Connect with us

Vermont

Vermont Law and Graduate School welcomes four fellows focused on animal issues

Published

on

Vermont Law and Graduate School welcomes four fellows focused on animal issues


For decades, Vermont Law and Graduate School has taught courses on animal rights and welfare. In 2021, the school officially launched the Animal Law and Policy Institute.

Now, the college offers an advanced degree for practicing lawyers to deepen their animal advocacy skills. It’s only the second such program in the United States.

The first four fellows arrived in South Royalton this fall from all over the world.

Delci Winders directs the VLGS’s Animal Law and Policy Institute, and she recently joined Vermont Public’s Jenn Jarecki to discuss it. This interview was produced for the ear. We highly recommend listening to the audio. We’ve also provided a transcript, which has been edited for length and clarity.

Advertisement

Jenn Jarecki: To get us started, what do we mean when we say animal welfare and animal rights?

Delci Winders: There is a sense that there is a division— that there’s a binary — between animal welfare and animal rights. And the argument goes: animal rights are focused on the interests in animals — animals’ interests in their own well-being, dignity, etc, whereas welfare is sort of focused on human interest in treating animals OK while we use them, but that it carries with it a notion that it’s OK to use them so long as we treat them as well as possible in doing so.

And so there are different perspectives on whether or not this is a continuum or not. I try really hard to approach it broadly and to accommodate students who come with any position on what I do tend to see as more of a continuum. And I think advocating for welfare can ultimately lead to rights in certain circumstances.

Jenn Jarecki: Delci, you’ve been with VLGS’s Animal Law and Policy Institute since the beginning. Can you briefly walk us through its history?

Delci Winders: The institute launched in 2021, when I was recruited to join the faculty to start the animal law program, and I brought with me our associate director, Laura Ireland. We both had experience in Lewis & Clark’s Animal Law Program. Laura was instrumental in starting a lot of that programming, and I founded and directed the Animal Law Litigation Clinic there.

Advertisement

Jenn Jarecki: What types of classes are taught at the Animal Law and Policy Institute, and what are some of the program’s aims?

Delci Winders: We’ve got a pretty broad array of classes. We’re the fastest-growing animal law program in the country, probably in the world, so we’re adding classes all the time.

So we’ve got your core animals in the law class, and then we’ve got a lot of more specialized classes. So we’ve got a class on undercover investigations, we’ve got a class on science and animal law, we’ve got wildlife law, we have the law of animals in agriculture, the list goes on and on. And our mission is to train the next generation of animal advocacy leaders while centering animals in the fight for environmental protection and environmental justice.

Jenn Jarecki: Delci, I’d love to turn to this new fellowship program. I understand four practicing lawyers from around the world are at VLGS for the next year. Can you tell us who they are and what they’re doing?

Delci Winders: Absolutely. We’ve got four amazing people. So we’ve got Carlos Contreras, who is originally from Colombia. He’s licensed to practice in Colombia, he’s also licensed to practice in Spain. And he had a practice in Spain where he worked on a very high profile case on behalf of a whistleblower, and has come to Vermont law graduate school to study — he’s focused on American legal studies, so that he can sit for the bar exam in New York and practice animal law in the United States.

Advertisement

And then we have Lana Nadj, who is an Australian attorney who has practiced in Australia for many many years. She’s focused on money laundering issues and things like that, but has increasingly wanted to dedicate her practice to animal law, and so she’s focusing on that with us.

And then we have Pius Ubenyi, who is a Nigerian lawyer who, as a practicing lawyer in Nigeria, got to do some wildlife law work, and decided that he really wants to focus on animals. So, this is the theme here. And so he’s joined us to focus entirely on animal law and develop expertise there.

And then we have Anette Sikka, who is originally from Canada, but has been living in Alabama, and is, again, has practiced for many years. Primarily focused on human rights issues, but wants to focus on animal issues and go back to the Deep South, where there’s so much need for that work.

Jenn Jarecki: How are they settling into Vermont so far? I mean, I know they’ve been here for a few months, but how are things going?

Delci Winders: It’s been so amazing having them around, they’re an incredible cohort. We’re working on a research and writing project together, so, me with the four of them. They also are working on their own targeted research projects, and they’ve really just dived in. They’re having a great time, I’m having a great time with them, and they’ve really built impressive communities here in Vermont very quickly.

Advertisement

Jenn Jarecki: Delci, you’ve taught animal rights law around the country. You also directed the world’s first law school clinic dedicated to farm animal advocacy. Why move your family across the country for this program? And how are you finding Vermont?

Vermont Law and Graduate School

/

Courtesy

Advertisement
Delcianna Winders

Delci Winders: It was not an easy decision. I had a great job at Lewis & Clark, but really, the opportunity to start a program at such a special institution was too good to turn down. So, I had been teaching in the summer program at Vermont Law and Graduate School for a few years, so I knew how special it was. I knew that it’s a mission-driven institution. It’s not just a school with really strong programs, it’s a school where those programs, which are focused on the public interest, are at the heart of the identity of the school.

And I also knew that it had this long history of animal law, going back to offering one of the very first animal law classes in the world, and that students had been pushing for more offerings for many years. So it just seemed like the perfect opportunity, too good to give up, and so I took a giant leap.

Jenn Jarecki: Well, sticking with Vermont for a second, Delci, this past year, lawmakers cleared the way for an animal welfare division within the Department of Public Safety. Can you talk about the significance of this move here in Vermont and how it compares to some of the other states you’ve worked in?

Delci Winders: So this came about because there was a sense that the animal protection laws were spread out across a lot of different agencies for enforcement, and so that ended up with a lot of uncertainty as to who was responsible for certain things, and it ended up with things falling through the cracks, sometimes with finger pointing. And that’s common, we see that in all of the states. We also see that very much at the federal level.

And so something I’ve been urging at the federal level for a while now is the creation of an animal protection agency, and I think we need that at the state level as well, and I think this is a step in that direction, and I’m very excited about it. We don’t have a person in that position yet, so it’s something to keep an eye on and see how it goes, but I think it could be a model for the rest of the country.

Advertisement

Have questions, comments or tips? Send us a message.





Source link

Vermont

Vermont postal worker allegedly threw away mail she was supposed to deliver for months

Published

on

Vermont postal worker allegedly threw away mail she was supposed to deliver for months


Crime

During a search of a dumpster where the worker allegedly discarded the mail, police found several packages and holiday cards.

A Vermont postal worker was cited and suspended for allegedly throwing away mail that was supposed to be delivered to other people, according to police.

Natasha Morisseau, 34, of North Troy, was cited on nine counts of petty larceny and five counts of unlawful mischief, Vermont State Police said in a statement. She works as a mail carrier for the town’s United States Postal Service (USPS) office.

Advertisement

Officers were first alerted to the discarded mail on the afternoon of Jan. 23, according to police. Upon finding the mail in a dumpster on Elm Street in North Troy, they determined that none of it was for that address.

Police identified Morisseau as a person of interest and learned that she was a postal employee. They confirmed that she had regularly been throwing away a small amount of mail under her care since at least October 2025, according to the statement.

After searching the dumpster and Morisseau’s mail vehicle, officers found opened and unopened packages, along with several holiday cards, one of which contained money. Morisseau was later cited Feb. 14 and is due to appear March 17 in Vermont Superior Court, police said.

Since Jan. 23, Morisseau has been suspended by USPS, and all recovered mail has been given back to them for delivery, according to the statement. The case has been forwarded to the USPS’ Inspector General for further review.

Sign up for the Today newsletter

Get everything you need to know to start your day, delivered right to your inbox every morning.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Vermont Air National Guard joins Iran campaign – The Boston Globe

Published

on

Vermont Air National Guard joins Iran campaign – The Boston Globe


On a typical day, some of the 20 stealth fighter jets based in South Burlington, Vt., take off from tiny Burlington International Airport for training runs near the northern border. In recent months, they’ve flown much farther afield.

The Vermont Air National Guard’s 158th Fighter Wing was deployed in December to the Caribbean, where it took part in the US campaign to capture Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. Shortly thereafter, the squadron joined a military buildup in and around the Middle East to prepare for US and Israeli airstrikes against Iran.

Though both deployments had been widely reported, the military remained mum about the whereabouts of Vermont’s F-35A Lightning II jets. Even Governor Phil Scott, technically the commander of the Vermont Guard, said he only knew what he’d read in the news, given that US military leaders were directing the missions.

On Monday, General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, confirmed the deployments at a Pentagon press conference about the war on Iran. Caine praised National Guard members from Vermont, Wisconsin, and elsewhere.

Advertisement

“In the case of the Vermont Air National Guard and the 158th Fighter Wing, they were mobilized for Operation Absolute Resolve,” Caine said, referring to the Venezuela campaign. “And then were tasked to take their F-35As across the Atlantic instead of going home, to be prepared to support this operation” in the Middle East.

Much remains unknown about the Vermont Guard’s recent missions, including the precise role they played in Venezuela and Iran, where the jets are currently based, and how long they’ll remain.

The Guard did not immediately respond to requests for comment., Its recently elected leader, General Henry “Hank” Harder, said in a statement that the force was “proud of the dedicated and professional service of our Airmen” and pledged to support their families in the meantime.

“We will continue to carry out our commitment to these Vermont Service Members until, and long after, they return from this mission,” Harder said.

Vermont’s three-member congressional delegation, meanwhile, has praised Vermont Guard members for their service in Venezuela but has criticized President Trump’s campaigns there and in Iran, particularly absent congressional authorization.

Advertisement

“The people of our country, no matter what their political persuasion, do not want endless war,” said Senator Bernie Sanders, an independent, echoing similar remarks from Senator Peter Welch and Representative Becca Balint, both Democrats. “We must not allow Trump to force us into another senseless war. No war with Iran.”


Paul Heintz can be reached at paul.heintz@globe.com. Follow him on X @paulheintz.





Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

In Vermont, small town meetings grapple with debate on big issues

Published

on

In Vermont, small town meetings grapple with debate on big issues


Tuesday is town meeting day in Vermont. Municipalities in New England and elsewhere are increasingly grappling with major national and international issues at the local level.

JOSEPH PREZIOSO/Getty Images


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

JOSEPH PREZIOSO/Getty Images

If you haven’t lived in certain New England towns, it can be hard to fathom their centuries-old direct democracy-style Town Meetings, where everyday residents vote on mundane town business such as funding for schools, snow plows and road repairs.

These days, voters are also being asked to weigh in on national and international issues, for example, demanding the de-funding of ICE, and condemning “the unprovoked attack and start of an illegal and immoral war against Iran.” It’s all fueling a separate – and fierce– debate on what towns ought to be debating.

Advertisement

“When you have people sleepwalking into an authoritarian regime, it’s up to us to sound the alarm,” insists Dan Dewalt, an activist in Newfane, Vermont, one of several communities where residents scrambled to draft a resolution against the Iran war in time for their annual Town Meeting on Tuesday.

Local resolutions are a uniquely effective tactic, activists and experts say, and they’re being used increasingly around New England and beyond, especially as national politics have become so polarized.

“People feel isolated, helpless and hopeless. And when you hear about other people who are just like you taking a stand and representing something that you believe, that gives you not only hope, but it gives you power,” said Dewalt.

Several other Vermont towns will be considering resolutions Tuesday calling for the removal of the president and vice president “for crimes against the U.S. Constitution,” while many others will vote on a pledge to ” to end all support of Israel’s apartheid policies, settler colonialism, and military occupation and aggression.”

A similar divestment resolution passed 46 -15 in Newfane last year, following hours of heated argument over the plight of Palestinians, the security of Israelis, the “inflammatory” language of the resolution – and whether such problems half-a-world away even belong on the agenda of the tiny town of just about 1,650.

Advertisement

“It’s a Town Meeting for town issues,” Newfane resident Walter Hagadorn declared at a recent Select Board meeting, where residents pressed board members to block any future resolutions not directly related to town business.

“You shouldn’t be subject to hours and hours of people virtue signaling” and trying to “hijack Town Meeting,” Hagadorn said.

Others agreed, suggesting activists host a debate on their issues at another time and place, or stage a rally or protest instead.

But Select Board member Katy Johnson-Aplin pushed back, saying that would not have the same impact.

“It doesn’t work the same way,” Johnson-Aplin said. It’s only when the issue is formally taken up at a Town Meeting that “it goes in the newspaper and it’s recorded that the town of Newfane has agreed to have this conversation.”

Advertisement

University of Pennsylvania political science professor Daniel Hopkins has been watching the growing movement of local communities taking a stand on issues far beyond town lines.

“This is a trend we’re seeing increasingly across the 50 states and in a variety of ways but I think it has taken on a new and potentially more concerning edge,” Hopkins said. “I worry that we are in an attention-grabbing, sensation-rewarding media environment in which the kinds of issues that engage us at a national level may further polarize states and localities and make it harder for them to build meaningful coalitions on other issues.”

Indeed, in Newfane, the resolution regarding Israel became so divisive that some residents decided not to even come to last year’s Town Meeting, according to Select Board vice-chair Marion Dowling.

In Burlington, where a similar resolution was proposed, City Council President Ben Traverse says things got so heated, he and his family were getting harassing phone calls and even death threats. Burlington city councilors voted in January to block the question from going to a popular vote.Vermont has a history of “big issue” resolutions, from the push for a Nuclear Arms Freeze in the 1980’s, to calls to ban genetically modified foods in 2003. Dewalt, the Newfane activist, was behind several of them, including calls to impeach then-president George W. Bush in 2006, which got him invited to talk about it on network TV shows, and quoted in The New York Times.

“I can guarantee you if I stood up on my soap box and made a declaration of the exact same wording, I wouldn’t have had anybody asking me questions about it, he said. “We’re not pie-in-the-sky here about the power of our Newfane Town Meetings, but our actions have consistently had an impact.”

Advertisement

But opponents say activists overstate the impact of their resolutions, and their victory. They say it’s disingenuous, for example, to claim the town of Newfane supported the resolution against Israel, when the winning majority of 46 people was less than 3% of town residents.

“I feel like they’re using the town as a vehicle for their personal messages and that bothers me,” says Newfane resident Cris White. “It’s so junior high.”

Traverse, the Burlington City Council president, also takes issue with what he calls the “inflammatory” language of that resolution.

“The question, as presented, approaches this issue in a one-sided and leading way,” Traverse says.

In Vermont, any registered voter can get a resolution on the Town Meeting agenda by collecting signatures from 5% of their town’s voters. While elected city or town officials have the authority to allow or block the resolution, there is no process in place to vet or edit language.

Advertisement

Traverse says it would behoove city leaders and voters to require an official review to ensure that language is fair and neutral, just as many states do with ballot questions. Traverse says he’s not opposed to contentious, big issue resolutions being put to local voters, but the language must be clear and even-handed.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending