Entertainment
Amid fears about Hollywood's future, L.A. approves $1-billion Television City project
For the past two and a half years, the battle for the future of L.A.’s Fairfax Avenue corridor has been raging between economic powerhouses.
Hackman Capital Partners, which owns and operates nearly two dozen studio properties, has been seeking to expand and modernize the historic 25-acre site known as Television City, where “American Idol,” “All in the Family” and scores of other shows were filmed.
Two neighborhood giants have pushed back against the project: A.F. Gilmore Co., which owns the Original Farmers Market, and the Grove LLC, which owns the popular Grove shopping center developed by billionaire Rick Caruso. Those businesses joined with neighborhood groups who say the project is too big and, without changes, will make local traffic much worse.
The debate over the $1-billion project has played out amid a serious downturn in the region’s entertainment industry, with studios shifting film and television production to Georgia, New Mexico and other out-of-state locations.
On Tuesday, the Los Angeles City Council sided with Hackman, voting 13-0 to approve the TVC project, including its environmental impact report, its tract map and new zoning for the site. Councilmember Katy Yaroslavsky, who represents the area, described the development as critical to the future of the local entertainment industry.
Yaroslavsky said out-of-state production has cost numerous Angelenos their jobs, tearing families apart and hurting restaurants, catering companies and other businesses.
“This project represents an opportunity, a real opportunity, to keep Los Angeles as the entertainment capital of the world,” she said. “We cannot let this opportunity pass us by. The stakes are simply too high.”
Zach Sokoloff, Hackman’s senior vice president, expressed gratitude for the council’s vote. That decision, he said, will be a critical part of the effort to rebuild the industry, along with Gov. Gavin Newsom’s push to expand Hollywood production tax credits.
The TVC project is expected to add 980,000 square feet of offices, soundstages, production facilities and retail space on the property, located on Fairfax at Beverly Boulevard. A 15-story office tower is planned for the interior of the campus. When fully built out, the facility would occupy nearly 1.7 million square feet.
Los Angeles City Councilmember Katy Yaroslavsky speaks Tuesday in support of the $1-billion TVC project, which would expand and redevelop the old CBS Television City site at Beverly Boulevard and Fairfax Avenue.
(Christina House / Los Angeles Times)
Yaroslavsky said she worked with Hackman to steadily reduce the size of the project over the past year, removing one tower entirely. But detractors have remained unconvinced, saying the project is still out of scale with its surroundings.
Shelley Wagers, co-chair of Neighbors for a Responsible TVC Development, said the developer provided “minimal concessions” to the nine businesses and community groups that filed challenges to the planning commission’s approval of the project. She contends that the project is more about the development of office space and less about studio operations.
“Given the flawed process and spotty administrative record, litigation is both inevitable and likely to be successful,” Wagers said after the vote.
Hackman Capital acquired the CBS Television City property in 2019, filing its application to redevelop the site two years later. In 2022, A.F. Gilmore and the Grove expressed “profound concern” about the development plan, calling it a “massively scaled, speculative development which, if approved, would overwhelm, disrupt, and forever transform the community.”
That same year, the Grove and A.F. Gilmore co-founded the Beverly Fairfax Community Alliance, using it to rally the neighborhood against Hackman’s project. Over a two-year span, the two companies poured nearly $1.2 million into the alliance’s public relations efforts, purchasing newspaper ads, billboard space and glossy mailers warning that the project would bring intolerable traffic and 20 years of construction.
Hackman fired back last spring, filing a complaint with the city Ethics Commission that called the Beverly Fairfax Community Alliance a “shell funded by private commercial interests.” In a letter to the commission, Hackman attorney Jim Sutton said the public deserved to know whether the alliance and its affiliated groups are “merely a ‘front’ for private commercial interests.”
Jason Kaune, an attorney for the Beverly Fairfax Community Alliance, said in an email that his client has complied with the city’s ethics rules, disclosing its spending on a quarterly basis. The Grove and A.F. Gilmore are the alliance’s sole funders, he said.
The alliance has been providing logistical support to Neighbors for a Responsible TVC Development, a coalition of community groups that includes the Beverly Wilshire Homes Assn. and Save Beverly Fairfax.
Architect’s rendering of the proposed renovations of the Television City property, located in the city’s Fairfax district.
(Foster + Partners and Television City)
Wagers, who co-chairs the neighbors organization, pushed back on the criticism from Hackman, saying she and her neighbors are acting out of concern for the Beverly Fairfax community — and are “not on anyone’s payroll.” She accused the developer of using concerns about film production to push through a project that is “wildly out of scale and out of character” with the neighborhood.
Stan Savage Jr., president & CEO of A.F. Gilmore Co., lodged his own concerns, telling the planning commission last year that traffic to and from the TVC project would make the Original Farmers Market, a major tourist destination, more difficult to reach.
“What the developer is proposing will have substantial and irrevocable consequences, damaging the small businesses of the market,” he told the commission.
Other business leaders have rallied around the TVC project. Jacqueline Canter, co-owner of Canter’s Deli, told the council on Tuesday that she has attended every City Hall hearing on the project to show her support.
“That’s how important this project is for the community,” she said. “TVC will create new jobs, which means more customers, more lunch orders and more business.”
The TVC project also drew support from construction trade unions and from the Entertainment Union Coalition, which represents 160,000 workers in Hollywood, including actors, directors and a wide array of behind-the-scenes players. In a letter to the city, the coalition warned that production work is so scarce that a significant number of workers face losing their homes — and are looking to move elsewhere.
“They aren’t choosing to leave Los Angeles,” the coalition wrote. “But in order to take care of themselves and their families, they will have to.”
Under the TVC proposal, Hackman would preserve and restore the 1952 Television City studio building designed by the architectural firm Pereira & Luckman — a move endorsed by the L.A. Conservancy, a historic preservation group.
Lawyers for the Grove and A.F. Gilmore did not immediately respond to questions about whether they will sue the city over the council’s vote. Lawyers for the companies have assailed the city’s handling of the approval process, saying it failed to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act.
Yaroslavsky described the final project as a compromise and noted that Hackman agreed to spend $6.4 million on community initiatives, including upgrades to nearby Pan Pacific Park. She also voiced hope that the various factions would avoid a drawn-out court battle.
Settlement conversations have already begun between the developer and critics of the project, Yaroslavsky said.
“I think they’re going to settle quickly. That’s my sense, that’s my hope,” she said. “I’m projecting optimism.”
Movie Reviews
Movie Review: A Home Invasion turns into a “Relentless” Grudge Match
I’d call the title “Relentless” truth in advertising, althought “Pitiless,” “Endless” and “Senseless” work just as well.
This new thriller from the sarcastically surnamed writer-director Tom Botchii (real name Tom Botchii Skowronski of “Artik” fame) begins in uninteresting mystery, strains to become a revenge thriller “about something” and never gets out of its own way.
So bloody that everything else — logic, reason, rationale and “Who do we root for?” quandary is throughly botched — its 93 minutes pass by like bleeding out from screwdriver puncture wounds — excruciatingly.
But hey, they shot it in Lewiston, Idaho, so good on them for not filming overfilmed Greater LA, even if the locations are as generically North American as one could imagine.

Career bit player and Lewiston native Jeffrey Decker stars as a homeless man we meet in his car, bearded, shivering and listening over and over again to a voice mail from his significant other.
He has no enthusiasm for the sign-spinning work he does to feed himself and gas up his ’80s Chevy. But if woman, man or child among us ever relishes anything as much as this character loves his cigarettes — long, theatrical, stair-at-the-stars drags of ecstacy — we can count ourselves blessed.
There’s this Asian techie (Shuhei Kinoshita) pounding away at his laptop, doing something we assume is sketchy just by the “ACCESS DENIED” screens he keeps bumping into and the frantic calls he takes suggesting urgency of some sort or other.
That man-bunned stranger, seen in smoky silhoutte through the opaque window on his door, ringing the bell of his designer McMansion makes him wary. And not just because the guy’s smoking and seems to be making up his “How we can help cut your energy bill” pitch on the fly.
Next thing our techie knows, shotgun blasts are knocking out the lock (Not the, uh GLASS) and a crazed, dirty beardo homeless guy has stormed in, firing away at him as he flees and cries “STOP! Why are you doing this?”
Jun, as the credits name him, fights for his PC and his life. He wins one and loses the other. But tracking his laptop and homeless thug “Teddy” with his phone turns out to be a mistake.
He’s caught, beaten and bloodied some more. And that’s how Jun learns the beef this crazed, wronged man has with him — identity theft, financial fraud, etc.
Threats and torture over access to that laptop ensue, along with one man listing the wrongs he’s been done as he puts his hostage through all this.
Wait’ll you get a load of what the writer-director thinks is the card our hostage would play.
The dialogue isn’t much, and the logic — fleeing a fight you’ve just won with a killer rather than finishing him off or calling the cops, etc. — doesn’t stand up to any scrutiny.
The set-piece fights, which involve Kinoshita screaming and charging his tormentor and the tormentor played by Decker stalking him with wounded, bloody-minded resolve are visceral enough to come off. Decker and Kinoshita are better than the screenplay.
A throw-down at a gas-station climaxes with a brutal brawl on the hood of a bystander’s car going through an automatic car wash. Amusingly, the car-wash owners feel the need to do an Idaho do-si-do video (“Roggers (sic) Car Wash”) that plays in front of the car being washed and behind all the mayhem the antagonists and the bystander/car owner go through. Not bad.
The rest? Not good.
Perhaps the good folks at Rogers Motors and Car Wash read the script and opted to get their name misspelled. Smart move.

Rating: R, graphic violence, smoking, profanity
Cast: Jeffrey Decker, Shuhei Kinoshita
Credits:Scripted and directed by Tom Botchii.. A Saban Entertainment release.
Running time: 1:34
Related
Entertainment
Inga Ibsdotter Lilleaas breaks out in ‘Sentimental Value.’ But she isn’t interested in fame
One of the most moving scenes in Joachim Trier’s “Sentimental Value” happens near the end. During an intense moment between sisters Nora (Renate Reinsve) and Agnes (Inga Ibsdotter Lilleaas), who have both had to reckon with the unexpected return of their estranged father, Gustav (Stellan Skarsgård), Agnes suddenly tells Nora, “I love you.” In a family in which such direct, vulnerable declarations are rare, Agnes’ comment is both a shock and a catharsis.
The line wasn’t scripted or even discussed. Lilleaas was nervous about spontaneously saying it while filming. But it just came out.
“[In] Norwegian culture, we don’t talk so much about what we’re feeling,” explains Lilleaas, who lives in Oslo but is sitting in the Chateau Marmont lounge on a rainy afternoon in mid-November. If the script had contained that “I love you” line, she says, “It would’ve been like, ‘What? I would never say that. That’s too much.’ But because it came out of a genuine feeling in the moment — I don’t know how to describe it, but it was what I felt like I would want to say, and what I would want my own sister to know.”
Since its Cannes premiere, “Sentimental Value” has been lauded for such scenes, which underline the subtle force of this intelligent tearjerker about a frayed family trying to repair itself. And the film’s breakthrough performance belongs to the 36-year-old Lilleaas, who has worked steadily in Norway but not often garnered international attention.
Touted as a possible supporting actress Oscar nominee, Lilleaas in person is reserved but thoughtful, someone who prefers observing the people around her rather than being in the spotlight. Fitting, then, that in “Sentimental Value” she plays the quiet, levelheaded sister serving as the mediator between impulsive Nora and egotistical Gustav. Lilleaas has become quite adept at doing a lot while seemingly doing very little.
“In acting school, some of the best characters I did were mute,” she notes. “They couldn’t express language, but they were very expressive. It was freeing to not have a voice. Agnes, she’s present a lot of the time but doesn’t necessarily have that many lines. To me, that’s freedom — the [dialogue] very often comes in the way of that.”
Inga Ibsdotter Lilleaas in “Sentimental Value.”
(Kasper Tuxen)
Lilleaas hadn’t met Trier before her audition, but they instantly bonded over the challenges of raising young kids. And she sparked to the script’s examination of parents and children. Unlike restless Nora, Agnes is married with a son, able to view her deeply flawed dad from the vantage point of both a daughter and mother. Lilleaas shares her character’s sympathy for the inability of different generations to connect.
“A lot of parents and children’s relationships stop at a point,” she says. “It doesn’t evolve like a romantic relationship, [where] the mindset is to grow together. With families, it’s ‘You’re the child, I’m the parent.’ But you have to grow together and accept each other. And that’s difficult.”
Spend time with Lilleaas and you’ll notice she discusses acting in terms of human behavior rather than technique. In fact, she initially studied psychology. “I’ve always been interested in the [experience] of being alive,” she says. “Tremendous grief is very painful, but you can only experience that if you have great love. I’ve tried the more psychological approach of studying people, but it wasn’t what I wanted. Acting is the perfect medium for me to explore life.”
Other out-of-towners might be disappointed to arrive in sunny Southern California only to be greeted by storm clouds, but Lilleaas is sanguine about the situation. “I could have been at the beach, but it’s fine,” she says, amused, looking out the nearby windows. “I can go to the movies — it’s perfect movie weather.”
Inga Ibsdotter Lilleaas. (Evelyn Freja / For The Times)
Her measured response to both her Hollywood ascension and a rainy forecast speak to her generally unfussed demeanor. During our conversation, Lilleaas’ candor and lack of vanity are striking. How often does a rising star talk about being happy when a filmmaker gives her fewer lines? Or fantasize about a life after acting?
“Some days I’ll be like, ‘I want to give it up. I want to have a small farm,’” she admits. “We lived on a farm and had horses and chickens when I grew up. I miss that. But at the same time, I need to be in an urban environment.”
She gives the matter more thought, sussing out her conflicted feelings. “Maybe as I grow older and have children, I feel this need to go back to something that’s familiar and safe,” she suggests. “I think that’s why I’m searching for small farms [online] — that’s, like, a dream thing. I need some dreams that they’re not reality — it’s a way to escape.”
Lilleaas may have decided against becoming a psychologist, but she’s always interrogating her motivations. This desire for a farm is her latest self-exploration, clarifying for her that she loves her profession but not the superficial trappings that accompany it.
“Ten years ago, this would maybe have been a dream, what’s happening now,” she says, gesturing at her swanky surroundings. “But you realize what you want to focus on and give value. I don’t necessarily want to give this that much value. I appreciate it and everything, but I don’t want to put my heart in it, because I know that it goes up and down and it’s not constant. I put my heart in this movie. Everything that comes after that? My heart can’t be in that.”
Movie Reviews
403 Forbidden
Forbidden
Access to this resource on the server is denied!
Proudly powered by LiteSpeed Web Server
Please be advised that LiteSpeed Technologies Inc. is not a web hosting company and, as such, has no control over content found on this site.
-
World1 week agoHamas builds new terror regime in Gaza, recruiting teens amid problematic election
-
News1 week agoFor those who help the poor, 2025 goes down as a year of chaos
-
Business1 week agoInstacart ends AI pricing test that charged shoppers different prices for the same items
-
World1 week agoPodcast: The 2025 EU-US relationship explained simply
-
Business1 week agoApple, Google and others tell some foreign employees to avoid traveling out of the country
-
Technology1 week agoChatGPT’s GPT-5.2 is here, and it feels rushed
-
Health1 week agoDid holiday stress wreak havoc on your gut? Doctors say 6 simple tips can help
-
Politics1 week ago‘Unlucky’ Honduran woman arrested after allegedly running red light and crashing into ICE vehicle