At a televised gathering with feminine pilots and crew members from Aeroflot, Russia’s flagship airline service, one participant requested President Vladimir V. Putin a query that was completely crafted to evolve with new authorities guidelines for reporting on his invasion of Ukraine.

“All of us assist your actions, the particular army operation that’s continuing there,” mentioned one pilot, seated amongst some 20 girls in Aeroflot uniforms at an extended desk, every along with her personal clear glass teapot. “We all know that civilians don’t endure, however please reassure us what’s on the finish of this path.”

Mr. Putin responded with a litany of his grievances towards Ukraine, however neither his reply nor any of the questions talked about the fact of Ukraine — the violent destruction of cities and cities by the Russian army, the civilian deaths, the determined exodus by tens of millions of refugees. With just about all media now below state management, that has all disappeared from home tv screens and newspaper headlines.

To spend a number of days watching information broadcasts on the principle state channels, in addition to surveying state-controlled newspapers, is to witness the extent of the Kremlin’s efforts to sanitize its conflict with the Orwellian time period “particular army operation” — and to make all information protection align with that message.

Phrases like “conflict” or “invasion” to explain the actions of the Russian army are forbidden below a brand new legislation that President Putin signed on Friday. The legislation mandates as much as 15 years in jail for any protection the state deems “false data” in regards to the army marketing campaign.

“It isn’t a conflict on Russian TV,” mentioned Stanislav Kucher, a veteran Russian tv host and former member of the presidential Council for Civil Society and Human Rights. Mr. Kucher moved to america after his reveals had been repeatedly shuttered.

“You’ll not see explosions, you’ll not see strikes on neighborhoods the place civilians dwell, you’ll not see quite a bit by way of troops, troopers, heavy armored automobiles or something like that,” he added.

Mr. Putin, 69, has lengthy sought to wrap his administration within the heroic actions and horrible sacrifices made by the Soviet Union to defeat Nazi Germany. His annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the destabilization of Ukraine by fueling a separatist conflict within the east that 12 months was no exception.

The Kremlin portrayed that grinding conflict as a continuation of the World Warfare II battle by the Soviet military towards invading Nazis and their native sympathizers. Along with his newest invasion of Ukraine, on Feb. 24, Mr. Putin doubled down, repeatedly describing it as an try to de-Nazify and demilitarize Ukraine.

So that’s the chorus on state media, the principle supply of stories for many Russians, particularly the older era. Mr. Putin himself referred to the federal government in Kyiv as Nazis about 10 instances throughout his assembly with the feminine flight workers final Saturday, and the phrase is repeated endlessly on each broadcast. To bolster the concept, information channels regularly present black and white footage of precise Nazis.

Information bulletins are pretty uniform from one tv channel to the following. The “operations” in Ukraine are principally described as a peacekeeping mission by the army to rescue the Russian-speaking residents of the breakaway areas of Donetsk and Luhansk from the horrible conflict crimes perpetuated on them by the Ukrainian authorities. The West is described as fully unsympathetic to their plight.

The huge destruction visited on the town of Kharkiv and plenty of smaller cities within the northeast often deserves at greatest a passing reference, or is blamed on Ukrainian forces.

On Sunday, “Vesti Nedeli,” a broadly watched program on Rossiya-1, appeared to make use of one report to organize Russians for the brewing battle for Kyiv. It famous that Russian forces had minimize off the Ukrainian capital from the north and the west, with battles persevering with within the suburbs. Then it accused the Ukrainian army of stopping civilians from leaving so that they might be used as human shields. The tens of hundreds of refugees fleeing west away from the Russian forces in caravans of worry and distress weren’t proven.

The two p.m. Information on Saturday on Channel One, one of many two hottest channels together with Rossiya-1, was typical on this story of two wars.

It began with the anchor quoting Mr. Putin, saying that the “particular operation’’ was continuing as deliberate. The destruction of the army infrastructure can be accomplished quickly, he added.

It blamed extremist Ukrainian forces for dynamiting a constructing within the port metropolis of Mariupol on high of 200 individuals sheltering within the basement, however there was no footage.

Denis Pushilin, the top of the Donetsk Folks’s Republic, one of many rump states created by Moscow after the 2014 invasion, complained in an interview that civilians didn’t use the humanitarian hall meant to achieve the Russian-controlled east, however risked hazard by heading west. Ukrainian officers mentioned they might not use the hall as a result of Russian forces had been shelling it.

“Vesti Nedeli” went into additional time on Sunday night with in depth reporting from the conflict — although after all not utilizing that time period. It repeatedly described the battle as nearly gained. It did profile one soldier who was killed, however he was conveniently from Dagestan, one of many Muslim Republics within the Caucasus, not from the Russian heartland.

Fallout from the sanctions which are dismantling the Russian financial system, just like the ending of worldwide flights by Russian airways, is usually attributed to the present “circumstances” with out additional clarification.

Most tv anchors and discuss present hosts, even those that initially expressed imprecise reservations in regards to the invasion, have rapidly adjusted their feedback. A number of the extra outstanding Kremlin cheerleaders have been focused by Western sanctions. Italy, for instance, seized the practically $9 million greenback Lake Como mansion owned by Vladimir R. Soloviev, a outstanding discuss present host.

Vyacheslav Nikonov, host of a present affairs program on Channel One referred to as “The Nice Recreation,” gave a belligerent speech within the Duma, or parliament, on the day after the invasion, which he echoed on his present.

He described how a lot he cherished Ukrainians and their fantastic nation. “I believe Russia is, after all, inquisitive about it being a affluent, pleasant nation,” Mr. Nikonov mentioned. “Our trigger is simply. We will be victorious.”

That is all in sharp distinction to experiences by Western and Ukrainian information media on the preventing within the northeast, with homes going up in flames and civilians mendacity lifeless within the streets. There was dramatic footage Saturday of a Russian MI-24 helicopter gunship erupting in a ball of flames after being struck by a surface-to-air missile.

The Kremlin has waged an prolonged assault on unbiased media for the previous decade, and among the final redoubts shut down final week within the face of the brand new legislation. That included two stalwarts: Echo of Moscow, an unbiased radio station that was sort of a household lounge for liberal Russians, and TV Rain, a tv channel that had bravely broadcast segments like an interview with the daddy of a younger soldier proven captured in Ukraine.

For the youthful era that doesn’t watch tv information, Telegram has change into the app of selection on each side, mentioned Kevin Rothrock, the managing editor for the English version of Meduza, an unbiased information company nonetheless working from outdoors Russia.

Movies of President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine talking in Kyiv, for instance, are posted there first. Scenes of indignant Ukrainians shouting “Occupiers!” at Russian troopers in Kherson or elsewhere are available, however not talked about in Russia.

To attempt to attain the youthful era, each the Ministry of Enlightenment and the Ministry of Training in Russia have produced movies detailing the official clarification for the conflict; they had been necessary viewing in faculties.

Novaya Gazeta, an unbiased newspaper whose editor, Dmitri Muratov, shared the Nobel Peace Prize final 12 months, has tried to observe the brand new pointers. In tales the place individuals interviewed mentioned “conflict,” for instance, there are ellipses and the phrase “phrase prohibited by the Russian authorities.”

Some information circulated outdoors the official filtering. Leonid Ragozin, a contract journalist, mentioned {that a} relative on a Moscow bus was speaking to a frightened buddy in Kharkiv, with sirens wailing within the background. She put the decision on speaker cellphone and the entire bus went silent to pay attention. No one complained.

Nonetheless, the onslaught of the official state model appears to be having the specified impact.

Numerous Russian polls present appreciable assist for the conflict — about two-thirds of the Russian public — though consultants say that stress to parrot the official line should be taken under consideration.

Mr. Kucher, the previous unbiased TV host, mentioned he was stunned at how usually the Kremlin speaking factors about preventing Nazis in Ukraine had been echoed again to him in phone conversations with former classmates.

“I used to be so surprised,” Mr. Kucher mentioned. “I by no means would have thought that propaganda would have such an impact on individuals.”

Sophia Kishkovsky contributed reporting.