Connect with us

Ohio

Heat Check: Ohio State's Recruiting Board Sees More Clarity As the Buckeyes Enter a Pivotal Stretch of Visits

Published

on

Heat Check: Ohio State's Recruiting Board Sees More Clarity As the Buckeyes Enter a Pivotal Stretch of Visits


Things have been relatively quiet on the Ohio State recruiting front.

Ohio State’s 2025 class has held firm at eight since last month’s edition of the Heat Check was published. That’s expected with the quiet period taking over February and limiting recruiting traction. But with the active period now in full swing, Ohio State is expected to host many talented prospects on campus over the next month, which should crank up the excitement and possibly result in a few decisions from a few targets.

At least one Ohio State target in this month’s edition of the board is ready to commit later this month, but we’ll get to that in a bit.

As always, rankings for Eleven Warriors’ monthly recruiting editorial have no perfect formula but are based on a combination of many factors, including roster needs for the Buckeyes in future seasons, the caliber of the player and how likely that player is to come to Columbus on National Signing Day.

Advertisement
THE BOARD
PROSPECT POSITION RANK PREV. RATING OTHERS IN THE MIX
FAHEEM DELANE S 1 2 ★★★★ Oregon•Alabama•Texas•LSU
DAVID SANDERS JR. OT 2 3 ★★★★★ Clemson•Alabama•Georgia•South Carolina•Tennessee
DORIAN BREW CB 3 1 ★★★★★ Texas•Texas A&M•Michigan•Oregon
JAIME FFRENCH WR 4 11 ★★★★★ Florida State•Miami
JUSTIN HILL DE/LB 5 5 ★★★★ Alabama•Penn State•Miami•Georgia•Oregon•Michigan
LONDON MERRITT DE 6 6 ★★★★ Alabama•Florida State•Clemson•Georgia•Florida
TREY MCNUTT S 7 7 ★★★★ Notre Dame•Penn State•Tennessee•Michigan•Oregon•Georgia
MICAH DEBOSE OT 8 4 ★★★★ LSU•Auburn•FSU•Alabama
MARQUISE DAVIS RB 9 8 ★★★★ Michigan•Miami•Kentucky•Tennessee
TARVOS ALFORD LB 10 9 ★★★★ Florida•Tennessee•Miami•Florida State•UCF
JORDON DAVISON RB 11 10 ★★★★ Texas•Oregon•Texas A&M•Alabama•Georgia•USC
DAKORIEN MOORE WR 12 NA ★★★★★ LSU•Oregon•Texas

Faheem Delane

You could make a case for several prospects that they should be in the No. 1 spot right now. We went with Delane, considering he has a perfect combination of all three factors that determine a prospect’s ranking in this exercise. Do the Buckeyes need a safety? Yes. Is Delane a highly-touted prospect? By nearly every recruiting metric. Is he likely to end up at Ohio State? The Buckeyes should be considered the favorite at the moment. Tim Walton and Matt Guerrieri could make a statement for OSU should they land the elite safety prospect.

David Sanders Jr.

Sanders is the country’s top-rated offensive tackle, which is arguably the highest position of need for Ohio State in 2025. The North Carolina prospect is also scheduled to visit the Buckeyes later this spring and included Ohio State in his recent top schools list, so there’s at least a puncher’s chance in this recruitment. This feels like a recruitment Ohio State can win, but we’d stop short of calling the Buckeyes the favorite. How his spring visit goes ultimately could determine how likely it is Sanders ends up in Columbus in the future. Should he decide to commit elsewhere, it certainly won’t be for a lack of effort on Ohio State’s part.

Dorian Brew

There’s been plenty of traction with Brew from other schools in the past month, especially Texas, leading to some in the recruiting industry speculating that Ohio State may not be as a consensus favorite for Brew as initially thought. A source close to the Buckeyes told Eleven Warriors this month that there’s still plenty of optimism Brew eventually lands in Columbus, though. The Buckeye legacy is also expected to be back on campus sometime this spring for a visit.

Jaime Ffrench

Is Brian Hartline about to pull another five-star wide receiver from Florida? That’s still to be determined, and there’s a long way to go between now and December’s Signing Day. Still, the Buckeyes are in a great position to eventually land the highly coveted Florida prospect. 

Justin Hill

The Swiss Army Knife from Winton Woods remains very much a priority for Jim Knowles and Ohio State, with the Buckeyes staying in good standing with Hill. Though the Jack position hasn’t really been utilized lately in Knowles’ defense, Hill seems like a perfect candidate for that role should OSU wish to instill it going forward.

Advertisement

London Merritt

Merritt has confirmed to Eleven Warriors he’ll take two more visits to Ohio State, one coming sometime this spring and the other being an official visit in June. The Buckeyes remain a firm player to win Merritt’s recruitment sometime this summer, which would give them two outstanding defensive ends in the 2025 cycle if they can add Merritt alongside Zahir Mathis.

Trey McNutt

Like Delane, McNutt is certainly a priority safety prospect for Ohio State in 2025, especially with the Ohio prospect being a legacy. Ohio State is still in a good position to keep the Shaker Heights prospect in-state, but it will face plenty of competition to do so. A potential pairing of McNutt and Delane combined with the already impressive cornerback haul Ohio State has in 2025 would be an unprecedented secondary haul for the Buckeyes, yet it seems within reach.

Micah DeBose

DeBose has confirmed he’ll take an official visit to Ohio State, and like Sanders, this feels like a recruitment the Buckeyes certainly can win. But it’s still fair to be wary of picking Ohio State over the field as of now. LSU has certainly positioned itself well in this recruitment. But pairing Carter Lowe with either DeBose or Sanders would be a massive win for Ohio State, and it will certainly go down swinging with both tackle prospects.

Marquise Davis

The urgency to land Davis is twofold for Ohio State. On one hand, Davis is not only one of the top prospects in Ohio, he’s a top-tier running back nationwide in 2025. That alone makes him a must-get for the Buckeyes. On the other hand, one of Ohio State’s main competitors for Davis is Michigan, and while the Buckeyes have reason to feel good about where they sit with Davis, it wouldn’t be ideal to lose another in-state running back to their rival for a second straight recruiting cycle (Jordan Marshall in the 2024 class).

Advertisement

Tarvos Alford

Arguably Ohio State’s top linebacker target, Alford is expected to come off the board on March 30 after he announces his commitment. With James Laurinaitis’ promotion to linebacker coach, Ohio State has more than positioned itself well for Alford heading into his commitment and should be considered the favorite a few weeks before his decision. Still, a lot can happen within a few weeks, but there’s a lot to like about where Alford and Ohio State sit as of now.

Jordon Davison

Maybe, just maybe, Ohio State could break the dreaded Mater Dei curse that’s seen them miss on prospect after prospect from the famed California high school powerhouse. Davison and his family are indeed serious about Ohio State and will take a multi-day visit to Columbus later this spring. Should that visit go well, the Buckeyes may continue to position themselves in the driver’s seat for the talented California prospect.

Dakorien Moore

Moore may already be committed to LSU, but the Buckeyes are very much in the thick of this recruitment. Five-star Ohio State cornerback commit Devin Sanchez has been in Moore’s ear about teaming up with him in Columbus for a few months and likely won’t stop any time soon. Moore is also expected to visit Ohio State this weekend and considering who’s in charge of recruiting wideouts to the Buckeyes, it can’t be discounted that Ohio State eventually flips Moore before all is said and done with the 2025 cycle.

Honorable mentions

Four-star tight end Nate Roberts was the prospect that just missed the cut this month. Roberts is still Ohio State’s No. 1 tight end target in the 2025 class and included OSU in his recent top five schools, but we went with the upside of potentially adding a player like Moore considering he’s the No. 1 wideout in the country and Brian Hartline continues to be wide receivers’ main recruiter at Ohio State.

Running backs: Bo Jackson, Jeff Overton, Akylin Dear, Waltez Clark, Byron Louis, Tory Blaylock, Harry Dalton and Donovan Johnson

Advertisement

Offensive linemen: Michael Fasusi, Lamont Rogers, Ty Haywood, Jayvon McFadden, Joshua Blackston, Jack Lange, Douglas Utu, Brayden Jacobs, Avery Gach, Mason Short and Kaden Strayhorn

Defensive linemen: Zion Grady, Isaiah Gibson, Nasir Wyatt, Damien Shanklin, Maxwell Roy, Trent Wilson, Myron Charles, Javeon Campbell, Jarquez Carter, Mariyon Dye, Landon Rink, Trajen Odom, Darren Ikinnagbon and Brandon Caesar

Linebackers: Madden Faraimo, Riley Pettijohn, Elijah Barnes, Gavin Nix, Abduall Sanders Jr., Elijah Melendez and Max Granville

Safeties: Jonah Williams, Cody Haddad, Kainoa Winston, DeShawn Stewart, Anthony Sacca, Jadyn Hudson and Messiah Delhomme

Wide receivers: Kaliq Lockett, Andrew Marsh, Daylan McCutcheon, Winston Watkins Jr., Phillip Bell, Naeshaun Montgomery, Vernell Brown III, Taz Williams Jr., Talyn Taylor and Edward Coleman

Advertisement

Tight end: Brock Schott, Luka Gilbert, Landon Pace



Source link

Ohio

Far fewer Ohio women could vote if top election officer gets way | Opinion

Published

on

Far fewer Ohio women could vote if top election officer gets way | Opinion



The SAVE acronym should stand for Suppress American Votes Everywhere.

Advertisement
play

  • A proposed bill in the U.S. Senate, the SAVE Act, would require citizens to present a birth certificate or passport to register to vote.
  • Richard Topper argues this could prevent thousands of Ohioans from voting, particularly those who move, change their names, or lack access to these documents.

Richard Topper has been a trial attorney in Columbus for 45 years and is actively involved in voting rights efforts.

As chief election officer of our state, Frank LaRose should be focused equally, if not more, on how election laws affect Ohio citizens’ rights to vote as he does to the miniscule numbers of undocumented citizens who attempted to vote in our elections.

To support our right to vote, LaRose, a Republican candidate for Ohio auditor of state, should speak out against the SAVE Act pending before the U.S. Senate.

The SAVE acronym should stand for Suppress American Votes Everywhere.

Advertisement

The bill would require all U.S. citizens to present a birth certificate or passport in person when they register to vote. The act could prevent thousands of Ohio citizens from participating in a single election.

The number far outweighs the 167 noncitizens whom, according to LaRose, “have appeared to cast a ballot in (over 15 elections) since 2018.”

How will the Save Act affect you?

Let’s say you’ve lived and worked in Ohio all your life but decide to move.

To vote, you’d have to re-register in person at your county board of elections and show them your birth certificate or passport. If you have neither, you will be unable to vote. 

Advertisement

For Ohioans who’ve changed their name due to marriage or remarriage, it becomes even more difficult to prove your citizenship with a birth certificate.

This will affect Ohio women’s right to vote, since 70% change their name when they marry.

Every person who wants to vote in Ohio for the first time, who moves to Ohio, or who moves within the state will need to have a birth certificate or passport to vote.

In 2023, close to 1.2 million Ohioans moved within or to Ohio. Under the SAVE Act, every one of those Ohioans is considered a non-citizen until they prove otherwise.

Not everyone has or can get access to a birth certificate.

Advertisement

An argument that sinks

A study by the Center for Democracy and Civic Engagement showed over 9% of voting-age citizens, or 21.3 million people in the U.S., cannot timely obtain a birth certificate or passport. In fact, only 37% of Ohioans own a U.S. passport.

The argument that too many non-citizens vote holds no water.

In 2024, Secretary LaRose required poll workers to challenge voters whose driver license read “non-citizen.”

Of the 5,851,387 people who cast ballots in 2024, only five alleged non-citizens attempted, but were not able to vote that day. One in a million. Nationwide, the figures are similar.  

Advertisement

Kansas legislators tried their own SAVE Act. The 67 non-citizens who registered to vote paled in comparison to the 31,000 Kansans who were denied their right to vote.

Ohioans need Frank LaRose to take a stand

LaRose should focus his attention on what the SAVE Act requires and how this will affect the average Ohioan.

In the past five years in his chief election officer position, LaRose decried costly and non-participatory August elections, then supported an August 2023 election that would have taken Ohioans’ longstanding right to amend our constitution by a majority.

He also voted in favor of unconstitutional gerrymandered Ohio legislative and Congressional districts which diminished the votes of 45% of Ohioans.

Advertisement

Recently, LaRose bowed to the Trump administration and supported an Ohio law which would nullify up to 7,000 legitimate Ohio mail-in ballots received during the four-day grace period after election day.

LaRose can redeem himself by supporting Ohio voters and taking a bold step to speak out against the voter suppressive SAVE Act.

Richard Topper has been a trial attorney in Columbus for 45 years and is actively involved in voting rights efforts.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Ohio

Unique migration: Mole salamanders are back in Northeast Ohio

Published

on

Unique migration: Mole salamanders are back in Northeast Ohio


It is the season for salamanders!

Nicholas Gaye, a naturalist with Lake Metroparks, said Northeast Ohio is home to about 15 species of salamander, each with their own habitat. But one of these species, the mole salamander, has a habitat unlike the others.

“Most of their time they’re spending is actually underneath the ground,” Gaye said.

Mole salamanders emerge once a year during the transition from winter to spring. This yearly migration was the delight of Lake County nature enthusiasts Saturday at the Penitentiary Glen Reservation, where nationalists shared facts about these elusive amphibians, pointing them out and guiding families along the trail.

Advertisement

Lake Metroparks

During these migrations, the salamanders trek to the surface in search of vernal pools, bodies of water that fill with rain and melted snow but dry in the summer and lack fish, the predators of salamander eggs.

Then, after four to eight weeks of development, the baby salamanders will emerge and spend a year or three in that vernal pool until they can survive on land.

If you missed it, don’t worry, because Gaye said the migration typically lasts for a week or two at the beginning of the season, and he expects further opportunities for viewing depending on the temperature. Mole salamanders require moist conditions to travel, so look for rainy and warm nights.

Additionally, he expects that another species, the marble salamander, will undergo its annual migration in the fall.

Advertisement

If you plan to join the hunt, however, Gaye asks for caution.

“As humans, we are stewards to our environment,” he said. “And it’s really important that, when we get out there to enjoy these amazing opportunities, that we’re being respectful and caring towards the critters that we’re coming across.”

47265625-Nicole Chaps Wyman.jpg

Nicole Chaps Wyman

Mole Salamander

Salamanders are slow-moving, so Gaye said observers should bring a flashlight to avoid stepping on them. Then, if you intend to touch them, he said to avoid anything on your hands that contains heavy metals, such as scented lotions, sunscreen, bug spray, or other products.

“Salamander skin is semi-permeable, meaning things can get through it easily and, if those heavy metals get through, they can really hurt the salamanders,” Gaye said.

Advertisement

Wet hands are also encouraged, as is limited exposure to what, at the end of the day, is considered a wild animal.

Lake Metroparks also has a salamander migration email list, which you can sign up for on their website.

We Follow Through

Want us to continue to follow through on a story? Let us know.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Ohio

Center for Christian Virtues loving Ohio kids left to fail. Critics wrong. | Opinion

Published

on

Center for Christian Virtues loving Ohio kids left to fail. Critics wrong. | Opinion



Is the Christian thing to do to turn a blind eye to this tragedy? Would it be to advocate for more money towards a system that is already flush with cash?

Advertisement
play

Aaron Baer is president of the Center for Christian Virtue.

Parents deserve options, competition and constitutional clarity — not fearmongering.

A February Dispatch guest column by teachers’ union gadfly William Phillis criticizing the Center for Christian Virtue is a case study in how teachers’ unions attempt to distract and divert the public’s attention away from the education crisis facing Ohio.

Tracking Phillis’ rants can be difficult. But in his piece, he manages to attack the Center for Christian Virtue for advocating for parental choice, goes on a rambling pseudo-legal argument about the First Amendment, and ends with a complete butchering of Jesus’ words. 

Advertisement

What his column never does is address the plight of Ohio’s kids in a failing education system created by the teachers’ unions. Because for Phillis and his friends, this discussion is not about the kids it’s about protecting their monopoly and the billions of dollars that flow through their system. 

The numbers don’t add up

This system needs reform from the ground up. And that’s what Center for Christian Virtues’ work is all about. 

At its core, CCV’s education agenda is about expanding opportunity, strengthening parental authority and ensuring more families can access schools that meet their children’s needs.

Advertisement

Through our advocacy for EdChoice and other scholarship pathways, CCV has helped broaden access to nonpublic education for families who previously had few realistic options. 

Critics like Phillis describe this as “diverting” public funds. The numbers tell a different story.

The combined cash reserves of Ohio’s school districts now exceed $10.5 billion, nearly triple what they were just 12 years ago. Yet three out of five Ohio fourth graders are not proficient in math and two out of three struggle with reading, according to the National Center for Education Statistics’ latest report.

Columbus City Schools tells the same story.

Advertisement

In fiscal year 2019, the district enrolled 48,927 students, spent $21,336 per pupil, and ended the year with a $229 million cash balance. By 2025, enrollment had dropped nearly 10% to 43,998. Yet per-pupil revenue rose 8% to $23,166, and cash reserves grew 62% to $372 million.

Despite higher funding and larger reserves, academic outcomes remain troubling: Just 25% of Columbus City Schools eighth graders are proficient in reading, and only 23% are proficient in math.

Simply pouring more money into underperforming public schools and into the political priorities of teachers’ unions has not produced the academic gains families were promised.

We must stop blindly throwing money away

That’s why the Center for Christian Virtues advocates for expanding educational options and fostering healthy competition among schools. This isn’t abolishing the public schools, this is challenging the public schools to meet the needs of families today, instead of just blindly throwing money after the problem. 

Advertisement

Phillis also falsely raises alarms about the separation of church and state. But the constitutional framework governing school choice is well established.

The U.S. Supreme Court made clear in Zelman v. Simmons-Harris that Ohio’s school voucher program is constitutional and that scholarship programs driven by private parental choice do not violate the First Amendment.

More broadly, Center for Christian Virtues’ education advocacy extends beyond vouchers. Through the Ohio Christian Education Network, we help communities launch new schools where demand is strong and equip educators with operational support to serve families seeking alternatives.

We also protect the religious liberty of Christian schools while expanding access to Gospel-centered education for Ohio families who choose it.

Yet what Phillis gets most wrong is his use of scripture to try to silence Center for Christian Virtues and our Ohio Christian Education Network. 

Advertisement

We cannot stay silent

Jesus commands his followers to “love our neighbors as ourselves,” and to care for the “least of these.”

So, as Christians, when we see a generation of American children suffering at the hands of an education establishment that is getting more money than ever and producing worse results, we cannot stay silent. 

Research from neuroscientist Jared Cooney Horvath revealed that Generation Z is the first generation in American history to perform worse academically than the previous generation.

Is the Christian thing to do to turn a blind eye to this tragedy? Would it be to advocate for more money towards a system that is already flush with cash? 

No. As Christians, we serve a God who cares for the “orphan, the widow, the stranger.” He loves those forgotten about by society. And there are few more overlooked today than the kids in our schools who are being starved of the educational opportunity our state has promised to provide them. 

Advertisement

Phillis seems upset that Center for Christian Virtues is growing and having success helping families find better schools. While he continues to call us names and criticize our work, we’ll stay focused on helping kids.

It’s what Jesus would have us do. 

Aaron Baer is president of the Center for Christian Virtue.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending