Fisker Inc. will wind down operations under a bankruptcy plan approved Friday that should allow car owners to drive their cars for years — while not paying anything to shareholders who were wiped out investing in the defunct Southern California electric-vehicle maker.

The plan approved by U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge Thomas Horan in Delaware comes as Fisker is grappling with a Securities and Exchange Commission investigation into possible securities violations at the company before its June bankruptcy filing.

Fisker disclosed in August that it had been subpoenaed by the SEC, which recently confirmed that it was investigating the company and demanded that the bankruptcy plan preserve records.

“The SEC has been much more aggressive in pursuing its claims and remedies, even if the focus of its investigation has filed for bankruptcy,” said Jennifer Lee, a former assistant director at the SEC Division of Enforcement now in private practice.

The agency has declined to comment on its investigation.

Co-founders Henrik Fisker, the company’s chairman and chief executive, and his wife, Geeta Gupta-Fisker, the chief financial and operating officer, and other officials are facing multiple shareholder lawsuits.

Plaintiffs allege violations of fiduciary duties and securities laws, including media appearances by Henrik Fisker touting the company’s prospects even as its fortunes declined.

Horan issued his ruling after a flurry of filings, hearings and closed-door meetings this week as Fisker, its creditors and owners worked out an agreement.

Leadership of the Fisker Owners Assn. came out last week in favor of the proposed plan, stating the vehicle maker had made progress in addressing open recalls Fisker had issued for its Ocean SUV and had engaged in “constructive dialogue” over maintenance issues.

The approved plan also resolved concerns by the National Highway Transportation Safety Board over how to pay for the costs of recalls, including one for malfunctioning brakes and another for a defective water pump. Under the approved plan, Fisker’s estate will cover those costs.

Another issue that was resolved was access to Fisker’s cloud server for over-the-air software updates the Ocean must receive to operate. Access to those updates will be provided by American Lease, a Bronx, N.Y., business that leases Uber and Lyft cars. It bid $46.25 million for Fisker’s unsold inventory of more than 3,000 cars.

American Lease agreed late this week to pay $2.5 million for access to the cloud for five years and will share that access with Fisker’s more than 6,000 car owners for an undetermined price.

“We’re happy with the outcome today, and we’re optimistic about the future,” said Brandon Jones, president of owners association. “There’s still some discussion and negotiation needed, but we’ll have the services we need to maintain our cars.”

Founded in 2016, Fisker went public in 2020 via a special purpose acquisition company backed by private equity firm Apollo Global Management. The company raised $1 billion in equity capital and borrowed even more, but ran out of money.

Headquartered in Manhattan Beach, Fisker moved to La Palma in Orange County earlier this year.

Henrik Fisker, a noted automotive designer, envisioned the company’s debut model, the Ocean, as a competitor to Tesla’s Model Y, but the company had trouble making and delivering the high-tech SUV. The Ocean was plagued by software glitches, though its ride and build were praised.

Several thousand car owners were eligible to vote on the plan, because they had filed claims against Fisker making them unsecured creditors.

Evan Scott, 39, filed two claims, one for nearly $28,000 based on the loss of value of his Ocean after price cuts, and a second for $1,000 after his car was delivered with faulty tires that had to be replaced after four months. He said he voted for the plan but feels he was misled by the company after purchasing some $50,000 in stock, which is now worthless.

“Everything they said was a lie for the last six months, and they knew they were going to file for bankruptcy,” said the Portland, Ore., resident.

Fisker’s stock reached a high of $28.50 in March 2021 amid peak interest in electric vehicles and a stock bubble that was popped after a rise in interest rates the following year. By the time of Fisker’s bankruptcy, its shares were trading for a nickel.

The Ocean’s base model retailed for $38,999 with the highest trim version going for more than $60,000, until a series of sharp price cuts. American Lease purchased its fleet of Oceans for about $13,900 per vehicle.

Fisker filed for bankruptcy after it was unable to secure a strategic investment from an auto manufacturer that Reuters identified as Nissan. It also failed in efforts to sell the company to other buyers. It estimated liabilities of up to $500 million and assets at between $500 million and $1 billion at the time of the filing.

It is being liquidated under Chapter 11 of the bankruptcy code typically used by companies seeking to restructure and remain in business. The process, however, has allowed management to remain in control of day to day operations of the company as it works through recalls and other issues.

By the time the bankruptcy plan was approved there were more than 4,000 claims filed against Fisker, including two that totaled more than $1 billion — one for $694 million for debt held by U.S. Bank, and a second for $475 million by Magna International, which manufactured the Ocean for Fisker at an Austrian plant.

Fisker has yet to sell the assets it owns in Austria as well as its intellectual property, which includes the vehicles designs and software code — which theoretically could be purchased by another auto maker to produce the Ocean and other vehicles Fisker had planned. Proceeds from those sales will go into a trust, with the majority received by the company’s secured creditor.

That creditor is CVI Investments and its investment manager, Heights Capital Management Inc., affiliates of Susquehanna International Group, a large Pennsylvania trading firm founded by billionaire Jeff Yass. It has a secured claim of more than $180 million stemming from debt it is owed by Fisker.

A number of shareholders sent letters to the court asking for an SEC inquiry into Fisker’s dealings with the creditor, whose position as a secured lender had been opposed by unsecured creditors earlier in the bankruptcy process. Attorneys for CVI have not responded to requests for comment.

Car owners seeking compensation may have other avenues to recover funds from the loss of warranty protection, software and mechanical problems and other issues.

The law firm Hagens Berman is filing arbitration cases against J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, a leading Fisker auto loan maker. Partner Steve Berman said his firm is proceeding with some 1,300 individual arbitration demands. Chase declined to comment.

California’s emergency ban on certain hemp products cleared a legal challenge Friday brought by cannabis businesses that sought to block the new rules.

Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Stephen Goorvitch denied the businesses’ request that he issue an order which would have temporarily allowed hemp sales while a lawsuit over the ban proceeded. The new regulations took effect in September.

In a ruling filed Friday, the judge called the temporary restraining order sought by the businesses a “drastic remedy” because it would have meant hurriedly blocking the implementation of the emergency regulations before a trial when the state and businesses would be able to fully present their cases.

“The potential harm to Californians, especially children, outweighs the potential that individual hemp businesses will not be able to adapt to the new regulations,” Goorvitch said in the ruling.

The decision is a blow to cannabis companies that filed a lawsuit challenging the new rules over concerns that hemp businesses will lose millions of dollars and some small businesses will be forced to shut down.

Jonathan Miller, general counsel of the U.S. Hemp Roundtable, said in a statement that the group is “disappointed with the court’s decision” and is reviewing its next steps in what could be a long legal process.

“We still hold out hope that Governor [Gavin] Newsom will come to the table and work with industry to achieve our mutual goal — to robustly regulate hemp products and keep them out of the hands of children — without devastating hemp farmers, business and consumers as does his emergency regulation,” Miller said.

The ruling keeps in place emergency regulations the state issued as part of an effort to protect young people from potentially dangerous hemp products. The U.S. Hemp Roundtable and hemp businesses such as JuiceTiva, Blaze Life and a cannabis company run by comedy duo Cheech Marin and Tommy Chong sued a California public health agency to block the enforcement of the new rules.

The regulations ban the sale of hemp-based food, beverages and dietary products containing detectable amounts of THC, a compound found in the cannabis plant that contributes to the mind-altering high associated with cannabis use, along with other intoxicating chemical substances. The new rules also state that people must be at least 21 years old to purchase hemp products and limit the number of servings of hemp products to five per package.

In denying the preliminary injunction, Goorvitch said the hemp coalition had failed to meet its burden of demonstrating it was likely to prevail at trial and that it stood to suffer irreparable harm if the ban on sales wasn’t blocked. Businesses can still sell hemp products without detectable levels of THC and “non-final food products” such as hemp flour and lotions with detectable levels of THC, the ruling said.

Jim Higdon, co-founder of Cornbread Hemp and a U.S. Hemp Roundtable member, said he thinks the judge doesn’t fully understand the industry and made the “wrong decision.”

“There’s a whole class of hemp businesses this ruling will destroy,” he said.

Higdon said his Kentucky business, which sells products such as hemp gummies and oil, has California retailers it wants to work with but it hasn’t been able to get its product on the retailers’ shelves because of the “regulatory uncertainty” in the state.

The California Department of Public Health proposed the ban because of concerns that hemp products with THC could harm young people whose brains are still developing. Consuming some of these products could “negatively impact cognitive functions, memory, and decision-making abilities,” the agency said in its findings. The agency didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment but typically doesn’t comment on pending litigation.

“We applaud the court for refusing to block California’s hemp regulations to protect consumers, especially children,” Tara Gallegos, a spokesperson for Newsom, said in a statement. “The court didn’t buy this attempt to reopen a loophole used by bad actors in the hemp industry to push dangerous intoxicating products into gas stations and corner markets.”

Some people consume hemp products with THC for relief from pain, anxiety, insomnia and other issues. People who rely on products for medical needs will still be able to obtain them through licensed adult-use and medical cannabis dispensaries, according to the state.

In the lawsuit, filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, hemp businesses called the new rules “draconian” and compared them to “requiring candy to stop containing sugar.” The businesses allege in the lawsuit the agency violated state and federal laws, including those that legalized the production of hemp and govern the rulemaking process.

A trial setting conference is scheduled in late November.