Idaho
Two Idaho Falls mayoral candidates want your vote; here is their take on the issues – East Idaho News
IDAHO FALLS — With less than a week to go before a runoff election, two candidates are still in the race to become Idaho Falls’ new mayor.
Thousands of votes were cast on Nov. 4, but Jeff Alldridge and Lisa Burtenshaw did not obtain a 50% majority, resulting in a runoff election being declared.
Looking at the numbers, Alldridge secured the most votes with 47.17% or 5,599 votes, with Burtenshaw trailing behind with 46.65% or 5,537 votes. The third candidate, Christian Ashcraft, received 6.18%, or 733 votes, and will not be on the ballot for the runoff.
RELATED | Here’s who is donating to Jeff Alldridge and Lisa Burtenshaw in the Idaho Falls mayoral runoff
Idaho Falls is one of two cities hosting runoff elections in eastern Idaho, with Pocatello holding theirs to elect a new mayor between Greg Cates and Mark Dahlquist.
RELATED | Idaho Falls and Pocatello, here’s what you’ll see on your ballots in the runoff elections
EastIdahoNews.com created new questions and sent them to Alldridge and Burtenshaw to gain a deeper understanding of each candidate’s platform. Their responses, listed below, were required to be 250 words or less, and were only edited for minor punctuation, grammar and length.
The runoff election is scheduled for Dec. 2. To find a voting location near you, visit VoteIdaho.gov.
RELATED | Who will be the next mayor of Idaho Falls? These three candidates are hoping to secure your vote
QUESTIONS
How will you persuade local voters to choose your name on the ballot during the upcoming runoff election? Why should someone vote for you?
Alldridge: I built this campaign on truth and real issues, not personal attacks.
I’ve shared a clear vision for Idaho Falls, been honest about where city leadership has fallen short, and offered solutions that put current residents and families first. Candidates should debate ideas, not rely on slander or innuendo to sway voters.
On November 4, I received the most votes, showing the citizens are ready for a new direction. My support came from regular citizens and local voters. The other campaign is backed by establishment figures and officials who can’t even vote in this mayoral race. That contrast matters.
I’m running to represent the people who live here, pay taxes here, raise their families here, and want a mayor who listens, adjusts when needed, and works to make Idaho Falls stronger for everyone.
Burtenshaw: Idaho Falls deserves a mayor who is experienced and ready for the job on Day 1. It’s time for the city to get back to doing what it does best, providing essential services and getting out of the way so that businesses can prosper. This city has been and will always be my home. I want to protect the quality of life we all cherish here. I will work hard to keep our neighborhoods safe, maintain reliable city services, and protect the heart of Idaho Falls, even as we grow. My mechanical engineering degree and critical thinking skills are very valuable for understanding infrastructure, planning, and long-term city development issues. I have a comprehensive knowledge of public finance and experience in large organizational structures.
I’ve built businesses here, raised a family here, and volunteered in nearly every corner of this city. I’m honored to make my case to the citizens of Idaho Falls. With every conversation I’ve had during this campaign, I’ve left convinced that we can do better as a City. My goal is to establish strong relationships between residents and the city so you can have confidence we’re working for you on the priorities that matter to the community.
Our community wants common sense, transparency, and accountability, and that’s the kind of leadership I’ll bring to the Mayor’s office.
Do you support the Idaho Falls Airport’s new 20-year Master Plan to expand onto nearby private property? Why or why not?
Alldridge: No. The sanctity of the neighborhoods around the airport matters far more than adding another terminal or expanding runways onto nearby private property. The city should never have threatened to take the adjacent soccer park without full transparency or letting homeowners in on the discussion from the start. Until the airport fully uses land it already leases and serves passengers effectively, I will not support further expansion.
Burtenshaw: The airport is a tremendous asset for our region. I helped grow the airport to provide more travel options for our community. I fully support the continued growth of this airport. With 5 airlines operating in Idaho Falls and 12 non-stop destinations, the airport is Idaho’s second busiest. The 20-year master plan does not disrupt the soccer complex, and provides a blueprint for a new control tower, more hangars, a second taxiway and air cargo buildings. Due to the proximity of the private land, including it as a “future land acquisition” allows for the potential purchase using federal dollars if the land becomes available. It does not obligate the Idaho Falls Airport or the property owner.
Growth should be guided by facts, public input, and respect for property rights. The airport can continue to grow responsibly through smart land use planning, infrastructure improvements, and strategic partnerships that balance regional economic opportunity with local impacts.
What are your thoughts on the citywide installation of water meters?
Alldridge: I am opposed to metering residential water.
Burtenshaw: Water metering is as complicated as it is controversial. The city has gradually been installing water meters for commercial property over the past 20 years. Due to our current infrastructure limitations, city-wide residential water metering is not feasible. The water landscape in Idaho is evolving, and to comply with state law, all new construction since 2007 has included meter pits. The city is proactively installing these pits (not the meters themselves) as part of a long-term plan. Should the state mandate full metering in the near future, our focus will be on implementing the change with an emphasis on water conservation and maintaining affordability. Idaho Falls is in a region where new groundwater rights are unavailable. The city is becoming better stewards of our current water rights by using surface water (canals) for irrigation. Pinecrest Golf Course, Sunnyside park and Community park have already been converted to surface water irrigation, saving millions of gallons of potable water each year. The city will continue to look for ways to conserve and protect our water.
As Idaho Falls grows, traffic, commuting, and parking in the downtown area are quickly becoming more difficult. What kinds of solutions would you propose to ease these transportation issues?
Alldridge: Idaho Falls isn’t growing as rapidly as we’re led to believe. New developments are happening faster than our actual population growth. Meanwhile, the growth we do have is straining our current roads and infrastructure.
When we build mostly apartments, we bring more people who eventually want single-family homes. This drives up demand and prices for locals.
Downtown access is already tight. When the city tried to fast-track paid parking downtown, residents and small-business owners pushed back hard. That tells you something. We should be making parking easier, not harder.
The city should consider public-private partnerships to expand free, convenient parking and better signal timing. The solution is making sure growth and our transportation system stay in sync.
Burtenshaw: For many years, during the 1990’s and early 2000’s, downtown was often described as “deserted.” I am glad to see the downtown become vibrant with more local shops and new restaurants, but this revitalization is creating traffic and parking issues. Bonneville County is the largest downtown employer, providing essential county services and operating the courthouse, DMV, and elections offices. The city, county, merchants, IFDDC, and landlords must work collaboratively to address employee parking and parking alternatives for a wide variety of downtown businesses.
Downtown needs to remain accessible and welcoming for residents, visitors, and businesses alike. Possible options include expanding shared parking, improving pedestrian crossings, and dedicated parking for employees.
Do you believe that Idaho Falls would benefit from more options for public transportation? If so, what kinds and who should pay for it?
Alldridge: Yes. For Idaho Falls, small and flexible public transit makes more sense than big buses on fixed routes. Point-to-point micro-transit can serve people more directly.
Public transportation will never fully pay for itself through fares, and that’s okay. It’s a public good, especially for seniors, people with accessibility needs, and residents with mobility challenges. Because it won’t be self-sufficient, we need to be honest that it must come from our local budget and not rely on the assumption that federal dollars will cover ongoing costs.
We should design transit so it can scale up or down based on real demand and what our revenues can support. We need to improve mobility for people who need it most, in a way the city can maintain over time.
Burtenshaw: Reliable transportation options strengthen our workforce, improve access to education and healthcare, and support economic growth. I am a strong supporter of the current GIFT program, which already provides valuable service to Idaho Falls residents. It’s a great example of a practical, right-sized transit solution that fits our community.
Looking ahead, we need to increase GIFT service to our metropolitan area. Idaho Falls and Ammon are not divided by daily life because we share employers, schools, shopping areas, and neighborhoods. Our transportation planning should reflect that reality. My established regional and statewide networks can help facilitate GIFT’s reach to improve efficiency and accessibility for everyone.
Funding should continue to come from a mix of local, state, and federal sources, along with creative grant opportunities. The focus for public transportation in Idaho Falls should remain on services that meet real needs without creating an unsustainable burden on taxpayers.
According to Zillow, the average house price in Idaho Falls is $468,436, while the average annual income is $50,907. What will you do to help locals work and live in Idaho Falls more affordably?
Alldridge: The numbers vary by source. According to the city’s 2026 Adopted Annual Budget, the median household income in Idaho Falls is $63,000 and the median home value is $420,000. At today’s interest rates, a family putting 20 percent down would need to earn roughly $109,000 a year to afford that home. That shows how far out of reach ownership has become for many working families.
The city can’t fix interest rates, but we can influence what gets built and where. We should encourage community-minded developers to build homes people can actually buy. Ownership gives families stability, helps build equity, and strengthens neighborhoods. More rentals will not solve our affordability problem.
We also need to grow good-paying jobs in Idaho Falls. We have talented people connected to the Idaho National Laboratory and some of the most affordable electricity in the country through Idaho Falls Power. Groups like REDI and the Idaho Innovation Center already work to attract and grow businesses. The city should be an active partner helping local entrepreneurs access programs like America’s Seed Fund through SBIR and STTR, which bring federal support to new tech and research ideas. We have what we need to become a real tech-and-innovation hub. We can become another Silicon Slopes. That would help local incomes better match today’s housing costs.
Burtenshaw: Housing affordability is a national issue and is one of Idaho Falls’ biggest challenges.
The city can lead on this issue by reducing red tape, making development predictable, and responsibly using impact fees to ensure that infrastructure keeps up with growth. As mayor, I’ll focus on promoting a mix of housing options that fit individuals and families. That mix includes entry-level homes and quality options in every price range. I can help address the other side of affordability by working to attract and retain businesses in our local economy that pay good wages and offer stable employment. I support the next generation of nuclear reactors being developed at the INL, and its alignment with workforce development at the College of Eastern Idaho. We can continue to expand our footprint as a regional hub for healthcare, and champion the long-standing companies that contribute to the stable job market. A healthy job market and balanced housing supply are the foundation for long-term affordability.
If elected, how will you govern differently from the previous administration?
Alldridge: I would not be a continuation of the current leadership. I would govern differently in three ways: by improving communication, rebuilding trust and engagement with residents, and strengthening the culture inside city government.
First, communication has to change. City Council meetings are too restrictive because residents can’t speak to agenda items. Under my leadership, agendas will be posted two weeks in advance on every city channel, and public comment will be allowed before votes. After each meeting, the city will share a short update on what was decided and what comes next. Livestreams should be easy to find on the city website and on YouTube.
Second, we need better ways for residents to engage. Formal council meetings can feel intimidating and don’t always invite real conversation. I will hold regular, informal Q&As and open discussions where people can ask questions and understand the reasoning behind decisions. When people understand the why, trust grows. The citizens are the best consultants the city will ever have.
Third, the culture inside city government needs attention. Employees do their best inside a system that often works against them. Departments are stuck in silos. I want employees to have more autonomy to solve problems, work across departments, and raise concerns without fear of reprisal.
That’s the kind of new leadership I plan to bring to Idaho Falls.
Burtenshaw: My candidacy is driven by genuine change and a shift from top-down decision making. In my administration, communication, accountability, and partnership with the people of Idaho Falls will have priority. I’ll work to make what we do at City Hall more accessible with regular communication, better information tools, and useful community updates on major projects and spending. My opponent and I agree that listening to the citizens needs to increase, where we differ is the fact that listening alone is not helpful unless you have the experience and skills to solve their concerns.
I am solutions oriented and understand that problems are best identified and resolved in a collaborative work environment. We need to break down internal barriers and focus on excellent customer service for every resident and business.
What role can the city government play in partnering with grocery stores, local farms, or food distribution networks to help make food prices in Idaho Falls more stable and affordable?
Alldridge: The city’s role is not to set grocery prices. What the city can do is help people’s food budgets stretch further by supporting a healthy economy where wages rise and cost pressures go down.
That means growing jobs that pay decent wages so people aren’t choosing between housing costs and groceries. It also means partnering with nonprofits like Community Food Basket that help families when they need support.
Burtenshaw: City government can’t and shouldn’t control food prices, but we can play a role in supporting and protecting our agricultural economy. Idaho Falls can work with Bonneville County and the City of Ammon to implement growth management policies that protect agricultural land. We can support local farmers through our relationship with the Greater Idaho Falls Chamber Agricultural Advocacy group. Together we can advocate for state policies that keep Eastern Idaho a thriving agricultural region.
The city also has several community gardens. As the mayor, I will continue to support and promote farmers markets and explore partnerships that make it easier for small producers to connect with Idaho Falls consumers.
=htmlentities(get_the_title())?>%0D%0A%0D%0A=get_permalink()?>%0D%0A%0D%0A=htmlentities(‘For more stories like this one, be sure to visit https://www.eastidahonews.com/ for all of the latest news, community events and more.’)?>&subject=Check%20out%20this%20story%20from%20EastIdahoNews” class=”fa-stack jDialog”>
Idaho
Idaho angler reels in record 43.25-inch lake trout at Payette Lake
MISSOULA, Mont. — An Idaho Falls angler is back in the Idaho record books after landing a record-setting lake trout at Payette Lake.
Idaho Fish and Game said Dylan Smith caught and released a 43.25-inch lake trout on May 2, setting a new state catch-and-release record for the species. The fish surpassed the previous record of 42 inches.
The catch marks Smith’s second appearance in Idaho’s record books. He previously held the state catch-and-release lake trout record after landing a trophy fish in 2018 before that mark was later broken.
According to Fish and Game, Payette Lake has become one of Idaho’s premier lake trout fisheries thanks to years of management efforts aimed at improving both lake trout and kokanee populations.
Idaho
Boise’s North End finds new way to mark Pride after Idaho law halts flag display
Pride Month looks different this June along Boise’s Harrison Boulevard, where a long-standing tradition of hanging Pride flags on lamp posts has been put on hold after a new state law restricted which flags can be flown on government property.
For several years, Pride flags lined lamp posts along Harrison Boulevard in Boise’s North End neighborhood. But Idaho House Bill 561, signed by Gov. Brad Little in March, restricts which flags can be flown on government property, including the City of Boise’s Harrison lamp posts.
In response, a group of neighbors formed Pride North End and launched a distribution effort to help residents show support from their own front yards. The group has been making Pride flags and yard signs available to people who want to display them at home.
“I thought that I would…be a personal example of ‘yes, this is what I do.’ This is what I believe in,” said Edna Schochat, a North End resident.
Pride North End has already distributed more than 900-yard signs and 250 flags. The group’s original donation goal was around $2,000 to order 100 flags and 200 yard signs, but it has exceeded that GoFundMe goal, reaching $10,000 worth of donations.
The group plans to continue holding public flag and sign distributions through the end of the month.
“We cannot just say something without doing something that proves that we mean what we say,” Schochat said.
Pride North End said any leftover funds after materials are distributed will go to local LGBTQ+ nonprofits. A link to the group’s GoFundMe can be found here.
Idaho
New Idaho education laws: What students, parents and educators should know
July 1 isn’t just the start of a new fiscal year for Idaho public schools. It’s also the effective date for many new education-related laws.
From mandatory moments of silence to restrictions on taxpayer funding for teachers’ unions, the Legislature enacted a slew of new policies affecting public schools during this year’s session.
Here’s what educators, parents and students should know:
School trustees, administrators and teachers
Here are the new laws that will affect school trustees, administrators and teachers:
Union activities. Public schools can no longer use taxpayer resources to accommodate teachers’ unions — including by giving teachers paid time off for union “activities” or by using payroll systems to deduct union dues.
The list of union “activities” in House Bill 516 is long. Among other things, it includes:
- Supporting or opposing candidates for office
- Influencing legislation
- Promoting union membership
- Participating in the “administration business or internal governance” of a teachers’ union
- Preparing, conducting or attending a union event
- Distributing union communications
- Speaking on the union’s behalf
- Engaging in union negotiations
- Filing a grievance on behalf of the union
A school district can’t give teachers paid time off to participate in these activities, unless the union reimburses the district.
HB 516 was based on a report from the Washington-based Freedom Foundation, an anti-union think tank, which alleged that public schools have spent more than $1 million subsidizing teachers’ unions.
The bill also prohibited districts from:
- Deducting union dues through payroll systems.
- Increasing teacher pay to cover union dues.
- Requiring that teachers meet with the union.
- Sharing employees’ contact information with the union.
- Communicating on the union’s behalf.
Civics instruction. Public schools must now ensure that their civics instruction aligns with a law aimed at cultivating the “virtue and knowledge necessary for self-government.”
Senate Bill 1336 codified nearly four pages of requirements for civics instruction. By the time public school students graduate, they must exemplify the virtues of “prudence, justice, fortitude, moderation and patriotism” while understanding the “fundamental principles of the nation’s republican form of government” along with the “history, meaning, significance, and effect of key historical documents.”
Click here to read the list of principles and texts that students must understand.
The bill also required that high school students complete two credits in American history and two credits in American government. These classes must include instruction on the American Revolution and founding along with instruction on the incompatibility of totalitarianism with the principles of American government.
The bill also “encouraged” public schools to display historical portraits of George Washington “in a conspicuous place” in each classroom where civics is taught.
Public charter schools can request an exemption from many of the new requirements. Traditional public schools cannot.
Lastly, the bill pushed back the implementation date for a new civics test that the Idaho Department of Education is writing. The new test will be required in 2027-28, rather than during the upcoming school year.
High-needs funding. Public schools are now eligible to receive up to $100,000 in state funding for “high-needs” special education students.
Senate Bill 1288 set aside $5 million for students who require full-time staff support or specialized equipment. Districts can apply for the state funds to cover students whose individual education program-related costs exceed $30,000 annually.
The state will fully reimburse costs between $30,000 and $80,000. Costs above $80,000 will be reimbursed at 80%, and reimbursement is capped at $100,000. Forty percent of the state funds are reserved for rural schools.
Sexual abuse reporting. School districts are no longer allowed to conduct an internal investigation of abuse in lieu of reporting an incident to law enforcement.
Sen. Tammy Nichols, R-Middleton, proposed the law in response to sexual abuse complaints against Gavin Snow, a former special education assistant in the Boise School District.
Senate Bill 1412, which passed with unanimous support, also requires that school districts ask job applicants for sworn statements disclosing pending or prior investigations, resignations during investigations or disciplinary action stemming from misconduct. An applicant who lies in the disclosure is no longer eligible for the job.
Funding flexibility. Public school districts and charter schools are now eligible for flexibility in how they spend state funds — if they meet performance benchmarks.
To qualify for the “earned autonomy,” districts would have to post high marks on test scores and graduation rates while charters would be graded on academics and financials.
House Bill 883’s sponsors estimated that about 10 districts and 15 charters would qualify.
Parents
Here are the new laws that parents should be aware of:
Social transition reporting. Parents will now have a right to be notified if their child identifies as a different gender at school. Schools could face a six-figure penalty for failing to comply.
House Bill 822 requires that public school officials notify parents within 72 hours if their child requests help with “social transitioning.” This includes when a student asks to go by a different pronoun or use a bathroom or participate on a sports team that doesn’t align with their birth sex.
Sponsored by Rep. Bruce Skaug, R-Nampa, the law gives parents the right to sue a school or healthcare provider for relief and monetary damages if they aren’t notified within the 72-hour window.
The attorney general can also seek a civil penalty up to $100,000.
Rep. Bruce Skaug, R-Nampa
Virtual school policy. Parents of virtual-school students will have new restrictions on money they receive to cover the costs of home learning.
After a state report last year found examples of taxpayer money being misused, lawmakers added limits on “supplemental learning funds.” According to House Bill 624, this money can only be spent on “eligible educational expenses, including:
- Computer hardware, internet access or other devices used to meet a student’s educational needs.
- Textbooks, curricula or other instructional materials, including educational software.
- Fees for standardized tests, advanced placement exams, certificate exams or college admissions exams.
- Therapies, including behavioral, physical, speech-language and audiology therapies, along with other State Board of Education-approved services.
In addition to the rules around supplemental learning funds, HB 624 added reporting requirements for private vendors that contract with virtual schools. Vendors must disclose the costs and services they provide while demonstrating a “clear relationship between the public funds received and the services provided.”
Military preference on charter waitlists. Active-duty military parents could be eligible for preference on charter school waitlists.
Lawmakers passed a bill that allows charter schools to place children from military families third among categories of students given preference on waitlists. It’s up to each charter school whether they implement the change.
Students
Here are the new laws that students should know about:
Moment of silence. Public school students will now have to start each school day with a moment of silence.
They can use the 60 seconds however they want — to reflect, meditate or pray — but they must be silent, and “no other activities shall take place,” according to House Bill 623.
Sponsored by Rep. Bruce Skaug, R-Nampa, the law requires that a moment of silence occur “at or near the beginning of each school day.” It prohibits teachers from instructing students on the “nature of any reflection” they might engage in.
School leaders also must notify parents about the moment of silence and “encourage” them to “provide guidance” to their children on how to use it, according to the law.
Idaho Launch cuts. Less state aid will be available for students going to college after they graduate in 2027.
For the current fiscal year and next fiscal year starting July 1, state lawmakers — with Gov. Brad Little’s approval — cut $10 million from Idaho Launch. The program offers high school graduates $8,000 to spend on an in-state higher education degree or workforce training certificate.
While the award amounts will remain the same, the state now has $65 million in scholarship money to dole out, compared to $75 million in previous years.
IDLA cuts. Fewer students are eligible to take discounted courses through the state’s online learning platform, the Idaho Digital Learning Alliance (IDLA).
House Bill 940 cut funding for IDLA’s elementary program, limiting the platform to students in grades 6-12. The bill also cut driver’s education, and eliminated state funding for students attending all-virtual schools and non-public schools — although private- and home-schoolers can pay IDLA’s full course fee and seek reimbursement through the Parental Choice Tax Credit.
HB 940 also set new fees for courses that are eligible for state funding. Courses that satisfy a graduation requirement are $40, while courses that don’t meet a graduation requirement are $100.
Copyright 2026 KMVT. All rights reserved.
-
Detroit, MI24 minutes agoIlitch Companies creates gaming platform, expands beyond Detroit
-
San Francisco, CA36 minutes agoFirst of its kind queer museum in San Francisco Chinatown amplifies Chinese LGBTQ artists
-
Dallas, TX38 minutes agoThese children were sold for sex. Then the system failed them again
-
Miami, FL44 minutes agoHard Rock Cafe lets Downtown Miami lease lapse after 30-plus years
-
Boston, MA46 minutes agoFederal judge in Boston bars Trump from implementing proof of citizenship requirement to vote – The Boston Globe
-
Denver, CO51 minutes agoDenver Broncos Foundation launches extension of ‘ALL IN. ALL COVERED.’ emphasizing youth football participation
-
Seattle, WA54 minutes ago
Iran and Egypt to play in Seattle ‘Pride Match’ despite earlier complaints | The Jerusalem Post
-
San Diego, CA59 minutes agoCon Rangers San Diego Comic-Con 2026 Exclusives