Connect with us

Fitness

Why modern fitness culture misunderstands human bodies

Published

on

Why modern fitness culture misunderstands human bodies

Sign up for Big Think on Substack

The most surprising and impactful new stories delivered to your inbox every week, for free.

For most of human history, movement was inseparable from survival. Deliberately burning energy for no immediate purpose would have made little sense in a world where calories were scarce and bodies were costly to maintain.

Advertisement

Seen through an evolutionary lens, exercise stops looking like a personal shortcoming and starts looking like a cultural invention we’re still learning how to live with, says Daniel Lieberman.

DANIEL LIEBERMAN: So the word exercise, you know, comes from the Latin ejercicio. And it meant, you know, to train so we still do math exercises or soldiers do exercises to get fit. But eventually the term has changed it’s meaning and it’s developed new meetings. So one hand it means to do voluntary physical activity for the sake of health and fitness. That’s the kind of sort of fitness, physical activity kind of exercise. But on the other hand, it’s also means, you know, to be exercised means to be upset, to be confused, to be anxious, to be kinda worried, you know, we get exercised by our math exercises. And so I, to me it’s part and parcel of the strange concept of exercise, right? It’s this modern idea of doing voluntary discretionary, physical activity for the sake of health and fitness. But we don’t do it often. You know, most people don’t do it ’cause they want to, they do it because, you know, it helps stave off death and decrepitude and in the modern world, of course, a lot of people are confused about it ’cause they find it hard to do, they’re not quite sure how much to do. There are all kinds of myths surrounding it. So very much people are exercised about exercise today. And really I think that by shining the light of evolution and using kind of an anthropological perspective, my goal really is to help people be less exercised about exercise.

– [Voiceover] How evolution made us move.

– I would say that the definition I use of exercise is pretty much the bog standard definition that people in the sort of fitness exercise science world use, it’s important to make a distinction between physical activity and exercise. So physical activity is just moving, right? When you do anything, right, go shop, you know, pick up your groceries and take them to your car. That’s physical activity. When you, you know, sweep the kitchen floor, that’s physical activity. But exercise is discretionary, voluntary physical activity for the sake of health and fitness. So it can include everything from sports to running on a treadmill to going for a walk. I think the paradox of exercise is that everybody knows it’s good for them. I don’t know that really anyone who says they don’t want to ever exercise, right? But the paradox is that most things that are good for us kind of want to do, you know, but exercise is kind of the reverse, right? It’s something that we all know we want to do. It’s good for us, and yet a lot of us have a hard time doing it. And the proof is in the data. According to the CDC, only about 20% of Americans get the very minimum levels of exercise that every health organization in the world thinks is the minimum for an adult, which is 150 minutes a week. So 80% of us really struggle and fail to get very basic amounts of exercise. But almost everyone says that they want to get enough exercise. The most common reason that people don’t like to do exercise when you ask them, is that they don’t have time. You know, they find it stressful and they’re busy, right? And that’s a legitimate concern for a lot of people. Imagine if you have to commute a long distance, you have a job that you know is very sedentary. You gotta, you know, deal with your kids in the evening or maybe you have two jobs or whatever, you know, it’s very challenging for people to exercise and to find the time in the modern world. The other reason that people often give for not exercising because they don’t like to, they find it uncomfortable. They find it unpleasant. They find it, you know, they get hot and bothered and they don’t feel like they get much reward out of it. And so there’s a lot of inertia that prevents people from doing it. They have a hard time getting off the couch. And, you know, I think we need to be compassionate towards both of those reasons, right? Because yes, people are stressed for time and yes, it is often unpleasant and unfun but we make them feel bad about that, right? We make them feel bad for being stressed. We make them feel bad for having that inertia when actually it’s completely normal. I mean, nobody ever exercised in the stone age, right? People were physically active when they had to be, and they might dance or do other sort, play, you know, do other things that were for fun. But you know, but volitionally going on a five mile run in the morning or going to the gym to lift weights whose sole purpose is to be lifted, that’s a really strange, weird, modern behavior and there are all kinds of instincts that we have not to do it. And we shouldn’t make people feel bad for having those instincts. Instead, we should help them figure out ways to overcome those instincts because we live in a world where we now, because we’ve mechanized everything, right, we no longer have to be physically active. We now, in a very strange way, have to choose to be physically active. And that’s not so easy. Oh my gosh, there are so many myths about exercise. It’s hard to know where to start. But I would say that, you know, one myth is that our ancestors were sort of just natural, incredible athletes who just get up in bed in the morning and you know, run ultra marathons at will and without ever much stress or difficulty that our ancestors were really incredibly strong. That there’s a trade off between speed and strength. That you don’t have to, you know, that it’s normal to be less physically active as you get older. That there’s a perfect type of exercise, perfect amount of exercise, that sports equals exercise. I could go on. The topic of exercise is just laden with myths. A common view about our sort of evolutionary origins and about sort of the evolution of physical activity is that we evolve from these kind of super athlete kind of ancestors and that on civilization has sort of contaminated us. So if you wear shoes or you drink Gatorade, or you have a fancy watch or something like that, somehow that kind of deprives you of the kind of natural talent that you have. And if only you had been born in some little village somewhere and didn’t have TV and didn’t have access to all these commercial goods that you’d be a natural, incredible athlete and that you could just get outta bed and you know, run an ultra marathon or something like that. A lot of these myths, to be honest, stem from I think this idea of this Rousseauian idea of the myth of the noble savage, right? That humans uncontaminated by civilization are also sort of naturally good and fine. And they also come from terrible, horrible racist stereotypes about, for example, you know, Africans not experiencing pain as much and you know, Asians having some kind of natural sort of proclivity to sneak around in the dark, you know, I mean, we all know these stereotypes and they’re pernicious and they’re wrong. But they’ve been applied in various ways to hunter gatherers and to subsistence farmers in various parts of the world to make us feel that somehow they’re like these kind of basically fundamental super athletes. And when you do that, I think you do harm to both, to people all around the planet. You do harm to those populations because you kind of dehumanize them. I mean, when they run an ultra marathon, it’s just as hard as when I were to try to run an ultra marathon. They sweat, they toil, they get nausea, they get cramps, they do it because not because it’s easy for them. They do it because they value it, they think it’s worth doing. And you also make people in the west feel terrible. Like somehow there’s something wrong with them, right? And they should throw away their shoes and you know eat a paleo diet or something like that, and all of a sudden ta-da they’ll become this like amazing athlete. And that’s just not true. That’s just a myth. And it’s pernicious in a variety of ways. In 2012, I had that good fortune to be invited to go to the Ironman World Championships in Kona in Hawaii. It’s an amazing event, right? And if you don’t know what an Ironman, full Ironman triathlon’s like, you start off with a 2.4 mile open water swim, then the athletes rush out of the water, jump onto bikes with these like high tech helmets and stuff like that. They speed off and they do 112 mile bike ride across the desert. And then they come back, throw off their bike, jump off their bikes, and then they do a full marathon in the heat. It’s like 90 degrees Fahrenheit, right? And it’s really amazing. And the elite athletes do this in a little bit over eight hours. They’re just like cyborgs. They’re not like human beings. It’s astonishing to watch. And the less lesser athletes take longer to do and everybody has to finish by 17 hours, so by midnight. And it’s just astonishing to see people put their bodies through that kind of endurance to achieve something like that. And I was really impressed by that. I’d never seen a full Ironman before. And then just a few weeks later, I was in a very rural part of Mexico in Chihuahua up in the Sierra Tarahumara where I got to observe a Raráhipri which is the traditional foot race that the Tarahumara Native Americans do. And it’s almost like a soccer game. There are two teams and they have a little ball, a little round ball that’s carved out of wood that morning, and there are about five people on each team, and they kind of kick the ball with their feet and then chase it and find it, and then kick it again and chase it and find it, kick it again. There’s like a little circuit they do. And there are two teams, and whichever team lapse the other team wins. And the race I saw must have been about 40, 50 miles long. And so it’s another incredible endurance event. And on the surface you’d say, oh my god, these events are totally different, right? Ironman is very commercial and everybody’s wearing the fanciest latest gear and they’ve got super fancy shoes and they drink, you know, they’re using gel and goo and all kinds of specially formulated nutrition drinks, and their bikes cost like, you know, $10,000 $20,000 and it’s very commercial, right? And they’re speakers and crowds, et cetera. Whereas the Tarahumara, when they’re running, they’re just wearing the clothes that they normally wear, they’re running in sandals. It’s very uncommercial. And you think, oh my gosh, it’s so different. You know, one is more authentic than the other, but if you stop and think, actually they’re very similar, right? Because both involve rewards, right? So Ironman, there’s like, you know, the winner and the winner gets a prize, et cetera. Well, the Tarahumara also have prizes. They bet huge amounts of stuff, right? They bet clothes and goats and corn and stuff like that. They don’t have Gatorade, but they make their own kind of form of Gatorade out of corn. And they cheer on their runners too. And there’s the joy of victory and the agony of defeat and all that. So in some ways they’re very different, but in other ways it’s kind of the same thing, you know? And it’s a personal journey that people undertake. A very small number of them. The vast majority of people are observers. They’re not participants. So really it made me realize that oh yes, there are some differences between sort of more modern, commercialized western forms of endurance physical activity. This is something basic and fundamental that all cultures do. And actually I think what makes us similar is greater than what makes us different. You know, there are different kinds of training, right? You know, play is a form of training in a way, right? You know, children play, right? Because they’re learning skills, they’re developing capacities and humans are one of the few species, dogs are another that continue to play as adults, right? And that play helps us maintain our capacities. It helps us with social relationships. I mean, there’s all kinds of good things that happen with play, right? But exercise is kind of very, I wouldn’t say exercise is generally play, although some play is exercise. And when you kind of exercise in order to, you know, or train for like an event, you’re doing something, you’re spending a lot of energy. You’re doing physical activity kind of to get ready for something, right? And certainly, you know, for the kinds of things that we do, again, that’s a very modern western behavior. So when I was talking to, and I’ve talked to Native American runners who participate in these, in these long distance races, when I asked them how they get ready for the race, how they train, they would kinda look at me like they didn’t understand the question. There was, you know, what are you talking about? And so, you know, I was working with a translator. The translator was saying, you know, this gringo, you know, like runs five miles every day to kind of get ready for a race. And the question that I got was, you know, why would you run if you didn’t have to? Because their life is their training, right? You know, when I ask people there or ask people in Africa, in the places where I work, when do you run? The most common answer I get is, oh, well, to chase a goat. You know, that’s the most common answer I get. There are a lot of ways to quantify how physically active somebody is, right? And a very simple one. It’s not necessarily the best one, but a simple way of doing it it’s what’s called the physical activity level. It’s just a ratio. So it’s the total amount of energy you spent in a day divided by the energy you would spend if you were just at bed rest, what’s called your basal metabolic rates. The energy you spend just taking care of the most basic essential functions of your body. And so say if you’re in bed rest in a hospital and lying in bed with just like a clicker for the TV and you’re doing absolutely nothing, not even digesting food, your physical activity level would be about at your power, physical activity level it would be about a 1.2. And if you’re like a tour de France cyclist, it would be above three. If you’re kind of a desk worker, it would be like 1.6. So it’s kind of a way to compare individuals but also species because it’s standardized your body size, ’cause your body size essentially determines your basal metabolic rate. And it’s interesting that most animals have physical activity levels of about two to three. So they’re, you know, pretty active. We evolve from apes. And turns out that primates in general, and apes in particular have really low PAL’s, really low physical activity levels. Chimpanzees have physical activity levels about 1.4. And so their physical activity levels are actually lower than sedentary American. So your average sedentary American who doesn’t really do much and you know, spends most of his or her time on in chairs and you know, et cetera, and takes elevators and all that is still more physically active actually than your average chimpanzee. Whereas hunter gathers, people who every day have to go out and get their food, their physical activity levels tend to be around two, about 1.92. Subsistence farmers who don’t have a lot of machines and tractors and stuff like that, they’re may be a little bit harder working maybe 2.1, 2.2. And it wasn’t until the industrial revolution that people’s physical activity levels would be able to go down like about 25% to 1.6, 1.7, which is sort of typical of your average American. So it’s a useful kind of simple standard to help us compare just generally how active , different groups or different individuals are. So your basal metabolic rate is a really important number because it tells you kind of just how much energy you’re spending on just the essential maintenance of your body, you know, paying for your brain and paying for all the tissues in your body. And you know, you have to turn over tissues all the time. Like the cells in your gut are being replaced like every five days or so. I mean, your fingernails are growing, everything’s happening in your body, right? And that all costs energy. And it turns out that a kind of typical say, adult male, my size, right? I’m not all that big, but you know, it spends about two thirds of his or her physical metabolism just on basal metabolic rates. So I spend about 1600 calories a day just existing, you know, just taking care of my body. So the vast majority of the energy that we spend isn’t spent on running around and being physically active and moving. It’s actually spent on just maintenance, just basic total maintenance. And that’s one of the reasons why we can never evolved not to be, you know, all that physically active when it wasn’t necessary. Because until recently, energy used to be limited, right? It wasn’t like, you know, 7-Eleven’s or Dunkin’ Donuts or Whole Foods or whatever your favorite place to get food is around the corner. You know, if you wanted something to eat, you had to go find it. You had to either, you know, hunt it or gather it or dig it up. And so energy was limited. And when energy is limited, you have to engage in trade-offs, right? And so if you spend energy on physical activity, that means you’re not spending energy on taking care of your body or reproducing, which is what the only thing natural selection really cares about. And so the fact that our bodies are so expensive helps explain why we tend to avoid unnecessary physical activity because it prevents, like for example, this morning I went for a five mile run. So I spent about 500 calories. Those are 500 calories that I could have spent on my metabolism. And if I were energy limited, that would’ve been a bit of a problem, right? Which is why people who are energy limited and already physically active, it makes no sense for them to go for a needless, completely pointless five mile run in the morning. So technically a calorie is the amount of energy it takes to raise one gram of water, one degree centigrade, right? So it’s a unit of energy. And so we convert various kinds of energy into calories. There are of course, other units of energy like the joule for example. But calories are kinda a useful one and it’s ’cause we all our food is labeled in calories. So calories is the most common one. But actually the calories that we mostly talk about that are on our food labels are actually kilocalories. They’re actually a thousand calories. So when you look at a label for a chocolate bar or a can of beans or something, and it says there are 50 calories, this actually means that there are 50,000 calories, right? But anyway, that’s neither here nor there, but that’s fine. But so most of the time we’re talking about calories with a capital C or kCal, kilocalorie. And you know, our bodies use a lot of calories. Typical human body spends about 2000 to 3000 calories, or in this case, kilocalories a day existing. That’s your basal metabolic rate. Plus all the energy you spend, you know, running around, doing chores, making dinner, whatever it is you do for your day. When you go for a walk, you probably spend an extra 50 calories per mile. If you go for a run, you’re spending probably an extra 100 calories per mile for that run. So that kinda gives you, hopefully gives you a sense of sort of what kind of energy amounts we’re talking about.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Fitness

Why 21-15-9 Might be the Smartest Workout Format in Fitness – and How to Use it to Drive Muscle Growth

Published

on

Why 21-15-9 Might be the Smartest Workout Format in Fitness – and How to Use it to Drive Muscle Growth

CrossFit means a lot of things to a lot of people – because it’s made up of a lot of things.

Since the rise of the fitness giant, countless brands, events and training methods have sprung up around it – not claiming to be CrossFit, but looking suspiciously CrossFit-esque.

There are, however, a handful of things that are uniquely CrossFit: the ‘Girls’ benchmark workouts. The Hero WODs and, of course, its signature rep schemes.

Chief among them is ’21-15-9′.

The 21-15-9 rep scheme may just be the single most CrossFit thing in existence. But what exactly is it? Where did it come from? And why might it actually be better at building muscle in a hurry than its conditioning roots would have you believe?

Advertisement

Let’s have a look.

What Is 21-15-9?

If you’ve never encountered it before, the format couldn’t be simpler. Choose two exercises (occasionally more) and perform 21 reps of each, then 15 reps of each, then nine reps of each, completing the entire workout as quickly as possible – with good form.

Probably the best-known example is ‘Fran’: 21 thrusters and pull-ups, followed by 15 of each, then nine. On paper it doesn’t look especially intimidating. In practice, it’s one of the most feared benchmark workouts in fitness.

Where Did it Come From?

Unlike many modern training methods, 21-15-9 didn’t come out of a study. It came from the gym floor.

CrossFit founder Greg Glassman has explained that the format emerged through years of coaching and experimentation in the 1990s. Rather than chasing a perfect sets-and-reps prescription, he was looking for a workout that allowed athletes to maintain a high power output from start to finish.

Advertisement

The thinking is surprisingly elegant. You begin with 21 reps while fresh. By the time you reach the set of 15, your ability to produce force has already fallen. By the final nine, you’re significantly more fatigued – but the workload has dropped by almost the same amount.

Instead of grinding through increasingly miserable sets of the same length, the workout ‘meets you where you are’, reducing the work required as your capacity declines. The result is a workout that encourages you to keep moving instead of standing around trying to recover.

The numbers themselves are also remarkably practical. Forty-five total reps per movement provides plenty of training volume without turning the session into an endurance slog, while every set divides neatly into thirds if you need to break it up.

(Although I’ve got to be honest, I’m a 20-15-10-5 man myself, just for the sake of round numbers.)

Why Does it Work So Well?

Although there isn’t research showing that 21-15-9 is somehow the magic formula, there are obvious reasons why it consistently produces brutally effective workouts.

Advertisement

Descending reps help maintain intensity. As fatigue accumulates, reducing the target allows movement quality, bar speed and overall work rate to stay higher than they would if you simply repeated the same number of reps over and over.

It also tends to land in a physiological sweet spot. Most 21-15-9 workouts take between three and eight minutes, depending on the movements and the athlete. That’s long enough to create a serious cardiovascular challenge while still requiring meaningful force production throughout. You’re taxing your anaerobic systems hard while relying on your aerobic system to help you recover just enough to keep going.

Finally, there’s the psychological trick. The hardest-looking part comes first. Once you’ve survived the opening 21, every remaining round appears more manageable. ‘Only 15 left.’ Then, ‘Just nine.’ In reality, you’re becoming more fatigued with every rep, but the shrinking target keeps you attacking the workout instead of pacing too conservatively.

Why it Might be Surprisingly Good for Building Muscle

Perhaps the biggest misconception about 21-15-9 is that it’s ‘just cardio with weights’.

Choose the right load and something interesting happens. Very few athletes complete every round unbroken. Instead, the workout naturally evolves into a series of short, broken sets separated by only a few seconds of rest.

Advertisement

Your 21 might become 11-5-5. Your 15 becomes 8-4-3. Your final nine might stay unbroken – or become 5-4.

In effect, you’ve accidentally turned the workout into a form of rest-pause training.

Those brief pauses allow just enough recovery to squeeze out more high-quality repetitions before fatigue catches up again. By the latter stages of each mini-set, you’re repeatedly working very close to failure, recruiting the high-threshold motor units with the greatest potential for muscle growth.

It’s a similar principle to rest-pause training, myo-reps and cluster sets: all methods used to accumulate hypertrophy-friendly volume while keeping the load relatively heavy and the rest periods brutally short.

You’re basically speed-running a large number of hard, growth-stimulating reps in a very small window of time. Could this help explain why elite CrossFit athletes often carry an impressive amount of muscle despite spending relatively little time performing traditional bodybuilding splits?

Advertisement

It’s certainly plausible, although the ‘elite’ part often selects for athletes with the greatest muscle-building potential.

Much of their training isn’t simply conditioning. It’s high-density resistance training performed under accumulating fatigue, with only fleeting recovery between efforts. In other words, they’re often doing something bodybuilders have deliberately programmed for decades: packing a lot of hard work into a very short period of time.

That’s not to say 21-15-9 is superior to a well-designed hypertrophy programme. If your sole goal is building muscle, there are more efficient ways to do it.

But if you’re looking for a workout that develops fitness, tests your mettle and still provides a meaningful stimulus for strength and size, it’s easy to see why this deceptively simple rep scheme has remained one of CrossFit’s defining fingerprints for more than 20 years.

Best Bodyweight 21-15-9 Workout: ‘JT’

If you’re looking for an interesting twist on the 21-15-9 format, look no further than Hero WOD ‘JT’, which concentrates the muscle-building potential of the format into a brutal upper-body workout.

Advertisement

Created in honour of Petty Officer 1st Class Jeff Taylor, who was killed in Afghanistan in 2006, the workout strips away barbells altogether and relies solely on three bodyweight movements:

21-15-9 reps of:

Don’t let the lack of equipment fool you. The volume – 45 reps of each movement, 135 reps in total – combined with the descending rep scheme makes this a brutal upper-body test, hammering the shoulders, chest and triceps while demanding serious muscular endurance.

Better still, it perfectly demonstrates one of the biggest strengths of 21-15-9. As fatigue mounts and the sets naturally fragment, the workout begins to resemble one giant rest-pause set, allowing you to accumulate a huge number of hard, near-failure reps in less than 10 minutes.

If your goal is building an impressive upper body while developing serious work capacity, there are few bodyweight workouts that deliver quite so much bang for your buck, making ‘JT’ one of my personal favourites.

Advertisement

fitness magazine cover featuring a muscular man with kettlebells

If there’s one thing Kori Sampson knows, it’s how to optimise your body composition for performance. To tap into his knowledge as an elite athlete and coach, we asked him to create a 4-week plan to help you move faster, recover quicker and keep pushing when the fatigue sets in – all while improving your muscle-to-fat ratio.

Ready to build muscle, burn fat and come out the other side looking, feeling and performing better? Click here to get 14 days of free access to the plan via the Men’s Health app.


Continue Reading

Fitness

10 minutes of swimming might not sound worth it – but I tried it for 2 weeks and found the benefits of a quick dip

Published

on

10 minutes of swimming might not sound worth it – but I tried it for 2 weeks and found the benefits of a quick dip

The concept of ‘exercise snacking’ has never been more popular. Not only is it convenient and accessible, but there is solid scientific evidence that short bursts of physical activity can yield real benefits for our health. But can a swimming workout be an effective ‘exercise snack’?

A study published in the European Heart Journal found that just 15 to 20 minutes of vigorous physical activity a week (almost as low as two minutes a day) was enough to significantly lower the risk of heart disease, cancer and early death. The study defined vigorous activity as any exercise that leaves you out of breath and raises your heart rate, including swimming.

Continue Reading

Fitness

The Fitness Secrets of Wimbledon’s Top Tennis Pros

Published

on

The Fitness Secrets of Wimbledon’s Top Tennis Pros

While many of us are far from becoming top-ranked athletes, there’s plenty to learn from the pros when it comes to optimising our health and fitness. From Janik Sinnner’s muscle-building techniques to Novak Djokovic’s devotion to longevity, dig into these tennis pros’ secrets for peak performance.

Joris Verwijst/BSR Agency//Getty Images

CARLOS ALCARAZ

Fitness Game Changer:

Sand Footwork Drills

Any pro tennis player has to play with agility, but Alcaraz can move. To do so at a high level, the 21-year-old performs lateral movement drills in the sand, teaching his feet to drive up from an unstable surface. This can help prevent ankle injuries and build strength in his calves and shin muscles.

breaker
jannik sinner

Jose Breton/Pics Action/NurPhoto//Getty Images

JANNIK SINNER

Fitness Game Changer:

Landmine Rotations

Sinner has historically lacked the physical prowess of his competitors, so the 23-year-old has gone all in on strength and mobility work. He does landmine rotational exercises such as the hollow body landmine press, which builds upper-body power.

Advertisement
breaker
novak djokavic

Lintao Zhang//Getty Images

NOVAK DJOKOVIC

Fitness Game Changer:

Devotion to Longevity

He’s been around this long for a reason. Djokovic, 37, eliminated gluten and dairy from his diet, started practising mindfulness techniques like conscious breathing and visualisation, and even brought a hyperbaric chamber to the 2019 US Open.

breaker
ben shelton

Cameron Spencer//Getty Images

BEN SHELTON

Fitness Game Changer:

Explosive Strength Moves

Known for his consistently fast serves, Shelton, 22, relies on single-leg training, using dumbbells to do lateral lunges, step-ups, and even Bulgarian split squats. He focuses on exploding upward on every rep so he’s ready to attack the ball on each serve.

breaker
frances tiafoe

Darrian Traynor//Getty Images
Advertisement

FRANCES TIAFOE

Fitness Game Changer:

Overcoming Isometrics

Tiafoe spent last off-season doing overcoming isometrics: exercises that force the 27-year-old to hold a position against a load he can’t move. This aids in boosting power and strength and can improve joint health.


fitness magazine cover featuring a muscular man with kettlebells

If there’s one thing Kori Sampson knows, it’s how to optimise your body composition for performance. To tap into his knowledge as an elite athlete and coach, we asked him to create a 4-week plan to help you move faster, recover quicker and keep pushing when the fatigue sets in – all while improving your muscle-to-fat ratio.

Ready to build muscle, burn fat and come out the other side looking, feeling and performing better? Click here to get 14 days of free access to the plan via the Men’s Health app.

Lettermark

Andrew Gutman, NASM-CPT is a journalist with a decade of experience covering fitness and nutrition. His work has been published in Men’s Health, Men’s Journal, Muscle & Fitness, and Gear Patrol. Outside of writing, Andrew trains in Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu, helps coach his gym’s kickboxing team, and enjoys reading and cooking. 

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending