Politics
Stakes are high for Newsom and California when Trump visits L.A. wildfires
SACRAMENTO — California Gov. Gavin Newsom and President Trump shared a surprisingly symbiotic relationship during the Republican’s first term in the White House, with their public sparring and ability to work together in times of crisis elevating both politicians.
Whether the two men can overcome an ugly 2024 election cycle and resume a respectful rapport for the benefit of Californians should become clearer when Trump surveys wildfire damage in Los Angeles County, possibly as soon as Friday.
The visit gives the president an opportunity to show that during a disaster, he can rise above petty partisanship and name-calling to provide aid to Americans in need, regardless of whom they voted for in November.
The stakes are considerable for Newsom, who finds himself in a precarious position with his state on fire.
The governor could end the day with a presidential example of acting like a level-headed leader capable of putting politics — and personal feelings — aside to help his state. Or, Newsom could walk away more vulnerable to criticism that his political gamesmanship and thirst for the national spotlight compromised his ability to deliver for Californians.
“We’re going to learn with this week’s visit whether Donald Trump and Gavin Newsom will treat each other as the president of the United States and the governor of California, or two individuals with completely opposite ideologies who have been sparring continuously,” said Thad Kousser, a professor of political science at UC San Diego.
Trump said over the weekend that he was planning to visit Southern California on Friday, but has not released any details about his trip.
Regardless of when the president visits, Kousser said a disaster provides an easy “political script” for both leaders to notch a win.
History shows they’ve acted as statesmen in times of crisis and temporarily paused their jousts on social media and in the courts.
During Trump’s first term, the governor often commended Trump for taking his calls and delivering everything he requested to support California, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Still today, Newsom asserts that his relationship with Trump was as good as any other governor’s during the initial term.
At the same time, their battles over the environment, immigration and other areas where their liberal and right-wing politics collided gave Newsom an opportunity to define himself as a fighter for Democratic values to a national audience. Newsom and California similarly gave Trump a chance to highlight the follies of Democratic rule and cast himself as a more sensible alternative.
Bob Salladay, the governor’s top communications advisor, said it’s a more complex relationship “than the simple friend or foe” narrative.
“If the past repeats itself as it often does, the governor and President Trump could easily have the same type of relationship that began six years ago,” Salladay said. “That is, we will protect California by fighting against misinformation and, yes, fighting in court to protect our values — while working cooperatively on important issues as we did during the pandemic. You can do both things.”
But the relationship between the two leaders also appears more complicated this time around.
After the president lost his reelection bid in 2020, Newsom continued to run against Trumpism in his successful effort to beat a recall campaign the following year and win reelection in 2022. The governor traveled the country during the 2024 presidential election cycle in support of then-President Biden and then-Vice President Kamala Harris, all the while growing his list of supporters across the nation.
Newsom has said after the November election that Trump did not respond to his effort to congratulate him for defeating Harris.
Two days after the election, the governor reignited the California vs. Trump narrative when he announced a special session to increase funding for the state Department of Justice to fight the incoming administration in court. Trump responded by calling out Newsom’s “insane policy decisions” that he claimed were forcing people to leave his state.
Rob Stutzman, a Republican political consultant, said leaning back into the “resistance” narrative so quickly after an election where voters rebuked progressive Democrats was a miscalculation.
“He went streaking in the quad thinking everyone was behind him and no one was behind him,” Stutzman said. “There’s no resistance to lead this time around.”
At a time when other prominent Democrats seem to be backing away from the national culture wars, Newsom has been slower to relinquish his high-profile role on the front lines. He’s also refused to follow the path of corporate leaders and bend the knee to Trump.
Newsom tried to tone down his message, trading his offensive posture for a narrative about defending the state’s values, while he talked about affordability in the weeks after the election. But the change hasn’t protected him, or his fellow California Democrats, from criticism.
Democratic lawmakers were set to begin special session hearings over the increase in legal funding Newsom requested to fight Trump when the fires broke out in L.A. County, giving the GOP a potent avenue to question their priorities as Los Angeles burned.
Despite initially insisting the special session was imperative to ensure lawmakers approved the extra legal money to fight Trump before the inauguration this week, that bill has been delayed.
Instead, Newsom expanded the special session to include another bill to provide $2.5 billion in wildfire recovery support for affected communities.
Restraining himself from fighting every battle with Trump is a challenge at a time when the president is blaming him for the wildfires.
Trump has repeatedly alleged that Newsom is at fault for fire hydrants that ran dry in the Palisades fire. Experts have debunked his claims about a lack of water in Southern California, but that hasn’t stopped the allegations from being repeated thousands of times.
Newsom launched a website as part of a campaign to correct misinformation about the fire shared by Trump and others. The site refutes claims from Fox News that California cut its firefighting budget during the governor’s tenure and shoots down allegations in social media posts about the state mismanaging forest lands.
The governor’s assault on misinformation, which Newsom discussed in national television appearances, comes as a familiar cast of California Republicans say they’re mounting another effort to recall him after more than a half-dozen attempts failed.
Mike Madrid, a “never-Trump” Republican political consultant, said Trump’s claims and the deluge of misinformation that spread on Elon Musk’s X platform after the fires broke out have become harder to disrupt since the president’s first term.
Trump’s infrastructure to share his message is stronger than Newsom’s, particularly as facts get drowned out on social media. The announcement that Facebook will no longer censor or try to combat incorrect information in posts will also put Newsom at a disadvantage, Madrid said.
“The reason why that’s so damaging and so destructive is the misinformation comes and it’s hitting, not just with right-wing trolls on Twitter, and it’s still reinforcing the narrative that California is not a functional government,” Madrid said.
Newsom’s political aides say the governor is providing an example for other Democrats about the best way to push back on Trump’s misinformation in his second term. They disagree with criticism about his special session, arguing that Trump would have targeted California regardless.
The governor, through his personal account, has offered retorts to a host of claims about his governance from popular and little-known Republicans. Despite his near-constant presence in Los Angeles since the fires broke out, his effort to swat down misinformation has opened him up to jabs about his focus.
“Instead of making highly produced clap-back videos with social media influencers, you should get to work helping Californians,” House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said on X. “You’re the leader of a state in crisis, and you should finally start acting like it.”
In his rebuttal, Newsom urged Johnson to “do the right thing” and help people in need instead of “playing partisan games.”
He made a similar case in his letter imploring the president to visit the state and survey the wildfire damage.
“In the spirit of this great country, we must not politicize human tragedy or spread disinformation from the sidelines,” Newsom wrote. “Hundreds of thousands of Americans — displaced from their homes and fearful for the future — deserve to see all of us working in their best interests to ensure a fast recovery and rebuild.”
Trump has not responded to the letter, or invited the governor to join him on his visit to Los Angeles.
Politics
Trump plans to meet with Venezuela opposition leader Maria Corina Machado next week
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
President Donald Trump said on Thursday that he plans to meet with Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado in Washington next week.
During an appearance on Fox News’ “Hannity,” Trump was asked if he intends to meet with Machado after the U.S. struck Venezuela and captured its president, Nicolás Maduro.
“Well, I understand she’s coming in next week sometime, and I look forward to saying hello to her,” Trump said.
Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado waves a national flag during a protest called by the opposition on the eve of the presidential inauguration, in Caracas on January 9, 2025. (JUAN BARRETO/AFP via Getty Images)
This will be Trump’s first meeting with Machado, who the U.S. president stated “doesn’t have the support within or the respect within the country” to lead.
According to reports, Trump’s refusal to support Machado was linked to her accepting the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize, which Trump believed he deserved.
But Trump later told NBC News that while he believed Machado should not have won the award, her acceptance of the prize had “nothing to do with my decision” about the prospect of her leading Venezuela.
Politics
California sues Trump administration over ‘baseless and cruel’ freezing of child-care funds
California is suing the Trump administration over its “baseless and cruel” decision to freeze $10 billion in federal funding for child care and family assistance allocated to California and four other Democratic-led states, Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta announced Thursday.
The lawsuit was filed jointly by the five states targeted by the freeze — California, New York, Minnesota, Illinois and Colorado — over the Trump administration’s allegations of widespread fraud within their welfare systems. California alone is facing a loss of about $5 billion in funding, including $1.4 billion for child-care programs.
The lawsuit alleges that the freeze is based on unfounded claims of fraud and infringes on Congress’ spending power as enshrined in the U.S. Constitution. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
“This is just the latest example of Trump’s willingness to throw vulnerable children, vulnerable families and seniors under the bus if he thinks it will advance his vendetta against California and Democratic-led states,” Bonta said at a Thursday evening news conference.
The $10-billion funding freeze follows the administration’s decision to freeze $185 million in child-care funds to Minnesota, where federal officials allege that as much as half of the roughly $18 billion paid to 14 state-run programs since 2018 may have been fraudulent. Amid the fallout, Gov. Tim Walz has ordered a third-party audit and announced that he will not seek a third term.
Bonta said that letters sent by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services announcing the freeze Tuesday provided no evidence to back up claims of widespread fraud and misuse of taxpayer dollars in California. The freeze applies to the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program, the Social Services Block Grant program and the Child Care and Development Fund.
“This is funding that California parents count on to get the safe and reliable child care they need so that they can go to work and provide for their families,” he said. “It’s funding that helps families on the brink of homelessness keep roofs over their heads.”
Bonta also raised concerns regarding Health and Human Services’ request that California turn over all documents associated with the state’s implementation of the three programs. This requires the state to share personally identifiable information about program participants, a move Bonta called “deeply concerning and also deeply questionable.”
“The administration doesn’t have the authority to override the established, lawful process our states have already gone through to submit plans and receive approval for these funds,” Bonta said. “It doesn’t have the authority to override the U.S. Constitution and trample Congress’ power of the purse.”
The lawsuit was filed in federal court in Manhattan and marked the 53rd suit California had filed against the Trump administration since the president’s inauguration last January. It asks the court to block the funding freeze and the administration’s sweeping demands for documents and data.
Politics
Video: Trump Says ‘Only Time Will Tell’ How Long U.S. Controls Venezuela
new video loaded: Trump Says ‘Only Time Will Tell’ How Long U.S. Controls Venezuela
transcript
transcript
Trump Says ‘Only Time Will Tell’ How Long U.S. Controls Venezuela
President Trump did not say exactly how long the the United states would control Venezuela, but said that it could last years.
-
“How Long do you think you’ll be running Venezuela?” “Only time will tell. Like three months. six months, a year, longer?” “I would say much longer than that.” “Much longer, and, and —” “We have to rebuild. You have to rebuild the country, and we will rebuild it in a very profitable way. We’re going to be using oil, and we’re going to be taking oil. We’re getting oil prices down, and we’re going to be giving money to Venezuela, which they desperately need. I would love to go, yeah. I think at some point, it will be safe.” “What would trigger a decision to send ground troops into Venezuela?” “I wouldn’t want to tell you that because I can’t, I can’t give up information like that to a reporter. As good as you may be, I just can’t talk about that.” “Would you do it if you couldn’t get at the oil? Would you do it —” “If they’re treating us with great respect. As you know, we’re getting along very well with the administration that is there right now.” “Have you spoken to Delcy Rodríguez?” “I don’t want to comment on that, but Marco speaks to her all the time.”
January 8, 2026
-
Detroit, MI6 days ago2 hospitalized after shooting on Lodge Freeway in Detroit
-
Technology3 days agoPower bank feature creep is out of control
-
Dallas, TX4 days agoDefensive coordinator candidates who could improve Cowboys’ brutal secondary in 2026
-
Health5 days agoViral New Year reset routine is helping people adopt healthier habits
-
Nebraska2 days agoOregon State LB transfer Dexter Foster commits to Nebraska
-
Iowa3 days agoPat McAfee praises Audi Crooks, plays hype song for Iowa State star
-
Nebraska3 days agoNebraska-based pizza chain Godfather’s Pizza is set to open a new location in Queen Creek
-
Entertainment2 days agoSpotify digs in on podcasts with new Hollywood studios