Movie Reviews
The Front Room Film Review: Thrilling Debut
Sam Eggers and Max Eggers give a thrilling directorial debut in The Front Room, which harkens back to the psycho-biddy films of the past.
Directors: Max and Sam Eggers
Genre: Horror, Thriller
Run Time: 94′
US & CA Release: September 6, 2024
UK & IE Release: October 25, 2024
Where to watch: in theaters
I was today years old when I found out that filmmaker Robert Eggers had twin brothers, Sam and Max, who are now making their feature directorial debut with The Front Room. I already have a feeling that some will unfairly criticize this film or compare it to Robert’s work, who has already made a name for himself in the world of horror with The Witch, The Lighthouse, and the upcoming Nosferatu.
However, one must always look at a movie like this as a singular authorial work, not as ‘the sibling of’ a popular filmmaker. Too many people did this with Ishana Night Shyamalan’s The Watchers, looking at her feature debut as ‘the daughter of’ M. Night Shyamalan rather than a singular work from Ishana. Approaching The Front Room as a unique film from The Eggers Brothers distances us from Robert’s work and instead showcases a talent that’s bound to develop, with a hagsploitation (also known as psycho-biddy) movie that grows decidedly wicked and darkly funny as its 94 runtime progresses.
It’s not perfect, and it certainly won’t be for everyone. There are plenty of elongated, gross-out sequences that involve bodily fluids and vomit, and an unsettling atmosphere that begins to stick with you as its obscene sequences get more disgusting. I won’t reveal a thing here, not necessarily because of spoilers, but due to my rather sensible stomach (and as I’m writing these words, I’m beginning to remember everything that went down in the movie). It definitely won’t be for people who are perhaps too squeamish with these types of scenes, as the movie’s more ‘horrific’ moments mostly see its protagonist, Belinda (Brandy Norwood), having to clean copious amounts of fluids from Solange (Kathryn Hunter), whom she is now taking care of.
After Norman’s (Andrew Burnap, playing Belinda’s husband) father dies, the couple is now forced to take Solange, Norman’s stepmother, into their care. In her last will and testament, she is willing to give all of her life savings to them, should they accept. Norman immediately refuses, and tells Belinda about his abusive childhood with her as Solange believes she is the reincarnation of a disciple of Jesus Christ and forced her stepson to do things he did not want to. However, Belinda is more accepting of Solange, due to her age and limited physical capabilities.
Thinking the two will share responsibilities, as Belinda is expecting their first child, Norman reluctantly accepts, and Solange now lives in their home. But it doesn’t take long for Solange to take over the house, and begin to not only reshape it, but Belinda’s newborn children too, in her image, while Norman is absent at work. In classic What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? fashion, Solange begins to torment Belinda to the point where Norman begins to take her stepmother’s side, thinking his wife is physically abusing her and the baby, while Solange is doing it to herself.
At first, it’s Belinda who gaslights Norman into thinking everything will be fine, but as the movie reaches its climax, Norman now believes her stepmother’s gaslighting, when he was the one who told his wife it would be a terrible idea to bring her in their home. This psychological shift is rivetingly portrayed on screen with a career-best turn from Brandy, whose portrayal of Belinda is both thrilling and morbidly comedic. Belinda is excited by the prospect of starting a family with Norman, but as he grows noticeably absent, her turn becomes sharp when she is stuck with someone who not only doesn’t hide her blatant racism towards her, but is also born out of pure spite and hatred towards her stepson.
Hunter also impresses as Solange, completely transforming herself in a performance that’s completely unrecognizable from anything she was previously in, with an accent that seems plucked from Michael J. Anderson in Twin Peaks and adopting a tone that’s never too serious, but never too funny either. You never know when she’s joking or not, which makes it even more disturbing when she makes snarky remarks at the dinner table. It’s often funny, reminding us all of the bitter grandma we may or may not know, but it quickly gets unnerving. And that’s how The Eggers Brothers get under your skin. They do it in such a subtle way that you don’t even realize you’re starting to be discomforted until it’s too late.
It’s a shame, however, that movie never fully develops the relationship between Belinda and Solange past the unsettling point. Yes, it gets fairly petrifying in its final moments (even a comedic needle drop isn’t so funny when you realize exactly how an element that won’t dare be revealed here occurred, even if the final shot brings satisfaction), but one can’t help but feel the core story to be fairly undercooked. The Eggers Brothers attempt to bring as much Biblical imagery as possible to the story, such as a shot of Solange as the reincarnation of The Virgin Mary holding Belinda’s baby as her vision of Jesus Christ, but it feels fairly jarring, because this part, which should be the film’s main focus, is treated as an afterthought.
One scene in particular, in which Solange invites some of her friends in the house, should act as a pivotal point in Belinda’s rivalry with Norman’s stepmother, but is entirely dropped once the scene ends and has no impact on how she will eventually perceive Solange. Belinda’s relationship with Norman is also fairly cyclical, but perhaps that was the point. He can’t be there, because he’s too busy at work. But the dialogues and situations feel frequently the same and don’t develop in intensifying drama, or with a true sense of friction between the two (it also doesn’t help that Burnap feels woefully miscast and barely has any chemistry with the effervescent Brandy). It makes their relationship feel less important when it’s the catalyst of the film’s inciting event.
But even with imperfect character (and thematic) beats, The Front Room remains an impressive feature directorial debut from The Eggers Brothers. Its aesthetic grows darker as the relationship between Belinda and Solange becomes more sinister, while Brandy and Kathryn Hunter give two wholly impressive turns, harkening back to the classic young/old relationships we’d usually see in hagsploitation films in the 1960s and 1970s. It may not be a full-on psycho-biddy picture, but it remains tons of fun nonetheless.
The Front Room is now available to watch in US & Canadian theaters and will be released in UK & Irish cinemas on October 25, 2024.
Movie Reviews
‘Hoppers’ review: Pixar’s best original movie in years
“So it’s like Avatar?” one character quips in Disney and Pixar’s “Hoppers,” bluntly translating the film’s high-concept premise for the sugar-fueled kids in the audience. And yes, the comparison is apt. The story follows a nature-obsessed teenage girl who manages to quite literally “hop” her consciousness into the body of a robotic beaver in order to spark an animal rebellion against a greedy mayor determined to bulldoze their forest for a freeway.
It’s a clever hook. The kind of big, elastic idea Pixar used to make look effortless. “Hoppers” does not reach the rarified air of “Up,” “Wall-E,” or “Inside Out,” but after a stretch of uneven originals like “Turning Red” and “Luca,” and outright misfires such as “Elemental” and “Elio,” this feels like a genuine course correction. The environmental messaging is clear without being preachy, the animals are irresistibly anthropomorphized, and the studio’s once-signature emotional sincerity is back in sturdy form.
Pixar can afford to gamble on originals when it has a guaranteed cash cow like this summer’s “Toy Story 5” waiting in the wings, but “Hoppers” earns its place in the catalogue. Director Daniel Chong crafts a warm, heartfelt film that occasionally strains under the weight of its own ambition, yet remains grounded by character and theme. Its meditation on conservation and animal displacement feels timely in a way that never tips into after-school-special territory.
We meet Mabel, voiced with bright conviction by Piper Curda, as a child liberating her classroom pets and returning them to the wild. Her moral compass is shaped by her grandmother, voiced by Karen Huie, who imparts wisdom about nature’s sanctity. True to both Pixar tradition and the broader Disney playbook, this beacon of guidance does not survive past the opening act. Loss, after all, is Pixar’s favorite inciting incident.
Years later, Mabel is still fighting the good fight, squaring off against the smarmy Mayor Jerry, voiced with slick menace by Jon Hamm. He plans to flatten the glade where Mabel and her grandmother once found solace. Mabel’s resistance feels noble but futile. The animals have already mysteriously vanished, the machinery is coming, and her last-ditch plan involves luring a beaver back to the abandoned forest in hopes of jumpstarting the ecosystem.
That’s when the film gleefully pivots into mad-scientist territory. At Beaverton University, Mabel discovers her professor, voiced by Kathy Najimy, has developed a device that can project human consciousness into synthetic animals. The process, dubbed “hopping,” allows Mabel to inhabit a robotic beaver and infiltrate the forest from within. It’s an inspired escalation that keeps the film buoyant even when the plotting grows predictable.
Her new posse includes King George, a lovably beaver voiced by Bobby Moynihan with distinct Bing Bong energy; a sharp-tongued bear voiced by Melissa Villaseñor; a regal bird king voiced by the late Isiah Whitlock Jr.; and a fish queen voiced by Ego Nwodim. As is often the case with Pixar, even in its lesser efforts, the world-building is meticulous. The animal hierarchy, complete with titles like “paw of the king,” is layered with jokes that play for kids while slyly winking at adults.
The plot ultimately follows a familiar template. Scrappy underdog rallies community. Corporate villain twirls metaphorical mustache. Emotional third-act sacrifice looms. At times, you can feel the machinery working a little too cleanly. Pixar, and Disney at large, has grown increasingly reliant on sequels and established IP, and “Hoppers” does not radically reinvent the wheel. In an animated landscape where films like “K-Pop: Demon Hunters,” “Across the Spider-Verse,” and “Goat” are pushing stylistic and narrative boundaries, being safe and sturdy may not always be enough.
And yet, there is something refreshing about a Pixar original that remembers how to tug at the heart without squeezing it dry. “Hoppers” is playful, peppered with cheeky needle drops, and builds to a sweet emotional catharsis that may or may not have left this critic a little misty-eyed. It feels earnest and engaged.
“Hoppers” may not be top-tier Pixar. But it is a welcome return to form, a reminder that the studio still knows how to marry big ideas with a bigger heart.
HOPPERS opens in theaters Friday, March 6th.
Movie Reviews
‘Hoppers’ review: Who can argue with hilarious talking animals?
Just when you think Pixar’s petting-zoo cute new movie “Hoppers” is flagrantly ripping off James Cameron, the characters come clean.
movie review
HOPPERS
Running time: 105 minutes. Rated PG (action/peril, some scary images and mild language). In theaters March 6.
“You guys, this is like ‘Avatar’!,” squeals 19-year-old Mabel (Piper Curda), the studio’s rare college-age heroine.
Shoots back her nutty professor, Dr. Fairfax (Kathy Kajimy): “This is nothing like ‘Avatar!’”
Sorry, Doc, it definitely is. And that’s fine. Placing the smart sci-fi story atop an animated family film feels right for Pixar, which has long fused the technological, the fantastical and the natural into a warm signature blend. Also, come on, “Avatar” is “Dances With Wolves” via “E.T.”
What separates “Hoppers” from the pack of recent Pix flix, which have been wholesome as a church bake sale, is its comic irreverence.
Director Daniel Chong’s original movie is terribly funny, and often in an unfamiliar, warped way for the cerebral and mushy studio. For example, I’ve never witnessed so many speaking characters be killed off in a Pixar movie — and laughed heartily at their offings to boot.
What’s the parallel to Pandora? Mabel, a budding environmental activist, has stumbled on a secret laboratory where her kooky teachers can beam their minds into realistic robot animals in order to study them. They call the devices “hoppers.”
Bold and fiery Mabel — PETA, but palatable — sees an opportunity.
The mayor of Beaverton, Jerry (Jon Hamm), plans to destroy her beloved local pond that’s teeming with wildlife to build an expressway. And the only thing stopping the egomaniacal pol — a more upbeat version of President Business from “The Lego Movie” — is the water’s critters, who have all mysteriously disappeared.
So, Mabel avatars into beaver-bot, and sets off in search of the lost creatures to discover why they’ve left.
From there, the movie written by Jesse Andrews (“Luca”) toys with “Toy Story.” Here’s what mischief fuzzy mammals, birds, reptiles and insects get up to when humans aren’t snooping around. Dance aerobics, it turns out.
Per the usual, “Hoppers” goes deep inside their intricate society. The beasts have a formal political system of antagonistic “Game of Thrones”-like royal houses. The most menacing are the Insect Queen (Meryl Streep — I’d call her a chameleon, but she’s playing a bug), a staunch monarch butterfly and her conniving caterpillar kid (Dave Franco). They’re scheming for power.
Perfectly content with his station is Mabel’s new best furry friend King George (Bobby Moynihan), a gullible beaver who ascended to the throne unexpectedly. He happily enforces “pond rules,” such as, “When you gotta eat, eat.”
That means predators have free rein to nosh on prey, and everybody’s cool with it. Because of bone-dry deliveries, like exhausted office drones, the four-legged cast members are hilarious as they go about their Animal Planet activities.
No surprise — talking lizards, sharks, bears, geese and frogs are the real stars here. They far outshine Mabel, even when she dons beaver attire. Much like a 19-year-old in a job interview, she doesn’t leave much of an impression.
Yes, the teen has a heartfelt motivation: The embattled pond was her late grandma’s favorite place. Mabel promised her that she’d protect it.
But in personality she doesn’t rank as one of Pixar’s most engaging leads, perhaps because she’s past voting age. Mabel is nestled in a nebulous phase between teenage rebellion and adulthood that’s pretty blasé, even if a touch of tension comes from her hiding her Homo sapien identity from her new diminutive pals. When animated, kids make better adventurers, plain and simple.
“Hoppers” continues Pixar’s run of humble, charming originals (“Luca,” “Elio”) in between billion-dollar-grossing, idea-starved sequels (“Inside Out 2,” probably “Toy Story 5”). The Disney-owned studio’s days of irrepressible innovation and unmatched imagination are well behind it. No one’s awed by anything anymore. “Coco,” almost 10 years ago, was their last new property to wow on the scale of peak Pixar.
Look, the new movie is likable and has a brain, heart and ample laughs. That’s more than I can say for most family fare. “A Minecraft Movie” made me wanna hop right out of the theater.
Movie Reviews
Review | Hoppers: Pixar’s new animation is a hilarious, heartfelt animal Avatar
4/5 stars
Bounding into cinemas just in time for spring, the latest Pixar animation is a pleasingly charming tale of man vs nature, with a bit of crazy robot tech thrown in.
The star of Hoppers is Mabel Tanaka (voiced by Piper Curda), a young animal-lover leading a one-girl protest over a freeway being built through the tranquil countryside near her hometown of Beaverton.
Because the freeway is the pet project of the town’s popular mayor, Jerry (Jon Hamm), who is vying for re-election, Mabel’s protests fall on deaf ears.
Everything changes when she stumbles upon top-secret research by her biology professor, Dr Sam Fairfax (Kathy Najimy), that allows for the human consciousness to be linked to robotic animals. This lets users get up close and personal with other species.
-
World6 days agoExclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
-
Massachusetts6 days agoMother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
-
Denver, CO6 days ago10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
-
Louisiana1 week agoWildfire near Gum Swamp Road in Livingston Parish now under control; more than 200 acres burned
-
Oregon4 days ago2026 OSAA Oregon Wrestling State Championship Results And Brackets – FloWrestling
-
Florida3 days agoFlorida man rescued after being stuck in shoulder-deep mud for days
-
Technology1 week agoArturia’s FX Collection 6 adds two new effects and a $99 intro version
-
News1 week agoVideo: How Lunar New Year Traditions Take Root Across America
