Connect with us

Lifestyle

‘The movie tells you how to make it’: After decades, Coppola’s ‘Megalopolis’ is here

Published

on

‘The movie tells you how to make it’: After decades, Coppola’s ‘Megalopolis’ is here

Director Francis Ford Coppola at the Cannes Film Festival in May 2024.

Vianney Le Caer/Invision/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Vianney Le Caer/Invision/AP

Francis Ford Coppola is known for his cinematic masterworks such as Apocalypse Now and The Godfather trilogy. Now, at age 85, the indie filmmaker has created Megalopolis, a mega-ambitious Roman epic set in a futuristic New York City.

The all-star cast features Adam Driver as an architect named Cesar Catilina who envisions a utopia. He’s pitted against Franklyn Cicero, played by Giancarlo Esposito, who seems content to keep the status quo as the mayor of “New Rome.”

As in the Roman Republic, the society is plagued with greed, political division,and special interests. Coppola told NPR he sees the fall of the Roman Republic as a cautionary tale for our times.

Advertisement

“It’s very impressionistic. It’s poetic,” says actress Aubrey Plaza, who plays a journalist known as “Wow Platinum.” She told NPR that while she admired Coppola’s creativity and passion, she found Megalopolis hard to grasp at first: “It’s a beautiful nightmare. It’s beautiful. But it is scary, also.”

Aubrey Plaza as Wow Platinum in Megalopolis.

Aubrey Plaza as Wow Platinum in Megalopolis.

Lionsgate


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Lionsgate

Coppola began working on Megalopolis in the 1980’s, and eventually self-financed it with much of his own fortune – $120 million from his wine business.

Sam Wasson, author of a book about Coppola, The Path to Paradise, says the filmmaker has often been misunderstood. A movie about utopia, he says, filled with ideas and artistic experimentation, is not the easiest sell.

“It’s very hard for people to understand why or how an artist could spend so much money on creativity,” Wasson told NPR. “That has made him a maligned Quixote figure in the press.”

Advertisement

Once filming began, Megalopolis’ production made headlines. Early in the process, according to The Hollywood Reporter, the visual effects crew was fired and the art department quit. (Plaza told NPR she believed it was “an intense work environment, but it never seemed to be like, ‘Oh, you know, we’re on a sinking ship.’”) Earlier this year, The Guardian and Variety cited sources claiming Coppola tried to touch and kiss background actresses in a nightclub scene without their consent.

Other cast and crew members denied Coppola had been inappropriate. But online, Variety posted videos reportedly of the party scene. And one of the extras, Lauren Pagone, filed a lawsuit against the director for civil battery and assault. She also alleges negligence by Coppola, his production company Zoetrope and two casting agencies.

Coppola is now suing Variety for $15 million dollars for libel. (In response, a spokesperson for Variety owner Penske Media Corporation told NPR in a statement, “While we will not comment on active litigation, we stand by our reporters.”)

As Coppola told NPR, he has “no intention of litigating this in the media.” In an interview this week, he shared his hopes for Hollywood – and for humanity.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity. 

Advertisement

Mandalit del Barco: I want to talk to you about Megalopolis. I know it’s been your passion project for decades. What do you want audiences to take away from this conversation? 

Francis Ford Coppola: Well, first of all, there are a lot of phrases in the movie business. They always want to attach phrases. You referred to it as my passion project. Every movie I make involves passion. All movies are passion projects. There’s not…one that’s more [of a] passion project than the other…My earlier films all were different styles. The Godfather is very classical. Apocalypse Now is very wild. One From the Heart was very theatrical. So I began to wonder what my style was. And of course my style is based on whatever theme that the movie is about. And in my wanting to learn what my style would be, I came upon the idea that it would be fun and I would enjoy doing the Roman epic.

In the course of my research, it was very clear that America…based itself on Rome, when it left the English and didn’t want a king. And if you know your history, you know the Roman Republic was invented because they didn’t want a king…And [then], ironically, Rome was repeating what the ancient counterpart did, and its senators were more concerned with their own power and their own money. And that’s how Rome lost its republic. And there was the possibility that we, the modern Rome – which is America – [were] going to repeat [that] historical counterpart. And I thought that was very, very interesting and very prescient.

Advertisement

del Barco: I know you’re asking the audiences to have this conversation about these ideas of what a utopia would look like.

Coppola: I mean, this could be a very long conversation. It could be a very short conversation. Let’s make it short, which is to say that our system seems to be based on a population of people who are unfulfilled – or said another way, people who are unhappy, and are kept that way deliberately, because our major activity is to sell them a little piece of happiness…And it’s clear that if the people were happy, they wouldn’t be interested and there would be good customers. But…I believe that they’re deliberately kept unhappy through various means so that they’ll be good customers. And that’s sort of what’s going on in the world today, which is very troublesome.

del Barco: Wow. And so with this film, you’re challenging the audiences to think about how to reshape that?

Coppola: All I ask them is to have a discussion, which is a simple sentence, which is, is this is the society we have the only one available to us? I believe if people just talk together, people all over the world…we will come up with that. That is, basically a utopia.

Advertisement

del Barco: Has your vision for the film changed over the years? 

Coppola: Oh, absolutely. Because – let me explain that when you know exactly how to make a movie, you set about making it according to what you think the rules are. But when you don’t know how to make a movie, which, for example, I didn’t with Apocalypse Now, you listen and the movie tells you how to make it. And that’s what happened with Megalopolis. My wonderful collaborators, the actors, many of the creative personnel, we sort of were collaborating together. We were listening to what the movie was and the movie was saying – do more of this, do less of that, do more of this, do less of that. And that’s how the movie came about and shaped itself. So when you see it, you know, it’s a big production. It’s very spectacular. You haven’t seen it, I take it?

del Barco: I have seen it. 

Coppola: Okay. Well…it’s not boring, but your reaction may very well be – wow, what did I just see? What the hell is that? And the best thing to do is to see it again. It’s like Apocalypse [Now]. The more times you see it, the more [it] changes. And that’s exactly what happened with Apocalypse Now. It’s been showing in theaters for more than 40, 50 years, and people are still going to see it. And I think the same thing will happen to Megalopolis.

Actor Martin Sheen with Francis Ford Coppola on the set of Apocalypse Now in 1976. Coppola directed and co-wrote Apocalypse Now.

Actor Martin Sheen with Francis Ford Coppola on the set of Apocalypse Now in 1976. Coppola directed and co-wrote Apocalypse Now.

Caterine Milinaire/Sygma/Getty Images

Advertisement


hide caption

toggle caption

Caterine Milinaire/Sygma/Getty Images

Advertisement

del Barco: I’m sorry to hear [about] the passing of your wife. I know she was probably very integral to this film as well. And I’m wondering if that, you know, that changed the creative process of this.

Coppola: Thank you for your condolences. My wife – the last thing she said to me was, you’re the most courageous man I’ve ever met, because you do what you feel is right. And, you know, nowadays the movie business, like the fast food business, they’ll spend $100 million to develop a potato chip that you find addictive and habit forming. And that’s the way they want movies to be. They want you to think there’s only one kind of movie. But the cinema is always changing. And, you know, I don’t know if you have children, but your grandchildren’s cinema will be totally different than anything we’re doing today. Cinema doesn’t remain the same, even if it’s more convenient to sell it if it does. There’s a line in my film which is – when you jump into the unknown, you prove you are free. And that’s what artists must do. You know, lawyers and businessmen can be ruled by time and convention and what the rules are. But artists don’t have to. Artists control time. I know in my story you see that that happens. But artists, moviemakers, painters, even architects, freeze time. Moviemakers move time backwards and forwards…

Advertisement

My film Megalopolis tells people that they’re extraordinary. There’s nothing we can’t do if we apply our creativity to it. So my vote is that we apply our human genius to the issues of saving this beautiful Earth. And since you’ve seen [the movie], you know, it ends on a very hopeful, celebratory note. It’s joyous at the end.

del Barco: Absolutely. And you don’t always see something like that – on the … grand scale of humanity. Another thing that was extraordinary to me in this film was that amazing interactive moment – with somebody in real life in the theater and the character on screen. I was wondering if you could talk about that idea of live cinema.

Coppola: Well, of course, that’s something I’ve always been interested in. When I made my movie, which was not very successful, One From the Heart, my idea was to make it as a live movie, that actually would be performed live…As I said, I come from theater, and even now I have one foot in the theater and one foot in the cinema. It’s my desire to merge those two.

del Barco:  I know you recently filed a lawsuit against Variety for publishing allegations that were anonymous about you on set. And they spoke to people who said that you —

Coppola: Basically basically basically, next question. You know, I know why you’re asking. There’s a lawsuit. Anyway. Next question.

Advertisement

del Barco: Okay. Because there’s another lawsuit, you know, against you. 

Coppola: I’m the one suing.

del Barco: You’re suing, and then there’s another suit that’s against you.

Coppola: Mine is the suit. But whatever you think, that’s not a question that’s of any interest.

del Barco: Yeah. I just didn’t know if you were worried that this would affect this film. 

Advertisement

Coppola: No.

[Following the interview with NPR, Coppola’s team sent the following statement from the director: “Nothing in my 60+ years career can equal the painstakingly difficult, yet artistically triumphant journey of bringing Megalopolis to the screen. It was a collaboration of hundreds of artists, from extras to box office stars, to whom I consistently displayed the utmost respect and my deepest gratitude.

To see our collective efforts tainted by false, reckless and irresponsible reporting is devastating. No publication, especially a legacy industry outlet, should be enabled to use surreptitious video and unnamed sources in pursuit of their own financial gain. 

While I have no intention of litigating this in the media, I will vigorously defend my reputation and have trust in the courts to hold them accountable.]

del Barco: Okay.  I know that even in the early marketing, they were saying that you’ve always been misunderstood and ahead of your time. I don’t know if that has anything to do with what’s going on?

Advertisement

Coppola: Oh, that’s a different matter. That’s like when you’re making a movie that’s not like any movie that’s ever been made before, you run into occasionally conflict with people who want to make it the regular way, you know, and want to do things the way they’re used to doing things. And, you know, my feeling is – I like a movie of mine, I like it to feel a little handmade, like the special effects are not just…like every movie’s special effects. Like if you saw my film Dracula, the special effects look as though they’re made with mirrors and by hand.

All of Megalopolis, as big as it is, it’s really handmade – it’s not it doesn’t look like it’s a factory-made movie. And that causes sometimes disagreements with the people who are used to – who have been trained to working in a system that basically, you know… I’ve been around longer than they have. And I know what the cinema used to be like. And it’s not like it is today. Today it’s like the army. You know, if you go to one of the five art directors and say, ‘Oh, I want you to do this,’ then she’ll say, ‘Oh, you can’t step on my toes.’ You have to go to the chief art director. And that’s not the way the cinema was for the 60 years that I was in it.

del Barco: Do you worry that Hollywood is dead now?

Coppola: Well, I’ll tell you in truth. Two wonderful institutions that I love dearly with all my heart – journalism and the Hollywood system – are dying. And what we’re seeing, you know, with journalism making quotes from unknown sources, I mean – you can’t run journalism and just make all your… just to get clicks for people to subscribe and then refer to unknown sources. At the same token, you can’t make motion pictures if your only goal is to make your debt payment. Because, you know, art has a degree of risk to it. And if they’re afraid of risk, then…making art without risk is like making babies without sex.

Writer/director Francis Ford Coppola and Adam Driver as Cesar Catilina in Megalopolis.

Writer/director Francis Ford Coppola and Adam Driver as Cesar Catilina in Megalopolis.

Phil Caruso/Lionsgate

Advertisement


hide caption

toggle caption

Phil Caruso/Lionsgate

Advertisement

del Barco: Well, when you are making a film, who are you making your films for? Who [do] you imagine going to the movies to see your films? 

Coppola: Well, it’s my audience. I love my audience, but my audience is more like me. I mean… if I’m going to see a movie about the Roman Empire, I like to know a little bit about it. I mean, most people don’t know why Rome invented a republic or why America…why was it that all our founders … who wrote the American Declaration of Independence – why was it they were so aware of Rome?

It’s because they were all educated, and in those days, that meant they spoke Latin, so they had to read Caesar’s Gallic wars and they had to read about Cicero and his contests with Catilina. They knew philosophers like Epicurus…Because they all spoke Latin…that was what an education in those days included. So we were blessed [to] have founders that were so well-educated and were so aware of history that they created a country that has worked effectively for more than 200 years, you know… But, you know, our country is a shining example of the republic concept. And if we lose it in this election, it will be a heartbreak – but yet Rome did lose it 2000 years ago plus.

del Barco: This film is coming out at a very politically charged time… we’re in the middle of an election. And these ideas about what is a republic, what is our society about – 

Coppola: What it really comes down to…is there any creature, any intelligent creature – be it an octopus or a dolphin or a parrot or anything – that comes even one percent of… our genius? We are a species that can chart and change the human genome, who can send a spacecraft to photograph Mars, who can move icebergs with particle physics…So, I mean, how can you be told by [a politician], ‘Oh, those people are just animals’? There’s no human being that isn’t part of the human family – that’s our cousin, you know? I mean, they put people down so they can control them.

Advertisement
Giancarlo Esposito as Mayor Cicero in Megalopolis.

Giancarlo Esposito as Mayor Cicero in Megalopolis.

Lionsgate


hide caption

toggle caption

Lionsgate

Advertisement

del Barco: You’re probably referring specifically at this time [to] certain politicians.

Coppola: Well, I mean, I think whatever politician denigrates people and puts them down and insults them when I know they’re geniuses. I mean…there’s no creature like the human being. And Megalopolis says that right to your face.

del Barco: You refinanced your winery for, what, $120 million to get this movie made? And not every filmmaker can do that. I mean, how sustainable is this system of financing in Hollywood today?

Coppola: Well, I mean…most companies have been bought recently by another company, which was recently bought by another company. So there’s so much debt racked up.

Advertisement

What’s worse is that they don’t even know everything they’ve bought. I know more about Paramount Pictures than the current owners do. That’s a danger, because since they buy it, their lawyers say, well, ‘What is that part? We don’t need that,’ and they just get rid of it. But that might be a vital part.

In other words, when you’re buying something that you don’t really know a lot about, some lawyers and accountants will tend to want to get rid of the parts that they don’t know what it was for. But there are many parts of movie studios. Thank God people like George Lucas and Martin Scorsese know, and put lots of pressure on them to keep and restore things that came with their purchase, if you know what I’m saying.

del Barco: What do you want to do next?

Coppola: I know I’m finished with Megalopolis because I’ve written a new project. I’m going to go do it in London, because London is the only city that I have never lived in, which means I never lived shoulder to shoulder with my wife, who I miss every morning because I have no one to talk to about…even now when all this is happening, I keep thinking, ‘Oh, I’ve got to tell Ellie what just happened. I got to tell her.’

I thought if I lived in a place where I never lived with her, I’ll still think about her all the time. But it won’t be quite as…. I would like to just live in another place and work on another movie and work with English actors. It’s a musical film. It’ll have a lot of incredible dancing. So it will be fun. I always say it’ll be fun.

Advertisement

del Barco: Do you go into every film thinking, this is going to be fun, it’s going to be a blast?

Coppola: . Yeah, absolutely. I read a great quote that George Lucas gave. He said, ‘You know, when you make a movie, you try to make it go as well as you can, given the circumstances.’ And that that thing – given the circumstances – that’s a big few words, because every movie has a certain circumstance that is not in harmony with what you’re doing. And you have to decide either to change what you’re doing to be in harmony with that circumstance, or you have to change the circumstance to be in harmony [with] the movie… I had to face that in Apocalypse Now and I had to face that in Megalopolis.

Lifestyle

‘The Invite’ is a marriage comedy with sex and heart

Published

on

‘The Invite’ is a marriage comedy with sex and heart
What happens when a simple dinner party goes off the rails? That’s the premise of The Invite, a very good new comedy directed by Olivia Wilde. Wilde also stars alongside Seth Rogen as a couple who invite their neighbors over for a meal, played by Penelope Cruz and Edward Norton. And it’s a heck of a dinner party, full of frank talk about sex and its complications.If you like slightly absurd relationship comedies, check out these episodes:’Mr. & Mrs. Smith’ is a stylish take on spy marriageIn Tina Fey’s ‘The Four Seasons,’ marriage is far from a vacationConnect with Pop Culture Happy Hour:Letterboxd / FacebookOur weekly newsletterSupport Pop Culture Happy Hour+
Continue Reading

Lifestyle

L.A. Affairs: It’s hot when a man drives to me. But would this new guy make the trek from the Valley?

Published

on

L.A. Affairs: It’s hot when a man drives to me. But would this new guy make the trek from the Valley?

I met Dan on Hinge.

He lives in Woodland Hills, and I live in Venice. In Los Angeles, this is considered a long-distance relationship. In another city it might be nothing. Here, it’s a factor.

But I believe that with the right person, you can make anything work, so I stay open. I’m a native New Yorker, and if I were living in Brooklyn and a guy lived on the Upper West Side, that would be a 45-minute subway ride, which is truly nothing in New York. So with that same logic, I try to have flexibility with men in L.A.

When we started planning our first date, Dan suggested three options: a hike on mushrooms, a wine tasting or a walk on the beach.

Advertisement

A hike on mushrooms is something I’d only do with someone I already trust, not someone I just met online. I don’t do first-date hikes because I don’t like feeling trapped if the guy’s a dud. So I chose the wine tasting.

Then I learned the wine tasting was in West Hills.

On a Friday night, driving there from Venice would be insane. So I said I didn’t want to meet there because of the traffic. He suggested Malibu. That was also not ideal on a Friday.

I was getting annoyed — this was a pink flag because in my dating world, the guy is supposed to come to the woman’s neighborhood in the early days. I’ve gone out with plenty of men from the Valley who effortlessly suggested they come to me. It’s not rare or impossible.

I suggested he come to the Westside. I didn’t specifically say Venice, and in hindsight, I probably should have. He landed on Brentwood, which was manageable for both of us. On our first date, we met at an Irish pub on Wilshire Boulevard. He was cuter and more interesting than I had expected, and with the Guinness flowing, we had fun.

Advertisement

When I got home, he texted me: “Well, I like you 🙂 Less the tik tok and the lack of rock music in your life, but it’s not a deal breaker — there are other qualities 🙂 What are your thoughts?”

I noticed the slight negativity but was mostly dazzled that a man texted immediately after the date to say he liked me. In the modern dating economy, this felt rare.

The next day, both of our evening plans fell through, so we made a last-minute date. The wine tasting he originally suggested still sounded like fun, and although it meant me driving to the Valley, I was up for it now that we’d met.

We sipped flights at Malibu Wines & Beer Garden in its airy, romantic courtyard and played a flirty version of Truth or Dare. Halfway through, he dared me to kiss him.

We ended with sushi on Ventura Boulevard and a short make-out session in his car. He invited me to Thanksgiving at his uncle’s, which felt too soon, but also sweet.

Advertisement

After the second date, he texted and said he had his kids that week and was also hosting an event on Thursday, so his only day to meet was Wednesday. I said great.

On Tuesday night, he checked if we were still on, and I said yes.

Then he texted: “I’m flexible on time but not on location. I have a big event on Thursday, hopefully you can come to me again.”

My stomach tightened. This again?

So I texted back: “I drove to you last time, which was a bit of an exception for me especially in the early days, but the wine tasting location sounded special. Usually guys come to my area. How about we switch it up this time?”

Advertisement

He replied: “I appreciate the effort! Because of my event, I’d rather be close to a computer just if needed … Here is what i offer:
— I’ll come to your area anytime next week/end
— Lunch/dinner on me
I want to continue where we stopped last time 😉 No pressure of course, but let’s snuggle”

I responded: “Ok let’s meet next week. Snuggles sound nice … let’s see what happens …”

Then he wrote: “So I won’t see you tomorrow?”

I replied: “Unless you wanna come to me and bring your laptop along, let’s rain check until you have more flexibility.”

He said: “Dang, you are hard. I’ll let you know tomorrow around midday if it’s ok.”

Advertisement

And then — surprise — he decided to come.

He drove to Venice for a 5 p.m. date. He said his ETA was 5 p.m., and it ended up being 5:25 p.m., typical 405 Freeway.

When he showed up, he was in a cranky mood. On our way to KazuNori in Marina del Rey, I thanked him for picking me up and told him I think it’s hot when the guy comes to the girl.

“You’re just saying that because you want me to come to you more,” he said, not playfully, but aggressively.

That was basically the end for me. But there I was, in his car, heading to dinner. So I stayed pleasant and tried to make the best of it.

Advertisement

I shared that in the early stages of dating, I find it’s good etiquette for the guy to come to the woman’s neighborhood. He immediately disagreed and started ranting about how dating rules are ridiculous and how they swing in women’s favor. He resented paying for dates and declared he wasn’t looking to “sponsor a woman’s life.”

“If women want equality and equal rights,” he said, “then it should apply all across the board, including dating, and the man shouldn’t have to pay.”

I said women don’t actually have equal rights because we get paid less than men and often receive lower salaries than men in the same position.

I tried to change the subject and reset the mood, but he insisted we keep hashing it out.

I tried to explain masculine/feminine dynamics: providing and protecting, giving and receiving.

Advertisement

“What does the man get out of this arrangement?” he asked.

It was like watching someone’s personality warp into Mr. Hyde. Then he brought up another point: He’s a single dad of two kids, so he gets tired; and because I don’t have kids, that should factor into who drives where.

At this point, I was barely engaging and focused on eating my hand rolls, and I couldn’t wait to get home.

The check came, and I happily split it, wanting nothing further from him.

In the car back to my place, he remarked: “It’s obvious we’re never gonna see each other again.”

Advertisement

Obvious, but did it need to be stated?

Then he showed me a Spotify playlist he’d made for me of his favorite electronic music, because he knows I like EDM.

“Oh, that’s sweet,” I said.

“Yeah, that’s how I show interest. Through things like this, not who drives to who,” he replied.

When I got out of the car, we wished each other luck, and I headed inside and shut the door.

Advertisement

Two hours later, he sent me the playlist. I’ve yet to listen to it.

It wasn’t the distance that ruined it. It was the resentment. I’m not looking for a man who feels burdened by the effort. I’m looking for a man who sees the value of courting a woman in the first place.

The author is a writer, comedian and former psychologist who lives in Venice. She is the creator of the new vertical series “Manfari.” She’s on Instagram: @solange_neue and @manfari.show.

L.A. Affairs chronicles the search for romantic love in all its glorious expressions in the L.A. area, and we want to hear your true story. We pay $400 for a published essay. Email LAAffairs@latimes.com. You can find submission guidelines here. You can find past columns here.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Lifestyle

Smithsonian chief emphasizes ‘accuracy and integrity’ after White House report

Published

on

Smithsonian chief emphasizes ‘accuracy and integrity’ after White House report

Lonnie Bunch III is the 14th Secretary of the Smithsonian. He’s pictured above in September 2017.

J. Scott Applewhite/AP


hide caption



toggle caption

Advertisement

J. Scott Applewhite/AP

In a memo addressed to staffers sent Tuesday, the secretary of the Smithsonian, Lonnie G. Bunch III, defended the institution after the White House issued a 162-page report that characterizes the National Museum of American History as a place which has become “subject to institutional capture by a radical, activist ideology that is fundamentally opposed to telling the noble, honest story of the great country we know and love.”

In his email, which NPR has obtained, Bunch wrote in part: “While there will always be room for improvement, this report is not a fair characterization of the work and totality of the National Museum of American History. At the Smithsonian, our work is driven by scholarship, accuracy and an uncompromising commitment to tell the fullness of America’s story. As public servants and the keepers of this institution, we are charged with helping a nation find understanding, hope and clarity and as part of that duty, we are dedicated to excellence, reflection and growth.”

He continued: “We remain focused on what grounds us: a steadfast commitment to scholarship, nonpartisanship, independence, accuracy and integrity. For nearly 180 years, the Smithsonian has worked alongside partners across government — from the White House to Congress to our governing Board of Regents — guided by our enduring mission to increase and diffuse knowledge. That purpose remains: to pursue knowledge with rigor and to serve the American public with clarity and care.”

Advertisement

The White House report was issued on July 4 by the Domestic Policy Council under the title “Saving America’s Story: How Ideological Capture at the Smithsonian Institution’s National Museum of American History Erases Our Heritage.”

The council faults the National Museum of American History on a multitude of fronts, saying it underemphasized the Founding Fathers and early colonial and Revolutionary history; was not sufficiently celebratory of the country’s 250th anniversary; and that it engaged in “anti-white,” “illegal alien” and transgender activism.

It also accuses the museum of trying to “indoctrinate” teachers and students through its exhibitions, programming and teaching resources.

In the report, the council also specifically criticizes museum director Anthea Hartig, who has led the National Museum of American History since 2019 and is concurrently the president of the Organization of American Historians, calling her “an activist advancing an ideological agenda contradictory to the museum’s founding purpose of fostering patriotism.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending