Connect with us

Utah

Opinion: This sculptor came to Utah with a vision and leaves with deeper respect

Published

on

Opinion: This sculptor came to Utah with a vision and leaves with deeper respect


The time has come for my wife, Traci, and me to leave Utah. We do so with enormous gratitude.

In March 2025, we left our home in Connecticut and drove west in a Sprinter van. We knew one person in the Salt Lake City area.

I had prayed deeply about where to go next and felt called to Utah — a place I had long associated with faith, family, self-reliance, love of country and a strong sense of responsibility to community. I came believing those values might make Utah a natural home for an idea I had been carrying with me.

Advertisement

I leave with an even greater respect for them.

For the previous nine years, I had devoted myself to creating “A Soldier’s Journey,” the 58-foot bronze relief at the heart of the National World War I Memorial in Washington, D.C. That experience strengthened a conviction that has guided my life as a sculptor: art can help us remember who we are. It can connect generations. It can tell the truth about sacrifice and struggle while reminding us of the ideals toward which we continue to strive.

The Grand Liberty Arch

The Grand Liberty Arch grew from that conviction.

I imagined a national monument that would tell the American story through people: families and soldiers, pioneers and patriots, Americans who endured slavery and fought for civil rights, Native Americans defending their land. It would not present our history as simple or perfect. Our history is neither.

It would instead ask what generations of Americans, in very different circumstances, have done with the freedom and responsibility handed to them — and what we will do with ours.

Advertisement

Utah seemed a fitting place to ask those questions.

What struck Traci and me almost immediately was how readily people welcomed us into their lives. Friends invited us into their homes and around their tables. They listened patiently as an artist described a monument that, at first, existed mostly in his imagination and a small model in clay.

Among those early conversations were the leaders of This Is the Place Heritage Park. Both received the idea warmly as we explored whether the park might become its home. Ultimately, we concluded that a national monument of this scale needed a different setting and a larger audience.

As the project developed, Utahns became part of the work itself.

I am a classical figurative sculptor. I work from life, and the people who enter my studio inevitably shape what I create.

Advertisement

One Native American model arrived with his son and brought his own tomahawk. I asked how he wanted to be represented. He chose to stand protecting his child and his land, tomahawk in hand.

I have thought often about that moment. I wanted the people represented in the arch to possess that same sense of agency, dignity and strength. History is made by human beings — parents and children, people protecting what they love, people enduring hardship, people trying to leave something better to the generation that follows.

Finding a place for the arch

Eventually, discussions turned to whether the Grand Liberty Arch might be located near the Utah State Capitol.

I came here admiring Utah’s devotion to faith, family, community and the idea that each generation bears responsibility for the next.

Before the Capitol Preservation Board was to consider the proposal, I prepared to present the project to neighborhood representatives and answer their questions. The day before that scheduled presentation, I was told it had been canceled because the board’s invitation had received no response.

I wish that conversation had happened then, including any objections, but the belated public conversation that followed reminded me of something important about Utah.

Advertisement

People here care deeply about their communities. They care about their neighborhoods, their history and the land entrusted to them.

A public monument intended to stand for generations cannot belong only to the artist who conceives it. I did not agree with every criticism of the Arch, and I did not recognize every characterization of the project or the process that appeared during that debate. But disagreement is part of life in a free society. Listening must be part of it, too.

In the end, I concluded that the proposed Capitol site was not the right home for a project of this scale.

The vision had grown beyond the arch itself. I imagined a place where parents might bring their children and teachers their students; where visitors could encounter our history, read words from the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, and consider both the freedoms we inherited and the obligations that accompany them. That vision requires room to breathe.

So, the Grand Liberty Arch will continue its search for a home, and Traci and I will continue our journey.

Advertisement

But when I think about leaving Utah, I think mainly about families who opened their homes to us, new friendships, models who trusted me to tell stories through their faces and bodies and people who gave their time to an artist with an unusually large idea.

I came here admiring Utah’s devotion to faith, family, community and the idea that each generation bears responsibility for the next. Nothing about the debate over my work changed that. If anything, I understand those commitments better now.

We can disagree about a monument. We can disagree about history, art and the use of a particular piece of land. A strong community does not require unanimity. It requires people who care enough to participate, the freedom to disagree and the grace to remain neighbors afterward.

That, too, is part of the American inheritance worth preserving.

We leave grateful.

Advertisement

Thank you, Utah. Godspeed.



Source link

Utah

One of the last people to speak with Charlie Kirk reflects on the day he was killed

Published

on

One of the last people to speak with Charlie Kirk reflects on the day he was killed


Nearly a year after Charlie Kirk was fatally shot at Utah Valley University, one of the last people to speak with him at the event says the experience changed the way he thinks about debate, politics and religion.

Henry Dells was the first person chosen to ask Kirk a question during the September 10, 2025, “Prove Me Wrong” event on the UVU campus.

Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA, was speaking to a crowd of thousands when he was shot and killed.

Advertisement

Dells, who was living in Utah at the time but was not a UVU student, said he had wanted the chance to challenge Kirk.

“I loved Charlie. He was really cool. I didn’t agree with him on everything, but I loved his debate tactic,” Dells said.

His question focused on religion rather than politics. Dells, who had previously been an atheist and identified at the time as a Latter-day Saint, told Kirk he believed Mormonism was more historically accurate than Protestantism and challenged him to “prove me wrong.”

“I’m glad that we ended really more on a basis where we had mutual respect for each other,” he said.

Advertisement

Dells then moved only a short distance from the stage. Because the crowd was packed tightly together, he said he could not easily leave the area.

He was standing near the amphitheater talking with a reporter about his conversation with Kirk when he heard a loud pop.

“To me, I thought someone set off a firecracker,” Dells said.

It was only after he looked toward Kirk that he realized what had happened.

“I see Charlie and his neck and his wound and him falling over, and that’s when everyone got down,” Dells said.

Advertisement

The shooting launched a massive investigation and led to the arrest and prosecution of Tyler Robinson, who is accused of killing Kirk.

A Utah judge ruled September 1, 2026, that Robinson must stand trial on seven charges, including aggravated murder. Robinson pleaded not guilty.

For Dells, however, the aftermath has been less about the courtroom and more about processing what happened to him.

Friends and family stayed with him in the days after the shooting, but he said he initially felt numb rather than traumatized. As calls and messages poured in after people learned he had been at the event, he said he tried to put the experience aside.

“I wasn’t letting myself feel like what happened,” Dells said. “I was just more void and numb.”

Advertisement

Eventually, he went to therapy. “A lot of emotions came out,” he said.

Dells also left Utah and returned to Texas. He said the shooting was one factor in that decision, along with a number of other experiences that had already made him consider leaving.

A year later, Dells said he feels largely back to normal.

“It’s something that’s always going to be there in the back of your mind,” he said.

Perhaps the biggest change, he said, has been the way he approaches disagreement.

Advertisement

Before the shooting, Dells said, he was more argumentative and focused on winning debates. Now, he wants to remain firm in his beliefs while showing more compassion toward people who disagree with him.

“I just urge everyone to try to pause and think, find a way that we can still unite.”

_____



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

Utah Tech Trailblazers @ California Golden Bears: Live game updates, stats, play-by-play – Yahoo Sports

Published

on

Utah Tech Trailblazers @ California Golden Bears: Live game updates, stats, play-by-play – Yahoo Sports






Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

3 Priorities the Utah Jazz Must Address Before Opening Night

Published

on

3 Priorities the Utah Jazz Must Address Before Opening Night


The Utah Jazz are six weeks away from tipping off their 2026-27 regular season campaign.

Advertisement

And for the most part, the Jazz’s work around the roster has been completed before the start of next season. They’ve had a successful draft and free agency period that’s now brought this roster to a better state than things have looked since the start of their rebuild process in 2022.

Advertisement

However, that’s not to say all of the Jazz’s outstanding priorities have been addressed to bring their offseason to 100% completion. A select few tasks are still on the Jazz’s to-do list to truly finalize how this roster looks for day one of the new season, and are bound to be answered in the days and weeks ahead.

Let’s break down the three biggest priorities that the Jazz have on tap between now and the start of next season:

Advertisement

1. Fill Their Final 15-Man Roster Spot

Oct 27, 2025; Salt Lake City, Utah, USA; Utah Jazz CEO of basketball operations Danny Ainge watches the teams warm up before the game against the Phoenix Suns at Delta Center. Mandatory Credit: Rob Gray-Imagn Images | IMAGN IMAGES via Reuters Connect

After the Jazz opted to move on from both Cody Williams and John Konchar a couple of weeks ago via trade with the Minnesota Timberwolves, Utah now has one open roster spot left to tackle before the season gets rolling.

Right now, the Jazz have 14 traditional contracts, three two-way deals, and a training camp contract for Harrison Ingram. Utah could decide to sign one of those lesser contracts, such as Blake Hinson’s, to a traditional contract, or an external addition could be picked up.

Advertisement

As to how the Jazz address that open spot remains to be seen. However, the front office at least has some additional options to tweak the back-end of their roster in whatever way they deem fit.

2. Decide on Keyonte George, Brice Sensabaugh Extensions

Advertisement

Mar 7, 2026; Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA; Utah Jazz guard Keyonte George (3) brings the ball up the court against Milwaukee Bucks guard Ryan Rollins (13) in the first half at Fiserv Forum. Mandatory Credit: Michael McLoone-Imagn Images | IMAGN IMAGES via Reuters Connect

Advertisement

The Jazz have two players from their 2023 draft class who are now eligible for a rookie-scale extension: Keyonte George and Brice Sensabaugh. Each is in a bit different tier as it pertains to value and role in Utah’s future plans, though each could feasibly find their way to a second contract in Utah based on how their first three years have gone.

The question though remains whether or not the Jazz decide to put pen to paper on those new contracts before the regular season, or if they decide to wait until next offseason to decide on the future of both.

If the Jazz want to maintain flexibility in terms of their finances, the Jazz will hold off on signing either George or Sensabaugh. If security is the priority for both sides, then a new deal is well within the realm of possibilities before late October.

3. Guarantee Mo Bamba’s Contract–– Or Don’t

Advertisement

Mar 4, 2026; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Utah Jazz head coach Will Hardy reacts with center Mo Bamba (11) and forward Brice Sensabaugh (28) against the Philadelphia 76ers in the second quarter at Xfinity Mobile Arena. Mandatory Credit: Kyle Ross-Imagn Images | IMAGN IMAGES via Reuters Connect

The Jazz have 14 traditional contracts signed onto their current roster. Yet, one of those deals, Mo Bamba’s, is non-guaranteed. If Utah wanted to cut ties with Bamba before the season started, they could do so to only incur a $200,000 cap hit before the season. If he’s on the roster for opening night, $500,000 is paid out his way.

Advertisement

So the Jazz are due to decide whether or not it’s worth keeping Bamba around as one of their final pieces on the roster, or if they find another player who’s more worthy of that spot than the backup big man.

Advertisement

To this point, it feels more likely than not that Bamba will remain a part of the roster when the Jazz are on the floor against the Memphis Grizzlies. At the very least, though, they have the flexibility to switch things up.

Be sure to follow Utah Jazz On SI on X to stay up to date for daily Utah Jazz news, rumors and analysis!

Advertisement
Add us as a preferred source on Google



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending