Connect with us

Health

Trump Administration Begins Layoffs at CDC, FDA and Other Health Agencies

Published

on

Trump Administration Begins Layoffs at CDC, FDA and Other Health Agencies

The Trump administration laid off thousands of federal health workers on Tuesday in a purge that included senior leaders and top scientists charged with regulating food and drugs, protecting Americans from disease and researching new treatments and cures.

Layoff notices began arriving at 5 a.m., workers said, affecting offices responsible for everything from global health to food safety. Senior officials based in the Washington area and Atlanta were reassigned to the Indian Health Service and asked to choose among locations including Alaska, Oklahoma and New Mexico — a tactic to force people out, employees said.

The layoffs and reassignments touch every aspect of the federal Department of Health and Human Services, and are part of what the administration has said is a vast restructuring of the agency. Entire units focused on reproductive health and preventing gun injuries were wiped out. So was a vaccine research program aimed at preventing the next pandemic.

On Tuesday afternoon, Senator Bill Cassidy, Republican of Louisiana and chairman of the Senate health committee, summoned Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to testify about the agency reorganization at a hearing on April 10.

Outside experts and former officials said the loss of expertise was immeasurable. Many described it as a “bloodletting.” Hundreds of people, many carrying handmade signs, gathered in the lobby of a National Cancer Institute building in the Maryland suburbs on Tuesday morning to witness the exodus of fired workers, but were dispersed so they could walk out without fanfare. Some employees, both current and former, were in tears.

Advertisement

But as staff members reeled and comforted one another, Mr. Kennedy posted a video on social media that showed him swearing in the new heads of the Food and Drug Administration, Dr. Martin A. Makary, and the National Institutes of Health, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya.

“Welcome aboard,” Mr. Kennedy said. “The revolution begins today.”

The cuts were intended to fulfill Mr. Kennedy’s plan, announced last week, to shrink his department from 82,000 to 62,000 employees. Tuesday’s layoffs affected 10,000 employees, on top of 10,000 who had already been fired or left voluntarily. The department did not respond to a request for comment on the record.

The restructuring is intended to bring communications and other functions directly under Mr. Kennedy, who has vowed to “make America healthy again.” It includes collapsing a number of agencies into a new division called the Administration for a Healthy America. Mr. Kennedy said last week that the department was “going to do more with less.”

Jessica C. Henry, 40, said she had been fired along with her entire team of communications and health education specialists at the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, a small branch of the National Institutes of Health with a budget of about $500 million. Their work focused on educating people about childhood dental health, including birth defects like cleft lips and palate, as well as water fluoridation and instructions on oral health maintenance as an aging adult.

Advertisement

Ms. Henry said she logged into her computer at her desk at N.I.H. headquarters in Maryland around 7 a.m., only to see an email notifying her of her termination.

“I also just feel so confused, and honestly kind of angry, because we hear a lot about how the administration wants to increase transparency,” she said in an emotional interview. “They want accountability to the American people for how their tax dollars are being spent. And from what I can tell, they just fired all of us who do that.”

Layoff notices began arriving at 5 a.m., workers said, affecting offices responsible for everything from global health to medical devices to communications at agencies including the F.D.A., the N.I.H. and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Mr. Kennedy is also eliminating entire but lesser known parts of his department, such as the Administration for Community Living, which supports programs that help older Americans and people with disabilities live independently. Advocates for disability rights say the cuts could deprive the most vulnerable Americans of housing, personal care and other services.

At the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, cuts hollowed out entire offices including the internal policy lab, the team that administers a national survey of drug use, an office of behavioral health equity, the contracts management division and all 10 regional offices, according to Miriam Delphin-Rittmon, the former assistant health secretary for mental health and substance use. She left the agency on Jan. 20 and has been hearing from former colleagues.

Advertisement

The policy lab was established as part of the 21st Century Cures Act, a law passed by Congress in 2016.

“It’s not clear really the strategy,” Ms. Delphin-Rittmon said. “Those are important content areas.”

The cuts also fell on senior leaders, including the director of the center for mental health services, Dr. Anita Everett, who was hired into a senior position at the agency during the first Trump administration, and Michelle Greenhalgh, the agency’s director of legislative affairs, according to multiple people with direct knowledge of the filings.

“Today was simply a tragedy,” said Michael T. Osterholm, who directs the University of Minnesota’s Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy, and has advised presidents of both parties. “There is so much intellectual capital that literally got swept under the rug today in this country, and we are going to pay a price for this for years to come.”

Dr. Bhattacharya, on his first day of work, sent an email to staff saying the layoffs would “have a profound impact on key N.I.H. administrative functions, including communications, legislative affairs, procurement and human resources.” He expressed his appreciation for the “scientists and staff whose work has contributed to lifesaving breakthroughs in biology and medicine.”

Advertisement

A number of top health officials received notice that they were being reassigned to regional offices of the Indian Health Service, which is responsible for providing federal health services to Native Americans and Alaska Natives.

At N.I.H., several institute directors — including Dr. Jeanne Marrazzo, head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the institute formerly led by Dr. Anthony S. Fauci — were reassigned. So were Dr. Fauci’s wife, Christine Grady, the head of the N.I.H. Office of Bioethics, and Dr. Clifford Lane, a close ally of Dr. Fauci’s who oversaw clinical research.

At the F.D.A., the top tobacco regulator, Brian King, was reassigned. At the C.D.C., several leaders, including Kayla Laserson, who ran the global health center, also were reassigned to the Indian Health Service.

The health service is chronically understaffed and underfunded; the reassignment notices said it has an “untenable vacancy rate” of 30 percent. Mr. Kennedy recently lamented that it has been “treated as the redheaded stepchild at H.H.S.” and said President Trump wants him to “rectify this sad history.”

Those who received the reassignments were given until Wednesday to decide whether to accept the offer, or leave their jobs.

Advertisement

Some workers knew that they would be affected by the layoffs. At the department headquarters in Washington, officials responsible for minority health and infectious disease prevention were told Friday that their offices were being eliminated, according to employees.

Others were caught off guard. At the F.D.A., senior leaders were pushed out and offices focused on food, drug and medical device policy were hit with deep staff reductions amounting to about 3,500 agency staff members. On Friday, the agency’s top vaccine regulator, Dr. Peter Marks, was forced to resign under pressure. He lashed out at Mr. Kennedy afterward, saying the secretary “doesn’t care about the truth.”

Some F.D.A. workers said that they discovered they had been fired when they attempted to scan their badges to get into the building early Tuesday. The office of the center director for veterinary medicine was wiped out, according to a person familiar with the cuts. That included veterinarians leading bird flu response for the agency.

Employees of several F.D.A. labs around the United States were also let go, including those who test medical products in Detroit and San Juan, Puerto Rico, and those who test food in San Francisco and Chicago.

“The F.D.A. as we’ve known it is finished, with most of the leaders with institutional knowledge and a deep understanding of product development and safety no longer employed,” Dr. Robert Califf, who ran the Food and Drug Administration during the Biden administration, wrote on social media. He said “history will see this” as “a huge mistake.”

Advertisement

At the C.D.C., which Mr. Kennedy wants to pare back to focus only on infectious disease, the reorganization is likely to have immediate effects. Offices devoted to the study of other programs, including reproductive health, chronic disease and gun violence prevention, were disbanded.

The administration has eliminated offices dedicated to protecting workers in various industries, including those that inspect mines for safety. A two-year project to study the effects of radiation was eliminated, as was an ongoing project on lead contamination in Milwaukee.

“These cuts to agency experts and programs leave our country less safe, less prepared and without the necessary talent and resources to respond to health threats,” Dr. Mandy Cohen, who led the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention during the Biden administration, said in a text message.

Some infectious disease teams were also laid off. A group focused on improving access to vaccines among underserved communities was cut, as was a group of global health researchers who were working on preventing transmission of H.I.V. from mother to child.

H.I.V. prevention was a big target overall. The Trump administration had been weighing moving the C.D.C.’s division of H.I.V. prevention to a different agency within the health department. But on Tuesday, teams leading H.I.V. surveillance and research within that division were laid off. It was unclear whether some of those functions would be recreated elsewhere.

Advertisement

Employees laid off at the agency included those studying injuries, asthma, lead poisoning, smoking and radiation damage, as well as those that assess the health effects of extreme heat and wildfires.

Communications offices were hit particularly hard across agencies including the N.I.H., C.D.C. and F.D.A. Renate Myles, the communications director at the National Institutes of Health, received a notice of reassignment. At the C.D.C., specialists in tuberculosis communications and education were laid off.

Mr. Kennedy, who promised “radical transparency,” has said he wants to consolidate communications under his purview.

The H.H.S. “is centralizing communications across the department to ensure a more coordinated and effective response to public health challenges, ultimately benefiting the American taxpayer,” Emily Hilliard, deputy press secretary for the department, said in an email on Friday.

But other divisions responsible for providing the public with information were hit, too.

Advertisement

The team that responds to Freedom of Information Act requests at the C.D.C. was eliminated, and a similar team at the F.D.A. was deeply cut, according to sources familiar with each office. They spoke on condition of anonymity out of fear of reprisal.

Processing such requests is required by law, but can be a painstaking process, given rules requiring the redaction of information such as a company’s trade secrets.

Benjamin Mueller, Gina Kolata, Aishvarya Kavi and Margot Sanger-Katz contributed reporting.

Health

One common type of fat may increase diabetes risk, while another helps fight it

Published

on

One common type of fat may increase diabetes risk, while another helps fight it

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A new review suggests that the type of fat you eat may affect your risk of developing type 2 diabetes.

Saturated fats rich in palmitic acid – the most common saturated fatty acid in U.S. foods – appear to make it harder for the body to respond to insulin.

Meanwhile, monounsaturated fats rich in oleic acid — such as those found in olive oil — may help protect against insulin resistance, the review concluded.

ONE TYPE OF OLIVE OIL HAS A SURPRISING EFFECT ON BRAINPOWER DURING AGING

Advertisement

“Palmitic acid is found in meats, dairy products, cocoa butter and in the form of palm oil in foods, including margarine, cereal, sweets, baked goods and fast foods,” Tanya Freirich, a registered dietitian nutritionist in Charlotte, North Carolina, told Fox News Digital. She was not involved in the review. 

“Oleic acid, on the other hand, is in higher concentration in foods like olive oil, canola oil, nuts, sunflower seeds, eggs, olive, avocados and also in meats (beef, chicken, pork), milk, cheese and pasta.”

Saturated fats rich in palmitic acid – the most common saturated fatty acid in U.S. foods – appear to make it harder for the body to respond to insulin. (iStock)

The review, which was published in the journal Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism, was led by researchers from the University of Barcelona and the CIBER Area for Diabetes and Associated Metabolic Diseases (CIBERDEM) in Spain.

The findings suggest that fat quality may be more important than total fat quantity when it comes to metabolic health and diabetes risk.

Advertisement

DIABETES RISK LINKED TO THESE ULTRAPROCESSED FOOD COMBINATIONS

This appears to support the idea that diets rich in monounsaturated fats, such as the Mediterranean diet, may contribute to lower rates of type 2 diabetes.

“Palmitic acid promotes several molecular processes that impair insulin action,” study investigator Dr. Manuel Vázquez-Carrera, from the Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutic Chemistry at the University of Barcelona, told Fox News Digital. 

“Palmitic acid is found in meats, dairy products, cocoa butter and in the form of palm oil in foods, including margarine, cereal, sweets, baked goods and fast foods,” a nutritionist said. (iStock)

Too much palmitic acid can cause harmful fat byproducts to build up in the body, which can impair the body’s ability to respond to insulin, he warned. This makes it harder to control blood sugar and increases the risk of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes.

Advertisement

“It also promotes inflammation, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction and cellular stress responses, which contribute to insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction,” Vázquez-Carrera added.

VITAMIN SUPPLEMENT MAY DELAY DIABETES IN SELECT GROUPS, RESEARCHERS SAY

By contrast, oleic acid – a hallmark of the Mediterranean diet – does not have these harmful effects, according to the researcher.

“In fact, oleic acid can counteract many of the detrimental effects triggered by palmitic acid, by promoting the storage of fatty acids in relatively inert triglycerides, preserving mitochondrial function and reducing inflammation,” he said.

“All sources of fat in our diet contain a mix of saturated and unsaturated fatty acids.”

Advertisement

Freirich confirmed that the review is consistent with previous research supporting the use of olive oil in the diet for metabolic benefits.

“Also confirming previous research, the consumption of saturated fats is associated with some negative metabolic changes,” she told Fox News Digital.

THE WORST FOODS TO BUY IN THE SUPERMARKET AND THE BETTER CHOICES INSTEAD

Given the complexity of foods and diets, there is an overlap between foods that contain both types of fatty acids, the nutritionist noted. 

“Palmitic acid and oleic acid can both be found in olive oil, baked goods and fast foods, in differing amounts,” she said. “All sources of fat in our diet contain a mix of saturated and unsaturated fatty acids.”

Advertisement

Study limitations

Vázquez-Carrera noted that these findings come from a review of numerous experimental, clinical and epidemiological studies rather than a single clinical trial.

“One important limitation is that much of the mechanistic evidence comes from cell culture and animal studies,” he said. 

CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH STORIES

“Although these studies provide valuable insights into how specific fatty acids affect insulin signaling, further human intervention studies are needed to confirm the extent to which these mechanisms operate in everyday dietary settings.”

In addition, many of the human studies in the review relied on self-reported dietary intake, which can introduce inaccuracies. 

Advertisement

Type 2 diabetes develops over many years, with genetics, lifestyle and environmental factors all playing a role, the researcher noted. (iStock)

“Another challenge is that people consume foods containing complex mixtures of fatty acids and bioactive compounds rather than isolated fatty acids,” Vázquez-Carrera added. “Therefore, it remains difficult to fully disentangle the specific contribution of individual fatty acids in free-living populations.”

Nutritional recommendations

The review’s findings appear to support current dietary recommendations that emphasize replacing part of the saturated fat intake with unsaturated fats, according to Vázquez-Carrera.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

“This means favoring dietary patterns rich in foods such as extra-virgin olive oil, nuts, seeds, legumes, vegetables, fruits and fish, while limiting excessive consumption of foods rich in saturated fats, especially highly processed foods,” he advised.

Advertisement

The review does not suggest that a single nutrient alone determines diabetes risk, the researcher pointed out.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

“Rather, maintaining a healthy body weight, engaging in regular physical activity and following an overall healthy dietary pattern, such as the Mediterranean diet, remain fundamental strategies for preventing insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes.”

Type 2 diabetes develops over many years, with genetics, lifestyle and environmental factors all playing a role, Vázquez-Carrera noted.

Improving the quality of dietary fat intake could prove to be an effective strategy for reducing type 2 diabetes risk, the review suggests. (iStock)

Advertisement

“Future research should move beyond simply classifying fats as ‘good’ or ‘bad’ and instead focus on understanding how specific fatty acids, their dietary sources and their interactions within whole dietary patterns affect metabolic health,” he said.

Improving the quality of dietary fat intake could prove to be an effective strategy for reducing type 2 diabetes risk, according to the researcher.

TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ

“A simple takeaway for consumers is to swap out foods high in saturated fat more often with foods rich in heart-healthy fats, like olive oil, nuts and avocados, to better support blood sugar and metabolic health,” advised New Jersey-based registered dietitian Erin Palinski-Wade, who was also not involved in the review.

Anyone at a higher risk for type 2 diabetes should consult a healthcare provider for personalized guidance on nutrition, exercise and other preventive measures, experts say.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Health

Video: Why Milder Symptoms Could Make This Ebola Outbreak More Dangerous

Published

on

Video: Why Milder Symptoms Could Make This Ebola Outbreak More Dangerous

new video loaded: Why Milder Symptoms Could Make This Ebola Outbreak More Dangerous

Early signs indicate that the species of Ebola behind the current outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo may have milder symptoms than past outbreaks. Our global health reporter Apoorva Mandavilli explains why this might actually make it more dangerous.

By Apoorva Mandavilli, Alexandra Ostasiewicz, Nikolay Nikolov, Stephanie Swart, Rafaela Balster and Lauren Pruitt

June 23, 2026

Continue Reading

Health

Want to age better? Researchers say 4-minute routine may help prevent dangerous falls

Published

on

Want to age better? Researchers say 4-minute routine may help prevent dangerous falls

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Just four minutes of daily strength exercises can dramatically improve mobility, balance and leg strength in older adults, per new research from the Penn State College of Medicine.

Standard public health guidelines recommend at least 150 minutes of moderate exercise per week. However, the study suggests that fewer than one in five older adults meet the recommended muscle-strengthening guidelines.

The research team designed a home-based program called Functional Activity Strength Training, or FAST-2. They evaluated 97 sedentary participants 65 and older, with an average age of 74.

FITNESS EXPERT REVEALS 6 PILLARS OF STRENGTH TRAINING THAT OLDER ADULTS SHOULD MASTER

Advertisement

Before entering the study, these individuals were averaging just 18 minutes of total physical activity each week.

The older adults were randomly split into two groups, with one group performing the daily exercise routine and the other serving as a control group that received no intervention, according to the study’s press release.

Just four minutes of daily home strength training can significantly improve mobility, balance and leg strength in older adults, according to a Penn State College of Medicine study. (iStock)

Participants performed four basic movements for 30 seconds each, separated by 30-second rest intervals. The entire routine lasted exactly four minutes. The circuit consisted of push-ups, chair stands, two-arm resistance-band rows and stair stepping.

To keep the routine accessible, researchers provided written explanations and simple modifications. For example, participants could perform push-ups against a kitchen counter or wall, or use their hands on their knees for support during chair stands.

Advertisement

Participants were also given four elastic resistance bands and an adjustable step platform.

7 COMMON FITNESS MISTAKES OLDER ADULTS MAKE AND HOW TO AVOID THEM FOR BETTER WORKOUTS

“Exercise is actually really complicated, because you have to decide how many repetitions, how far, how many sets, how much rest and how many times per week,” co-author Smita Dandekar, associate professor of pediatrics at Penn State College of Medicine, said in the press release.

“It’s hard work … so if we can make it short, we’re part [of the] way there.”

The program consisted of four basic movements: push-ups, chair stands, resistance-band rows and stair stepping. (iStock)

Advertisement

As the participants grew stronger, they were encouraged to progress to higher levels of difficulty, such as transitioning away from modifications or increasing the height of the stepper.

DOCTOR SHARES 3 SIMPLE CHANGES TO STAY HEALTHY AND INDEPENDENT AS YOU AGE

After 12 weeks, the results suggested that a tiny dose of regular exercise could yield noticeable physical benefits. In a 30-second chair-stand test, the exercise group performed an average of 4.2 more repetitions than the control group.

“These indicators … give you a sense of whether or not you’re going to be able to be active in the future.”

The adults doing the exercises also shaved 2.3 seconds off their time during a test measuring how they could stand up and sit down five times consecutively. Furthermore, they extended their one-legged balance time by an average of 3.6 seconds.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH STORIES

The researchers emphasized that these specific measurements are critical medical indicators of an older adult’s future health.

By keeping the routine ultra-short, researchers eliminated common barriers like time constraints and exhaustion, resulting in an exceptionally high 81% workout completion rate. (iStock)

“These indicators predict your future ability to go into a nursing home, your future likelihood of falling and of developing difficulty walking,” noted lead author Christopher Sciamanna, professor of medicine and of public health at Penn State College of Medicine, in the press release.

“They give you a sense of whether or not you’re going to be able to be active in the future.”

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

While traditional home exercise programs generally see low engagement, the participants in this study successfully completed their workouts on 81% of the tracked days, according to the researchers.

After 12 weeks, exercising seniors gained the ability to complete an average of four more chair-stand repetitions than those who did not exercise. (iStock)

The study had several noted limitations. As it tracked a relatively small sample size of fewer than 100 individuals over a brief 12-week time frame, it is unknown whether these mobility gains can be sustained long-term.

TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ

Advertisement

Additionally, the researchers did not specify the exact dropout rates or detail how the routine might affect seniors who already relied on assistive devices like walkers or canes.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Because the final trial results reflected a specific group of participants who met the entry criteria, further investigation is required to determine whether the short routine can safely benefit older adults facing more severe physical limitations or cognitive decline.

The study was published in the journal PLOS One.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending