Louisiana
Martha Odom, killed in Mall of Louisiana shooting, loved ballet, Dr Pepper, writing
She was a writer, a dancer, a Dr Pepper enthusiast.
Martha Odom, 17, died after being caught in the crossfire of a shooting Thursday at the Mall of Louisiana in Baton Rouge. Odom, a senior at Ascension Episcopal School in Lafayette, visited the mall with friends for their “senior skip day” as graduation approached in just three weeks.
Odom planned to attend Sewanee, also known as the University of the South, where she was going to study English and creative writing. Instead, she and two other classmates from Ascension Episcopal were hit in the crossfire in a food court shooting that police say happened when two groups started arguing and drew guns.
She died from a gunshot wound to the chest, the coroner’s office reported Friday.
After Odom’s name became public Friday morning, and outpouring of social media tributes for her followed. She leaves behind her parents and a younger sister.
Odom was an overachiever: captain of the girls’ soccer team at her school, editor of the student newspaper, a teacher at her dance studio. She won second place in the Lafayette Public Library’s 2026 Writes of Spring contest.
She planned to spend her summer before college at Ballet Austin’s summer intensive, a chance to “train in the timeless art of dance,” she wrote in the student newspaper.
“Her classmates, Ascension faculty, and our Blue Gator families remember Martha as a joyful presence whose kindness and infectious enthusiasm brought light to all who knew her,” the school shared on social media.
Her family visited New York City over spring break, and she wrote about how much she enjoyed eating at Raising Cane’s in Times Square, going to a New York Rangers’ hockey game and seeing several Broadway musicals, including “The Outsiders” and “Cats: The Jellicle Ball.”
In other writings for the student newspaper, she shared her observations about Taylor Swift (‘captivating,’ ‘empowering’), being a debutante late last year (‘had the time of my life’) and how much her soccer team had improved (‘the soccer team is a family’).
She also took sharp interest in journalism and shared her fears about the press losing independence. In one student newspaper piece, she wrote about the inaccurate portrayals of journalists as lead characters in rom-coms including “13 Going on 30” and “27 Dresses.”
“What did rom-coms get wrong about journalists? Their drive,” she wrote. “It takes grit to unearth the information in an article. It takes bravery to be that bridge between the people and their government. A lack of that grit leads to an epidemic of self-censorship, where writers hesitate to publish critical works for fear of penalties.”
Odom summed up her beliefs in a Psalm from the Bible she shared in her Instagram biography.
“Behold,” reads Psalm 133:1 that she cited. “How good and pleasant it is when God’s people live together in unity.”
Louisiana
Louisiana Purchase & Gardens Zoo holds “Red, White and Blue Day”
MONROE, La. (KNOE) – Families spent part of Independence Day weekend at Louisiana Purchase Gardens and Zoo for the first-ever “Red, White and Blue Day,” a new event the zoo hopes will become an annual tradition.
The celebration featured children’s activities, food vendors and patriotic decorations throughout the grounds.
Organizers also added a pair of crowd-pleasers: a pizza-eating contest and a watermelon-eating contest, drawing spectators who gathered to watch contestants race the clock.
Zoo Director Phillip Crawley said the event was designed as a family day focused on bringing the community together.
“We want a family day, you know, we want people to come together. We want the, all of America needs to come together,” Crawley said. “Everybody’s been so at each other lately that hey, let’s all just get back together… let’s come out here to the zoo let’s have a good time… and see that everybody’s happy.”
Crawley said the goal is to give families another reason to visit while creating a positive, shared experience in a relaxed setting.
Zoo officials said “Red, White and Blue Day” was the first of its kind at Louisiana Purchase Gardens and Zoo, and they hope to make it a yearly event moving forward.
Copyright 2026 KNOE. All rights reserved.
Louisiana
Louisiana grand jury’s role in legal proceedings explained
(KTAL/KMSS) – The ongoing saga of Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill has many commentators on social media questioning what the grand jury process entails.
A grand jury is unlike a trial jury. A trial jury hears a case and decides a defendant’s guilt or innocence. The purpose of the grand jury is to determine if there is sufficient evidence against a defendant to bring them to trial.
The evidence viewed by a grand jury only represents what the state government considers just cause to bring charges in a case. They do not render verdicts; instead, they indict, which is a formal accusation or a decision that a person should be tried for their alleged crimes in a court of law.
In Louisiana, the grand jury is empanelled for a six-month service term. Occasionally, a special grand jury may be empanelled for eighteen months. Grand jurors are selected by lot from a pool of at least 300 prospective jurors. The number of grand jurors is specified by the court.
Once a grand jury is selected, the process becomes cloaked in privacy as names are sealed in envelopes and locked in sealed boxes. The clerk of court in the parish prepares subpoenas ordering pool members to appear on the date set forth by the court for grand jury selection.
Louisiana
Louisiana Supreme Court recalls Liz Murrill’s arrest warrant in late-night emergency ruling
The Louisiana Supreme Court in an emergency order late Friday night agreed to recall an arrest warrant for Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill, after issuing a ruling earlier in the day to stay her indictment from an Orleans Parish grand jury.
The grand jury indicted Murrill on Thursday, charging her with 16 felony counts of malfeasance in office and intimidation. Orleans Criminal District Court Judge Leon Roche issued an alias capias arrest warrant and set Murrill’s bond at $400,000.
The attorney general quickly asked the state Supreme Court to intervene, who responded with an order Friday morning that stayed the indictment.
But by late Friday, Murrill went back to the high court alleging that the special prosecutor appointed to her case, former New Orleans judge Laurie White, had refused to recall the alias capias arrest warrant despite the stay.
“I object to the removal of the capias (warrant), as the accused should not get any more preferential treatment than any other criminally charged defendant,” White allegedly told Murrill’s legal team, according to their filing to the Supreme Court.
The Louisiana Supreme Court issued another order late Friday night, saying it was “in order to add clarity and specificity where none should have been required.” The order recalled Murrill’s arrest warrant, ordered White and law enforcement to remove the warrant from law enforcement databases, and ordered White and law enforcement to “take all necessary actions to comply with this Order.”
The court’s vote on recalling the warrant was 4-3, with Justices Billy Burris, Cade Cole, Jefferson Hughes and Jay McCallum voting in the majority. Chief Justice John Weimer and Justices Piper Griffin and John Michael Guidry each dissented. Weimer and Guidry had also dissented earlier Friday from the decision to stay Murrill’s indictment; Griffin had voted in favor of the stay.
“It is said that procedure is the handmaiden of substance, but in criminal cases procedural rules are indispensable to serve justice and ensure that all are treated equally,” Weimer wrote in his Friday night dissent over recalling the warrant. “Yet, ironically, on the eve of this July 4th when our nation will commemorate the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, this court is once again called upon to provide exceptions to the normal process pursuant to another feigned emergency by one party.”
Griffin wrote in a dissent that recalling the warrant goes to the merits of the case. Guidry wrote in his dissent that the majority had elevated “power and privilege over process.”
“This is yet another unprecedented preferential act by the majority bestowing a privilege that no other criminally charged defendant can reasonably expect to receive,” Guidry wrote.
This is a developing story, check back later for more.
-
Sports2 minutes agoToronto Maple Leafs top pick Gavin McKenna reveals that he’s changing his jersey number
-
Technology7 minutes agoChina’s robot-run hotel opens to public in 2027
-
Business14 minutes agoChina-backed AI tool behind fake Brad Pitt fight making Hollywood inroads
-
Entertainment17 minutes agoDon Was produced the Rolling Stones, Bob Dylan and Ozzy. At 73, he found his voice in Detroit — and the Dead
-
Politics29 minutes agoCommentary: Happy Birthday, America! You’ve weathered another rough year
-
Sports37 minutes agoDodgers’ Eliezer Alfonzo praying his sister and stepmother will be found in Venezuela
-
World47 minutes agoReform UK’s Farage failed to disclose funds from convicted criminal: Report
-
News1 hour agoPaul Pelosi in hit-and-run in California, car left with major damage, authorities say