Connect with us

Education

Amid Court Fight, L.G.B.T.Q. Club Proposes a Compromise to Yeshiva

Published

on

Amid Court Fight, L.G.B.T.Q. Club Proposes a Compromise to Yeshiva

An L.G.B.T.Q. pupil group provided to delay in search of recognition from Yeshiva College, its members mentioned Wednesday, after a U.S. Supreme Court docket ruling prompted the Trendy Orthodox Jewish establishment to droop all undergraduate membership actions moderately than sanction the group.

Though Yeshiva misplaced on the Supreme Court docket on procedural grounds final week, it instantly introduced its intent to refile its case in state courtroom. In a deal proposed on Wednesday, the coed group’s lawyer mentioned it might stand down whereas the case performed out, if the college agreed to permit the opposite golf equipment “to renew efficient instantly.”

In an announcement, the scholars known as their determination “painful and tough” and mentioned that Yeshiva had a duty below metropolis human rights legislation to deal with their membership, the Satisfaction Alliance, like some other on campus. The college and its lawyer didn’t instantly reply to requests for touch upon Wednesday morning.

“We don’t want Y.U. to punish our fellow college students by ending all pupil actions whereas it circumvents its obligations,” they mentioned. “Y.U. is making an attempt to carry all of its college students hostage whereas it deploys manipulative authorized techniques, all in an effort to keep away from treating our membership equally.”

The group’s determination is the most recent improvement within the battle between the nation’s main Trendy Orthodox Jewish college and lots of in its personal neighborhood, together with college students, alumni and college who’ve circulated open letters to the administration criticizing its refusal to acknowledge the membership.

Advertisement

The college has mentioned that it bears no ailing will towards its L.G.B.T.Q. college students however that recognizing the membership would fly within the face of the spiritual values it needs to inculcate in undergraduates. And being legally compelled to take action would violate the college’s spiritual freedom, officers say.

Their determination final week to stop the actions of all pupil golf equipment, from the Accounting Society to the Zoology Membership, was a measure of how far they’re prepared to go to defend what they see as a primary proper.

However the college students and their supporters say they don’t imagine there’s a Jewish worth that justifies denying homosexual college students the identical recognition as different teams. They argue that Yeshiva should deal with them equally as a result of it’s an establishment of upper studying and never a home of worship.

“Our targets usually are not in any kind of misalignment with Torah values,” mentioned Avery Allen, 19, a biology main who serves as a co-president of the Satisfaction Alliance. “We would like a secure house for our college students, and I don’t suppose any a part of that’s in battle with Torah or with Halacha, Jewish legislation.”

The dispute at Yeshiva has ballooned past its Manhattan campus to develop into the most recent flash level in a nationwide debate over the road between civil rights and spiritual freedom, and whether or not spiritual teams and entities affiliated with them can legally deny providers and public lodging to folks with differing views.

Advertisement

It has additionally precipitated anguish for some within the Trendy Orthodox Jewish neighborhood. In a single open letter to the administration, greater than 1,000 Yeshiva alumni mentioned the battle had rendered their alma mater unrecognizable to them.

The letter mentioned the college had “deployed our sacred Torah values in service of targets our Torah doesn’t sanction” and “implied that no authoritative interpretation of Torah values can permit for even essentially the most primary inclusion of brazenly LGBTQ+ folks in Torah-observant communities.”

Yeshiva educates roughly 6,000 college students on 4 campuses in Manhattan and the Bronx. These on the middle of the case have mentioned they don’t imagine their identification as Trendy Orthodox Jews and as members of the L.G.B.T.Q. neighborhood are at odds.

“There are numerous outdoors influences that attempt to create a false sense of mutual exclusivity,” mentioned Ms. Allen, the coed chief. “However for these residing it, I don’t suppose that must be.”

The case hinges on the query of whether or not Yeshiva is an academic establishment or a non secular company, a class that’s exempt from the New York Metropolis Human Rights Legislation, which prohibits discrimination in employment, housing and public lodging.

Advertisement

Such exemptions are widespread and supply the authorized foundation for broadly accepted points of American spiritual life, such because the refusal of the Roman Catholic Church to make use of girls as monks.

However in recent times, such exemptions have more and more been used to justify denying providers to L.G.B.T.Q. folks. For the Satisfaction Alliance, not receiving official recognition at Yeshiva means being disadvantaged of house to fulfill, cash to host occasions and the power to promote occasions on college web sites and e-mail lists.

The plaintiffs embody the coed membership, an nameless pupil member of it and a number of other alumni of Yeshiva. In courtroom, they argue that Yeshiva is a college and as such is in violation of the legislation.

However Yeshiva has countered that its curriculum and insurance policies make it clear that it’s each a college and a non secular establishment.

Justice Lynn Kotler of State Supreme Court docket in Manhattan dominated in favor of the scholars in June, saying that the college’s constitution states that it’s “an academic company below the schooling legislation of the State of New York” that was “organized and operated completely for instructional functions.”

Advertisement

In response, Yeshiva requested the U.S. Supreme Court docket for an emergency keep of the state courtroom ruling. That request was granted on an interim foundation on Sept. 11 by Justice Sonia Sotomayor however was rejected by the total courtroom 5 days later by a vote of 5 to 4.

In that call, the bulk mentioned that Yeshiva must abide by the decrease courtroom ruling whereas it pursued challenges in state courtroom, and solely after that would it return to the Supreme Court docket.

The college has been represented in courtroom by legal professionals from the Becket Fund for Non secular Liberty, a legislation agency primarily based in Washington, D.C., that’s recognized for a string of high-profile Supreme Court docket victories. And the case has been intently watched by different spiritual teams.

Earlier this month, a number of influential teams informed the courtroom of their intent to file briefs in assist of Yeshiva, together with the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of New York, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, the USA Convention of Catholic Bishops and the Council for Christian Faculties and Universities.

The dispute has additionally drawn the curiosity of outdoor teams that assist the Satisfaction Alliance. After the college mentioned it might block pupil golf equipment, a neighborhood group, Jewish Queer Youth, mentioned it might finance pupil actions on campus. It has funded the Satisfaction Alliance because the membership was based in 2019, mentioned its spokesman, Joe Berkofsky.

Advertisement

On Tuesday, greater than a dozen college students on Yeshiva’s campus in Washington Heights declined to discuss the case.

One pupil who declined to supply his identify mentioned he was apprehensive that if Yeshiva acknowledged the membership, it might upset rabbis on the college. However he mentioned he was additionally involved that not recognizing the group would tarnish the college’s repute.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Education

Video: Protesters Scuffle With Police During Pomona College Commencement

Published

on

Video: Protesters Scuffle With Police During Pomona College Commencement

new video loaded: Protesters Scuffle With Police During Pomona College Commencement

transcript

transcript

Protesters Scuffle With Police During Pomona College Commencement

Pro-Palestinian demonstrators tried to block access to Pomona College’s graduation ceremony on Sunday.

[chanting in call and response] Not another nickel, not another dime. No more money for Israel’s crime. Resistance is justified when people are occupied.

Advertisement

Recent episodes in U.S.

Continue Reading

Education

Video: Police Use Pepper Spray on Protesters on G.W.U.’s Campus

Published

on

Video: Police Use Pepper Spray on Protesters on G.W.U.’s Campus

new video loaded: Police Use Pepper Spray on Protesters on G.W.U.’s Campus

transcript

transcript

Police Use Pepper Spray on Protesters on G.W.U.’s Campus

Police officers arrested 33 pro-Palestinian protesters and cleared a tent encampment on the campus of George Washingon University.

“The Metropolitan Police Department. If you are currently on George Washington University property, you are in violation of D.C. Code 22-3302, unlawful entry on property.” “Back up, dude, back up. You’re going to get locked up tonight — back up.” “Free, free Palestine.” “What the [expletive] are you doing?” [expletives] “I can’t stop — [expletives].”

Advertisement

Recent episodes in Israel-Hamas War

Continue Reading

Education

How Counterprotesters at U.C.L.A. Provoked Violence, Unchecked for Hours

Published

on

How Counterprotesters at U.C.L.A. Provoked Violence, Unchecked for Hours

A satellite image of the UCLA campus.

On Tuesday night, violence erupted at an encampment that pro-Palestinian protesters had set up on April 25.

The image is annotated to show the extent of the pro-Palestinian encampment, which takes up the width of the plaza between Powell Library and Royce Hall.

Advertisement

The clashes began after counterprotesters tried to dismantle the encampment’s barricade. Pro-Palestinian protesters rushed to rebuild it, and violence ensued.

Arrows denote pro-Israeli counterprotesters moving towards the barricade at the edge of the encampment. Arrows show pro-Palestinian counterprotesters moving up against the same barricade.

Police arrived hours later, but they did not intervene immediately.

Advertisement

An arrow denotes police arriving from the same direction as the counterprotesters and moving towards the barricade.

A New York Times examination of more than 100 videos from clashes at the University of California, Los Angeles, found that violence ebbed and flowed for nearly five hours, mostly with little or no police intervention. The violence had been instigated by dozens of people who are seen in videos counterprotesting the encampment.

Advertisement

The videos showed counterprotesters attacking students in the pro-Palestinian encampment for several hours, including beating them with sticks, using chemical sprays and launching fireworks as weapons. As of Friday, no arrests had been made in connection with the attack.

To build a timeline of the events that night, The Times analyzed two livestreams, along with social media videos captured by journalists and witnesses.

The melee began when a group of counterprotesters started tearing away metal barriers that had been in place to cordon off pro-Palestinian protesters. Hours earlier, U.C.L.A. officials had declared the encampment illegal.

Security personnel hired by the university are seen in yellow vests standing to the side throughout the incident. A university spokesperson declined to comment on the security staff’s response.

Mel Buer/The Real News Network

Advertisement

It is not clear how the counterprotest was organized or what allegiances people committing the violence had. The videos show many of the counterprotesters were wearing pro-Israel slogans on their clothing. Some counterprotesters blared music, including Israel’s national anthem, a Hebrew children’s song and “Harbu Darbu,” an Israeli song about the Israel Defense Forces’ campaign in Gaza.

As counterprotesters tossed away metal barricades, one of them was seen trying to strike a person near the encampment, and another threw a piece of wood into it — some of the first signs of violence.

Attacks on the encampment continued for nearly three hours before police arrived.

Counterprotesters shot fireworks toward the encampment at least six times, according to videos analyzed by The Times. One of them went off inside, causing protesters to scream. Another exploded at the edge of the encampment. One was thrown in the direction of a group of protesters who were carrying an injured person out of the encampment.

Advertisement

Mel Buer/The Real News Network

Some counterprotesters sprayed chemicals both into the encampment and directly at people’s faces.

Sean Beckner-Carmitchel via Reuters

Advertisement

At times, counterprotesters swarmed individuals — sometimes a group descended on a single person. They could be seen punching, kicking and attacking people with makeshift weapons, including sticks, traffic cones and wooden boards.

StringersHub via Associated Press, Sergio Olmos/Calmatters

In one video, protesters sheltering inside the encampment can be heard yelling, “Do not engage! Hold the line!”

In some instances, protesters in the encampment are seen fighting back, using chemical spray on counterprotesters trying to tear down barricades or swiping at them with sticks.

Advertisement

Except for a brief attempt to capture a loudspeaker used by counterprotesters, and water bottles being tossed out of the encampment, none of the videos analyzed by The Times show any clear instance of encampment protesters initiating confrontations with counterprotesters beyond defending the barricades.

Shortly before 1 a.m. — more than two hours after the violence erupted — a spokesperson with the mayor’s office posted a statement that said U.C.L.A officials had called the Los Angeles Police Department for help and they were responding “immediately.”

Officers from a separate law enforcement agency — the California Highway Patrol — began assembling nearby, at about 1:45 a.m. Riot police with the L.A.P.D. joined them a few minutes later. Counterprotesters applauded their arrival, chanting “U.S.A., U.S.A., U.S.A.!”

Just four minutes after the officers arrived, counterprotesters attacked a man standing dozens of feet from the officers.

Twenty minutes after police arrive, a video shows a counterprotester spraying a chemical toward the encampment during a scuffle over a metal barricade. Another counterprotester can be seen punching someone in the head near the encampment after swinging a plank at barricades.

Advertisement

Fifteen minutes later, while those in the encampment chanted “Free, free Palestine,” counterprotesters organized a rush toward the barricades. During the rush, a counterprotester pulls away a metal barricade from a woman, yelling “You stand no chance, old lady.”

Throughout the intermittent violence, officers were captured on video standing about 300 feet away from the area for roughly an hour, without stepping in.

It was not until 2:42 a.m. that officers began to move toward the encampment, after which counterprotesters dispersed and the night’s violence between the two camps mostly subsided.

The L.A.P.D. and the California Highway Patrol did not answer questions from The Times about their responses on Tuesday night, deferring to U.C.L.A.

While declining to answer specific questions, a university spokesperson provided a statement to The Times from Mary Osako, U.C.L.A.’s vice chancellor of strategic communications: “We are carefully examining our security processes from that night and are grateful to U.C. President Michael Drake for also calling for an investigation. We are grateful that the fire department and medical personnel were on the scene that night.”

Advertisement

L.A.P.D. officers were seen putting on protective gear and walking toward the barricade around 2:50 a.m. They stood in between the encampment and the counterprotest group, and the counterprotesters began dispersing.

While police continued to stand outside the encampment, a video filmed at 3:32 a.m. shows a man who was walking away from the scene being attacked by a counterprotester, then dragged and pummeled by others. An editor at the U.C.L.A. student newspaper, the Daily Bruin, told The Times the man was a journalist at the paper, and that they were walking with other student journalists who had been covering the violence. The editor said she had also been punched and sprayed in the eyes with a chemical.

On Wednesday, U.C.L.A.’s chancellor, Gene Block, issued a statement calling the actions by “instigators” who attacked the encampment unacceptable. A spokesperson for California Gov. Gavin Newsom criticized campus law enforcement’s delayed response and said it demands answers.

Los Angeles Jewish and Muslim organizations also condemned the attacks. Hussam Ayloush, the director of the Greater Los Angeles Area office of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, called on the California attorney general to investigate the lack of police response. The Jewish Federation Los Angeles blamed U.C.L.A. officials for creating an unsafe environment over months and said the officials had “been systemically slow to respond when law enforcement is desperately needed.”

Fifteen people were reportedly injured in the attack, according to a letter sent by the president of the University of California system to the board of regents.

Advertisement

The night after the attack began, law enforcement warned pro-Palestinian demonstrators to leave the encampment or be arrested. By early Thursday morning, police had dismantled the encampment and arrested more than 200 people from the encampment.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending