Connect with us

Entertainment

No one has higher expectations for 'Suits LA' than the creator of the 'Suits' universe

Published

on

No one has higher expectations for 'Suits LA' than the creator of the 'Suits' universe

Aaron Korsh hates thinking about expectations. He sees it as a pointless mind game that he has no real control over. But when you’re the creator of a cable legal drama — in this case, “Suits” — that concluded nearly six years ago and became, to the surprise of many, the most-streamed show of 2023 when it hit Netflix, it’s impossible to be oblivious to the pending opinions. But Korsh insists he’s more concerned about meeting the bar he’s set for himself and the quasi spinoff series, launching Sunday on NBC, to worry about everyone else’s.

“I’m incredibly stressed out all the time with the totality of making this thing be something that I feel like I’m proud of,” Korsh says on the set of “Suits LA” earlier this month while sitting in a corner nook lined with law books on shelves. “But because of that, I don’t really think about how it’s going to be received at all because I have zero control over that. The only thing I can control is, do I love it? Am I proud?”

Korsh, 58, is not usually on the “Suits LA” set — most of his time is spent with the show’s writers at a rented office space across town on the Fox lot in Century City — but he appreciates the ability to drop in when he can, especially for key scenes in the show’s world building. He didn’t get to do it as easily or as often with the flagship series, which was shot in Toronto.

Back then, Korsh was a first-time TV creator and showrunner helming one of the vestiges of USA network’s “blue sky” era, which consisted of bright and breezy dramas like “White Collar” and “Monk.” His glossy legal drama, which centered on hot shot corporate attorney Harvey Specter (Gabriel Macht) and the young guy with an insane memory (Patrick J. Adams) that he hired to be his associate even though he never attended law school, was originally conceived to revolve around investment bankers, Korsh’s former profession. But it became a legal drama because it was easier to create an episodic narrative around cases.

When “Suits” premiered in June 2011, typically a slower period for TV, the biggest hits then were tentpole reality fare like “American Idol” and “Dancing With the Stars.” And Netflix, which began as a DVD-by-mail business, was just beginning to grow its streaming division and move into creating original content.

Advertisement

Now, Korsh is a few days into filming the seventh episode on a soundstage on the NBCUniversal lot, and is sitting in front of an assortment of monitors, absorbed by the scene playing out on screen. A group of the show’s fictional lawyers are convening for a partner’s meeting in a glass conference room inside the firm’s luxe offices. Even in this fictional world of high stakes, just as in real life, the meeting could have been an email.

But tone is being established. And that has Korsh’s focus.

A side character, already eliciting some whispered chuckles from the show’s out-of-earshot team members as the scene unfolds, improvises a line about Harvard — the Ivy central to the lore of “Suits” — that causes Korsh to yelp with laughter.

Stephen Amell as Ted Black, left, and Bryan Greenberg as Rick Dodson in “Suits LA.”

(David Astorga / NBC)

Advertisement

For Korsh, who got his break in television as a writer’s assistant on sitcoms, it’s those moments of levity that became as integral to “Suits” over its nine-season run as the characters’ tension and power playing. So, he revels when they unfold organically, even if he isn’t quite sure if this zinger will make the final cut.

“Aaron’s writing has a very specific rhythm and tone to it,” says Anton Cropper, who directed on the original “Suits” and returns for the spinoff as an executive producer, in between takes of the scene. “That is part of what makes this original series so special. I don’t think he’s hard to make laugh. But when a moment does surprise him, it’s fun.”

“Suits LA,” like its predecessor, isn’t what it initially set out to be.

While working on the original “Suits,” Korsh had an idea for a show about Hollywood dealmakers anchored by a former prosecutor-turned-agent. He says it is loosely inspired by an agent who pursued him as a client; the agent spent his previous legal career putting away members of the mob. It wasn’t until after “Suits” wrapped, and pandemic-forced listlessness set in, that Korsh felt motivated to explore the idea on the page. The project was known as “Ted” then.

Advertisement

Korsh was in talks about it twice with NBCUniversal Television. (Netflix boss Ted Sarandos has also stated publicly that Korsh shopped it to the streamer.) The first time, the note was given to turn the agents into — you guessed it — lawyers. Just as Korsh saw how that tweak made the original “Suits” better, he saw the narrative potential this time around too. “And it wasn’t that difficult. I added the criminal law element as opposed to just entertainment law to give the show a bit of a wider foundation,” he says.

He also says the original pilot was flashback-heavy, with roughly 15 scenes set in the past. A note was also given to remove them all, he says. He got rid of some over the course of development. (“I’m gonna tell this flashback story throughout the course of the first season,” he says.)

Even with the changes, however, it was passed over by the studio. But the long-gestating idea finally met its moment after a series of events: there was executive restructuring at the studio, the dual Hollywood strikes commenced, and the Netflix effect hit “Suits.”

“I was 150% sure that the day the strike was over, I was going to get a call from them [NBCU] saying ‘we want to do this,’” says Korsh days later when we reconvene at his office. “I didn’t know that they were going to say, ‘We want to call it ‘Suits LA.’” I was perfectly fine with it, though. I don’t really care what the title of the show is.”

“Suits LA” ditches the high-rise battles for Tinseltown-style face-offs with a new group of ambitious and stylishly dressed lawyers. Stephen Amell (“Arrow”) anchors the series as Ted Black, a former federal prosecutor from New York with a troubled parental relationship who has reinvented himself as a heavyweight entertainment lawyer representing some of Hollywood’s biggest names at Black Lane, the firm he started with his best friend, criminal lawyer Stuart Lane (“The Walking Dead’s” Josh McDermitt). They’re joined by two ambitious proteges, played by Bryan Greenberg and Lex Scott Davis, battling it out for the coveted title of head of entertainment. It sets the stage for backstabbing, strained loyalties, romantic possibilities and plenty of name-dropping — albeit with considerably less curse words than the original “Suits.” And while the real-life intersection of entertainment and the legal world offer plenty of inspiration, don’t expect a ripped-from-the-headlines take on the Justin Baldoni-Blake Lively case anytime soon — though some of the show’s writers admit to discussing the Hollywood drama.

Advertisement

“Suits LA” may be an unintentional spinoff from Korsh’s legal universe, but it’s not the first. “Pearson” was an offshoot that followed Jessica Pearson, Harvey’s high-powered mentor played by Gina Torres, as she left law and entered Chicago politics. It launched in 2019, but was canceled after one season. Korsh is quick to note his pride at the attempt, but suspects its darker tone may have made it less appealing to “Suits” fans. “Suits LA,” like “Pearson,” will feature some characters from the original; Macht will reprise his role as Harvey in a recurring guest stint as Ted’s former colleague.

That’s where expectations come into play.

During its original run, “Suits” was one of the top-rated cable shows — and even spawned adaptations in South Korea and Japan. But it gained a new, bigger life in the streaming era. (In addition to Netflix, the series streams on Peacock.) U.S. viewers watched 57.7 billion minutes of “Suits” in 2023, making it the most-viewed series that year, according to Nielsen. The curiosity surrounding Meghan Markle’s most notable TV credit — as longtime star paralegal Rachel Zane in the series — because of her ties to the British royal family, likely contributed to some of the interest.

1 Two men wearing suits sit side by side

2 A woman in an evening dress looks at a man in a suit

3 A woman in a dress stands beside a man in a suit

1. Patrick J. Adams, left, as Mike Ross and Gabriel Macht as Harvey Specter in “Suits.” (Steve Wilkie / USA Network) 2. Patrick J. Adams as Mike Ross and Meghan Markle as Rachel Zane in “Suits.” (USA Network / NBCU Photo Bank / NBCUniversal) 3. Sarah Rafferty as Donna Paulsen and Rick Hoffman as Louis Litt in “Suits.” (Shane Mahood / USA)

Advertisement

Clips of the show made the rounds on TikTok. Brands like e.l.f. Cosmetics and T-Mobile sought cast members for 2024 Super Bowl ads. Macht, Adams, Torres and Sarah Rafferty, in a nod to the show’s resurgence, were invited to present that year at the Golden Globes. Adams and Rafferty, who played Donna, the all-knowing assistant-turned COO in the original series, also launched a podcast, “Sidebar,” late last year to engage with fans.

Revisiting the series as a viewer, Adams has some thoughts on why “Suits” found a second wind: “Aaron and his team were really good at continuing to throw really interesting and dynamic problems at this group of people, week after week. … But fundamentally, what they did so well, and what we did so well, is we built that family and we made it a group of people that viewers wanted to return to and and wanted to see succeed, or fail, in some cases.”

Rafferty echoed the sentiment: “You felt his [Aaron’s] investment in the person you’re embodying, not just plugging the plot along,” she says. “I think it is magical that the energy of these characters live on.”

Some fans are curious to see how “Suits LA” fits alongside its predecessor. Others are skeptical, believing that it’ll feel like a copy-and-paste job of the original characters and their dynamics.

Advertisement

Amell, who says he experienced similar skepticism when he was cast as Oliver Queen/Green Arrow in the CW’s superhero drama, isn’t worried about it.

“It’s weird because I’m playing a new character that a lot of people feel like is a reimagining of another character, but he’s not,” he says, noting that Macht sent a text of support to Korsh that was shared with the “Suits LA” team. “Internet commentary is a very, very loud but very, very small portion of the overall fandom at large. If you are adamant that you’re not watching anything but the original show, God bless you. I kind of feel bad for you because it’s the same creative team and it’s an extension of the universe. None of it really matters until the show airs.”

Korsh puts it simply: “‘Suits LA’ is certainly not a copy of ‘Suits. These characters are unique people with their own drives, their own desires, their own senses of humor, and their own things that tick them off.”

Overseeing any series, let alone one with an engaged and protective fan base, is already a stressful undertaking. But last month Korsh also found himself confronted with the unthinkable: leading a show amid crisis — in this case, the wildfires sweeping through parts of L.A.

It was a scramble trying to make the right call under pressure. Production shut down on Jan. 8, a Wednesday, as the Palisades and Eaton fires raged. Korsh was asked by studio heads that same day if shooting should resume in the morning — “I said no. Though, I will say, I did not think I was the person that should be making the decision,” he says. Then, as Friday loomed, the studio communicated to Korsh that he had the greenlight to shoot the next day but was not obligated to do so. He chose to keep production on pause, though the writers continued to work in that time at their discretion. Greenberg, who stars in the series as entertainment lawyer Rick Dodson, lost his home, and Korsh said at least one member from the show’s crew did as well.

Advertisement

That weekend, after consulting with his agent, Korsh had his line producer check in with the crew to gauge their feelings about returning. Then, the decision was made to restart work.

“It was surreal,” he says, recalling those harrowing days, careful to make sure his emotions don’t strain his words. “I don’t think I have truly — or anybody I know has, really — grappled with what has happened … I really didn’t feel prepared to make the decisions, but with the collective wisdom of everyone, I think I am happy with the decisions we made.”

Being the decision maker for a TV series was not the path he was originally on.

A smiling Aaron Korsh in a blue button-down shirt

“I don’t think I have truly — or anybody I know has, really — grappled with what has happened,” says Aaron Korsh about the Los Angeles wildfires, which halted production on “Suits LA” for a period.

(Annie Noelker / For The Times)

Advertisement

Korsh grew up in a suburb just outside of Philadelphia; his father was a computer science professor and his mother is a psychologist. He, however, wanted to be a businessman like his wealthier uncle: “I wanted to pursue making money.” After studying finance at Wharton, he landed on Wall Street when it was still reeling from the 1987 stock market crash. He was making the money he was after, but he hated his job. Around that time, a former college roommate died, forcing Korsh to confront his own mortality. It provoked a negative attitude — he describes himself then as a “bratty young kid” — leading to a wake-up call. Korsh’s boss pulled him aside and gave him three choices: change his attitude and stay, quit or get fired.

Korsh quit.

He eventually moved to Los Angeles and landed a temporary real estate investment job. He became a TV writer almost by chance. A college friend who was a TV writer took him along to a table read of a sitcom pilot starring Bryan Cranston, before his “Malcolm in the Middle” and “Breaking Bad” fame.

“No one knew I wasn’t a writer so I just sat there and got to watch what they did and I couldn’t believe it,” he says . “I was like, ‘This is what you do for a living? This is the greatest thing ever.’ This is what I want to do.”

Korsh obsessively called around. He landed a production assistant gig on “Everybody Loves Raymond” thanks to a production coordinator who was intrigued that a former investment banker was eager to take a minimum-wage job. The next year, the show’s co-creator Phil Rosenthal made an extra writer’s assistant position for Korsh. He worked as a writer’s assistant at different shows for eight years before landing a writing spot on the short-lived ABC sitcom “Notes From the Underbelly.” But it was his brief time on “The Deep End,” a show about a group of young L.A. lawyers, that gave him a taste of the legal world that would come to define his career since.

Advertisement

When asked if he was able to enjoy the experience of “Suits” as he made it, Korsh chuckles. He points out that when the “Suits” pilot was shot, his son was about 6 months old; his daughter was born while the show was in its second season.

“I was a first-time parent and unprepared for all three of my children, and I felt torn between my two responsibilities,” he says. “I was in a bad mood much of the time. Season 4, I was the angriest, I think. And I actually called Phil Rosenthal … to talk to him about it. He was like, ‘Is it because the network won’t let you do what you want to do?’ I’m like, ‘No, they’ll let me do whatever I want. It’s just a totality of how hard it is.’”

That’s not what stands out for him now, though. “I tend to look backwards with nostalgia, rose-colored glasses, which I’m happy that I do,” he says. “I only remember the positive and I miss it … I’m lucky to have this job and I was incredibly satisfied with the results of those nine years. The other side of hard things is deep satisfaction and growth.”

Right now, as he moves past the halfway point of shooting the first season and is days away from the “Suits LA” premiere, Korsh is enjoying the moment even with the stress on his shoulders.

“I’m older and I’m approaching it differently — I’m not sure how,” Korsh says. “I’m definitely less obsessive about the words being exactly right or things being exactly as I had imagined or as good as I’ve imagined, but I’m not less obsessive about making the show as good as it can be. Right this second, I’m feeling pretty good. I am very happy with everything we’ve gotten.”

Advertisement

Movie Reviews

Movie review: Supergirl is a blast

Published

on

Movie review: Supergirl is a blast

Last year’s “Superman” ended with Iggy Pop singing “Because I’m a punk rocker, yes I am” — an ironic coda for a superlatively square hero. But it rings straightforwardly true for Superman’s cousin.

Milly Alcock’s Kara Zor-El, or Supergirl, sports not a spandex suit but a Blondie T-shirt. When we meet her in Craig Gillespie’s “Supergirl,” she’s been on an interstellar bender for days. She’s more Courtney Love than Clark Kent.

Nonchalant and sarcastic, Kara is also a little Han Solo-ish, you might say, given that she moves capriciously through the galaxy in her junky spaceship while getting in fights in extraterrestrial bars. She’s a welcome, jagged riff on more buttoned-up superheroes, and Alcock is terrific in the role. If only “Supergirl” was as good as she is.

While the latest DC release, and second under James Gunn’s stewardship, has its moments, “Supergirl” struggles to match Kara’s punk-rock energy with an equally spirited supporting cast and story.

Skepticism seems to have gathered for “Supergirl” ahead of its release. Many fans have argued it wasn’t the right next step for DC Universe. But I’m not so sure. Alcock’s breezy cameo in “Superman” was one of that movie’s highlights. Handing the follow-up to her, and her faithful floating dog Krypto, strikes me as an extremely natural next step. When in doubt, follow the dog.

Advertisement

And much of “Supergirl” is winning. It resides almost entirely in space, touching down only momentarily on Earth. In its consistently creative production design, clever needle drops and underdog story arc, “Supergirl” resides a little closer to Gunn’s “Guardians of the Galaxy” movies than other DC entries. Its outer space is filled with cosmic detritus, mean characters and cute critters. Seth Rogen as the voice of a tiny alien co-piloting a space bus is an inspired concoction, as is a shabbier sci-fi realm with rest stops along the intergalactic highway.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Justin Baldoni and wife break silence after ‘It Ends With Us’ legal battle with Blake Lively

Published

on

Justin Baldoni and wife break silence after ‘It Ends With Us’ legal battle with Blake Lively

Justin Baldoni has broken his silence after reaching a settlement in a lengthy and highly publicized legal dispute with Blake Lively.

Baldoni and his wife, Emily Baldoni, presented a united front in an Instagram video the couple shared Wednesday that began, “So we have not spoken publicly for the better part of the last two years, and it’s not because we haven’t had anything to say, because Lord knows we have.”

The “It Ends With Us” actor and director said that although they’d wanted to address the debacle that involved dueling lawsuits with Lively, nearly two years of tit-for-tat fodder and culminated in a confidential settlement, “something was telling us not to.”

The couple said they prayed about when to make a public statement. “This feels like the moment,” Emily said.

“What does feel important,” she continued, “is that we can genuinely say that we are sitting here today feeling immense gratitude for so many things and so many people and so many things that have happened to us.”

Advertisement

“Gratitude has saved us,” Justin added.

“I also feel that it’s important as we say that — in that gratitude — it doesn’t negate the injustice and the pain that we have also felt in the last few years, and we’ve had to wrestle with so many things and try to understand so many things,” Emily said. “How could something like this even happen? Let alone disguised as a fight for women. So much to unpack. And the truth is, reality is, is that there’s been a lot of trauma for us to move through as a family, which also makes it hard to speak.”

“We don’t even know this is the right thing to say, but we just know we need to share something,” Justin said. “What I will say is that there have been so many painful things that have been spoken into existence — “

“Untruthful,” Emily broke in.

“We didn’t want to add to the noise, so we just wanted to let the justice system run its course,” he said.

Advertisement

“And the truth and the facts have spoken for themselves,” Emily said.

The couple’s statement comes a year and a half after Lively filed a bombshell lawsuit against Baldoni alleging sexual harassment, retaliation and several other charges on the heels of a messy “It Ends With Us” summer release and press tour that fueled rumors of on-set turmoil.

Less than a month after the allegations against Baldoni rallied Hollywood against him, he countersued Lively, her publicist Leslie Sloane and her husband, Ryan Reynolds, for $400 million in damages, claiming they’d smeared his name in the press and wrestled away his control of the film. His suit was later dismissed.

In May, two weeks ahead of the trial, Lively and Baldoni reached an agreement to resolve their legal dispute, bringing an abrupt end to the contentious battle.

“The parties in the Blake Lively and Wayfarer Studios litigation have reached an agreement to resolve the matters,” lawyers for both sides said in a joint statement.

Advertisement

“The end product — the movie ‘It Ends With Us’ — is a source of pride to all of us who worked to bring it to life. Raising awareness, and making a meaningful impact in the lives of domestic violence survivors — and all survivors — is a goal that we stand behind. We acknowledge the process presented challenges and recognize concerns raised by Ms. Lively deserved to be heard. We remain firmly committed to workplaces free of improprieties and unproductive environments. It is our sincere hope that this brings closure and allows all involved to move forward constructively and in peace, including a respectful environment online.”

In June, a federal judge ordered Baldoni and his production company to pay Lively’s attorney fees related to his unsuccessful defamation lawsuit against her, but rejected her bid for additional damages.

“So, how are we doing?” the filmmaker said in the Instagram video. “We are healing, and if you’ve ever been through something traumatic, you know that healing isn’t linear. It lives different every day, and we have had to rethink for ourselves what is real. What matters, and it’s this. It’s our family. It’s our friends. It’s our community. It’s our faith.”

Times staff writer Josh Rottenberg contributed to this report.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

‘The Guest’ Review: Trine Dyrholm Gives a Scorcher of a Performance in a Gutsy Danish Party-Gone-Wrong Drama

Published

on

‘The Guest’ Review: Trine Dyrholm Gives a Scorcher of a Performance in a Gutsy Danish Party-Gone-Wrong Drama

A family and friends gather for a naming-day ceremony at a Danish seaside hotel, but an unexpected appearance by one uninvited attendee (Trine Dyrholm) ruptures the veil of bland, happy-clappy familial unity in director Mads Mengel’s gutsy, well-wrought debut feature, The Guest.

The most audacious move here may be Mengel and co-screenwriter Christian Bengtson’s choice to write something that will inevitably invite comparisons with Festen (The Celebration), arguably the most notorious Danish-language film of the last 30 years, which similarly revolved around a bougie gathering disrupted by angry revelations. But there’s a savvy 2026 vibe about the way the film refuses to create florid melodrama out of quotidian crisis, and instead observes with generosity as the characters grope awkwardly toward emotional détente and mutual forgiveness.

The Guest

The Bottom Line

When wetting the baby’s head goes too far.

Advertisement

Venue: Karlovy Vary Film Festival
Cast: Simon Bennebjerg, Trine Dyrholm, Josephine Park, Peter Gantzler, Petrine Agger, Mette Klakstein Wiberg, Kristine Kujath Thorp, Buster Lund Luscher
Director: Mads Mengel
Screenwriter: Christian Bengtson, Mads Mengel

1 hour 40 minutes

Festen-alumnus Dyrholm, having a bit of a career moment with outstanding performances both here and in the recent The Girl With the Needle among others, leads a uniformly excellent cast in a work that deserves celebration on the festival circuit and beyond.

Dyrholm’s Vibeke is technically the first person we meet, although she’s seen only in shadow at first as she smokes and drives while her unattached seatbelt, caught outside by a closed door, clatters on the road. This is the kind of unsafe driving her son Karl (Simon Bennebjerg) so deplores, a point of contention later on in the story when he will steal her car keys in interest of her own safety and that of others.

Advertisement

But well before we get to that flashpoint, the film introduces Karl, effectively the film’s protagonist, as he arrives at the swanky resort with his wife Emilie (Mette Klakstein Wiberg) and their infant son Elliot (Buster Lund Luscher). The young family, who’ve chosen this new, secular tradition instead of a christening to welcome their child to the world, are there a day before the ceremony to meet up with core family members.

As this advance party settles down for dinner, a table that includes Karl’s sister Rikke (Josephine Park) and Emilie’s parents Frank (Peter Gantzler) and Kirsten (Petrine Agger), there’s a surprise: Vibeke is coming, courtesy of Rikke’s invitation. Karl is quietly furious and seems determined to turn her away, even when she shows up minutes later. Poor Frank and Kirsten look on confused, determinedly polite in their insistence that all family members should be welcome.

Bengtson and Mengel’s economical script carefully dripfeeds backstory as the film unfolds to explain that Karl hasn’t spoken to his mother in years, that Rikke has taken over all the daily mom management and that she’s very worn out by it. Even so, she insists Vibeke is regularly taking her medication and isn’t a problem these days, although to Karl every weird anecdote and moment of emotional intensity is an augur of impending chaos. Rikke counters that their mother is just “big, that’s her personality not her condition.”

Interestingly, that specific condition is never named throughout, although armchair diagnosticians might spot many of the signs of bipolar disorder. But the film’s emotional focus on the person and her actions rather than the label is also very contemporary, reflecting a more holistic, inclusive mindset and approach to dealing with mental health issues.

Which is all fine and dandy, until Vibeke duly does skip a dosage and starts getting manic. One of the first signs of chemical imbalance arrives during the ceremony on the beach, when Vibeke carries little Elliot much further away from the shore than anyone wants, creating a panic. From there it just gets worse as Vibeke picks up on the censorious feeling emerging from the other party guests, who had found her so charming the night before when she’d led everyone to the casino to play roulette and diverted a bunch of partying teenagers from the room next to Karl and Emilie so they could get some sleep. When the toasts at the formal dinner begin, Vibeke’s mood darkens much further, and if we’ve all learned one thing from Festen, it’s be very afraid when a Dane gets up to make a toast.

Advertisement

Cinematographer David Bauer’s nimble-footed lensing and use of natural light does indeed hark back considerably to the look of those Dogme 95 movies back in the day, as does the naturalistic editing style deployed by Louis Emil Ramm Seeberg. But there are plenty of sins against the rules of cinematic chastity that marked that movement, such as the ample space made for Lasse Aagaard’s affecting, low-key score that amps up the anxiety as Vibeke starts to spiral.

That said, Mengel keeps things simple in sonic terms when it really counts, letting the musicality of Dyrholm’s deep, sonorous voice ring out on its own in the big monologue scenes. She is, as ever, utterly mesmerizing but the performance is made even more powerful by the muted, expressive reactions of the rest of the cast as they look on, frozen like deer in the headlights of the car crash of pseudo-christening. Moments of levity puncture the gloom, but the final feeling is one of numbed sorrow and pity for all these kind, fallible people, just trying to do their best.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending