New Mexico sues DOJ over Epstein Zorro ranch files
New Mexico is suing the Justice Department for access to unredacted files tied to Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch investigation.
- New Mexico investigators are seeking thousands of unredacted federal records related to Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch.
- The state’s Attorney General has sued the U.S. Department of Justice to gain access to these heavily redacted files.
- Investigators believe the documents could provide new leads in determining if crimes occurred at the Santa Fe County property.
- The criminal investigation is separate from the work of New Mexico’s Truth Commission, which is reviewing institutional failures.
New Mexico investigators are not looking for one document that will suddenly solve the Jeffrey Epstein case at Zorro Ranch. Instead, they said each interview, record and lead could help determine whether enough evidence exists to bring criminal charges.
During a virtual news conference Wednesday, Aug. 05, Attorney General Raúl Torrez said investigators are continuing to examine whether crimes connected to Jeffrey Epstein occurred at Zorro Ranch while seeking access to thousands of unredacted federal records they believe could generate new leads.
Zorro Ranch is a property in Santa Fe County, south of Santa Fe, that was owned by Epstein for years and has been part of New Mexico’s investigation into allegations of criminal activity connected to him.
Epstein was a wealthy financier and convicted sex offender who was accused of sexually abusing and trafficking underage girls. Some women have alleged they were abused at Zorro Ranch, one of several properties Epstein owned across the country.
Why do investigators want the Epstein files?
Investigators believe the records can provide new leads in the case, even if they do not contain a single piece of decisive evidence.
Zorro Ranch appears more than 13,000 times in records connected to Epstein, but many of those pages remain heavily redacted, with names and other information removed.
More: Former governor Richardson recalls a single visit to Epstein ranch
Why did New Mexico sue the Justice Department?
The Attorney General’s Office filed the lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia because the decision to release the records rests with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche and the U.S. Department of Justice, Torrez said.
His office first followed the Justice Department’s direction by seeking the records elsewhere but believes officials sent the state to offices that did not have the documents. The lawsuit asks a federal judge to determine whether the department acted unlawfully by refusing to release the records and to decide what information, if any, should remain confidential, Torrez said.
More: Stolen and erased: One Navajo girl’s harrowing story of sex trafficking in New Mexico
What has the investigation accomplished so far?
Investigators have already executed a search warrant, identified survivors, corroborated information and developed new investigative leads. Torrez declined to provide additional details, said releasing more information could compromise the ongoing investigation.
Also the state reopened the investigation after records released by the federal government raised questions about whether federal authorities had fully pursued the case years earlier, Torrez said.
Who is cooperating?
Local agencies and property owners have cooperated with investigators, while the Justice Department remains the only entity that has not turned over the requested records, Torrez said.
More: Texas Tech fires coach Marlene Stollings amid abuse claims within women’s basketball team
How does the Truth Commission fit into the case?
The criminal investigation is separate from the work of New Mexico’s Truth Commission, which is reviewing institutional failures related to Epstein’s ties to the state.
Torrez said, his office complied with a subpoena from the commission and provided the requested information. However, the two investigations serve different purposes. While the commission’s work is intended to be public and examine how institutions responded, prosecutors are focused on determining whether enough evidence exists to seek an indictment and cannot publicly discuss witnesses, evidence or investigative techniques while the case remains active.
What happens next?
The Justice Department will have an opportunity to respond to the lawsuit before a federal judge decides whether additional hearings are needed and ultimately rules on the state’s request.
Regardless of how the lawsuit is resolved, investigators will continue pursuing evidence while the federal court considers whether the Justice Department must release the requested records, Torrez said.
Andrea Marvez is the public safety reporter for the Las Cruces Sun-News. Reach her by email at amarvezsarquis@gannett.com or by phone at 575-541-5406. For more local news follow her on Instagram at @andreamarvez and on Facebook at @AndreaMarvez.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login