Connect with us

Washington

The Trump Resistance Inside Washington's National Cathedral

Published

on

The Trump Resistance Inside Washington's National Cathedral


President Jimmy Carter entered hospice care when he was 98 years old. Nine months later, his wife of 77 years, Rosalynn Carter, whom he described as, “my equal partner in everything I ever accomplished,” died. Carter said he wanted to live long enough to cast his vote for Vice President Kamala Harris for president. On October 16, he fulfilled his wish but ultimately failed to achieve his goal of defeating Donald Trump. 

Perhaps Carter just could not, or did not want to hold on to see Trump return to the Oval Office. On December 29, just three weeks before Trump’s inauguration, Carter passed away at the age of 100.

On January 9, Carter’s casket arrived at the steps of the Washington National Cathedral. It was draped in an American flag and borne by a special military honor guard. Before entering the towering cathedral doors for his state funeral, the Episcopal Bishop of Washington, Mariann Edgar Budde; Reverend Randy Hollerith, Dean of the cathedral; Reverend Rosemarie Logan Duncan, the Canon of Worship; and Reverend Sean Rowe, the Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church, placed their hands on the coffin and prayed. 

The invited guests were already seated inside, including every living U.S. president and vice president (excluding Dick Cheney). Most of the Supreme Court was there, the House and Senate leadership, foreign heads of state, and some 3,000 additional guests. As we waited inside, spiritual music chosen by Carter and his wife was performed by the United States Marine Chamber Orchestra, Armed Forces Chorus, and the cathedral choir. When suddenly the music shifted to something more contemporary, I realized that pianist David Osborne was playing “The Wind Beneath My Wings.” 

Advertisement

The funeral marked more than the death and celebration of President Carter. It exposed the profound challenges that lay ahead for both our government and the nation as we prepare for Trump to not only resume the presidency, but do so at a time when the climate crisis is wreaking unparalleled devastation and right-wing resentment politics having gained enough ground to elect Trump president again, give Republicans control of the House and Senate, and build an ultra-conservative Supreme Court. 

The funeral was an unexpectedly fitting location for a handoff Carter had fought so vigorously to avoid. The cathedral has often stood as a symbol of resistance to Trump, his politics, and policies — and is prepared to continue to do so in the times ahead. 

In 2019, midway through the previous Trump administration, Bishop Budde, Dean Hollerith, and cathedral Canon Theologian, Reverend Kelly Brown Douglas, released a searing statement, likening Trump to Senator Joseph McCarthy, and asserting, “As faith leaders who serve at Washington National Cathedral — the sacred space where America gathers at moments of national significance — we feel compelled to ask: After two years of President Trump’s words and actions, when will Americans have enough?” 

One year later, Bishop Budde made national news after President Trump stood before St. John’s Episcopal Church in Lafayette Square — the most historic and famed church within the diocese — after having violently cleared a Black Lives Matter protest so that he could hold up a bible for a photo op. Bishop Budde strongly condemned Trump’s actions, calling both his message and posture “antithetical to the teachings of Jesus and everything that we as a church stand for.” 

Advertisement

These and others members of clergy officiating Carter’s service and in leadership at the cathedral have not only demonstrated tools for a Trump resistance, but also embody those attributes and aspirations most vigorously pursued by Carter, but which Trump has pledged to squash: diversity, equity, inclusion, racial justice, gender equity, LGBTQ+ rights, the rights of immigrants and migrants, environmental justice, climate action, human rights, and the separation of church of state. 

These include retired Bishop Gene Robinson, the first openly-gay Bishop in all of Christendom; Reverend Leonard Hamlin, cathedral Canon Missioner, whose work includes ending gun violence and advancing racial justice and reconciliation; and Reverend Douglas, one of the first Black women to be ordained a priest in the Episcopal Church and a leader in the fields of womanist theology, racial reconciliation, social justice, and sexuality and the Black church. In her most recent book, Resurrection Hope: A Future Where Black Lives Matter, Douglas warns of Trump: “In 2016 America elected a clear white supremacist as president.”

While they are nonpartisan, and clear that all are welcome at their cathedral, including the president-elect and his followers, leaders of the cathedral tell me that moving forward they fully intend to hold anyone who tramples their spiritual values accountable while also ensuring support for those most likely to be the targets of harm. Their strongest contempt is for white Christian nationalism, a movement that has embraced Trump and to which Trump has offered not only a platform but also real political power. 

Bishop Robinson likens this moment in our history to that which preceded the Civil War. 

Advertisement

“As far as I’m concerned, anything that devalues another human being is violent,” Reverend Douglas tells me. “That goes for racist, sexist, misogynistic, transphobic ideology. It’s violent, and we have to name the violence. We have to stop the violence. That’s our task.” 

From a Confederate Flag to Racial Justice

Despite its name, the Washington National Cathedral has no formal connection to and receives no direct support from the federal government. But it does maintain a special place in the federal sphere. In 1893, a congressional charter authorized a cathedral dedicated to religion, education and charity. Construction in the gothic style began in 1907 atop Mount St. Alban, the highest peak in the city, when President Theodore Roosevelt helped lay the foundation stone and ended 83 years later, when President George H.W. Bush oversaw the laying of the final stone in 1990. It is the sixth-largest cathedral in the world and the second-largest in the nation. 

It is also constantly reinventing itself, such as the addition in the 1980s of a sculpture of Darth Vader’s head to its 112 grotesques (think “gargoyle,” except that a gargoyle serves a function — to spout water — or gargles, otherwise, it’s a “grotesque”).

Its many arches and small recessed chapels provide a surprisingly welcoming environment even to the non-religious. Multicolored light paints over the grey limestone as the sun moves across the sky and cuts through the 215 stained glass mosaic windows covering the cathedral walls. Though a member of the Episcopal church, the cathedral holds itself as “a house of prayer for all people.” Dean Hollerith is keen to open the building to the public, hosting yoga classes, talks on energy justice and the climate crisis, and guest speakers including Liz Cheney. 

The cathedral is also wrestling with its own racist past.

Advertisement

In addition to providing its own regular services, the cathedral serves as host to many key moments of national celebration and mourning. Carter’s is its fifth presidential funeral, following those of Dwight D. Eisenhower, Ronald Reagan, Gerald Ford, and George H.W. Bush. President Woodrow Wilson is buried within the cathedral. 

Had any of the attendees of Ford’s funeral in 2007 looked to their right, they would have seen the Confederate flag emblazoned within stained glass windows of the church. Two window panes commemorating Stonewall Jackson and Robert E. Lee were donated to the cathedral by the United Daughters of the Confederacy (UDC) in 1953. They remained installed there for 64 years. 

On January 5, I sat in one of the many small chapels in the cathedral, a yellow and red pillow hand-stitched with an image of Sojourner Truth on the seat before me. Reverend Douglas had just delivered a Sunday Sermon steeped in messages of hope, love, and resistance and then bid personal farewells to a long line of enthusiastic parishioners. Now changed out of her voluminous white robes, she opted for a somewhat oversized brown checkered jacket atop her white clerical collar, while maintaining her signature red lipstick and white pearl earrings.

Reverend Kelly Brown Douglas

Advertisement

Courtesy of Antonia Juhasz

Reverend Douglas came to the cathedral in 2015. When I ask what it was like for her to look upon those windows for the first time, she instinctively closes her eyes and tightens her lips. Pain travels rapidly across her face as she chooses her words carefully. “Unwelcoming” is the word she finally settles on. In Resurrection Hope, she has a good deal more to say on the topic, describing their placement as a kind of blasphemy. “A display of these men within sacred spaces insinuates theological legitimacy for white supremacist ideologies and values. Such a display provides a sacred canopy over the Lost Cause narrative, which of course was the intention of the UDC in placing these memorials there,” she writes. 

Douglas served on a task force formed to plan for the windows’ removal, part of a broader movement to confront monuments to white supremacy across the nation. “We embarked on a journey of trying to change the narrative of this place around race, and really engaging in issues of racial justice,” she says. 

In 2017, a white supremacist mob brandishing torches and weapons descended on Charlottesville, Virginia, to stop the removal of a statue of Robert E. Lee. “After Charlottesville happened, we knew the windows had to go,” Douglas says. The windows were promptly removed. In September 2023, the church installed the “Now and Forever Windows” heralding racial justice and the Civil Rights movement created by the eminent Black artist Kerry James Marshall. 

Advertisement

Bishop Gene Robinson and Reverend Leonard Hamlin at the Now and Forever Windows

In her book, Douglas details Trump’s overtly racist response to the broader movement, describing how he has “shamelessly trafficked in white supremacist and anti-Black rhetoric.” Trump defended the Charlottesville mob, saying some were “very fine people.” He tweeted, “Sad to see the history and culture of our great country being ripped apart with the removal of our beautiful statues and monuments,” and in 2020, Trump warned, “a radical movement is attempting to demolish this treasured and precious inheritance. [They] have torn down statues of our founders, desecrated our memorials.” 

Douglas shares a text from her son, which reads, “He [Trump] literally is reigniting the KKK…. Supporting these confederate statues is really about the same thing as supporting the KKK — white supremacy. How come white people can’t see that?” 

Pray Today, Protest Tomorrow

A few days before Carter’s funeral, Dean Hollerith takes me on a tour of the cathedral. If you want to humanize a massive religious institution, there’s no better way than seeing the wine bottles lined up in the attic placed there across a century by the masons who constructed the building. Out on the roof, the highest vantage point in the city, he encourages me to look not out at the Washington Monument, but instead down under my hands. The roof’s tiles are marked with etchings made by students who have snuck up to the perch over the decades to write, “Stan was here” and the kinds of drawings more typically found on a teenager’s notebook than a church edifice.

Advertisement

The roof of the Washington National Cathedral etchings by students in the tiles

Courtesy of Antonia Juhasz

Seated in his comfortable yet modest office deep within the cathedral, Dean Hollerith describes arriving at his job in 2016 just in time to host the traditional prayer service following inauguration of the president. He reiterated that all are welcome to the cathedral, but, he says, “you know, we can pray for you today and protest you tomorrow, right?” On the same day that Dean Hollerith and Bishop Budde led the inaugural prayer service for the new Trump administration, they immediately put on their tennis shoes and spent the rest of the day at the Women’s March. 

A few months later, Hollerith condemned the Trump White House and Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ use of the Bible to justify separating immigrant children from their parents, calling it “the same lopsided reasoning used to justify slavery.” 

On December 12, 2020, demonstrators from a pro-Trump rally, including members of the Proud Boys, marched through Washington D.C. ripping down Black Lives Matter banners outside two historically Black congregations, Asbury United Methodist Church and Metropolitan AME Church, and setting one banner on fire. Bishop Budde and Dean Hollerith denounced the “racist and religious overtones surrounding the effort to discredit the presidential election,” stating: “We reject the version of Christianity that seeks to provide a mantle of spiritual authority to the poison of White nationalism…. What we are witnessing is nothing less than idolatry — the worship of someone other than God as though he were God.” 

Advertisement

And less than one month later, following the January 6 insurrection at the Capitol, Bishop Budde and Dean Hollerith released a video informing the president that there had been no fraudulent election, and denouncing his actions to call supporters to the U.S. Capitol, feed their conspiracy theories, and whip them into a frenzy. They warned, “To those who see this as a Christian endeavor, or something to be blessed in the name of Jesus, there is nothing Christian about what we are witnessing today. Nothing.” 

Matthew Shepard’s Ashes

Reverend Hamlin says that the best tool of resistance is not just speaking but embodying and acting upon one’s values. In 2018, the cathedral provided a resting place for the ashes of Matthew Shepard, a gay student who died of injuries inflicted in a brutal hate crime in 1998.

Standing in the cathedral crypt alongside Reverend Hamlin, Bishop Robinson shares how, for 20 years, Shepard’s parents had not buried their son’s ashes, fearing that his grave would be desecrated by the Westboro Baptist Church, a designated extremist hate group and family-based cult that picketed Shepard’s funeral. They asked if the cathedral would consider taking the ashes. The Dean responded, “This is where Matthew belongs.” For Robinson it was a critical moment. “It’s not just a church welcoming Matthew’s ashes, it was the freaking National Cathedral!” he says, shock still filling his voice. 

The chapel where Shepard is interred has become a place of pilgrimage. “The vast majority of the Christian world is still anti-gay. The Roman Catholic Church teaches that we are intrinsically disordered,” Robinson says. “For this place, sitting high on this hill overlooking Washington, to do this thing offers comfort and solace and hope to all kinds of kids who are still suffering.” 

On November 30, 2023, Reverend Mother Felix Culpa of the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence, an order of queer and trans nuns, read at a service held at the cathedral honoring Shepard, and naming him a “modern day martyr.” The cathedral commissioned a spiritual portrait of Shepard by Kelly Latimore, a preeminent iconographer of contemporary icons. 

Advertisement

Later, they commissioned several more paintings by Latimore, now featured in an exhibit on the seventh floor depicting people across time advocating for social justice, including Rosa Parks, John Lewis, Martin Luther King Jr., Maya Angelou, a woman helping a man receive clean water in Flint, Michigan, based on the parable of Jesus the Good Samaritan, and a migrant mother and her young son held captive in a cage based on the Madonna and Child

The Good Neighbor

Courtesy of Kelly Latimore

The Cathedral and Carter’s Environmental Legacy

Advertisement

The National Cathedral, like Washington itself, is progressive and political. It nonetheless came as a surprise that while I sat at the cathedral café after observing services on December 29, I just happened to find myself beside two cathedral parishioners who are also both veterans of the Carter administration’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 

Dr. Stan Meiburg is Executive Director of the Andrew Sabin Family Center for Environment and Sustainability at Wake Forest University and William Dickinson is President at the Environmental Policy Network. Back in 1977, Meiburg was a graduate student at Johns Hopkins University just starting what became a 39-year career at the EPA, during which he rose to become deputy administrator during the Obama administration. Dickinson began his services under Ford, continuing with Carter, and culminating in a 16-year career at the agency, including serving as Special Assistant to the EPA administrator for Toxics and Pesticides.

“I had great pride in being a part of this administration,” Meiburg later tells me. “It was inspiring.” Dickinson describes Carter’s EPA as the most impactful in U.S. history. (Rolling Stone contributing writer Jeff Goodell calls Carter “America’s greatest environmental president.”) 

Meiberg and Dickson describe Carter’s EPA as the antithesis to what the Trump administration pursued in its first term, and the destruction it now intends to accomplish over the next four years, particularly with the support of the right-wing U.S. Supreme Court. 

Both shared a long list of achievements and bristled at a revisionist history that Carter’s only serious achievements occurred after he left office. This still relatively new EPA was tasked with writing and enforcing the rules needed to implement a new suite of critical laws, including the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (managing hazardous waste). They also worked to confront the climate crisis and support passage of the Superfund program which holds industries responsible for cleaning up (or paying to clean up) hazardous and polluted land. 

Advertisement

The Carter administration was not only an environmental advocate, but also virulently anti-monopoly and painfully aware of the risk of a growing concentration of wealth and power in the hands of a few individuals and mega-corporations. I detail in my book, The Tyranny of Oil, Carter’s historically aggressive Federal Trade Commission under the leadership of Michael Pertschuk. He argued that the FTC should be “the greatest public interest law firm in the country.” Among other antitrust actions, he relentlessly pursued the fossil fuel industry. President Reagan’s FTC then dismissed his case against the oil companies.

Meiburg and his wife now live in North Carolina, but they return to attend cathedral services. He describes being raised a Southern Baptist “just like President Carter,” he tells me. “I know what small Baptist country churches look like and the cathedral is a long step from there, but it’s not a step of discontinuity.”

Supporters gather outside the National Cathedral to celebrate President Carter after his state funeral

Courtesy of Antonia Juhasz

Advertisement

A Funeral to Honor the “First Millennial”

At George H.W. Bush’s funeral in 2018, the presidents and their wives all sat together in the front pew of the cathedral with the vice presidents seated behind them. As a family member of the deceased, former President George W. Bush and wife Laura were seated across the aisle.

At Jimmy Carter’s funeral last week, the presidents and vice presidents were largely unchanged, but their seating arrangement was quite different. Gone was the long front row. In its place were just four chairs in which President Joe Biden, First Lady Jill Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, and the Second Gentleman Doug Emhoff were seated. Behind them sat the former presidents and their wives, followed by the vice presidents and their wives. Thus, Harris was seated in front of, rather than behind, Trump. 

In a rare occurrence for such an event, Michelle Obama was notably absent from Carter’s funeral. This meant that Obama and Trump were seated side-by-side and the two quickly took advantage of the unique opportunity launching into a lengthy discussion. At the end of the funeral, I spotted them appearing to depart in a different direction than the other presidents, perhaps heading off to speak together further. 

Garth Brooks and Trisha Yearwood sang a radiant rendition of John Lennon’s “Imagine,” one of Carter’s favorites. He once said of the song, “In many countries around the world — my wife and I have visited about 125 countries — you hear John Lennon’s song ‘Imagine’ used almost equally with national anthems.” Atlanta gospel singer Phyllis Adams and pianist Leila Bolden moved even the non-spiritual attendees with their transformative performance of “Amazing Grace.” 

As the eulogies progressed, it became clear that much of the proceedings had two primary goals: celebrating the life and work of Jimmy Carter and sending out warnings to and about the president-elect. Many focused on Carter’s honesty, integrity, and adherence to the rule of law, even when it cost him politically.

Advertisement

Courtesy of Antonia Juhasz

President Biden repeatedly emphasized Carter as a man of great character whose life demonstrated how “we have an obligation to give hate no safe harbor and to stand up to what my dad used to say is the greatest sin of all, the abuse of power.” 

Seeming to target both Trump’s policies and the power exerted over him by billionaires including Elon Musk, the world’s richest man, Jimmy Carter’s grandson, Joshua Carter, said that until his death, his grandfather worked to confront “the richest people in the world using their enormous wealth to buy a nation’s poverty,” and identified “the most serious and universal problem on our planet as the growing chasm between the richest and poorest people on earth.” 

Reverend Andrew Jackson Young Jr., a renowned civil rights leader, served as Carter’s Ambassador to the United Nations. In that role, Young brought Carter’s historic effort to advance human rights to international diplomacy. “Dr. King used to say that greatness is characterized by antitheses strongly marked. You’ve got to have a tough mind and a tender heart, and that was Jimmy Carter,” Young shared.

Advertisement

John Carter, another grandson of President Carter, and chair of the Carter Center Board of Trustees, extolled Carter’s efforts to end racial discrimination, advance gender equity, end mass incarceration, and decriminalize marijuana. He said of the Nobel Peace Prize winner, “He gave voice to dissidents, stood up to dictators, brought countries together in peace. His heart broke for the people of Israel, it broke for the people of Palestine, and he spent his life trying to bring peace to that Holy Land.”

As a climate crisis driven by fossil fuels decimates huge swaths of California in historic fires, Carter’s grandson was one of several speakers to herald his historic climate and environmental leadership: “50 years ago, he was a climate warrior who pushed for a world where we conserved energy, limited emissions, and traded our reliance on fossil fuels for expanded renewable sources.”

John Carter added, “He was the first Millennial. And he can make great playlists.” 

After the service concluded, I spoke with Bishop Budde. She felt exalted by the celebration of President Carter. But when asked about Trump, she said matter-of-factly that “Trump seeks to dismantle everything I stand for.” She plans to organize, “to get political, find like-minded constituencies. We have to lobby, we have to show up and debate, all those things we have to do as people of faith, as part of a civic society.” Whether or not they’ll have an effect is another question, one she says is largely out of their control, including if the media will pay attention. “Every once in a while, Antonia, in my 13 years as Bishop, the traditional media notices and gives us our proverbial 15 seconds,” she adds, “Even Rolling Stone, if we’re lucky.”

“But the one thing I can control is I’m going to show up.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Washington

Legislative Staff in Washington State Approve Contract in First Collective Bargaining

Published

on

Legislative Staff in Washington State Approve Contract in First Collective Bargaining


It took Democratic staff in Washington’s Legislature a little longer but they have joined their Republican colleagues in approving two-year contracts, concluding the first-ever round of collective bargaining for legislative employees.

Legislative assistants, policy analysts and communications staff in the House Democratic Caucus and legislative assistants in the Senate Democratic Caucus unanimously ratified agreements in separate votes in late December. The decisions came nearly three months after workers overwhelmingly rejected proposed contracts with their employers, which are the chief clerk of the House and secretary of the Senate.

“We’re pretty excited. It’s not everything we wanted. But it’s a reasonable first contract,” Josie Ellison, a communications specialist and member of the House Democratic Caucus bargaining team, said Thursday night. “For now, everybody seems pretty enthusiastic about it.”


The Washington Public Employees Association represented both Democratic staff bargaining units.

Advertisement

“This historic agreement marks a new chapter for our members, providing the protections and support they deserve,” Amanda Hacker, association president said in a statement.

Legislative assistants in the House and Senate Republican caucuses approved their respective two-year agreements in September.

Each contract contains pay hikes of 3 percent on July 1, 2025 and 2 percent a year later, the same amount offered to other state employee unions. State lawmakers and the next governor, Bob Ferguson, will now decide whether to fund them in the next two-year budget.

Under the collective bargaining law, state employee unions — including legislative staff units — needed to submit a ratified contract by Oct. 1 to be considered for funding. Because Democratic staff did not meet the deadline, they will need to make a separate case to Ferguson and lawmakers to fund their deals.

Jeremy Knapp, an executive legislative assistant with the Senate Democratic Caucus and member of the bargaining team, said Thursday that administration of the Senate and House are supportive.

Advertisement

“It’s in the Legislature’s hands now,” he said.

A 2022 law cleared the way for partisan legislative staff to unionize and negotiate terms and conditions for the workplace.

Employees of the Democratic and Republican caucuses in each chamber had to be in separate units unless a majority of each caucus voted to be in the same unit. All four units negotiated collectively on economic issues, like wages and benefits, and separately on workplace-related issues.

“The collective bargaining agreements represent several months of hard work by the negotiating teams and we are pleased that we have been able to reach an agreement with both the Legislative Professionals Association and the [Washington Public Employees Association],” Chief Clerk of the House Bernard Dean wrote in an email.

The contracts with Democratic staff call for a third-party arbiter in the grievance process. That means if a dispute arises on a contract provision, the two sides will have access to arbitration through the American Arbitration Association, to resolve it. This had been a sticking point as employers resisted involvement of an outside party, employees said.

Advertisement

“It gave us what we think is a very fair grievance process,” Knapp said.

Secretary of the Senate Sarah Bannister called the agreement “a significant milestone” that “brings a sense of relief and allows us to focus fully on the work ahead.”

She said the decision to add a panel with an arbitrator “was made collaboratively, reflecting a commitment from everyone to ensure fairness, transparency, and efficiency in resolving disputes.”

The contracts also outline new ways to resolve conflicts between elected officials and legislative staff. And there are provisions to create a “transition” pool for union members facing the loss of a job because the lawmaker they work for retires, loses re-election or leaves office for another reason.

Knapp said the Senate contract lays out how a person facing the loss of work could get a job as a session aide to avoid unemployment. There’s also language ensuring the employer provides workers, who are at-will employees, with two weeks notice before being let go or two weeks pay if fired.

Advertisement

This story was first published in the Washington State Standard. Read the original here.





Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

Washington Street closure extended in Quincy

Published

on

Washington Street closure extended in Quincy


QUINCY (WGEM) – The road closure for Washington Street between 7th and 8th streets has been extended for fire hydrant repair.

Officials stated that the closure has been extended to Jan. 15.

Officials also warn motorists to use alternative routes and drive with caution.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington

A brief history of presidential inaugural speeches, from George Washington to today

Published

on

A brief history of presidential inaugural speeches, from George Washington to today


The only constitutionally mandated event on Inauguration Day is for the president-elect to take the oath of office. But on the first Inauguration Day, in 1789, George Washington did something else.

He gave a speech.

Every president since has followed his example and delivered an inaugural address as part of the national celebration.

This button from George Washington’s first inauguration visually unified the states of the Union.
National Museum of American History

These addresses are more than just a series of individual speeches. Rhetoric scholars Karlyn Kohrs Campbell and Kathleen Hall Jamieson argue that each inaugural address is not simply marking one stage in the ritual of political transition. Each is also part of a genre that has characteristics which, at some level, are expected and understood by speakers and audiences. There have been 59 inaugural addresses, starting with Washington, and while they may have differed in style and even specific subjects, virtually all feature these characteristics, which range from calls to unify the country to setting forth political principles.

Advertisement

The political history collections at the National Museum of American History, where I am a curator specializing in the history of presidential campaigns and campaign rhetoric, include several objects that illustrate these characteristics.

Exploring the genre of inaugural addresses through quotations and objects from the past can help listeners better understand the opening speech of a new administration, the first act in a job that began with the taking of the oath.

'We are all Republicans....all Federalists' reads a quote on an ivory pitcher with Thomas Jefferson's image on it.
This commemorative pitcher features a quote: ‘We are all Republicans….all Federalists,’ from Thomas Jefferson’s first inaugural address.
National Museum of American History

(Re)Unification of the audience

Inaugurations serve as the transition point between the competition of a campaign and the needs of an administration beginning to govern. For the audience to properly fulfill their role as witnesses to this investiture of power, they must be unified and reconstituted as “we the people.”

In the words of political scientist Lee Sigelman, these speeches are “literally brimming with verbal tokens of unity.”

There are references to our founders, our nation and the future we face. In 1957, Dwight Eisenhower spoke of the purposes “to which we, as a people, are pledged,” and Benjamin Harrison called his 1889 inaugural moment a “mutual covenant” between himself and the people. George W. Bush in 2001 united his listeners, saying, “Americans are generous and strong and decent, not because we believe in ourselves but because we hold beliefs beyond ourselves.”

Thomas Jefferson’s first inaugural in 1801 may have been the most explicit: “We have called by different names brethren of the same principle. We are all Republicans, we are all Federalists.”

Advertisement

Reaffirmation of national values

New presidents must also establish their qualifications for the office by demonstrating they understand and will preserve the shared values that are key to what Bill Clinton in 1993 called “the very idea of America.”

A button with images of Abraham Lincoln and Barack Obama on it, with 'A Birth of New Freedom' printed above those images.
A button commemorating the 2009 inauguration of Barack Obama.
National Museum of American History

These traditional values are expressed in words such as freedom, liberty, democracy and courage. In 1981, Ronald Reagan reminded the audience, “Freedom and the dignity of the individual have been more available and assured here than in any other place on Earth. Jimmy Carter in 1977 summarized these values into “our belief in an undiminished, ever-expanding American dream.”

Setting forth political principles

A large ivory piece of silk with black printing on it.
A silk copy of William Henry Harrison’s 1841 inaugural address, the longest in history at more than 8,400 words.
National Museum of American History

Unlike many other presidential addresses, most notably the State of the Union, the inaugural does not advocate specific legislation but rather articulates more general philosophies that will guide a new administration. When policies are offered, they are less a call for action than a demonstration of a president’s commitment to the democratic system.

In 1845, James Polk promoted his “plain and frugal” economic plans because he said a national debt “is incompatible with the ends for which our republican Government was instituted.” Herbert Hoover said that the policies he listed in his 1929 address would be tested against the “ideals and aspirations of America.”

Even William Howard Taft, whose 1909 inaugural was among the most policy specific, framed his ideas with respect to the “proper” role of the federal government “in what it can and ought to accomplish for its people.”

Enacting the presidential role

A miniature ladder with a ribbon that features the likenesses of President William McKinley and his new vice president, Theodore Roosevelt.
This novelty item celebrating William McKinley’s second inauguration in 1901 highlighted the political principles he had promoted in his first inaugural address and term.
National Museum of American History

Candidates give speeches that are, for obvious reasons, partisan and self-promoting. But when the campaign ends and governing begins, presidents must demonstrate an understanding of their role within the broader system.

In his first inaugural in 1933, Franklin Roosevelt moved out of campaign mode and acknowledged the constraints on his “leadership of frankness and vigor.” He pledged to rely on his “constitutional duty” to work with Congress.

Rhetoric scholars Campbell and Jamieson add that these speeches must also enact the “public, symbolic role of president of all the people” by revealing traits such as humility and reliance on a higher power. A typical example is found in the conclusion of Warren Harding’s 1921 address: “I accept my part with single-mindedness of purpose and humility of spirit, and implore the favor and guidance of God in His Heaven. With these I am unafraid, and confidently face the future.”

Advertisement
A booklet with images of an eagle, a three-masted schooner and two men, with 'OFFICIAL INAUGURAL PROGRAM' printed on the tope.
The official program for Franklin Roosevelt’s 1933 inauguration.
National Museum of American History

Fulfilling ceremonial expectations

Because of the celebration that surrounds them, inaugural addresses are expected to reflect stylized, ceremonial speaking. Such speeches strive to reach beyond the immediate situation to evoke timeless themes using memorable phrases.

In 1961, John Kennedy challenged Americans across the decades to “Ask not what your country can do for you – ask what you can do for your country.” The phrases “mystic chords of memory” and “better angels of our nature,” among the most memorable words in presidential rhetoric, have been applied to countless situations since Abraham Lincoln first uttered them in 1861.

Not all inaugural addresses achieve greatness. Some have been quite forgettable. But each of them has tried to fulfill these expectations, helping to sustain what Franklin Roosevelt in his second inaugural called “our covenant with ourselves.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending