Business
Disneyland costumed character employees vote to unionize

Disneyland Resort employees who portray costumed characters such as Mickey Mouse or Cinderella have voted to unionize under the Actors’ Equity Assn.
The unit, which consists of 1,700 people, voted 953 in favor of unionization and 258 against, Actors’ Equity said Saturday night on the social media platform X. Of the votes tallied, 79% were pro-union.
The results of the vote, overseen by the National Labor Relations Board, come after a three-day election period in which employees, known as “cast members” in Disney parlance, placed their votes at three polling sites in Disneyland. The employees announced their intent to unionize in February.
“This is an incredible victory, and we appreciate all the support over the past several weeks. We’re excited about the next phase,” said Actors’ Equity Assn. President Kate Shindle in a statement. “These cast members are both pro-union and pro-Disney, and they’re looking forward to meeting with their employer across the bargaining table in a good faith effort to make both the work experience and the guest experience better.”
The workers regularly don full-body costumes of well-known animated Disney characters. They also portray so-called lookalike characters, such as the Disney princesses, in which the actors’ faces are exposed while performing. These employees work at meet-and-greets in the parks, perform in parades and are part of dining experiences in the Disneyland Resort hotels.
“While voting is complete, there are still steps in the process prior to the election being certified, so it is premature for the company to comment on the results,” said Disneyland spokesperson Jessica Good in a statement. “Whatever the outcome, we respect that our cast members had the opportunity to have their voices heard.”
Organizers said prior to the election that a top priority was creating a healthier and safer working environment for these workers, who often endure injury and discomfort due to the physical nature of their jobs.
Employees can get accidentally injured during guest interactions, such as when a child jumps on a costumed character out of excitement, or intentionally hurt. A recent social media trend emerged in which guests distract employees wearing full-body costumes, then try to twist or aggressively move their heads around.
The Disneyland Resort employees in the characters and parades departments now join their counterparts in Walt Disney World in Florida in being part of a union. Most of the rest of the Disneyland Resort workforce, including custodians, ride operators and merchandise clerks, among others, are already unionized.
The organizing effort comes as the Walt Disney Co. plans to invest $60 billion over 10 years into its “experiences” division, which includes the theme parks, resorts, cruise line and merchandise. That division has proved to be a cash cow for the company; last year, it brought in about 70% of Disney’s operating income.
At Disneyland Resort, that investment will result in what company Chief Executive Bob Iger called the biggest expansion of the parks since the addition of Disney’s California Adventure, which opened in 2001. The plan, known as DisneylandForward, will result in at least $1.9 billion in development and could include new attractions alongside restaurant, retail and hotel space.
The plan calls for changes to the park’s zoning, allowing the company more freedom to mix attractions, theme parks, shopping, dining and parking. While the plan doesn’t specify which attractions will be added to the resort, company officials have floated ideas including immersive “Avatar,” “Frozen” and “Tron” experiences.
Times staff writers Christi Carras and Ryan Faughnder contributed to this report.

Business
The Stock Market’s Boomerang Month Has Put Investors in a Bind

The stock market is now higher than before President Trump’s broad and steep tariffs sent share prices into a tailspin. The 10-year government bond yield is now largely in line with where it started the year. On Tuesday, a widely watched measure of inflation nudged lower.
Judging from a snapshot of today’s financial markets, it would be easy to conclude that very little had happened over the last four and a half months.
As the administration has dialed down its trade offensive, delaying the worst of the tariffs announced on April 2 and promoting a long list of trade deals in the works, stocks have risen and the unnerving volatility in the government bond market — which Mr. Trump noted when he first began pausing his tariffs — has subsided.
On Tuesday, the latest reading of the Consumer Price Index showed a slower pace of inflation in April than economists had predicted, despite widespread concerns that tariffs could have sped up price increases.
The S&P 500, which came close to hitting a bear market early last month, is now up slightly since the start of the year, after a 0.7 percent gain on Tuesday.
Still, investors remained cautious, and complain that the outlook remains uncertain, with little clarity on what the final level of tariffs will be.
That leaves them in a tricky position, with many saying they have little conviction as to where the economy is headed but they cannot afford to wait on the sidelines and miss out on the possibility that tariffs will be lowered further and stocks will rise.
In the meantime, investors are still trying to parse how the tariffs that remain in place — including 30 percent tariffs on many Chinese imports — are affecting consumer spending and corporate profits
John Kerschner, a portfolio manager at Janus Henderson, said signs of tariff-fueled inflation are not likely to show up in the economic data for months.
“The market will wait with bated breath for those readings to make a determination of where we actually stand on tariff induced rising prices. Thus, market uncertainty will likely remain elevated,” Mr. Kerschner said.
The Federal Reserve is also in a wait-and-see mode, unwilling to keep lowering interest rates before the inflationary effect of the new tariffs is known. That’s because lower interest rates stimulate the economy and could add a further tailwind to inflation.
Market bets on when the Fed will next lower interest rates have gradually been pushed further out. At the start of this year, investors were anticipating that the Fed would lower interest rates at its meeting last week. Now, investors expect the first rate cut of the year to arrive at the September meeting.
Ellen Zentner, chief economic strategist for Morgan Stanley Wealth Management said the lower than expected reading in the Consumer Price Index on Tuesday “doesn’t mean tariffs aren’t impacting the economy, it just means they aren’t showing up in the data yet.”
“Wait-and-see is still the name of the game, and until that changes, the Fed will remain on the sidelines,” she added.
The longer uncertainty prevails, the more it becomes its own economic force, separate from the tariffs. Uncertainty means businesses hold off on making investment decisions and consumers pull back from spending, slowing economic growth.
Beneath the surface, that concern is still evident in the markets.
The Russell 2000 index of smaller companies, which are more at risk from a downturn in the economy, has risen from its lows, but remains 14 percent lower than its peak in November. The S&P 500 is only 4 percent below its February high.
The lowest-rated corporate debt continues to show some signs of strain.
Then there is the dollar, which has sent the most pointed signal of concern about tariffs. The dollar index, which measures the currency against a basket of its peers, has fallen 6.9 percent so far this year.
That is the dollar’s biggest slide since the end of 2022, when the Fed pivoted from raising interest rates, which had strengthened the dollar, to holding them steady.
But even now, as tariffs have de-escalated, the dollar has regained ground.
“As far as markets are concerned, there’s now a belief that the worst of the trade war has passed, and that the trend is now towards de-escalation,” noted analysts at Deutsche Bank said in a recent research note. But they also warned, “The U.S. is not out of the woods yet.”
Business
Google settles lawsuit alleging bias against Black employees
Google agreed to pay $50 million to settle a lawsuit alleging the search engine giant was racially biased against Black employees.
The settlement, which was reached after mediation and certified by a U.S. District Court judge in Oakland on Friday, covers some 4,000 Google employees in California and New York.
The original lawsuit came after a state agency, now known as the California Civil Rights Department, in 2021 began investigating Google’s treatment of Black female workers.
In 2022, former Google worker April Curley filed a lawsuit in federal court in San Jose alleging that she and other Black workers experienced systemic discrimination.
Curley, who worked at Google for six years, had been hired to conduct outreach and design recruiting programs with historically Black colleges.
However, her experience at the company quickly soured, she said, alleging that she was stereotyped as an “angry” Black woman, that she and other Black women had not been allowed to present during important meetings and that she was wrongfully terminated in 2020 after challenging internal practices.
Black workers were hired to lower-level jobs, paid lower wages, subjected to hostile comments and denied promotions, Curley and other Black workers who joined the proposed class-action alleged in their lawsuit.
The complaint said managers disparaged Black employees for not being “Googley” enough, comments the plaintiffs said served as racist dog whistles.
Throughout the litigation, the Mountain View-based company has maintained that it did not violate any laws.
“We’ve reached an agreement that involves no admission of wrongdoing. We strongly disagree with the allegations that we treated anyone improperly and we remain committed to paying, hiring, and leveling all employees consistently,” Google spokesperson Courtenay Mencini said in a statement Tuesday.
In addition to the monetary payout, Google has agreed in the settlement to analyze pay and correct differences based on race for the next three years. The company has also committed to maintaining transparent salary ranges and methods for employees to report concerns about pay or other practices.
And through August 2026, the company will not require employees to enter into mandatory arbitration for employment-related disputes, according to the settlement agreement filed last week in federal court.
Business
Tariff Misery in Japan: Honda and Nissan Forecast Plunges in Profit

President Trump’s decision to negotiate a break for China on tariffs is galling for Japan, which is reeling from auto sector levies that the White House has shown no sign of willingness to lift.
Japan, a top U.S. ally in Asia, was eager to advance trade negotiations with Washington, even as Mr. Trump imposed tariffs on automobiles, and threatened an across-the-board 24 percent tariff on Japanese goods.
While Beijing and others assembled plans for retaliatory tariffs, Japan rushed to Washington for trade negotiations, armed instead with commitments to buy more American goods and boost investments in the United States to $1 trillion.
Now in Tokyo, the sting is palpable.
On Tuesday — one day after the Trump administration agreed to temporarily nix most of its tariffs on China — two of Japan’s top automakers issued dire profit forecasts, weighed down by the effects of U.S. car tariffs.
Honda Motor said that its operating profit would fall nearly 60 percent for the fiscal year that began in April. It attributed the downgrade to a whopping $4.4 billion hit from tariffs.
Nissan Motor suspended its profit forecast for the current year, and said that it would likely swing to an operating loss in the first quarter. The automaker, which was already restructuring its global operations before the U.S. tariffs, said it would slash an additional 11,000 jobs on top of the 9,000 cuts it announced in November.
In Japan there is a sense of disbelief and indignation among business leaders and government officials that the Trump administration backed down on China tariffs, while maintaining punishing levies on allies like Japan with significantly smaller trade imbalances.
The fact that the U.S. prioritized China over many other trade partners in reaching a tariff agreement showed that “at this stage, allies like Japan are at a disadvantage,” said Kazuhiro Maeshima, a professor of American politics and diplomacy at Sophia University in Tokyo. “This can only be seen as disregard,” he said.
Earlier this month, a 25 percent U.S. tariff on vehicle imports was extended to cover auto parts as well. Those two levies are particularly painful for Japan because automobiles and car parts are by far its biggest export to the United States.
Economists estimate that the higher auto tariffs alone could put a big dent in economic growth in Japan this year. Factoring in broader disruptions from U.S. tariff policy, officials have predicted that growth could be more than halved.
That is because the auto sector is the backbone of Japanese industry. Nissan has already planned to shift some manufacturing to the United States to skirt tariffs, and if such moves are replicated by others, it could spark a broader hollowing out of industrial production in Japan.
Japan’s biggest automaker, Toyota Motor, said last week that while it aimed to protect production and jobs in Japan, U.S. tariffs would likely cost it more than $1 billion in April and May alone.
Honda’s chief executive, Toshihiro Mibe, said on Tuesday that the company plans to expand manufacturing in the United States to try to recover some of the billions of dollars of tariff losses it forecast. That includes moving some domestic production of its hybrid Civic to a factory it operates in Indiana, he said.
Japan is also negotiating with the United States regarding the proposed 24 percent “reciprocal” tariff, which the Trump administration announced last month and then delayed until early July. The next round of trade talks is expected later this month, but progress has stalled.
Japan has said lower tariffs on cars are a necessary condition of any trade deal, a position that Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba reiterated in parliament on Monday.
-
Austin, TX4 days ago
Best Austin Salads – 15 Food Places For Good Greens!
-
Education1 week ago
In Alabama Commencement Speech, Trump Mixes In the Political
-
Technology1 week ago
Be careful what you read about an Elden Ring movie
-
Culture1 week ago
Pulitzer Prizes 2025: A Guide to the Winning Books and Finalists
-
World6 days ago
The Take: Can India and Pakistan avoid a fourth war over Kashmir?
-
Education1 week ago
University of Michigan President, Santa Ono, Set to Lead University of Florida
-
Technology6 days ago
Netflix is removing Black Mirror: Bandersnatch
-
Politics1 week ago
EPA chief Zeldin announces overhauls to bring agency back to Reagan-level staffing