Connect with us

News

The revolt against over-management

Published

on

The revolt against over-management

Stay informed with free updates

Make a loose fist with your hand. Now press the thumb against the inside of the forefinger. Or let it rest on top. You should look as though you are giving an invisible cash note to someone. Excellent. You are doing the Clinton Thumb (or the Obama or Blair or Cameron Thumb). Use this gesture to emphasise a point when speaking. It conveys firmness and resolution, without the arrogance that is implicit in a jabbing finger.  

There concludes our first lesson in Politics Before Donald Trump. Next week: message discipline. Come with a rote phrase, such as “we’re all in this together”, and prepare to repeat it, regardless of context.  

Young readers no doubt think I am hamming up how robotic and over-managed politics was in the recent past. Well, trawl YouTube, friends. If nothing else, the rise of Trump has exposed a widespread public fed-up-ness with uniformity and standardisation. I wonder if the same revolt is spreading to other fields.  

Advertisement

Take my own world, the media. Why do podcasts do so well? Because, in the end, they are messy, elliptical, digressive and everything else that broadcast theory abhors. (In the case of Joe Rogan, perhaps the biggest media figure in the anglophone world, there can’t be much difference between his on-air and off-air speech.) The tight professionalism of linear radio is now, for millions of us who were raised on it, unlistenable in comparison. 

Even the world’s favourite sport, so long in the intellectual grip of the micromanaging perfectionist Pep Guardiola, might be loosening up. Arsenal, coached by one of his apostles, are impressive, as the inside of a Swiss watch is impressive. The spacing between players is just so. Free kicks and corners are choreographed to ballet standards. Even in open play, we fans know that a sequence of rehearsed moves will get the ball to the right flank, where opposition defenders will then flock, at which point a diagonal pass will release the spare Arsenal forward in the underpopulated left-centre zone.

It is the most “engineered” football in the world, give or take that of Pep’s own Manchester City, another team that is easier to admire than to love. But both are having disappointing seasons. A slightly freer Liverpool are thriving, with a not obviously better squad. If they clinch the Premier League, the era of over-coaching — the bane of modern fans — should recede.   

Years ago, this column regretted the “death of the maverick”. The argument was that in most industries there is so much data about what works that everyone converges on the same way of doing things. Songwriters know to put a hook in the first 30 seconds to keep Spotify listeners from skipping a track. New-build apartments have the same kitchen-lounge plan. Football had become rigid. My mistake was to not anticipate that people would at some point revolt. How strange that politics, which is so often downstream of trends elsewhere, would go first. Watching Trump’s distressingly effective inaugural speech, I nursed one consolation. His success sends a signal to other over-managed sectors: there are rewards for deviating from strict form.

I am writing this in Los Angeles, where I once lived. It has no dominant architectural style. It has no obvious centre. (“Downtown” is something of a misnomer.) A bleak strip mall might contain a jewel of a restaurant or gallery. In its lack of pattern, it is more like life, more like the flux of experience, than all but one rich-world city I can think of. 

Advertisement

After the Great Fire of London in 1666, various geniuses submitted plans to rebuild the place from first principles. Most wanted to bring some Euclidean order to the labyrinth. Their designs — full of right angles and other atrocities — got nowhere. Otherwise, London would now be a ghastly grid or (Christopher Wren’s idea) another European piazza-and-boulevard set-up.

Well, LA, London’s one rival as the least designed of the great western cities, will have to change in lots of ways. Even before its recent trauma, it had problems. In the end, though, as long as something in the human id chafes against structure and regimentation, the appeal of this place can’t dim.

Email Janan at janan.ganesh@ft.com

Find out about our latest stories first — follow FT Weekend on Instagram and X, and sign up to receive the FT Weekend newsletter every Saturday morning

Advertisement

News

Waymo called the cops on teen riders, raising privacy concerns

Published

on

Waymo called the cops on teen riders, raising privacy concerns

A Waymo robotaxi drives in San Francisco’s North Beach neighborhood this week.

Heather Diehl/Getty Images


hide caption



toggle caption

Advertisement

Heather Diehl/Getty Images

Police in San Mateo, Calif., posted Monday on social media that they had apprehended a pair of teenagers from a Waymo driverless robotaxi after the company alerted authorities to suspected criminal activity. It’s the latest incident involving video surveillance of passengers and others by autonomous vehicles — raising questions about the limits of privacy in such vehicles.

The Facebook post by the San Mateo County Police said: “Parents do you know where your teens are? @waymo does!”

The 15-year-olds were allegedly drinking alcohol and shooting toy guns from the car, according to the police. They said Waymo’s systems detected behavior that then triggered a safety response, after which the company disabled the vehicle and contacted police.

Advertisement

Waymo’s cars, equipped with an array of cameras, microphones and other sensors to monitor passengers and other nearby vehicles, are becoming more common in cities across the United States. Experts say the detention of the two teens in San Mateo highlights a potential — but not inevitable — trade-off between privacy and convenience. It also questions the extent to which companies similar to Waymo are required to hand over private data, including audio and video of passengers, in situations where a crime is suspected.

NPR reached out to Waymo, which is owned by Alphabet, the parent company of Google, for comment on the details of the San Mateo incident and how the company responded, but did not hear back. But on its website, the company says that as many as 29 cameras in its autonomous cars provide an all-around view and “are designed with high dynamic range and thermal stability, to see in both daylight and low-light conditions, and tackle more complex environments.”

“There already exist laws that govern duty to report or even duty to protect” for carriers such as Waymo, according to Alessandro Acquisti, a professor of information technology at the MIT Sloan School of Management. “The privacy problems arise when and if driverless carrier companies used such laws or ethical obligations as a pretext for blanket, indiscriminate accumulation of identifiable data for unspecified future purposes.”

That includes not just monitoring people inside the cars, but outside too. Take, for example, a hit-and-run investigation last year in Los Angeles. Media reported that the police inquiry was aided by video captured by a Waymo taxi that had a clear view of the crime. Critics suggested at the time that authorities were using the company’s vehicles as a mobile surveillance platform. And during 2025 protests in Los Angeles against Immigration and Customs Enforcement crackdowns, demonstrators vandalized Waymos, apparently angry that video recorded by the vehicles could be used by police, although there is no evidence that happened.

Continue Reading

News

Trump fires last members of election commission, inciting fears of midterm ‘chaos’

Published

on

Trump fires last members of election commission, inciting fears of midterm ‘chaos’

Donald Trump has terminated the remaining members of the independent, federal commission that assists election administration officials nationwide just a few months before the midterm elections, multiple outlets reported Thursday.

The remaining three commissioners of the four-member bipartisan commission ⁠were forced out on Thursday in different ways. The one Republican appointee resigned and the other ⁠two, Democratic appointees were notified of their terminations via email from ​the White House presidential personnel office.

“On ‌behalf of President ‌Donald J Trump, I am writing to inform you that your position ‌as Commissioner of the Election Assistance Commission is terminated, effective immediately. Thank you for your service,” the email, seen by Reuters, said.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The Election Assistance Commission serves as a “national clearinghouse of information on election ‌administration”, accredits testing laboratories and certifies voting systems, and maintains the national mail-voter registration form developed by the National ​Voter Registration Act of 1993, according to the commission’s website. The terminations follow Trump and top administration officials’ advocacy to change vote-by-mail requirements and investigations into the 2020 election outcome, which Trump lost to Democrat Joe Biden.

Advertisement

“It is ⁠irresponsible and dangerous that this Administration remains dead set on ​causing chaos for ​our election officials across this ​country,” Arizona secretary of state Adrian Fontes said in a ​Thursday statement. “This ‌move undermines the integrity ​of nonpartisan ​election administration.”

The 2002 law that established the commission, the Help America Vote Act, states the president can appoint replacements to the commission.

It is unclear how Trump will move ahead with the commission.

Reuters contributed reporting

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Former Olympian pleads not guilty in reflecting pool vandalism charges

Published

on

Former Olympian pleads not guilty in reflecting pool vandalism charges

Former U.S. Olympian David Hearn (left) walks with his attorney Norman Eisen to speak to reporters and protesters gathered after his arraignment at the Superior Court of the District of Columbia in Washington, D.C. on Thursday.

Finn Gomez/Getty Images


hide caption



toggle caption

Advertisement

Finn Gomez/Getty Images

Former U.S. Olympic canoeist David Hearn pleaded not guilty to damaging the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool in D.C. Superior Court Thursday morning.

Federal prosecutors charged Hearn with a single count of destruction of property causing more than $1,000 in damage to the pool.

Hearn has previously claimed, which his attorneys repeated during a short press conference outside the court, that he simply touched the water in the pool out of curiosity.

Advertisement

The Trump administration had just completed a $14 million renovation of the pool.

But shortly after the work finished, peeling paint and algae gathered in the water. The remodel has been largely criticized as a massive failure and waste of taxpayer dollars.

Superior Court Judge Carmen McLean released Hearn on his own recognizance. His next hearing is scheduled for Aug. 5.

Norm Eisen, one of Hearn’s attorneys, spoke to reporters outside of court following the hearing. He said the administration is using Hearn as a “scapegoat … for their own failures.”

“It is not a crime to touch the reflecting pool, to touch water in the United States of America,” he said.

Advertisement

Prosecutors say there is a host of evidence against Hearn.

This is a developing story.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending