California
California politicians weigh in on Trump’s conviction, but Garvey remains notably mum
Trump reacts to guilty verdict after jury convicted him on all 34 felony charges
Donald Trump was found guilty of falsifying business records to hide a hush money payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels.
Former President Donald Trump’s conviction Thursday spurred an avalanche of reactions from some of California’s leading political figures in the hours following the jury’s historic announcement.
As the most populous state in the nation and a Democratic stronghold, the Golden State has brandished itself a cradle of Democrat-led MAGA opposition ever since the 2016 election. Though the state has a Democratic super-majority, a handful of Republican-held districts are expected to be among the tightest and most consequential races in the bid for House control. Any impacts of Trump’s conviction in these districts are unclear at this point, but a steady trickle of comments from Republican and Democratic party leaders may offer a glimpse into how the verdict will play into in campaign messaging aimed at undecided and moderate voters.
More: Trump guilty, now what? Why the verdict isn’t the most shocking part of the trial
California GOP, Democratic party leaders weigh in on Trump verdict
California Republican Party Chairwoman Jessica Millan Patterson called the decision a “dark day,” alleging a “politically-motivated case brought by a far-left district attorney” in a statement released a few hours after Trump’s 32-count guilty verdict was read.
“Despite Democrat-led efforts to interfere with the presidential election, Americans will have the final say this November when they re-elect President Trump and send him back to the White House to fix the many failures of the Biden administration and put our nation on a pathway to success,” Patterson said.
Claims popularized by Trump and his allies in the Republican Party of election interference, rigging and other types of fraud have been repeatedly disproven by independent experts and election officials.
More: Don’t be fooled: 5 types of misinformation we expect this election season
The state’s Democratic party chair Rusty Hicks released his own statement on the verdict as well, striking a jubilant tone in stark contrast to Patterson’s “dark day.”
“Today, the People of New York have returned a guilty verdict and rendered Donald Trump a convicted felon,” Hicks said in a statement on X. “In November, the American People will render him a two-time loser for President. And California Democrats are going to do our part to make it so.”
Candidates for California’s U.S. Senate seat Schiff and Garvey
In California’s race to fill the late-Dianne Feinstein’s Senate seat, Trump’s shadow looms large over Republican candidate Steve Garvey, who has repeatedly refused to clarify his level of support for the former president. While Trump is a potential poison pill for the Republican candidate in deep-blue California, it’s long been a political rallying cry for his opponent.
Congressman Adam Schiff, D-Burbank, catapulted onto the national stage for leading the prosecution in Trump’s first impeachment trial. In debates before the March 5 primary, he often brought up Trump’s name, echoing many other leading Democrats in positioning himself as a bulwark against Trump an MAGA Republicanism.
More: Trump found guilty in hush money trial ahead of convention, November election. What’s next?
More: How will Donald Trump’s guilty verdict hit his reelection bid? Is his political fallout here?
Schiff celebrated the Manhattan jury’s decision in a Thursday post on X, formerly Twitter, minutes after the verdict.
“Today, twelve ordinary American citizens found a former president guilty of dozens of felonies,” Schiff said in the Thursday post. “Despite his efforts to distract, delay, and deny — justice arrived for Donald Trump all the same. And the rule of law prevailed.”
As of Thursday afternoon, Garvey has not released public comment on the verdict.
California’s House members take to social media
Republican Tom McClintock, representing the 5th Congressional District in the Central Valley and Sierra Nevada Foothills, said the verdict “perverts the rule of law.” In his post on X, he calls the prosecutor “poisonously partisan” and the jury pool “contaminated.”
Republican Doug LaMalfa called it a “miscarriage of justice,” mirroring McClintock and Patterson in claiming the prosecution was partisan. He went one step further, claiming the judge “purposely rigged the entire process” to ensure a guilty verdict.
Democrat Eric Swallwell said on the social media platform Thursday that Trump’s conviction is a win for the rule of law and for “the idea that we all follow the same rules.”
One of California’s two ranking House Democrats, Rep. Ted Lieu, said on X: “In America, no one is above the law: not the rich, not the powerful, and certainly not any former President of the United States.”
Kathryn Palmer is an elections fellow for USA TODAY. Reach her at kapalmer@gannett.com and follow her on X @KathrynPlmr.
California
Dozens of Mexican mafia members arrested in California
-
Now Playing
Dozens of Mexican mafia members arrested in California
02:59
-
UP NEXT
Unsealed autopsy reveals gruesome details in D4vd murder case
02:31
-
Two CIA officers killed in car crash after Mexico drug raid
01:25
-
Chicago collectible store is latest target in Pokemon card crime spree
01:59
-
Defense to argue text messages show consensual relationship in Weinstein retrial
03:08
-
FBI says it is looking into whether cases of missing and dead scientists are linked
01:30
-
Deadly shooting at Mexico tourist site
00:59
-
Epstein’s other house of ‘horrors’: Zorro Ranch
14:15
-
Inside look at Jeffrey Epstein’s ranch in New Mexico
02:20
-
New details about Louisiana gunman’s mental health
01:19
-
Father in Louisiana mass shooting was convicted felon
02:51
-
Singer D4vd faces first-degree murder charges
05:54
-
8 children killed in Louisiana mass shooting
01:41
-
Lynette Hooker’s daughter “never imagined” her mom would disappear
01:31
-
Singer D4vd arrested for murder of 14-year-old girl
01:26
-
Los Angeles judge: Alec Baldwin to face civil trial over ‘Rust’ shooting
02:49
-
No charges to be filed against Taylor Frankie Paul’s ex-boyfriend
03:16
-
Ex-Alabama football player faces charges after wearing makeup and wigs to impersonate NFL players
02:39
-
Son speaks about mother’s death after operation by surgeon arrested in separate case
01:47
-
Singer D4vd arrested in connection with murder of teenage girl
03:36
NBC News NOW
-
Now Playing
Dozens of Mexican mafia members arrested in California
02:59
-
UP NEXT
Unsealed autopsy reveals gruesome details in D4vd murder case
02:31
-
Two CIA officers killed in car crash after Mexico drug raid
01:25
-
Chicago collectible store is latest target in Pokemon card crime spree
01:59
-
Defense to argue text messages show consensual relationship in Weinstein retrial
03:08
-
FBI says it is looking into whether cases of missing and dead scientists are linked
01:30
California
Top California governor candidates debate in San Francisco as field narrows
Six of the top-polling candidates in California’s race for governor faced off at a debate in San Francisco Wednesday night.
This marked the first debate since former East Bay Congressman Eric Swalwell dropped out of the race for governor and resigned from his seat. Despite Swalwell’s exit as well as the departure of Betty Yee from the race, no clear Democratic frontrunner has emerged.
The debate was hosted by Nexstar/KRON in San Francisco.
The candidates at this debate included four Democrats: former Congresswoman Katie Porter, former California State Attorney General Xavier Beccera, San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan, and billionaire philanthropist Tom Steyer. The two Republicans at this debate included former Fox News commentator Steve Hilton and Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco.
All candidates are trying to make an impression ahead of the June 2 primary. Ballots will be mailed out to California voters in early May.
Political analyst Larry Gerston examines the first California governor’s race debate since Eric Swalwell dropped out, hosted by Nexstar/KRON in San Francisco.
California
Federal appeals court blocks California law requiring federal agents to wear identification
LOS ANGELES — An appeals court has blocked a California law passed in 2025 requiring federal immigration agents to wear a badge or some form of identification.
The Trump administration filed a lawsuit in November challenging the law, arguing that it would threaten the safety of officers who are facing harassment, doxing, and violence and that it violated the constitution because the state is directly regulating the federal government.
A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued an injunction pending appeal Wednesday. It had already granted a temporary administrative injunction to block the implementation of the law.
At a hearing March 3, Justice Department lawyers argued that the California law sought to regulate the federal government, violating the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution.
The appeals court agreed unanimously, saying the law “attempts to directly regulate the United States in its performance of governmental functions,” in an opinion written by Judge Mark J. Bennett. The panel was composed of two Trump appointees, Bennett and Daniel P. Collins, and Obama appointee Jacqueline H. Nguyen.
California lawyers argued that the law applied equally to all law enforcement officers without discriminating against the U.S. government, and that states could apply “generally applicable” laws federal agents. They also argued that the law was important to address public safety concerns.
People are more likely to attack officers in self-defense if there’s no visible identification letting the public know they are law enforcement, California lawyers said in a brief opposing the injunction.
“This confusion has resulted in federal law enforcement officials being mistaken for criminals and vice versa, creating serious risk of harm to peace officers and members of the public,” they wrote.
The appeals court judges said they did not consider the public safety factors because the federal government has demonstrate its constitutional rights would be violated by the legislation, and “all citizens have a stake in upholding the Constitution,” it ruled, quoting previous case law.
First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli called it a “huge legal victory” in a post on X.
The California Attorney General’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The initial lawsuit also addressed another California measure signed into law last year that would have banned most law enforcement officers from wearing masks, neck gaiters, and other facial coverings. It was blocked by a federal judge in February.
The legislation did not apply to state law enforcement and made exceptions for undercover agents, protective equipment like N95 respirators or tactical gear, and other situations where not wearing a mask would jeopardize the operation.
-
Indiana2 minutes agoFull-length Replay: Indiana | FOX Sports
-
Iowa8 minutes agoIowa City clergy members condemn racist comments following Ped Mall shooting
-
Kansas14 minutes agoDeadly crash, fallen road sign closes SB I-35 at Antioch in Overland Park
-
Kentucky20 minutes agoJohn Fanta will be NBC Sports’ Kentucky Derby Infield Reporter
-
Louisiana26 minutes agoSearch for suspects after deadly Louisiana mall shooting
-
Maine32 minutes agoCampbell seeks Maine House District 107 position as state representative
-
Maryland38 minutes agoMaryland Lottery Pick 3, Pick 4 results for April 23, 2026
-
Michigan44 minutes agoHockey roundup: Michigan coach Brandon Naurato named to U.S. national team