney’s. No matter all the struggles, the artistic injustices, the corporate hegemony, he still believes that if you make something truly soulful, it will break through. It will claw its way to the surface, and move people. It’s undoubtedly gotten harder since “Once,” this movie seems to admit. The world is against you. But what one person can offer, a ballad or otherwise, still has power. Fairy tale or not, that’s worth believing in.

“Power Ballad,” a Lionsgate release in theaters Friday, is rated R by the Motion Picture Association for “language throughout and some drug use.” Running time: 108 minutes. Three stars out of four.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending