South Dakota
Is your farm vulnerable to cybersecurity attacks?
MADISON, S.D. — With precision agriculture technology becoming more and more advanced, how do farmers keep their equipment and records safe from cybersecurity breaches?
Students and researchers at Dakota State University in Madison, South Dakota, are able to climb in the tractor seat and conduct research surrounding cybersecurity in farm equipment in their on-campus tractor cybersecurity lab.
“The security aspect of things is just trying to make sure that all of our devices, whether they are smart tractors or any sort of even smart tablets or anything that farmers are using are secure and safe and aren’t leaking any information that they shouldn’t be,” said Austin O’Brien, associate professor of computer science and Master of Computer Science coordinator at Dakota State University.
Ariana Schumacher / Agweek
They are also looking at the impacts of artificial intelligence.
“We are working on different projects of how to use AI in various aspects, whether that’s gathering data so farmers can make better decisions, ranchers same thing, or they can also perhaps have higher yields, things of that nature and then autonomous self-driving tractors, things along those lines,” O’Brien said.
The goal of this research is to make sure our farm equipment is secure. They have joined forces with various industry partners including AI Sweden, South Dakota State University and Case IH New Holland.
“We want to make sure that really nefarious agents, you know, cyber hackers, attackers or whoever, they are not able to gather information from these devices,” O’Brien explained. “Also, so that they might not get in and then also take control of any of these or even put bad information inside of that.”
Ariana Schumacher / Agweek
The research set up is unique and makes students and researchers feel like they are actually on the farm.
“We have kind of the set up, I would say almost a little more for fun. We’ve got the driver’s seat and everything and so there is a simulator that is attached to it that is kind of like driving a tractor,” O’Brien said.
But the lab is for more than just fun.
“Maybe the more important part is the stuff that we don’t show,” O’Brien explained. “We are working with CNH and they have proprietary hardware, so we aren’t really allowed to show the actual hardware, but it is more of a smaller device that we have inside our labs so that way we have a good idea of what kind of hardware we are working with, where the inputs and the outputs are and what kind of power that it has.”
Those involved in the project are excited to be working on something that can make an impact on South Dakota’s largest industry: agriculture.
“Students really like the idea that we have been able to research and work on something that actually has a real impact on the South Dakota economy,” O’Brien said.
U.S. farmers and ranchers rapidly have been adopting technologies into their operations. The
2022 U.S. Census of Agriculture
said the percentage of farms with internet access continues to grow, now standing at about 79%. The 2022 Ag Census was the first to list precision agriculture adoption as a farm characteristic, and it estimated that less than 12% of farms were using the technologies. However, among the highest grossing farms — those that sell more than $1 million in farm products — precision ag technology use was at about 39%.
Adoption has been more swift in row crops. A February 2023 USDA study,
“Precision Agriculture in the Digital Era: Recent Adoption on U.S. Farms,”
said farmers were using auto-steer and guidance systems on more than 50% of U.S. acreage planted to corn, soybeans, winter wheat, cotton, rice and sorghum. That’s up from an estimated 10% in the early 2000s.
The use of precision agriculture technologies in row crops holds the possibility of reducing inputs and environmental footprint by more precise placement of seed and fertilizer and by more precise field coverage with less overlap thanks to guidance systems. Yield monitors can provide valuable information about field performance and resource allocation. Remote sensing and autonomous equipment could offer valuable information or efficiency without increasing labor.
Factors holding farmers back from adopting the technologies include cost and technical knowledge. But another risk factor for many is whether the data and connection to the farm can be protected.
While agriculture and food companies have dealt with disruptive and dangerous hacks to technology
, cybersecurity breaches in farm equipment have not happened in the United States yet.
“We haven’t seen anything of that nature happen, but we are always wanting to stay a step ahead of that for sure,” O’Brien said. “We know that with the Ukraine conflict that’s out there, we have seen Russia basically do different types of attacks on different infrastructure, so we want to make sure that our infrastructure is a step ahead of that.”
Ariana Schumacher / Agweek
Cybersecurity professionals can kind of determine peak times attackers may look to target farming equipment.
“Which is different from some areas of cybersecurity,” said Mark Spanier, associate professor and interim dean of the College of Arts and Sciences at Dakota State University. “In agriculture, you know that somebody is wanting to attack like right at harvesttime, because they can put all of their efforts in that short window of time. If they can be disruptive during that window of time, they can create all sorts of havoc.”
But having more specific target attack times can also be challenging.
“So, it’s an interesting balance of ‘I know when somebody is likely going to attack so I can put all of my efforts in’ but it also means that your attacker can put all of their efforts in at that very specific point as well, so it creates an interesting dynamic,” Spanier said.
And there are ways that farmers right now can be proactive in protecting their equipment technology.
“The onboard computer systems that they are going to have on their pieces of equipment, ensuring they are updated and with the current specs on things, as with anything you are wanting to make sure things are up to date so if there has been a known vulnerability that has emerged, that is then updated with the patches that it needs to have,” Spanier said.
Ariana Schumacher / Agweek
“Just be cognizant of what you are doing, where you leave your data, where your data exists, so if you are uploading data to the internet, just make sure that you know exactly where you are uploading to,” O’Brien said “Maybe that’s certain websites if you are working with different companies or businesses. Just be aware that you are working directly with them and maybe not through various other services.”
But overall, this research is to serve as a prevention tool.
“That kind of concern, while it’s there, just know that we are actively working on things, so we don’t want to present it as a doom and gloom situation, we are wanting to stay a step ahead,” O’Brien said. “We haven’t seen any big issues but that’s because people are actively working to stay in front of it.”
South Dakota
South Dakota: Learn about heat-treated soybeans at Cattlemen’s Education Day
PIERRE, S.D. – The South Dakota Cattlemen’s Association (SDCA), in partnership with South Dakota State University (SDSU), will be hosting Cattlemen’s Education Day on February 19, 2026, in Brookings, S.D. The event brings together industry leaders, educators and cattle producers for a day of learning and connecting.
Attendees will learn about both sides of cattle production from preparing their calves for optimal performance at the rail to understanding how carcasses are graded and processed. Participants will hear from SDSU Extension Feedlot Specialist, Dr. Warren Rusche, about how maturity and yield grades are calculated and the latest carcass trends in the United States.
“We are excited to host the Cattlemen’s Education Day on February 19th on the campus of South Dakota State University,” Rusche said. “We are especially excited to share our most recent research on how we have seen an extra 20-30 pounds in carcass weight by using heat-treated soybeans in finishing diets.”
Each session will provide different strategies to help producers maximize their bottom lines and improve their operation practices. Participants will explore the benefits of soybeans in feeder calf diets, review the latest implant rules and regulations and be updated on the current cattle markets. The event concludes with an open discussion to address practical concerns and industry challenges.
Thanks to the generous support of Merck and South Dakota Soybean Checkoff this day of learning is offered at no cost to attendees, but pre-registration is highly encouraged.
For more information about the event visit sdcattlemen.org, click ‘Events Calendar’ and select ‘Cattlemen’s Education Day’ or contact Ella Stiefvater.
The South Dakota Cattlemen’s Association (SDCA) is a grassroots organization representing members of the beef production industry across the state. The purpose of SDCA is to unify members to work together to protect their industry; seek solutions to industry problems; provide a unified voice and to build the good will, esteem, and recognition the industry deserves. SDCA is an affiliate of the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA) which has more than 25,000 individual members and represents more than 175,000 cattle producers and feeders nationwide.
–South Dakota Cattlemen’s Association
South Dakota
From a South Dakota stage to a national platform: The winding road that got Tina Peters on the President’s radar
Mesa County’s former Clerk and Recorder has for months been a subject of national fascination, as well as a source of consternation for Colorado election officials. But it didn’t start out that way.
Tina Peters first made national headlines in the summer of 2021, when the state started looking into the tampering of the county’s voting machines. Almost immediately, the county District Attorney’s office and the FBI began an investigation into the release of information from Mesa County’s Dominion voting election system and the role Peters played in it.
At the start of the investigation, Peters was attending a cybersecurity conference headlined by Mike Lindell, the CEO of MyPillow, and a leading purveyor nationally of false claims about election security. She quickly became a cause celebre on the right in President Donald Trump’s MAGA world, when people like Steve Bannon defended her right to investigate claims of election rigging. But for four years, Trump himself remained silent on Peters, even as his allies continued to claim she was innocent.
“I’m not overly surprised that he didn’t have much to say during that time just because there was so much unknown, although that hasn’t stopped him in other ways,” said Republican Matt Crane, the executive director of the Colorado County Clerks Association, which has long pushed back against Peters’ efforts to try to prove election fraud.
Peters was indicted by a grand jury from Mesa county and a Republican district attorney prosecuted the case. A jury of her peers later found her guilty on seven counts, including four felonies.
“Ms. Peters has made this community a joke. She’s made respecting law enforcement a joke, made respecting court orders a joke. She’s not accepted any responsibility and considers this a badge of honor,” said Mesa County DA Dan Rubinstein during Peters’ sentencing hearing.
But even after her conviction and sentencing in the fall of 2024, still no word from Trump.
“I had hoped that somebody smart was in his ear telling him that all of this was a facade,” said Crane. “She found no evidence of fraud. This is not a person worth getting behind or using calories on because she didn’t find any fraud, and she was a useful idiot for grifters and bad actors.”
Meanwhile, Peters’ supporters wanted Trump to speak out and take action. Scott Bottoms, a Republican representative in the Colorado Statehouse and now candidate for governor, said a team comprised of Peters’ attorneys, members of her inner circle and people like himself staged a campaign to alert the president to her cause.
Bottoms thinks Trump didn’t initially weigh in because it was a state issue and also because he thinks the media was biased against Peters.
“The media has been very quiet or very one-sided on the issue.” He said that contributed to Trump not being directly engaged.
“I mean, how would he hear about a county clerk in Mesa County at the White House unless people had to just be beating on his door with it, and finally he opened his eyes and said, ‘Hey, this is a serious issue going on.’”
Peters’ conviction and sentence have stood out because other legal efforts related to 2020 election tampering have faltered. On Trump’s first day in office in his second term, he commuted the sentences of some of the people convicted of crimes stemming from the U.S. Capitol attack, and pardoned more than 1,200 people for crimes related to the January 6 riot.
Then, in March, the administration turned some attention to Peters. The U.S Department of Justice decided to review her case, and in May of 2025, President Trump released his first social media post calling for her release.
He referred to Peters as a hostage “being held in a Colorado prison by the Democrats, for political reasons. ” He asked the state to release her.
“FREE TINA PETERS, NOW!” Trump wrote to punctuate his message.
Trump has since ramped up efforts to secure her release, at one point telling state leaders to “rot in hell” and using Peters as a reason to punish the blue state, from efforts to cut federal funds to shutting down the National Center for Atmospheric Research and denying disaster emergency funding requests. Trump issued a symbolic federal pardon for her crimes, and Peters’ supporters are pushing for Democratic Gov. Jared Polis to commute her sentence.
Crane is urging the governor to hold firm and resist pressure from Trump and said any special treatment for Peters would invite people to do nefarious things in the name of proving fraud or “stopping the steal.”
“It shows that you can try to undermine our election community, that you can commit these types of crimes, and that there’s no significant consequence to it … It becomes open season on our elections and our election personnel that you can have somebody now and go and listen to some disinformation, not know their jobs and say, hey, ‘we’re going to go and prove this.’”
But for Peters’ supporters, like Bottoms, Trump’s involvement has been welcome news. Though Bottoms said he is discouraged that federal funding for Colorado is being taken away, he said it’s because of the “leftists and the Marxists who control our state,” and is glad Trump is stepping in.
Here is a timeline of Trump’s involvement in the Tina Peters case:
Aug. 12, 2024: A guilty verdict
After more than four hours of deliberation, a Mesa County jury finds Peters guilty on 7 charges, including four felony counts.
Oct. 3, 2024: Prison time for ‘a charlatan’
21st Judicial District Judge Matthew Barrett sentences Peters to more than 8 years in prison. At sentencing, 21st Judicial District Attorney Dan Rubinstein argued for a strict sentence given Peters’ refusal to take accountability for her actions.
“Ms. Peters has made this community a joke. She’s made respecting law enforcement a joke, made respecting court orders a joke. She’s not accepted any responsibility and considers this a badge of honor,” said Rubinstein.
Barrett lambasted Peters’ behaviour before handing down the prison time, noting that she was “as defiant a defendant as this court has ever seen.”
“You are no hero,” Barrett told Peters. “You’re a charlatan who used, and is still using, your prior position in office to peddle a snake oil that’s been proven to be junk time and time again.”
Mar. 3, 2025: Department of Justice gets involved
The federal government’s law enforcement arm wades into the Peters issue, announcing plans to review the state conviction. The Department of Justice submitted a statement of interest in district court. In it, the DOJ notes concerns about whether the case was political.
Mar. 10, 2025: Colorado GOP leader calls for federal government to hold back funds
While campaigning to lead the Colorado GOP, Darcy Schoening tells 9News the federal government should pull funding from projects in Colorado, specifically citing Peters’ sentence as rationale.
May 5, 2025: The Truth (social) comes out
President Donald Trump pours fuel onto the Peters issue with a social media post calling for her release. In it, Trump describes Peters as a political prisoner and directs the Department of Justice to “take all necessary action to help secure” her release.
Aug. 21, 2025: Trump takes aim at Colorado again, threatens harsh measures
Trump again calls for Peters’ release, this time while with a threat of consequences should she stay in prison.
Sept. 2, 2025: Space command move announced, signs of a pressure campaign begin
Trump announces he is moving Space Command to Huntsville, Alabama. The President did not mention Peters in the announcement, but Colorado Democrats called the decision “political.”
Nov. 12, 2025: Feds look to move Peters out of state custody
The Federal Bureau of Prisons sends a letter to the Colorado Department of Corrections requesting Peters’ be transferred to a federal facility. Such transfers from state to federal custody are rare and usually are reserved for cases involving long-term safety and security needs.
Colorado’s Attorney General Phil Weiser and 21st Judicial District Attorney Dan Rubinstein would later co-author a letter to the governor asking Polis to reject the request, saying it was an attempt to circumvent the prison sentence Peters received.
Dec. 8, 2025: Federal court rejects Peters’ habeas petition
A federal judge declines to consider Peters’ appeal, saying the state courts must settle the matter first. Peters’ legal team had been arguing that she should be eligible to post bond while the state appeal played out.
Dec. 11, 2025: Peters pardoned, kind of
Trump claims on social media to have pardoned Peters. The action is met with skepticism as Peters was convicted on state charges, and the presidential pardon is commonly understood to be limited to federal crimes.
Peters’ attorneys argue they have found a new read of the presidential pardon powers that could be read to apply to state charges as well.
Dec. 16, 2025: Trump administration vows to dismantle NCAR, Dems think Peters issue to blame
In another blow to federal funding in Colorado, the Trump Administration announces plans to cut funding to the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder. Rep. Joe Neguse, a Democrat whose district includes Boulder, suggests it’s retaliation for Peters still being in prison.
Dec. 24, 2025: Peters’ attorneys ask appeals court to review presidential pardon
Just ahead of scheduled oral arguments, Tina Peters’ attorneys ask the Colorado Court of Appeals to consider whether they still have jurisdiction over the clerk’s case in light of Trump’s pardon.
Dec. 30, 2025: Trump vetoes Arkansas River Valley conduit
The bipartisan legislation would have helped finish a critical water project to benefit southeastern Colorado by giving local communities 100 years to pay back no-interest loans.
Dec. 31, 2025: ‘May they rot in hell’
Trump takes to social media to call Gov. Jared Polis a “scumbag” and says Rubinstein, the district attorney in Mesa County, is “disgusting.” He concludes the post: ‘May they rot in Hell. FREE TINA PETERS!”
Jan. 6, 2026: More cuts, more pressure from Trump Administration
The federal government freezes some childcare and food funding intended for Colorado.
Jan. 8, 2026: Colorado AG ratchets up legal challenge
Weiser expands the scope of a lawsuit against the federal government, arguing that the cuts to Colorado funding amounted to a pattern of unlawful behavior.
Jan. 8, 2026: Polis renews attention of his clemency powers with “harsh” comment
After publicly calling Peters’ prison sentence “harsh,” Polis kicks off a new wave of speculation that he might commute some of her sentence.
Jan 9, 2025:
Tina Peters’ attorney, Peter Ticktin, tells CPR News that her legal team has applied for clemency. The Governor’s office later told CPR that it could not confirm a request for clemency for Peters because and said under state law that clemency applications are not a public record.
Jan. 14, 2026: Peters’ case heard by Colorado appellate court
A panel of three Colorado Court of Appeals judges hears arguments as to whether Peters received a fair trial and sentence at the district court level.
Jan. 18, 2026: Peters is involved in a prison scrap
Peters is seen involved in a tussle with another inmate at the La Vista Correctional Facility in Pueblo.
South Dakota
SD Republicans pitch fixed 4.2% sales tax without property tax caveat
PIERRE — South Dakota’s top Republican leaders want to make the state’s reduced sales tax rate permanent.
Senate President Pro Tempore Chris Karr, R-Sioux Falls, and House Speaker Jon Hansen, R-Dell Rapids, plan to bring Senate Bill 195, which would permanently fix the state’s current sales tax rate at 4.2%. This bill was filed on Jan. 29.
The sales tax percentage was previously set at 4.5%. The 2023 Legislature passed House Bill 1137, which instituted the deceased tax rate starting on July 1, 2023, with a planned expiration date of June 30, 2027.
In a Jan. 29 press conference held after the Legislature adjourned for the day, Karr said the money not generated from the additional three-tenths percentage amount—about $111 million per annum—would directly to tax payer savings.
The Senate leader was explicit in saying his proposal would not go towards property tax relief.
“Would you rather pay more in sales tax to offset somebody else’s owner-occupied property tax?” Karr said “I think most people would say, ‘No, I don’t want that. I don’t want to pay an increased sales tax on food and clothes and the other things I buy to pay for somebody else’s house, their property taxes specifically.’”
Karr expressed concern that allowing the sales tax rate to return to 4.5% would mean the additional revenue generated to go toward “things that aren’t core government.”
“We start using it on shiny objects and things that are for political purposes, so I want to protect these dollars while we can,” Karr said.
More than half of the state’s overall revenue picture is made up of an ongoing sales and use tax, which saw a fiscal year-to-year decrease.
South Dakota FY2025 collected about $1.43 billion from the state sales and use tax — a 1.5% decrease compared with FY2024. Data from the state’s Bureau of Finance & Management indicates several months measured in FY2025 saw dips in sales and use tax growth.
But the Sioux Falls senator argued the state’s average growth in sales tax revenue has remained steady.
South Dakota benefited from billions of dollars of federal pandemic aid during the COVID-19 crisis, which skewed the state’s budgeting and spending priorities in past years, according to South Dakota Searchlight.
Without accounting for those years, Karr said South Dakota’s sales tax growth has increased by 4.3%
Gov. Larry Rhoden noted during his 2025 budget presentation that the FY2026 collections are estimated to reach about $1.5 billion and $1.56 billion in FY2027. State sales and use tax revenue has seen month-to-month growth since June, with a more-than-8% increase in October.
Acknowledging the state’s tight belt appropriators may want around the budget for fiscal 2027, Karr said he believes the expected growth means state government should be able to “absorb” some of the lost sales tax revenue.
“I think we’ll still see some good growth going into next year and hopefully have those dollars for the ‘Big Three,’” Karr said. The “Big Three” refers to South Dakota’s three largest spending areas: Medicaid, K-12 education, and state employee pay.
“I think we can do it, and if I’m wrong, then let’s start ratcheting the sales tax up. But I don’t think it needs to go all the way back up to 4.5% at this time,” Karr said.
-
Illinois1 week agoIllinois school closings tomorrow: How to check if your school is closed due to extreme cold
-
Pennsylvania5 days agoRare ‘avalanche’ blocks Pennsylvania road during major snowstorm
-
Science1 week agoContributor: New food pyramid is a recipe for health disasters
-
Technology1 week agoRing claims it’s not giving ICE access to its cameras
-
Movie Reviews1 week ago
Movie Review: In ‘Mercy,’ Chris Pratt is on trial with an artificial intelligence judge
-
News1 week agoVideo: Jack Smith Defends His Trump Indictments During House Hearing
-
Politics1 week agoSupreme Court appears ready to keep Lisa Cook on Federal Reserve board despite Trump efforts to fire her
-
Politics6 days agoTrump’s playbook falters in crisis response to Minneapolis shooting