Connect with us

New Mexico

New Mexico, Texas and Colorado negotiate settlement over Rio Grande

Published

on

New Mexico, Texas and Colorado negotiate settlement over Rio Grande


ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (AP) — New Mexico, Texas and Colorado have negotiated a proposed settlement that they are saying will finish a yearslong battle over administration of one of many longest rivers in North America, however the federal authorities and two irrigation districts that depend upon the Rio Grande are objecting.


What You Want To Know

  • It as introduced Tuesday that Texas, New Mexico and Colorado have negotiated a proposed asettlement that might finish an extended battle of the administration of the Rio Grande river
  • In an announcement, New Mexico Legal professional Basic Hector Balderas known as it “a complete decision of all of the claims within the case”
  • The case has been pending earlier than the U.S. Supreme Court docket for almost a decade. Texas has argued that groundwater pumping in southern New Mexico has diminished river flows, limiting how a lot water makes it throughout the border. New Mexico argues that it has been shorted on its share of the river
  • One other listening to has been scheduled for January

New Mexico Legal professional Basic Hector Balderas on Tuesday introduced that the states had brokered a deal following months of negotiations. Whereas the phrases stay confidential, his workplace known as it “a complete decision of all of the claims within the case.”

“Excessive drought and erratic local weather occasions necessitate that states should work collectively to guard the Rio Grande, which is the lifeblood of our New Mexico farmers and communities,” Balderas mentioned in a press release. “And I’m very upset that the U.S. is exerting federal overreach and standing in the way in which of the states’ historic water settlement.”

Attorneys with the U.S. Division of Justice and irrigation districts that serve farmers downstream of Elephant Butte reservoir argued that the proposal wouldn’t be a workable resolution. The river is managed via a system of federal dams and canals underneath provisions of a water-sharing settlement that additionally entails Mexico.

Advertisement

The case has been pending earlier than the U.S. Supreme Court docket for almost a decade. Texas has argued that groundwater pumping in southern New Mexico has diminished river flows, limiting how a lot water makes it throughout the border. New Mexico argues that it has been shorted on its share of the river.

New Mexico and the opposite states plan within the coming weeks to submit their movement to maneuver the proposed settlement ahead, opening the door for federal officers and the irrigation districts to reply.

One other listening to has been scheduled for January.

The battle over the Rio Grande has develop into a multimillion-dollar case in a area the place water provides are dwindling resulting from elevated demand together with drought and hotter temperatures introduced on by local weather change.

Up to now, New Mexico has spent roughly $21 million on attorneys and scientists over the past 9 years.

Advertisement

Final fall, the particular grasp overseeing the case presided over the primary section of trial, which included testimony from farmers, hydrologists, irrigation managers and others. Extra technical testimony was anticipated to be a part of the subsequent section, which has now been delay.

Earlier this yr, a few of the river’s stretches in New Mexico marked report low flows, leading to some farmers voluntarily fallowing fields to assist the state meet downstream water-sharing obligations.

Within the Elephant Butte Irrigation District, officers lately warned farmers that they’ll possible anticipate one other late begin to the irrigation season in 2023 and that allotments can be low once more for the reason that system relies upon much less on summer season rains and extra on spring runoff from snowmelt in southern Colorado and northern New Mexico.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

New Mexico

NM Gameday: Nov. 22

Published

on

NM Gameday: Nov. 22


Any person with disabilities who needs help accessing the content of the FCC Public File may contact KOB via our online form
or call 505-243-4411.

This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.
© KOB-TV, LLC
A Hubbard Broadcasting Company



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New Mexico

Learn more about the Winter Wonderland at Expo New Mexico

Published

on

Learn more about the Winter Wonderland at Expo New Mexico


Walk or drive through the magic of Winter Wonderland at Expo New Mexico for the holiday season. For five years, Winter Wonderland has brought the classic holiday tradition of enjoying festive lights and attractions to New Mexicans. From Santa Claus photos to interactive holiday lights and live actors, the event promises the full feeling of wintertime.



Source link

Continue Reading

New Mexico

Snap calls New Mexico's child safety complaint a 'sensationalist lawsuit'

Published

on

Snap calls New Mexico's child safety complaint a 'sensationalist lawsuit'


Snap has accused New Mexico’s attorney general of intentionally looking for adult users seeking sexually explicit content in order to make its app seem unsafe in a filing asking the court to dismiss the state’s lawsuit. In the document shared by The Verge, the company questioned the veracity of the state’s allegations. The attorney general’s office said that while it was using a decoy account supposed to be owned by a 14-year-old girl, it was added by a user named Enzo (Nud15Ans). From that connection, the app allegedly suggested over 91 users, including adults looking for sexual content. Snap said in its motion to dismiss, however, that those “allegations are patently false.”

It was the decoy account that searched for and added Enzo, the company wrote. The attorney general’s operatives were also the ones who looked for and added accounts with questionable usernames, such as “nudenude_22” and “xxx_tradehot.” In addition, Snap is accusing the office of “repeatedly [mischaracterizing]” its internal documents. The office apparently cited a document when it mentioned in its lawsuit that the company “consciously decided not to store child sex abuse images” and when it suggested that it doesn’t report and provide those images to law enforcement. Snap denied that it was the case and clarified that it’s not allowed to store child sexual abuse materials (CSAM) on its servers. It also said that it turns over such materials to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.

The New Mexico Department of Justice’s director of communications was not impressed with the company’s arguments. In a statement sent to The Verge, Lauren Rodriguez accused Snap of focusing on the minor details of the investigation in an “attempt to distract from the serious issues raised in the State’s case.” Rodriguez also said that “Snap continues to put profits over protecting children” instead of “addressing… critical issues with real change to their algorithms and design features.”

New Mexico came to the conclusion that Snapchat’s features “foster the sharing of child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and facilitate child sexual exploitation” after a months-long investigation. It reported that it found a “vast network of dark web sites dedicated to sharing stolen, non-consensual sexual images from Snap” and that Snapchat was “by far” the biggest source of images and videos on the dark web sites that it had seen. The attorney general’s office called Snapchat “a breeding ground for predators to collect sexually explicit images of children and to find, groom and extort them.” Snap employees encounter 10,000 sextortion cases each month, the office’s lawsuit said, but the company allegedly doesn’t warn users so as not to “strike fear” among them. The complaint accused Snap’s upper management of ignoring former trust and safety employees who’d pushed for additional safety mechanisms, as well.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending