Connect with us

Vermont

Rutland ramps up incentives, cuts red tape, in push for 1,000 new housing units by 2028 – VTDigger

Published

on

Rutland ramps up incentives, cuts red tape, in push for 1,000 new housing units by 2028 – VTDigger


The Housing Trust of Rutland County’s East Creek Commons housing project on Thursday, November 14. Photo by Glenn Russell/VTDigger

Over a year ago, Rutland City Mayor Mike Doenges announced the goal of creating 1,000 new housing units by 2028. The mayor recognized that, on paper, the roughly 60 new units in development this past year is a far cry from being on track towards his admittedly “lofty” target. But Doenges said he anticipated a slow start and much of the work in year one has been to address bureaucratic roadblocks to get the momentum rolling. 

“I think it’s going better than I could have hoped,” Doenges recently said of his housing plan. “I don’t think we’ve seen that kind of burst of development in a very long time in our city so I take that as a very, very positive sign that we’re heading in the right direction.”

One of Doenges’ main affordable housing partners, the Housing Trust of Rutland County, has two projects in the works in Rutland City: 22 new units at the East Creek Commons on Columbian Avenue and 30 new units on Forest Street. It is also working on a 24-unit housing project in West Rutland.

Devon Neary, executive director of the Rutland Regional Planning Commission, sees affordable housing projects as a vital part of the solution to Rutland’s housing crisis. 

Advertisement

“When we really look at housing development, it needs to be along a spectrum,” said Neary. “We need to make sure that we are retaining the population that we have and providing housing for everyone within their affordable range.”

The region’s home sales and rental costs rose at a steep rate in the past few years and people living in Rutland have felt this impact in their wallets, he said. The average one-bedroom rental cost in Rutland County jumped from $780 in 2019 to $911 in 2023, and the median home sale increased from $150,000 in 2018 to $229,000 in 2022, based on a housing needs assessment by Vermont Housing Finance Agency conducted last year. 

This has left about half of the renter households in Rutland County cost-burdened, according to federal standards — a quarter of renters paid between 30% to 50% of their income on rent and 24% paid more than half their monthly earnings on rent in 2021. 

Mary Cohen, executive director of the housing trust, said that while the trust is doing its best to contribute affordable housing, its capacity as a public developer is not enough to fill the need for varied types of housing in the city. Rutland’s rents are not high enough to attract private developers who need assurance of a return on investment for housing projects, she said.

The Housing Trust of Rutland County’s East Creek Commons housing project on Thursday, November 14. Photo by Glenn Russell/VTDigger

“It can’t just be the affordable housing organizations that are doing this. It’s a lot of private developers that need to step to the plate as well,” Cohen said.

Advertisement

Recognizing that Rutland’s affordable housing organizations are already “neck-deep” in projects, Doenges has looked for ways to encourage more market-rate housing development and bring in private developers. 

The mayor said that he sees his role as two-fold: to encourage and welcome new residents, and to “get out of the way” of developers by helping to remove costs and zoning barriers that slow down projects.

Doenges worked with the Rutland Heritage Family Credit Union to spearhead a program called Roofs Over Rutland, which received $8 million last month to provide low-interest-rate loans to developers. 

Of that funding, which came from the state treasurer’s “10% in Vermont” local investment program, $5 million will be designated for projects of five or more units. The other $3 million will go towards smaller-scale projects. There have been more than a dozen housing development loan requests since Roofs Over Rutland’s roll out, according to Doenges. 

30 years ago, downtown Rutland decided its future. Today, it’s back to the drawing board.Advertisement


“That’s very encouraging, because it does prove the fact that there have been developers waiting in the wings for interest rates to come down, to reinvest and bring units online,” he said.

Other steps include reducing prohibitive permitting fees and wastewater water allocation permits, which have been lowered from $4 per gallon to 25 cents per gallon for residential developments, Doenges said.

Advertisement

Due to modernized zoning and existing development in the area, Neary said Rutland is also positioned to take full advantage of the recent loosening of Act 250 regulations through Act 181, passed by the Legislature in June. Doenges, Neary and Cohen all agreed this legislative change will cut costs and speed up operations for developers. 

The Rutland Regional Planning Commission has also recently released a housing guide for developers, which Neary said has helped bring clarity to the housing production process.

“We’ve heard from several developers that that guidance document has been monumental in removing some of the barriers, especially information barriers for accessing public money and incentives for housing development and really bringing resources directly to those developers fingertips,” said Neary. 

The Board of Aldermen is also considering an ordinance to place limits on short-term rentals. Michael Talbott, the board’s president, said this would hopefully have the trickle-down effect of making more housing available in Rutland. Other municipalities in Vermont that have regulated short-term rentals include Burlington, Stowe, Killington, Woodstock, Londonderry, Tunbridge and Plymouth.

Talbott said that he recognizes a need to be more thoughtful about reining in the unfettered short-term rental market and protecting renters in Rutland. 

Advertisement

“We have people who tell us their landlord evicted them, turned their long-term apartment that they liked and always paid for into an Airbnb,” said Talbott. “Obviously, we need short-term rentals in Rutland, but how many do we need and where do we need them? Because we know we also need long-term rentals in a really significant way.” 

Neary said despite the “slow roll,” the lessening of regulatory barriers in concert with programs like Roofs Over Rutland mark significant headway towards tackling the region’s housing woes. The city’s success, Neary continued, will be key to addressing the housing shortage in the county as a whole, which is estimated to need around 7,000 additional housing units for renters and homeowners by 2040, according to the housing finance agency study. 

“Housing doesn’t just pop up out of nowhere. I think what is most critical is that the city of Rutland is really laying the foundation for significant housing growth,” said Neary. 





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Vermont

Commentary | Vermont Chamber: Vermont is in trouble

Published

on

Commentary | Vermont Chamber: Vermont is in trouble


Not someday in some distant future. Now.

We are aging, shrinking, and pricing out our own children, workers, and entrepreneurs. Schools face consolidation, taxes are climbing, and employers struggle to fill jobs. We’re too dependent on federal funding to support state spending. A housing shortage is driving up prices, slowing economic growth, and leaves young people feeling forced out.

Staying the course is not a viable option. It only gets worse from here if nothing changes.

Advertisement

The cost of scarcity

For decades, Vermont has treated growth as a threat to mitigate. We are living through the consequences of that mindset, and it hits marginalized communities hardest. True equity requires expanding supply rather than fighting over the crumbs of a shrinking economy. Otherwise, people lose hope and leave. This is already happening: Vermont experienced the nation’s largest percent decrease in population last year, becoming the only state losing population to both natural change and net migration.

The data are clear: Over the next decade, Vermont must add roughly 13,500 workers annually just to maintain economic stability. We need 7,500 new homes each year, yet we only permit about 2,500. When we fail to build, we aren’t “preserving” Vermont. We are pricing out multi-generational families, working-class neighbors, and Black, Indigenous, and People of Color Vermonters who represent our state’s fastest-growing demographic. Saying no to growth denies depopulated rural areas the chance to revitalize their communities. A shrinking tax base concentrates economic pressure on fewer people, creating a vicious cycle that erodes even the most resilient communities.

Most Vermonters support more housing and population growth, and policymakers keep saying they intend to follow the will of the people. However, intentions do not house families, fill classrooms, staff hospitals, or make life more affordable. Outcomes do. Right now, tangible outcomes are coming far too slowly or not at all.

It doesn’t have to be this way. We can choose a different path forward.

From roadmap to results

The planning is done. Between the Vermont Futures Project’s Economic Action Plan and the Vermont Business Roundtable’s Systems Innovation Framework, we have the data-informed roadmaps. We know where the hurdles are: a regulatory system that prizes “no” over “how,” and a fiscal trajectory where spending outpaces tax base growth, both exacerbated by unfunded mandates adding layers to an already inefficient system.

Advertisement

Process continues to overshadow results. It is time for outcomes. Future policymakers should focus on these four immediate shifts:

Regulatory Modernization: Move from a culture of “permission” to a culture of “production.” If a project meets established goals, it should be approved in months, not years. Start with “yes” as the default.

Fiscal Stewardship: Align our budget with economic reality. Vermont cannot tax its way out of a shrinking population and a constrained economy. Families and businesses need a predictable environment that allows them to plan, invest, stay, and grow.

Intentional Growth: Actively recruit and retain a diverse, working-age population. Growth funds our schools, supports our healthcare system and sustains our communities, benefiting the people already here.

Accountability: Ensure enacted policies achieve their goals. If the goal is housing, did we build the homes? If it is affordability, did we bring costs down sustainably? Revisit system design and policies if they fail to produce tangible results.

Advertisement

What comes next

Data is not destiny. Vermont’s future is a choice. Let’s choose abundance because Vermonters can no longer afford to choose scarcity. Here’s how you can help.

To the business community: Step forward to share your experiences with the downstream impacts of public policy. Your insights are crucial to modernizing our rules, regulations, and system design, and restoring Vermont’s competitiveness to build an economy where everyone can thrive.

To policymakers: We stand ready to be your partners. The data is clear, our organizations are aligned, and the roadmap is ready. We don’t need endless studies; we need your help to produce results. As the election cycle approaches, remember that accountability is measured by tangible outcomes for Vermonters, not intentions.

To our fellow Vermonters: Say “yes” to the possibilities in your own communities. Welcome new housing, support the local businesses, and champion a growing tax base over rising tax rates. But wanting change is not enough; you must participate to make it happen. Engage with your elected officials, serve on a local board, and turn out to vote for the future you want to see.

Finally, we must all reshape the narrative about Vermont. Share stories about why you love living and working here and why others should consider Vermont too. Your voice can help break the vicious cycle of scarcity. Speak openly about how growth can improve well-being and why you support it.

Advertisement

Growth is not a threat to Vermont; growth is what will save it.



Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

VT Lottery Powerball, Gimme 5 results for June 22, 2026

Published

on


Powerball, Mega Millions jackpots: What to know in case you win

Here’s what to know in case you win the Powerball or Mega Millions jackpot.

Just the FAQs, USA TODAY

The Vermont Lottery offers several draw games for those willing to make a bet to win big.

Advertisement

Those who want to play can enter the MegaBucks and Lucky for Life games as well as the national Powerball and Mega Millions games. Vermont also partners with New Hampshire and Maine for the Tri-State Lottery, which includes the Mega Bucks, Gimme 5 as well as the Pick 3 and Pick 4.

Drawings are held at regular days and times, check the end of this story to see the schedule.

Here’s a look at June 22, 2026, results for each game:

Winning Powerball numbers from June 22 drawing

17-19-21-45-48, Powerball: 13, Power Play: 2

Check Powerball payouts and previous drawings here.

Advertisement

Winning Gimme 5 numbers from June 22 drawing

05-09-18-35-39

Check Gimme 5 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Pick 3 numbers from June 22 drawing

Day: 8-0-1

Evening: 2-1-6

Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.

Advertisement

Winning Pick 4 numbers from June 22 drawing

Day: 2-8-4-6

Evening: 0-2-1-8

Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Megabucks Plus numbers from June 22 drawing

12-26-29-34-38, Megaball: 03

Check Megabucks Plus payouts and previous drawings here.

Advertisement

Winning Millionaire for Life numbers from June 22 drawing

07-08-20-24-42, Bonus: 05

Check Millionaire for Life payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your lottery prize

For Vermont Lottery prizes up to $499, winners can claim their prize at any authorized Vermont Lottery retailer or at the Vermont Lottery Headquarters by presenting the signed winning ticket for validation. Prizes between $500 and $5,000 can be claimed at any M&T Bank location in Vermont during the Vermont Lottery Office’s business hours, which are 8a.m.-4p.m. Monday through Friday, except state holidays.

For prizes over $5,000, claims must be made in person at the Vermont Lottery headquarters. In addition to signing your ticket, you will need to bring a government-issued photo ID, and a completed claim form.

Advertisement

All prize claims must be submitted within one year of the drawing date. For more information on prize claims or to download a Vermont Lottery Claim Form, visit the Vermont Lottery’s FAQ page or contact their customer service line at (802) 479-5686.

Vermont Lottery Headquarters

1311 US Route 302, Suite 100

Barre, VT

05641

Advertisement

When are the Vermont Lottery drawings held?

  • Powerball: 10:59 p.m. Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
  • Mega Millions: 11 p.m. Tuesday and Friday.
  • Gimme 5: 6:55 p.m. Monday through Friday.
  • Lucky for Life: 10:38 p.m. daily.
  • Pick 3 Day: 1:10 p.m. daily.
  • Pick 4 Day: 1:10 p.m. daily.
  • Pick 3 Evening: 6:55 p.m. daily.
  • Pick 4 Evening: 6:55 p.m. daily.
  • Megabucks: 7:59 p.m. Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Millionaire for Life: 11:15 p.m. daily

What is Vermont Lottery Second Chance?

Vermont’s 2nd Chance lottery lets players enter eligible non-winning instant scratch tickets into a drawing to win cash and/or other prizes. Players must register through the state’s official Lottery website or app. The drawings are held quarterly or are part of an additional promotion, and are done at Pollard Banknote Limited in Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Vermont editor. You can send feedback using this form.



Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Vermont Police identify victims in Chelsea house fire – Valley News

Published

on

Vermont Police identify victims in Chelsea house fire – Valley News


CHELSEA — Vermont State Police have identified the victims of a June 17 fatal house fire as the home’s residents, Karen Snyder, 71, and Max Quayle, 57.

The investigation into the cause and origin of the fire that broke out just after 3 a.m. last Wednesday is ongoing, according to the police news release.

Investigators found Snyder, the owner of the home where the fire started, and Quayle in the wreckage after extinguishing the blaze at 7 North Common.

The fire also severely damaged a neighboring house to the west, 5 North Common, that Fire Chief Ed Coburn said has not had occupants for years, and caused minor damage to a house to the east, 9 North Common including scorching a wall and cracking some windows.

Advertisement

Both 5 and 7 North Common will likely have to be torn down because they are unsafe, Coburn said, but the final decision will be up to property owners and the town.

Anyone with information that might aid investigators should call VSP’s Royalton Barracks at 802-234-9933 or submit information anonymously online at https://vsp.vermont.gov/tipsubmit.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending