Connect with us

Crypto

Cryptocurrency Regulation Debate Escalates as Senators Question DOJ’s Handling of Money Transmission Laws – The UCW Newswire

Published

on

Cryptocurrency Regulation Debate Escalates as Senators Question DOJ’s Handling of Money Transmission Laws – The UCW Newswire

In a recent development that will set the stage for a battle concerning cryptocurrency regulation, United States Senators Cynthia Lummis and Ron Wyden have penned a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland, expressing their apprehensions regarding the Justice Department’s (DOJ) interpretation of money transmission licensing.

The letter, signed by both senators, raises concerns over the DOJ’s application of money transmission laws in the case against Roman Storm, the co-founder of crypto mixer Tornado Cash. Storm faces charges related to operating an unlicensed money transmission operation, among other serious allegations.

Central to the senators’ concerns is the discrepancy between the DOJ’s interpretation and established definitions outlined by the Bank Secrecy Act and the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). According to Lummis and Wyden, non-custodial crypto service providers, like Tornado Cash, do not meet the criteria set forth in these definitions.

The senators argue that bitcoins and other cryptocurrencies have a clear, unilateral owner throughout the transaction process, eliminating any ambiguity regarding ownership. They assert that custody and control are the fundamental factors determining the occurrence of “acceptance and transmission” on crypto networks.

Highlighting FinCEN’s role as the primary interpretive authority on money transmission registration requirements, the senators caution against the DOJ’s broad application of its interpretation. They warn that such an approach could extend regulatory scrutiny to a wide array of services, including internet service providers and even the postal service.

Advertisement

Echoing similar sentiments, crypto advocacy groups filed a joint amicus brief in April with the Southern New York District Court, supporting Storm’s position. Storm’s legal team filed a motion to dismiss the charges in March, arguing that Tornado Cash did not meet the definition of a money transmission business.

However, prosecutors contend that Storm bears responsibility for operating Tornado Cash and allege that the service facilitated criminal activities. They accuse Storm of designing software that aided criminality and assert that Tornado Cash was involved in the transmission of funds derived from criminal offenses.

Storm, who was arrested in August on charges of sanctions violations, facilitating money laundering, and unlicensed money transmission, faces up to 45 years in prison if convicted. He has pleaded not guilty to the charges and is currently out on $2 million bail with travel restrictions.

The letter from Senators Lummis and Wyden underscores the growing debate surrounding cryptocurrency regulation in the United States and the reach of the SEC, highlighting the need for clarity and consistency in interpreting existing laws in the rapidly evolving crypto landscape. Perhaps a new administration will see this and force a clear outline so that compliance can be adhered to clearly by all in the industry as opposed to it being a guessing game.

Terry Jones
Digital Assets Desk

Advertisement

 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Crypto

UK investors sue Binance in London for £150 million

Published

on

UK investors sue Binance in London for £150 million
Almost 1,700 British investors are suing Binance and founder Changpeng Zhao for at ​least £150 million ($200 million), alleging the crypto trading platform ‌sold them risky, complex derivative products without regulatory authorisation.
Continue Reading

Crypto

Japanese Yen Sinks to 162.27, Its Weakest Since 1986, Reviving Intervention Bets

Published

on

Japanese Yen Sinks to 162.27, Its Weakest Since 1986, Reviving Intervention Bets

Key Takeaways

A Four-Decade Low

The yen’s slide to a four-decade low has put Japanese authorities back on intervention watch. The currency has been dragged down by a persistent interest-rate gap between Japan and the United States, heavy speculative short positioning, and the limited staying power of Tokyo’s earlier efforts to prop it up.

Image source: X

The mechanics are straightforward given the Bank of Japan (BOJ) typically holds its policy rate at 0.75%, while the U.S. Federal Reserve’s target sits at 3.50% to 3.75%. That spread rewards investors who borrow cheaply in yen and park funds in higher-yielding dollar assets, a so-called carry trade that steadily pressures the Japanese currency.

Japan’s Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama signaled Tokyo’s readiness to act, saying the government was prepared to take appropriate action against excessive currency moves.

Intervention Has Already Failed Once

Tokyo has been here before and recently Japan launched its first yen-buying operation in nearly two years (after the currency punched through the politically sensitive 160 level). Authorities then spent a record 11.73 trillion yen, about $72.4 billion, defending the yen between late April and late May, only to watch it weaken again.

That track record is why traders doubt a fresh round would hold because the forces dragging on the yen are structural, rooted in the rate gap rather than short-term sentiment, and intervention can slow the slide without reversing it. Markets are now watching whether a move toward the 160-to-162 range triggers another defense from the finance ministry.

Where Does Crypto Fit Into All This?

A depreciating home currency has historically nudged some Japanese savers toward alternative stores of value, and bitcoin sits among them. Japan is one of the world’s most active retail crypto markets, and a yen losing ground against the dollar strengthens the argument that scarce, non-sovereign assets can hedge currency risk. Bitcoin priced in yen has tracked far higher than its dollar quote, mirroring the currency’s erosion over time.

Advertisement

The pressure also feeds into global risk appetite since a weaker yen can unwind carry trades suddenly when sentiment shifts, a dynamic that has spilled into crypto and equity markets before, sending leveraged positions scrambling.

In any case, the immediate question is whether Tokyo intervenes again or lets the slide run. With the rate gap unlikely to close soon, the Fed has held rates elevated while the BOJ moves cautiously. That said, the yen’s path ahead depends heavily on the next moves from both central banks and until that spread narrows, the currency’s weakness looks set to persist.

Continue Reading

Crypto

Consumer alert issued for Bitcoin cryptocurrency ATMs

Published

on

Consumer alert issued for Bitcoin cryptocurrency ATMs

OHIO — The Ohio Department of Commerce Division of Financial Institutions issued a consumer alert on Monday for Ohioans who have used cryptocurrency ATM kiosks operated by Bitcoin Depot Inc. 

The alert follows Bitcoin filing for bankruptcy last month in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas. Since the filing, it has shut down its ATM network, meaning consumers may be eligible for outstanding funds.

Bitcoin previously operated in 33 states, including Ohio, holding money transmission license number OHMT 263 with the division.

A Bitcoin ATM is a physical kiosk allowing people to buy or sometimes sell cryptocurrency, usually using cash or a debit card, but unlike a traditional ATM, it does not connect to a bank account. Instead, it transfers cryptocurrency to a digital wallet or an address the user provides.

“In the past year, Bitcoin Depot processed 10,637 individual transactions in Ohio across at least 50 machines,” the division said in a news release. “Any Ohioan who believes they may have been impacted by a scam involving these machines is encouraged to file a claim.”

Advertisement

There are 32 consumers who are owed a total of $90,907 in refunds, ranging from $18 to $43,000. These individuals will be contacted directly, but the division is calling attention to the situation to ensure any other Ohioan who used the service is aware of the potential refund.

Those who believe they are owed money, or who have an outstanding claim with Bitcoin Depot, can file a claim through the bankruptcy case. They can also call the company’s restructuring hotline at 844-339-4117 (Toll-Free U.S./Canada) or +1-332-232-7827 (International), or email BitcoinDepotInfo@ra.kroll.com.

Before filing a claim, consumers are encouraged to gather all recepts, transaction records and supporting documents.

For additional information, contact the Division’s Office of Consumer Affairs via email at web.dfi@com.ohio.gov or call 614-728-8400.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending