Connect with us

News

Under Trump, Green Card Seekers Face New Scrutiny for Views on Israel

Published

on

Under Trump, Green Card Seekers Face New Scrutiny for Views on Israel

For decades, immigrants who have followed the rules and have not broken the law have had hopes of earning a green card, a document that allows them to live legally in the United States and gain a path to citizenship.

But under new guidance issued by the Trump administration, immigrants can now be denied a green card for expressing political opinions, such as participating in pro-Palestinian campus protests, posting criticism of Israel on social media and desecrating the American flag, according to internal Department of Homeland Security training materials reviewed by The New York Times.

The documents, which have not been previously reported, show how expansively the Trump administration is carrying out a directive from last August to vet green card applicants for “anti-American” and “antisemitic” views.

The administration includes criticism of Israel as a potentially disqualifying factor, with the training materials citing as an example of questionable speech a social media post that declares, “Stop Israeli Terror in Palestine” and shows the Israeli flag crossed out.

The materials were distributed last month to immigration officers at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, which is part of the Department of Homeland Security and handles applications for green cards and other forms of legal status.

Advertisement

They reflect how U.S.C.I.S. — long considered the gateway agency for legal migration — has rapidly transformed under President Trump into another cog in his administration’s deportation machine. The agency has worked to strip naturalized Americans of their citizenship and has hired armed federal agents to investigate immigration crimes.

The administration is also granting permanent legal residency to far fewer applicants. Green card approvals have fallen by more than half in recent months, according to a Times analysis of agency data.

“There is no room in America for aliens who espouse anti-American ideologies or support terrorist organizations,” Joseph Edlow, the agency’s director, told Congress in February.

Critics of Mr. Trump’s approach say the administration is seeking to restrict legitimate political speech, and has conflated opposition to Israeli government policies with antisemitism.

Basing green card decisions on “ideological screenings is fundamentally un-American and should have no place in a country built on the promise of free expression,” said Amanda Baran, a senior agency official under President Joseph R. Biden Jr.

Advertisement

Administration officials said they were defending American values.

“If you hate America, you have no business demanding to live in America,” said Zach Kahler, a spokesman for U.S.C.I.S.

Abigail Jackson, a White House spokeswoman, said the administration’s policies had “nothing to do with free speech” and were meant to protect “American institutions, the safety of citizens, national security and the freedoms of the United States.”

The administration has moved aggressively against immigrants for expressing political views that officials have deemed anti-American, making ideology a central part of its immigration vetting process. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has revoked the visas of pro-Palestinian student activists, including one who wrote a column criticizing her university’s response to pro-Palestinian demands.

The Department of Homeland Security has proposed reviewing the social media histories of tourists seeking to visit the United States.

Advertisement

Immigration officers have significant discretion in deciding whether to grant foreigners long-term permanent residence. They have long considered a variety of factors, including criminal records, national security threats, family ties to the United States and employment histories.

Ideology has also traditionally been one of those factors. In some cases, U.S. law forbids officers from granting green cards to people who have belonged to a Communist or other “totalitarian” political party, have promoted anarchy or have called for the overthrow of the U.S. government by “force or violence or other unconstitutional means.”

But in the past, immigration officers have focused on statements that could incite or encourage violence, given concerns about infringing on constitutionally protected speech, former U.S.C.I.S. officials said.

The new training materials reviewed by The Times guide immigration officers through the factors they should consider when ruling on green card applications. They discourage officers from granting green cards to people with a history of “endorsing, promoting or supporting anti-American views” or “antisemitic terrorism, ideologies or groups.”

Immigration officers have been told to weigh those factors as “overwhelmingly negative.”

Advertisement

The documents list support for “subversive” ideologies as among other factors that could lead to an application being rejected. As an example, the materials point to someone “holding a sign advocating overthrow of the U.S. government.”

In addition, the guidance describes the desecration of the American flag as a negative factor, citing Mr. Trump’s executive order last year directing the Justice Department to prosecute protesters who burn the flag. The Supreme Court has ruled that flag burning is a form of political expression protected by the First Amendment.

Immigration officers have also been told to scrutinize applicants who encourage antisemitism “through rhetorical or physical actions.” They were instructed to “focus particularly on aliens who engaged in on-campus anti-American and antisemitic activities” after the Hamas attacks against Israel in 2023, the documents show.

Further examples in the documents of conduct characterized as antisemitic include a social media post showing a map of Israel with the nation’s name crossed out and replaced with the word “Palestine.” Another illustrative post suggests that Israelis should “taste what people in Gaza are tasting.”

Immigration officers must elevate all cases involving “potential anti-American and/or antisemitic conduct or ideology” to their managers and to the agency’s general counsel’s office for review, according to the documents.

Advertisement

In recent months, the agency has also changed the way it refers to the employees who adjudicate green card applications, long known as “immigration services officers.” In job postings, it now calls them “homeland defenders.”

“Protect your homeland and defend your culture,” one posting says.

Steven Rich contributed reporting.

News

Video: Trump Says He ‘Loves the Inflation’ Amid War With Iran

Published

on

Video: Trump Says He ‘Loves the Inflation’ Amid War With Iran

new video loaded: Trump Says He ‘Loves the Inflation’ Amid War With Iran

transcript

transcript

Trump Says He ‘Loves the Inflation’ Amid War With Iran

President Trump dismissed the newest inflation report on Wednesday, marking the third-straight month of high prices for consumers. The war in Iran has snarled the world’s energy supply, resulting in high oil and gas prices.

Reporter: “Are you concerned, Mr. President, about the latest inflation number which came out this morning? Could that be a —” “No, I love it. The numbers were great. You know what I really love. I love the inflation.” “Inflation to come down between now and —” “When the war is over?” “Yes.” “It’s coming down.” “I know you can’t —” “It’s going to come down like a rock.”

Advertisement
President Trump dismissed the newest inflation report on Wednesday, marking the third-straight month of high prices for consumers. The war in Iran has snarled the world’s energy supply, resulting in high oil and gas prices.

By Jorge Mitssunaga

June 10, 2026

Continue Reading

News

Iran attacks Bahrain, Kuwait, Jordan and Hormuz ships after new US strikes

Published

on

Iran attacks Bahrain, Kuwait, Jordan and Hormuz ships after new US strikes

Iran has again claimed attacks on United States military bases in Bahrain, Kuwait and Jordan, and targeted two vessels in the Strait of Hormuz in retaliation for renewed waves of US attacks on the country.

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) said it launched drone strikes on Bahrain’s Sheikh Isa airbase and Kuwait’s Ali Al Salem and Ahmad Al-Jaber airbases early on Thursday.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

The Al-Azraq airbase in Jordan was also targeted with 12 ballistic missiles, it said, while two oil tankers that attempted “to illegally pass through” the Strait of Hormuz were also hit.

Bahrain activated air raid sirens twice, while Kuwait said its air defence systems were “intercepting hostile aerial targets”.

The IRGC said the strikes were in response to the US’s “repeated violations” of an April ceasefire and declared the Strait of Hormuz “closed until further notice”.

Advertisement

All traffic in the waterway, including oil tankers and commercial vessels, would be shot at, it said.

The attacks came after the US’s Central Command announced renewed strikes on “multiple targets” inside Iran. The military said the strikes were at President Donald Trump’s “direction” and “in response to Iran’s unwarranted and continued aggression”.

Tit-for-tat exchanges

Al Jazeera’s Mohamed Vall, reporting from Tehran, said about a dozen places were hit in three waves of attacks by the US, including in the city of Karaj, west of the Iranian capital, and in the central Abyek county.

Iranian state media reported multiple explosions on the islands of Qeshm and Kish and in the cities of Bandar Abbas and Sirik along the Strait of Hormuz.

Blasts also hit the southern city of Kargan, wounding at least two people.

Advertisement

The US Central Command, which announced an end to the strikes four hours after they began at 22:15 GMT on Wednesday, said it hit “military surveillance capabilities, communication systems, and air defense sites across Iran”.

The latest exchange came a day after the two sides traded tit-for-tat strikes, triggered by the downing of a US Apache helicopter in the Strait of Hormuz. Washington blamed Tehran for the incident and said the two pilots were rescued uninjured.

Iran said it targeted the US Fifth Fleet in Bahrain, the Ali Al Salem airbase in Kuwait, as well as an airbase in Azraq, Jordan, on Wednesday. The US, meanwhile, bombed Qeshm Island as well as the ports of Sirik, Jask and Bandar Abbas.

Tehran said the US attacks destroyed two water reservoirs and damaged a telecommunications tower.

Al Jazeera’s Vall said many of the locations hit on Thursday “were similar to those hit during the previous night”. He said that “the Americans are betting on force as the only means for them to force the Iranians to sign a deal, but the Iranians are saying that the result will be the contrary”.

Advertisement

Trump threatens Iran

At the White House on Wednesday, Trump accused Iran of stalling negotiations for a peace deal and threatened to hit the country “very hard”.

“We’ll see what happens with the deal. We were really close to a deal. But they keep tapping us along. They keep playing us for suckers,” he told reporters.

Earlier in the day, the US president wrote on his Truth Social platform that Iran had taken too long to negotiate a peace deal and “now they will have to pay the price”.

In a subsequent interview with Fox News, he also threatened to strike power plants and bridges in Iran if it was unwilling to sign an agreement.

Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian hit back in a post on X.

Advertisement

“Critical infrastructures are the lifeblood of the people. Threats to target them – from transportation networks to the electricity and water industries – are not a show of strength but a sign of desperation in the face of a nation’s will,” he wrote.

“Iran, relying on the knowledge and capabilities of its specialists, national unity, and solidarity, will stand firm against any pressure or threat,” he added.

The US-Iran escalation comes days after Israel and Iran traded fire in their most serious clash since the April ceasefire, which ended weeks of devastating US-Israeli strikes on Iran and Iranian retaliatory attacks across the Gulf.

Traffic through the Strait of Hormuz has remained severely limited ever since, driving up oil and food prices worldwide.

Progress towards a peace deal also remains slow.

Advertisement

The two sides are engaged in indirect talks aimed at securing an interim agreement that would halt hostilities, while deferring Iran’s nuclear programme to future negotiations.

But sticking points remain, with Iran demanding the release of frozen assets and relief from sanctions. Complicating matters further is Israel’s intensifying campaign in Lebanon against the Iranian-backed Hezbollah.

Continue Reading

News

Read the Charges Against 8 People Connected to the University of Michigan

Published

on

Read the Charges Against 8 People Connected to the University of Michigan

Case 5:26-cr-20306-JEL-EAS ECF No. 1, PageID.103 Filed 05/20/26 Page 13 of 63

Michigan. They littered the yard and porch with small tents, sheets wrapped to look like dead bodies, dismembered and bloody baby dolls, and a broken crib. They taped a demand note to the front door ordering, among other things, that the University of Michigan divest from Israel. c. On or about May 15, 2024, shortly after police arrived at V-1’s house, @safeumich, @jvpumich and @tahrirumich posted a video of the trespass with this message:
GOOD MORNING, @[V-1]. This morning, on the 76th anniversary of the Nakba, students hand delivered our demands to Regent [V-1]. About 2 weeks ago, she laughed at students demanding divestment while she attended a party next door to our encampment. Regent [V- 1], we will hold you accountable for the 35,000+ Palestinians martyrs whose death you funded and profited from. No matter how many times you call on violent cops to brutalize students, cancel and move your meetings to hide from students, and refuse to admit this university’s and YOUR complicity in genocide, we will continue to protest. You cannot hide. We demand divestment and will remain relentless in the struggle for a free Palestine.

d. On or about May 15, 2024, later in the day, @safeumich posted:

@[V-1] There’s nothing funny about genocide. This morning, the UMich Gaza Solidarity Encampment delivered our demands to Regent [V-1’s] door, the same regent who laughed in our faces as we told her, “[V-1, V-1] you can’t hide, you are funding genocide.” Since this morning, she has reiterated REFUSAL to divest on X. SHAME! We have communicated that the regents must respond to our demands with an open bargaining meeting for divestment by the end of their board meeting TOMORROW!… [V-1], if you aren’t losing sleep after funding mass murder and genocide, then WE WILL WAKE YOU UP!

e. On or about May 17, 2024, Unsalted Counter Info’s website cross-

13

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending