Science
U.S. Energy Secretary Pledges to Reverse Focus on Climate Change
Before a packed crowd of oil and gas executives on Monday, Chris Wright, the new U.S. energy secretary, delivered a scathing critique of the Biden administration’s energy policies and efforts to fight climate change and promised a “180 degree pivot.”
Mr. Wright, a former fracking executive, has emerged as the most forceful promoter of President Trump’s plans to expand American oil and gas production and dismantle virtually every federal policy aimed at curbing global warming.
“I wanted to play a role in reversing what I believe has been a very poor direction in energy policy,” Mr. Wright said as he kicked off the CERAWeek by S&P Global conference in Houston, the nation’s biggest annual gathering of the energy industry. “The previous administration’s policy was focused myopically on climate change, with people as simply collateral damage.”
Mr. Wright’s speech was greeted with enthusiastic applause.
It was quite different from a year ago, when Jennifer Granholm, the energy secretary during the Biden administration, told the same gathering that the transition to lower-carbon forms of energy like wind, solar and batteries was unstoppable. “Even as we are the largest producer of oil and gas in the world,” Ms. Granholm said, “the expansion of America’s energy dominance to clean energy is striking.”
Mr. Wright, however, was dismissive of renewable power, which he said played only a small role in the world’s energy mix. Natural gas currently supplies 25 percent of raw energy globally, before it is converted into electricity or some other use. Wind and solar only supply about 3 percent, he said. He noted that gas also had a variety of other uses — it could be burned in furnaces to heat homes or used to make fertilizer or other chemicals — that were hard to replicate with other energy sources.
“Beyond the obvious scale and cost problems, there is simply no physical way wind, solar and batteries could replace the myriad uses of natural gas,” Mr. Wright said.
Mr. Wright has argued that there is a moral case for fossil fuels, saying they are crucial for alleviating global poverty and that moving too quickly to cut emissions risks driving up energy prices around the world. He has denounced efforts by countries to stop adding greenhouse gas to the atmosphere by 2050, calling that a “sinister goal.”
At a conference in Washington last week, Mr. Wright said that African countries needed more energy of all kinds to lift themselves out of poverty, including coal, the most polluting fossil fuel. “We’ve had years of Western countries shamelessly saying don’t develop coal, coal is bad,” he said. “That’s just nonsense.”
In Houston on Monday, other oil and gas executives echoed Mr. Wright’s remarks, pitching oil and gas as the best solution for impoverished people in developing nations around the world.
“There are billions of people on this planet that still live sad, short, difficult lives because they live in energy poverty, and that’s a shame,” said Michael Wirth, chief executive of Chevron. “It should be unacceptable but affordability had left the conversation, at least in the West.”
In recent years, much of the world has been investing heavily in renewable energy. Last year, nations invested roughly $1.2 trillion in wind, solar, batteries and electric grids, slightly more than the $1.1 trillion they spent on oil, gas and coal infrastructure, according to the International Energy Agency.
But Mr. Wright warned against a shift to renewable energy that he said was likely to prove costly. “Everywhere wind and solar penetration have increased significantly, prices went up,” he said.
That is not always true. Texas has seen its electricity prices decline slightly over the past decade as wind and solar have grown rapidly and now supply more than one-quarter of the state’s power. The costs of wind turbines and solar panels have dropped precipitously in the last decade. But some places, like California and Germany, have seen electricity prices rise significantly at the same time they ramped up their use of renewable energy.
Some energy executives at the conference were more optimistic about renewable energy. John Ketchum, the chief executive of NextEra Energy, the largest producer of wind and solar power in the United States, said that renewables were essential for meeting growing demand for electricity in the United States over the next few years — especially since there was a large backlog for new turbines that burn natural gas.
Renewable energy “is cheaper and it’s available right now,” Mr. Ketchum said. “When you look at gas as a solution, as an example, to get your hands on a gas turbine and to actually get it built throughout the market, you’re really looking at 2030, or later.”
In his speech, Mr. Wright sharply criticized the Biden administration for slowing the growth of natural gas exports. Last year, the Energy Department paused approvals of new terminals that export liquefied natural gas, saying that it was concerned about the environmental and price impacts of shipping more gas overseas. Despite the pause, the United States was still the world’s largest exporter of natural gas in 2024.
On Monday, Mr. Wright signed the fourth export approval since Mr. Trump took office, extending an approval for the Delfin terminal off the coast of Louisiana. He said the Biden administration’s review of gas exports had found only modest impacts on global emissions and domestic U.S. prices.
On the topic of climate change, Mr. Wright said he didn’t deny that the planet was warming, calling himself a “climate realist.”
But he added that rising greenhouse gas emissions from burning fossil fuels — which have increased global average temperatures to their highest levels in at least 100,000 years — were a “side effect of building the modern world.”
“We have indeed raised global atmospheric CO2 concentration by 50 percent in the process of more than doubling human life expectancy, lifting almost all of the world’s citizens out of grinding poverty, launching modern medicine,” he said. “Everything in life involves trade-offs.”
Mr. Wright did not dwell on the downsides of climate change, which include the growing risks of heat waves, drought, floods and species extinction. He also did not address the costs of adapting to a hotter planet, which experts estimate could reach trillions of dollars for developing countries alone this decade.
Instead, Mr. Wright rebuked Britain for slashing its greenhouse gas emissions faster than any other wealthy country, saying that doing so had driven key industries overseas.
“I find it sad and a bit ironic that once mighty steel and petrochemical industries of the United Kingdom have been displaced to Asia where the same products will be produced with higher greenhouse gas emissions, then loaded on a diesel powered ship back to the United Kingdom,” Mr. Wright said. “The net result is higher prices and fewer jobs for U.K. citizens, higher global greenhouse gas emissions, and all of this is termed a climate policy.”
Mr. Wright said he was not against low-carbon energy and supports advanced forms of nuclear power and geothermal power, which multiple startups in the United States are pursuing.
But he said that the administration’s “all-of-the-above” approach to energy likely would not extend to wind farms, citing opposition in some communities. President Trump has railed against wind farms, saying falsely they cause cancer. The administration has stopped approvals for wind farms on public land and in federal waters and has threatened to block projects on private land.
“Wind has been singled out because it’s had a singularly poor record of driving up prices and getting increasing citizen outrage, whether you’re a farm or you’re in a coastal community,” Mr. Wright said. “So wind is a little bit of a different case.”
The Trump administration’s policies are not uniformly popular among oil and gas producers. Many companies have warned that Mr. Trump’s tariffs on steel and aluminum could raise prices for essential materials like pipes used to line new wells, while the constant threat of tariffs on Canadian oil could raise prices for refineries in the Midwest.
Mr. Wright mostly sidestepped questions on the tariffs, saying that “it’s very early on” and pointing out that inflation was low during Mr. Trump’s first term.
Ivan Penn contributed reporting
Science
What My Father’s Experience Taught Me About Memory and the Brain
A couple of years ago, in the middle of the night, I crept downstairs to find my father sitting at the kitchen table, sobbing like a child.
My mother was beside him, trying to comfort him, an activity that took up more and more of her time. He was 87 and had dementia. It wasn’t unusual to find him upset or confused. But on this night, something seemed to be happening to him in real time — in 1941.
He was 6 years old, and was leaving Pittsburgh, the only home he had ever known, for an Air Force base in San Antonio, where his father had been ordered for duty. He and his parents were traveling there by train, transferring in Chicago.
It was the beginning of a lonely, difficult time for my father’s family, moving between Air Force bases in the South, where landlords sometimes turned them away because they were Catholic. An only child, he had been allowed to take one pet with him, a canary he was carrying in a birdcage.
As they were changing trains in Chicago, the bottom fell out of the cage. The canary flew out, up into the vaulted atrium of the station’s Great Hall. There was no way to get the bird — there was no time, they had to board a train to Texas. So my 6-year-old father shuffled after his parents, holding an empty cage.
In the years that had elapsed, he had negotiated arms treaties with the Soviets, had advised presidents, had served as a U.S. ambassador, all with the same watchful, wisecracking reserve. I thought I knew who he was. I could count on one hand the times I had seen him cry. Now here he was, sobbing over the canary as if it were yesterday.
This was all, it seemed, because of his brain. He had fallen hard in their house in Washington, D.C., smacking his head on the hardwood floor. Blood rushed into spaces in his brain, and cells starved of oxygen began to die. Eventually, he was diagnosed with vascular dementia, which is most often caused by strokes.
For five years after that, my parents lived with my family outside Boston, and we learned firsthand how brain injury affects behavior. My father recovered in some ways, but he became chaotic, his thoughts broken into mirror shards.
The biggest problem was that he had no idea where he was. Specifically, he did not know why he was living with us in Massachusetts, and no matter how many times we tried to remind him, over and over, he tried to leave. We would catch him packing the car, and gently — or not so gently — guide him back into the house.
This child-father was full of surprises. He bought surprising things: Five laptops! A cruise on the Norwegian fjords! Recurring $2 donations to every Democrat running for any office, anywhere! Once, in a weeklong cascade of Amazon deliveries, we received seven identical birdbaths from China.
Science
Dirty mind? Study suggests gut movement may flush excess material from our brains
With each step you take, coordinated contractions in your abdominal muscles help keep you stable and upright.
Now, new research finds that those gentle changes in tension and pressure also affect your brain, and may play a role in the organ’s overall health.
Imaging in humans and other animal species has long shown that the brain gently moves inside the fluid-filled skull cavity, but it’s never been clear what, exactly, is propelling this motion, said neuroscientist Patrick Drew, a Penn State University professor and associate director of the Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences.
Using advanced imaging, Drew’s team observed mice brains before and after the animals began walking. They realized that the brain actually moved just milliseconds before a mouse took a step — the brief moment when the animal’s abdominal muscles contracted in preparation for movement.
To test the observation, they strapped pressure sensors around the bellies of lightly anesthetized mice and observed the brain when slight pressure was applied only to the abdominal muscles. The same motion followed. Breathing or cardiac activity didn’t trigger the same response.
The connection, Drew and his colleagues determined, is the vertebral venous plexus, a network of veins that connects the abdomen to the spine in mice and humans alike.
“It’s like a hydraulic system. It really is very much like the jacks that push your car up, or something that an excavator might have,” Drew said. “Whenever you tense those muscles, which you do whenever you make a movement … that pushes blood into the spinal cord, it increases the pressure on your brain, and it moves your brain forward.”
The paper, which was published April 27 in Nature Neuroscience, answers a puzzling question about the mechanism controlling this long-observed cerebral movement.
It also puts forward hypotheses about why this belly-brain choreography exists.
Drew and his team ran computer simulations of fluid’s motion in and around mouse brains. The kind of contraction generated by walking moves cerebrospinal fluid out of the brain, leading Drew to hypothesize that the mechanism plays an important role in flushing out protein waste and other unnecessary material.
“It’s more speculative, but using simulations, we can see that this sort of motion should drive fluid movement and could help clear waste in the brain,” Drew said.
In future research, Drew said, the team would like to explore whether the brain is detecting these mechanical signals, and how physical conditions like obesity affect the hydraulic relationship between the abdominal muscles and the brain.
These current findings clarify the relationship between the brain and physical movement, illuminating fundamental mechanics that can apply to other research, said Michael Goard, an associate professor at UC Santa Barbara who studies sensory and spatial processing.
“He did, what I think is a very thorough job figuring out what’s causing this movement in the case of locomotion and tying down the mechanical elements,” Goard said.
Science
The Longevity Secrets Helping Athletes Blow Past the Limits of Age
The assessment covers seven simple movements — various lunges, jumps and timed balances — and produces a player score relative to the rest of the league and the player’s own history. The report also includes “jump” and “landing strategy” metrics that chart the distribution of force across a player’s hips, knees and ankles, and it translates arcana like “max ankle dorsification angle” into the lingua franca of basketball: “how small your ankle angle can get like when you get low on a quick first step.” The file, which a player can access throughout his career, regardless of team, is meant to give him information about how hard he can push his body — and, just as critically, when it’s time to ease off.
“When you’re younger, there’s days you can take as many — for us — baseball swings as you want,” New York Yankees first baseman Paul Goldschmidt, who is 38, told me. We were talking in mid-February at the team’s spring training facility in Tampa, Fla., as he was getting ready for eight straight months of baseball. “As you get older, there’s times when rest is more important than work.”
For some athletes, the right biometric data presented in the right context represents “permission to rest,” says Ana Montero, a co-founder of Atlas, a San Francisco-based company that makes brain-wave-scanning, behind-the-ear wearables about the size of Mentos candies. “It’s quantifiable evidence that is showing you: Dude, today — or right now — is not the day. Go to the gym, go for a walk, go for whatever it is. And then coming back and actually seeing that you’ve bounced back.”
The Atlas device gathers several types of data, including electroencephalography, or EEG, which measures electrical activity in the brain, and galvanic skin response, or G.S.R., which is what a polygraph test measures. That data is sorted into five categories (among them agility, vitality and stress) and then delivered with advice through a smartphone app.
“There’s always some noise in brain activity because neurons are not perfect chips or transistors,” André Marques-Smith, Atlas’s other co-founder, says. “So mistakes get made.” He adds that what causes neurons to lose their precision are things that we’re all familiar with: fatigue, stress, anxiety, hunger, aging. Tom Ryan, the N.B.A.’s senior vice president of basketball strategy, says Launchpad chose Atlas because it was eager to find a device that collected this sort of data in real time. If it works the way it’s supposed to, then a vet like Goldschmidt will know exactly when he’s good for some extra batting practice and when he should take a nap instead.
-
New York54 minutes agoNew York’s Budget Deal Is Still Hazy. Here Are 5 Key Questions.
-
Detroit, MI1 hour agoApproval poll: Do you approve of Lions GM Brad Holmes? (post-2026 draft)
-
San Francisco, CA2 hours agoWhere to watch Pittsburgh Pirates vs San Francisco Giants: TV channel, start time, streaming for May 8
-
Dallas, TX2 hours agoDallas Weather: Thunderstorms in the forecast for Friday & Mother’s Day
-
Boston, MA2 hours agoWhere to watch Tampa Bay Rays vs Boston Red Sox: TV channel, start time, streaming for May 8
-
Denver, CO2 hours ago11 Denver Restaurants For Anyone Missing Their Southern Roots – Tasting Table
-
Seattle, WA2 hours agoOffseason Checklist: Seattle Kraken
-
San Diego, CA2 hours agoSan Diego Padres celebrate Puerto Rican heritage with local artist